throbber

`
`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`
`
`
`Boston Brussels Chicago Dallas Düsseldorf Frankfurt Houston London Los Angeles Miami
`Milan Munich New York Orange County Paris Seoul Silicon Valley Washington, D.C.
`
`Strategic alliance with MWE China Law Offices (Shanghai)
`
`Paul M. Schoenhard
`Attorney at Law
`pschoenhard@mwe.com
`+1 202 756 8223
`
`June 7, 2018
`
`VIA ECF
`
`Hon. Peter R. Marksteiner
`Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`717 Madison Place NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Re: GoPro Inc. v. Contour IP Holding LLC, Nos. 17-1894, -1936
`
`Dear Mr. Marksteiner:
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) and Fed. Cir. R. 28(i), Contour alerts the circuit clerk
`that certain statements made by GoPro and its declarant Damon Jones during PTAB proceedings
`and this appeal were false. Such information came to Contour’s attention during Damon Jones’
`recent deposition in on-going district court proceedings. Relevant deposition transcript pages are
`attached and, for ease of reference, have been assigned appendix page numbers.
`
`GoPro argued to this Court that the so-called “GoPro Catalog” should be treated as a
`prior art printed publication, in part because it was allegedly made available on the GoPro
`website. E.g., GoPro Br. at 23-34; GoPro Reply Br. at 16-28.1 In support, GoPro relies
`exclusively on the testimony of Damon Jones, who declared: “After the 2009 Tucker Rocky
`Dealer Show and prior to September 13, 2009, GoPro continued to distribute and otherwise make
`available the GoPro Catalog to GoPro’s actual and potential customers, dealers and retailers
`through its website, direct mail, and other means of distribution.” Appx4321 (¶ 11); Appx4331
`(same). Mr. Jones later declared: “In the First Declaration, ¶ 11 is made based on my personal
`knowledge. . . .” Appx5000-01; Appx5005-06 (same).
`
`Mr. Jones recently testified, however, he has no such personal knowledge:
`
`Q. Was the GoPro catalog you distributed at the 2009 Tucker
`Rocky dealer show on GoPro’s website after the Tucker Rocky
`dealer show?
`
`
`1
`The PTAB declined to address this argument. Appx22 n.8; Appx54-55 n.8; Appx71-72;
`Appx83. Contour has asked this Court to treat the argument as waived. Contour Br. at 30-31.
`
`U.S. practice conducted through McDermott Will & Emery LLP.
`500 North Capitol Street, N.W. Washington DC 20001-1531 Telephone: +1 202 756 8000 Facsimile: +1 202 756 8087 www.mwe.com
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 001
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 06/07/2018
`June 7, 2018
`Page 2
`
`The exact one that I distributed, the exact version and
`A.
`everything, I don’t know that.
`
`Q. When was the GoPro HD HERO catalog that you’ve
`referenced in your declarations and that you distributed at the
`Tucker Rocky dealer show, when was that catalog available on
`GoPro’s website?
`
`Again, I don’t know. That’s similar to the previous
`A.
`question.
`
`Appx5916; see also Appx5917-18, Appx5919-20, Appx5921, Appx5922. Mr. Jones also
`testified he had no evidence the catalog was sent to GoPro customers by direct mail. Appx5922-
`23.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Paul M. Schoenhard
`
`Paul M. Schoenhard
`
`
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 002
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 3 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`
`(REDACTED)
`Page 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04738-WHO
`---------------------------------X
`CONTOUR IP HOLDING, LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`GOPRO, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`---------------------------------X
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
`(cid:9)(cid:51)(cid:38)(cid:37)(cid:34)(cid:36)(cid:53)(cid:38)(cid:37)(cid:10)
`VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DAMON JONES
`MAY 8, 2018
`Palo Alto, California
`9:12 a.m.
`
`REPORTED BY:
`KELLI COMBS, CSR NO. 7705
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`45
`
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`23
`24
`25
`
`Appx5915
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 003
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 4 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 33
`
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q Was the GoPro HERO -- HD HERO catalog you
`distributed at the Tucker -- at the 2009 Tucker
`Rocky dealer show on GoPro's website before the
`Tucker Rocky dealer show?
` A That, I don't know.
` Q Was the GoPro catalog you distributed at
`the 2009 Tucker Rocky dealer show on GoPro's website
`at the time of the Tucker Rocky dealer show?
` A That, I do not know.
` Q Was the GoPro catalog you distributed at
`the 2009 Tucker Rocky dealer show on GoPro's website
`after the Tucker Rocky dealer show?
` A The exact one that I distributed, the
`exact version and everything, I don't know that.
` Q When was the GoPro HD HERO catalog that
`you've referenced in your declarations and that you
`distributed at the Tucker Rocky dealer show, when
`was that catalog available on GoPro's website?
` A Again, I don't know. That's similar to
`the previous question.
` Q Do you know if the GoPro HD HERO catalog
`that you distributed at the 2009 Tucker Rocky
`dealer show was ever on GoPro's website?
` A I know the catalogs that were available on
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5916
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 004
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 5 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 34
`GoPro website. I know that there were other trade
`shows going on. I don't know exactly which catalogs
`they had and for how long. I do know the catalogs
`were available that were current catalogs at the
`time.
` Q Sure.
` And it's probably my fault my question
`wasn't clear.
` I'm asking about the catalog that you
`referenced in your declaration that you distributed
`at the 2009 Tucker Rocky dealer show. When was that
`catalog available on GoPro's website?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; asked and
`answered.
` THE WITNESS: Again, I -- I don't know the
`exact catalog. You're asking about versions
`earlier. I don't know the version of that catalog.
`I don't know if that exact -- I don't know what
`exact catalog was up there. I know that people
`had -- I know there were catalogs available on
`GoPro.com. I know that we would mail out catalogs
`to people. The exact one that I gave, I don't know
`if that was the exact one that was -- I mean, the
`one that I had was the one that I had. It didn't go
`anywhere else. So, I mean, I only have -- like, the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5917
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 005
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 6 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 35
`version that I recorded or brought in was the one
`that I retained, so...
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: I'm going to object to
`this line of questions because counsel is refusing
`to show Mr. Damon [sic] the catalog that's attached
`to his declaration.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q Mr. Damon, you also mentioned mailing.
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Mr. Jones, sorry. My
`bad.
` MR. KEVILLE: Yeah, I'm following your
`lead. I'll try not to do that.
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: My bad.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q Mr. Jones, you mentioned mailing. Do you
`have any knowledge that the exact catalog that you
`attached to your declaration and you say you
`distributed at the 2009 Tucker Rocky dealer show was
`ever mailed by GoPro to any customers?
` A Do I have any evidence of that?
` Q No. Do you have any knowledge that that
`actually happened?
` A I believe they were, yes, because it
`became very popular as a first time people saw HD
`video, and they were impressed, and everybody all of
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5918
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 006
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 7 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 188
`reference on the GoPro website to the HD HERO camera
`or any LCD BakPac, Wi-Fi BakPac or other remote
`BakPacs, correct?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague,
`ambiguous, overbroad, calls for speculation, lacks
`foundation, compound.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know if there was or
`wasn't. On this that you provided, I don't see any.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q Assuming that -- well, let me put it this
`way: If Exhibit 37, the Wayback Machine snapshot of
`GoPro's website on August 3rd, 2009, is accurate and
`authentic, then you would agree that between June
`and August 3rd, 2009, GoPro did not have on its
`website any HD HERO marketing material?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague,
`ambiguous, overbroad, calls for speculation,
`compound.
` THE WITNESS: I can't -- I can't say
`whether there was or there was not. From what you
`provided here, it does not show any.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q Looking at Exhibit 37 --
` A Yes.
` Q -- the snapshot of the GoPro website as of
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5919
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 007
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 8 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 189
`August 3rd, 2009, you would agree that looking at
`that between June and August 3rd, 2009, there was no
`GoPro HD HERO marketing material on the GoPro
`website?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague,
`ambiguous, overbroad, calls for speculation, lacks
`foundation, compound.
` THE WITNESS: All I can agree with was
`there is nothing mentioned in here that you
`provided. I can't say what was on the website or
`what there wasn't. Then I can't remember. From
`what I see here that you provided, I don't see it.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q So if Exhibit 37, the snapshot of the
`GoPro website from the Wayback Machine, is authentic
`and accurate, you would agree that up until
`August 3rd, 2009, GoPro had no marketing material
`for the HD HERO camera or its BakPac accessories on
`the website?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague,
`ambiguous, overbroad, compound, lacks foundation,
`calls for speculation.
` THE WITNESS: Again, I can only go from
`this that you provided. This is not the whole
`website. This is a snapshot of some pages of the
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5920
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 008
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 9 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 197
`reference to a product catalog; just individual
`product links?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague,
`ambiguous, overbroad, calls for speculation, lacks
`foundation.
` THE WITNESS: On the pages that you
`provided, I do not see a sample video or product
`catalog listed on those pages.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q Do you know when in 2009 GoPro first put a
`product catalog on its website?
` A In 2009 when it first put a product
`catalog on its website?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague and
`ambiguous, overbroad.
` THE WITNESS: I do not know when it first
`put one on.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q When you were at GoPro up until 2016, did
`GoPro keep any backup or archive copies of its
`website?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; compound.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know. I have no
`idea.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5921
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 009
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 10 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 238
`this wireless feature, out of its catalog as of
`October 2009?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague and
`ambiguous, overbroad, calls for speculation, lacks
`foundation, assumes facts not in evidence.
` THE WITNESS: I don't know. Whoever was
`in charge of those decisions would have to be asked.
`I don't know.
`BY MR. KEVILLE:
` Q In your Exhibit 31 declaration, you said:
` "After the 2009 Tucker Rocky
` dealer show and prior to
` September 13th, 2009, GoPro
` continued to distribute and
` otherwise make available the GoPro
` catalog to GoPro's actual and
` potential customers, dealers and
` retailers through its website."
` Do you have any evidence that the catalog
`that's marked Exhibit 34 that has the wireless
`remote was ever on the GoPro website?
` A Do I have any evidence of that personally?
` Q Yes.
` A I don't have any evidence of that
`personally.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5922
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 010
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 11 Filed: 06/07/2018
`
`(REDACTED)
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY
`Page 239
` Q And also say it was distributed through
`direct mail. Do you have any evidence that that
`catalog that's marked Exhibit 34 was sent to GoPro
`customers by direct mail?
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Objection; vague and
`ambiguous and overbroad.
` THE WITNESS: I don't have any -- any
`evidence of that personally.
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Do you understand what
`"evidence" means?
` MR. KEVILLE: No. No. Counsel, you can
`ask questions at the end. You know how this works.
`You're a lawyer. You don't get to ask questions in
`the middle of my deposition.
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: I'm not going to let
`you trick him --
` MR. KEVILLE: No. No. No.
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: -- because that's
`exactly what you're doing. I'm not going to let you
`trick him. I'm not going to let you trick him, so
`it is what it is.
` MR. KEVILLE: Bring that up with the
`judge.
` MS. KHACHATOURIAN: Go ahead. I would be
`happy to talk to the judge about this deposition.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`800-642-1099
`
`David Feldman Worldwide
`A Veritext Company
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Appx5923
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 011
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

`

` Form 30
`FORM 30. Certificate of Service
`Case: 17-1894 Document: 38 Page: 12 Filed: 06/07/2018
`Rev. 03/16
` UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I certify that I served a copy on counsel of record on
`by:
`
`June 7, 2018
`
`U.S. Mail
`Fax
`Hand
`Electronic Means (by E-mail or CM/ECF)
`
`Paul M. Schoenhard
`Name of Counsel
`
`/s/ Paul M. Schoenhard
`Signature of Counsel
`
`Law Firm
`Address
`City, State, Zip
`Telephone Number
`Fax Number
`E-Mail Address
`
`McDermott Will & Emery LLP
`500 North Capitol Street NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`202-756-8223
`202-756-8087
`pschoenhard@mwe.com
`
`NOTE: For attorneys filing documents electronically, the name of the filer under whose log-in and
`password a document is submitted must be preceded by an "/s/" and typed in the space where the
`signature would otherwise appear. Graphic and other electronic signatures are discouraged.
`
`Reset Fields
`
`GOPRO-1043, Page 012
`IPR2015-01078
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket