`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 20
`
`
`
` Entered: January 4, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC,
`Petitioner,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`NVIDIA CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2015-01028 (Patent 6,198,488 B1)
`IPR2015-01029 (Patent 6,992,667 B2)1
`_______________
`
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, BEVERLY M. BUNTING, AND
`JON B. TORNQUIST, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 We use this caption in this paper to indicate that this Order applies to, and is
`entered in, both indicated cases. The parties are not authorized to use this
`caption.
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01028 (Patent 6,198,488 B1)
`IPR2015-01029 (Patent 6,992,667 B2)
`
`
`A conference call in inter partes reviews IPR2015-01028 and IPR2015-
`01029 occurred on December 29, 2015. Respective counsel for Petitioner and
`Patent Owner, and Judges Turner, Bunting, and Tornquist were in attendance.
`A court reporter was present on the call. Patent Owner requested the call to
`discuss contingent motions to amend to be filed in each of the cited cases.
`The conference call satisfies the “to confer” requirement of 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.221(a). Patent Owner indicated that it intended to contingently amend
`claim 20 in the IPR2015-01028 case, with no additional claim amendments,
`unless justified. With respect to the IPR2015-01029 case, Patent Owner
`indicated that it had not yet finalized its plans for its motion to amend.
`Upon inquiry from the Board, Patent Owner indicated that it was familiar
`with the requirements for a motion to amend. For additional guidance
`regarding the requirements of a motion to amend, Patent Owner’s attention is
`directed to Idle Free Sys., Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR2012- 00027 (PTAB)
`(Papers 26 and 66), Nichia Corp. v. Emcore Corp., IPR2012- 00005 (PTAB)
`(Papers 27 and 68), ZTE Corp. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc., IPR2013-00136
`(PTAB) (Papers 32 and 33), Microsoft Corp. v.Proxyconn, Inc., 789 F.3d 1292
`(Fed. Cir. 2015), and MasterImage 3D, Inc. v. RealD Inc., IPR2015-00040
`(PTAB) (Paper 42).
`
`ORDER:
`It is ORDERED that the party facilitating the recording of the conference
`call through the court reporter will file a transcript of the conference call in
`PRPS when the transcript becomes available.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01028 (Patent 6,198,488 B1)
`IPR2015-01029 (Patent 6,992,667 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Robert A. Appleby
`Gregory S. Arovas
`Eugene Goryunov
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`robert.appleby@kirkland.com
`greg.arovas@kirkland.com
`eugene.goryunov@kirkland.com
`Samsung-NVIDIA-IPR-Service@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Christopher Broderick
`Don Daybell
`ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`CPBPTABDocket@orrick.com
`D2DPTABDocket@orrick.com
`
`
`3
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
