throbber

`
`INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
`
`I ALI:
`
`THE INTERNATIONAL
`TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE
`CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE
`
`_I
`
`BLUE BOOK
`
`
`
`
`
`VOLUME VIII — FASCICLE Vlll.7
`LETS LIBRAEY
`alcnfififiomsfihmfi $53083
`
`I“I‘DATA COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
`
`MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEMS
`
`RECOMMENDATIONS x.4oo-x.4zop 1"
`
`
`
`IXTH PLENAHY ASSEMBLY
`
`MELBOURNE. 14-25 NOVEMBER 1988
`
`Geneva 1989
`
`ISBN 92—61-03721—6
`
`IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
`
`3 1863 004 7904
`
`
`
`_—___-fl#———
`Page1of75
`
`"
`
`'
`
`7'
`
`' AT&T EXHIBIT1020
`
`Page 1 of 75
`
`AT&T EXHIBIT 1020
`
`

`

`© ITU
`
`Printed in Switzerland
`
`Page 2 of 75
`
`Page 2 of 75
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U5. Code)
`
`Recommendation 11.400 ‘)
`
`MESSAGE HANDLING SYSTEM AND SERVICE OVERVIEW
`
`3
`
`
`
`and computer based store and forward
`in various countries of telematic services
`The establishment
`eed to produce standards to facilitate
`tion with public networks creates a n
`messaging services
`in assoeia
`international message exchange between subscribers to such services.
`
`The CCITT,
`
`considering
`
`(a)
`
`the need for message handling systems:
`
`the need to transfer and store messages of different types;
`(b)
`that Recommendation X200 defines the reference model of open systems interconnection
`(c)
`applications;
`((1)
`that Recommendations X208, X217, X2113 and X219 provide the foundation for CCITT applica-
`
`for CCITT
`
`tions:
`
`(e)
`
`that the X.500—Series Recommendations define directory systems;
`
`that message handling systems are defined in a series of Recommendation
`(1')
`X407, X408, X411, X413 and X419;
`
`3: X400, X402, X403,
`
`(8
`
`)
`
`(h)
`and E420;
`
`that interpersonal message is defined in Recommendation X420 and T.330;
`handling services: E400, E401, R410
`
`that several F-Series Recommendations describe public message
`
`that several F-Series Recommendations describe intcrcommunication between public message handling
`(i)
`services and other services: E421, F415 and E422,
`
`unanimously declares
`
`thc vie
`
`w that the overall system and service overview of message handling is defined in this Recommen-
`
`dationr
`
`
`
`'3 Recommendation R400 is identical to X.400.
`
`Fascicle Vlil.7 — Rec. X400
`
`‘Page 3 of 75
`
`_______—_—________________—.
`
`

`

`CONTENTS
`
`‘PARTI - Introduction
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`Introduction
`
`Scope
`
`References
`
`Definitions
`
`A borevfalions
`
`Con ventions
`
`PART 2 — General description of MHS
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`Purpose
`
`Functional model of MHS
`
`7.1
`7.2
`7.3
`7.4
`
`Description of the MHS model
`Structure of messages
`Application of the MHS model
`Message store
`
`Message transfer service
`8.1
`Submission and delivery
`8.2
`Transfer
`8.3
`Notifications
`
`8.4
`8.5
`8.6
`
`8.7
`
`User agent
`Message store
`Access unit
`
`Use of the MTS in the provision of public services
`
`9
`
`1PM service
`
`9.1
`
`9.2
`9.3
`
`1PM service functional model
`
`Structure of IP-messages
`IP-notifications
`
`10
`
`11
`
`Intercommunfcation with physical delivery services
`10.1
`Introduction
`
`10.2
`
`Organizational configurations
`
`Specialized access
`11.1
`Introduction
`11.2
`Teletex access
`11.3
`Telex access
`
`PART 3 i Capabilities of MHS
`
`12
`
`Naming and addressing
`12.1
`Introduction
`
`12.2
`1 2.3
`12.4
`
`Directory names
`0/ R names
`O/R addresses
`
`4
`
`Faseicle VIIIJ — Rec. X.4l]l]
`
`Page 4 of 75
`
`Page 4 of 75
`
`

`

`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`MHS use of directory
`Introduction
`13.1
`13.2
`13.3
`
`Functional model
`
`Physical configurations
`
`Properties of a UL
`Submission
`DL use of a directory
`
`Distribution fists in MHS
`Introduction
`14.1
`14.2
`14.3
`14.4
`14.5
`14.6
`14.7
`14.8
`14.9
`14.10
`14.11
`
`DL expansion
`Nesting
`Recursion control
`Delivery
`
`Routing loop control
`Notifications
`
`D1. handling policy
`
`MHS security threats
`
`Security capabilities of MHS
`Introduction
`15.1
`15.2
`15.3
`15.4
`15.5
`
`Security model
`MHS security features
`
`Security management
`
`Conversion in MHS
`
`Use of {he MHS in provision of public services
`
`PART 4 — Elements of service
`
`Purpose
`
`_
`
`,
`
`1 8
`
`19
`
`Classification
`19.1
`19.2
`19.3
`19.4
`19.5
`19.6
`19.7
`19.8
`19.9
`
`Purpose of classification
`Basic message transfer service
`MT service optional user facilities
`Base MH/I’D service interccmrnunication
`Optional user faciiities for MH/PD service intercommunication
`Base message store
`
`MS optional user facilities
`Basic interpersonal messaging service
`{PM service optional user facilities
`
`Annex A -— Glossary of terms
`
`Annex B — Definitions of elements of service
`
`Annex C — Elements of service modifications with respect to the 1984 version
`Annex D -— Differences betwaen CCITT Recommendation E400 and ISO Standard 10021-1
`
`Fascicle VIIIJ # Rec. XAGI}
`
`
`hFTage 5 of 75
`
`Page 5 of 75
`
`

`

`PARTI — INTRODUCTION
`
`I]
`
`Introduction
`
`Thls Recommendation Is one of a set of Recommendations for message handling. The entire set prowdes a
`comprehensive specification for message handling comprising any number of cooperating open-systems.
`
`Message handling systems and services enable users to exchange messages on a store-and-forward basis. A
`message submitted by one user, the originator, is conveyed by the message transfer system (MTS), the principal
`component of a larger message handling system (MHS), and is subsequently delivered to one or more additional
`users, the message’s recipients.
`
`An MHS comprises a variety of interconnected functional entities. Message transfer agents (MTAs)
`cooperate to perform the store—and-forward message transfer function. Message stores (MSs) provide storage for
`messages and enable their submission, retrieval and management. User agents (UAS) help users access MHS.
`Access units (AUs) provide links to other communication systems and services of‘ various kinds (e.g. other
`telematic services, postal services).
`
`This Recommendation specifies the overall system and service description of message handling capabilities.
`
`1
`
`Scope
`
`This Recommendation defines the overall system and service of an MHS and serves as a general overview
`of MHSA
`
`Other aspects of message handling systems and services are defined in other Recommendations. The layout
`of Recommendations defining the message handling system and services is shown in Table 1/X.400. The public
`services built on MHS, as well as access to and from the MHS for public services are defined in the F.400-Serics
`of Recommendations.
`
`The technical aspects of MHS are defined in the XAOO—Series of Recommendations. The overall system
`architecture of MHS is defined in Recommendation X402.
`
`6
`
`Fascicle VIIIJ' i Rec. K400
`
`I Page 6 of 75
`
`Page 6 of 75
`
`

`

`TABLE 1/X.400
`
`Structure of MHS Recommendations
`
`Name of Recommendation/Standard
`
`MHS: System and service overview
`
`_[
`
`Joint MHS
`CCI‘I'I‘
`ISO
`x400
`10021—1
`
`—|
`Al
`
`CCITI‘ only
`System
`Service
`r E400
`
`Joint support
`l—CCI'IT
`i_
`ISO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Se
`
`
`
`r
`
`
`
`MHS: Overall architecture
`MHS: Conformance testing
`MI—IS: Abstract service definition
`conventions
`MHS: Encoded information type
`conversion rules
`
`MHS: MTS: Abstract service definition
`and procedures
`
`MHS: MS: Abstract service definition
`MHS: Protocol specifications
`MHS:
`Interpersonal messaging system
`Telematic access to IPMS
`
`X402
`
`10021-2
`
`X407
`
`10021-3
`
`K411
`
`10021-4
`
`X413
`X419
`X420
`
`10021—5
`10021-6
`10021-7
`
`MHS: Namingand addressingfor public
`
`MH services
`M113: The public message transfer service
`MHS:
`Intercomlnunication with pubiic
`physical delivery services
`MHS: The public 1PM service
`MHS:
`Intercomrnunication between 1PM
`service and teiex
`Intercommunication between 1PM
`service and teletex
`
`MHS:
`
`—I
`
`031:
`031:
`
`Basic reference mode]
`Specification of abstract syntax
`notation one (ASN.1)
`Specification of basic encoding
`rules for abstract syntax notation
`one (ASN.1)
`OSI: Association control: service
`definition
`
`OSI:
`
`OSI:
`
`081:
`
`OSI:
`
`081:
`
`051:
`
`Reliable transfer: mode] and service
`definition
`
`Remote operations: model, notation
`and service definition
`
`Association controi: protocol
`Specification
`Reliable transfer: protocol
`specification
`Remote operations: protocol
`specification
`
`X403
`
`X403
`
`_
`4’
`
`T330
`
`F4401 —l
`
`E410
`E415
`
`E420
`E421
`
`11.422
`
`X200
`X208
`
`X209
`
`X2]?
`
`511.218
`
`X219
`
`X227
`
`X228
`
`X229
`
`7498
`8824
`
`8825
`
`8649
`
`9066-1
`
`90'12-1
`
`3650
`
`9066-2
`
`9072-2
`
`L
`__|
`L_
`
`
`Fasclcle VIII.7 — Ree. X400
`
`7
`
`Engage 7 of 75
`
`;_
`
`3
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 75
`
`

`

`2
`
`References
`
`This Recommendation cites the documents listed below:
`
`Recommendation F.60
`
`Operational provisions for the international telex service
`
`Recommendation F.69
`
`Plan for the telex destination codes
`
`Recommendation E72
`
`Recommendation F.160
`
`International telex store-and—forward — General principles and operational aspects
`
`General operational provisions for the international public fascimile services
`
`Recommendation F200
`
`Teletex service
`
`Recommendation E300
`
`Videotex service
`
`Recommendation F400
`
`Recommendation E401
`
`Recommendation R410
`
`Recommendation R415
`
`Recommendation E420
`
`Recommendation E421
`
`Message handling 7 System and service overview (see also ISO 1002M)
`
`Message handling services — Naming and addressing for public message handling
`services
`
`Message handling services — The public message transfer service
`.
`ti"
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Message handlmg servrces — Intercommunlcatlon With public physteal delivery servrces
`
`Message handling services —— The public interpersonal messaging service
`
`Message handling services — Intercommnnication between the IPM service and the
`telex service
`
`Recommendation E422
`
`Message handling services — Intercommunication between the IPM service and the
`teletex service
`
`Recommendation T.61
`
`Character repertoire and coded character sets for the international teletex service
`
`Recommendation T330
`
`Teiematic access to IPMS
`
`Recommendation U.80
`
`International teletex store-and-forward 7 Access from teiex
`
`Recommendation U204
`
`Recommendation X200
`
`Recommendation X208
`
`Recommendation X209
`
`Interworking between the teiex service and the public interpersonal messaging service
`
`Reference model of open systems interconnection for CCIT’I‘ applications (see also
`ISO 7498)
`
`Specification of abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (see also ISO 8824)
`
`Specification of basic encoding rules for abstract syntax notation one (ASN.1) (see also
`ISO 3825)
`
`Recommendation X217
`
`Association control: Service definitions (see also ISO 8649)
`
`Recommendation X.218
`
`Reliable transfer model: Service definition (see also ISO/IEC 9066-1)
`
`Recommendation X219
`
`Recommendation K400
`
`Recommendation X402
`
`Remote operations model: Notation and service definition (see also ISO/IEC 9072—1)
`
`Message handling 7 System and service overview (see also ISO/15C 1002171)
`
`Message handling systems — Overall architecture (see also ISO/IEC 10021-2)
`
`Recommendation 31.403
`
`Message handling systems — Conformance testing
`
`Recommendation X.407
`
`Recommendation X408
`
`Recommendation X411
`
`Message handling systems — Abstract service definition conventions (see also 150/
`IEC 10021-3)
`
`Message handling systems — Encoded information type convention rules
`
`Message handling systems e Message transfer system: Abstract service definition and
`procedures (see also ISO/IEC 100214)
`
`8
`
`Fascicle VIII.7 — Rec. X400
`
`Page 8 of 75
`
`Page 8 of 75
`
`

`

`
`
`Recommendation X413
`
`Recommendation K419
`
`Recommendation X420
`
`Message handling systems — Message store: Abstract service definition (see also
`ISO/[EC 1002175)
`Message handling systems — Protocol specifications [see also ISO/IEC 10021-6)
`Message handling systems — Interpersonal messaging system
`(see also ISO/IEC 10021)?)
`
`in
`
`Recommendation X500
`
`Directory — Overview (see also ISO/IEC 9594‘!)
`
`Recommendation X501
`
`Directory — Models (see also [SO/[EC 9594—2)
`
`Recommendation X509
`
`Recommendation X511
`
`Recommendation X518
`
`Recommendation X519
`
`Recommendation X520
`
`Recommendation X521
`
`Directory e Authentication (see also ISO/IEC 9594—8)
`Directory — Abstract service definition (see also ISO/[EC 9594-3)
`Directory — Procedures for distributed operations (see aiso ISO/IEC 9594-4)
`Directory — Protocol specifications (see also ISO/IEC 95945)
`Directory — Selected attribute types (see also ISO/[EC 9594—5)
`Directory 4 Selected object classes (see also ISO/IEC 9594—?)
`
`3
`
`Definitions
`
`This Recommendation uses the terms listed below, and those defined in Annex A.
`Definitions of the elements of service applicable to MHS are contained in Annex B.
`
`3.1
`
`Open systems interconnection
`
`This Recommendation uses the following terms defined in Recommendation X200:
`a) Application layer;
`1)) Application-process;
`e) Open systems interconnection;
`d)
`051 reference model.
`
`3.2
`
`Directory systems
`
`This Recommendation uses the following terms defined in Recommendation X500:
`3)
`directory entry;
`
`directory system agent;
`b)
`directory system;
`0}
`directory user agent.
`d)
`This Recommendation uses the following terms defined in Recommendation X501:
`e)
`attribute;
`f)
`group;
`g) member;
`h)
`name.
`
`4
`
`Abbreviations
`
`A
`
`ADMD
`AU
`
`CA
`
`DL
`
`DSA
`
`DUA
`
`Additional
`
`Administration management domain
`Access unit
`
`Contractual agreement
`
`Distribution list
`
`Directory system agent
`
`Directory user agent
`
`
`Page 9 of 75
`
`Fascicle VII‘L'i‘r e Rec. X400
`
`9
`
`Page 9 of 75
`
`

`

`EIT
`
`1/0
`
`11’
`
`[PM
`
`{PMS
`
`MD
`
`MH
`
`MHS
`
`MS
`
`MT
`
`MTA
`
`MTS
`
`N/A
`
`0/ R
`
`OSI
`
`PD
`
`PDAU
`
`PDS
`
`PM
`
`PR
`
`PRMD
`
`Essential
`
`Encoded information type
`
`Input/output
`
`Interpersonai
`
`Interpersonal messaging
`
`Interpersonal messaging system
`
`Management domain
`
`Message handling
`
`Message handling system
`
`Message store
`
`Message transfer
`
`Message transfer agent
`
`Message transfer system
`
`Not applicable
`
`Originator/recipient
`
`Open system interconnection
`
`Physical delivery
`
`Physical delivery access unit
`
`Physical delivery system
`
`Per—message
`
`Per-recipient
`
`Private management domain
`
`PTLX AU
`
`Public telex access unit
`
`TLMA
`
`Telematic agent
`
`TLX AU
`
`Telex access unit
`
`TTX
`
`UA
`
`Teletex
`
`User agent
`
`5
`
`Conventions
`
`“Administration” is used for shortness to indicate a telecommuni-
`In this Recommendation the expression
`on with public
`cation Administration, a recognized private operating agency, and, in the case of intercommunicati
`delivery service, a postal Administration.
`
`Note — This Recommendation is identical t
`with ISO, the conventions of ISO standards have been adopt
`differ from the CCITT style. The other Recommendations 0
`conventions.
`
`0 Recommendation E400. Because of the desired alignment
`ed for the structure of this text. These conventions
`f the X.400-Series are in accordance with CCIT’I‘
`
`10
`
`Fascicle VIII.7 — Rec. X400
`
`Page 10 of 75
`
`Page 10 of 75
`
`

`

`PART 2 — GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF MHS
`
`6
`
`Purpose
`
`.1»
`
`This Recommendation is one of a set of Recommendations and describes the system model and elements
`of service of the message handling system (MHS) and services. This Recommendation overviews the capabilities of
`an MHS that are used by Administrations for the provision of public MH services to enable users to exchange
`messages on a store—and-forward basis.
`
`The message handling system is designed in accordance with the principles of the reference model of open
`systems interconnection (OSI reference model) for CCITT applications (Recommendation X.2(]l)) and uses the
`presentation layer services and services offered by other, more general, application service elements. An MHS can
`be constructed using any network fitting in the scope of 081. The message transfer service provided by the MTS is
`application independent. An example of a standardized application is the [PM service. End systems can use the
`MT service for specific applications that are defined bilaterally.
`
`Message handling services provided by Administrations belong to the group of telematic services defined
`in FrSeries Recommendations.
`
`telematic services and telex (Recommendations F.60, Riot], F205], F300, etc}, data
`Various other
`transmission services (XI), or physical delivery services (R415) gain access to, and intercommunicate with,
`the
`IPM service or intercommunicate with each other, via access units.
`""
`
`Elements of service are the service features provided through the application processes. The elements of
`service are considered to be components of the services provided to users and are either elements of a basic
`service or they are optional user facilities, classified either as essential optional user facilities, or as additional
`optional user facilities.
`
`'7
`
`Functional model oi MHS
`
`The MHS functional model serves as a tool to aid in the development of Recommendations for MHS, and
`aids in describing the basic concepts that can be depicted graphically. It comprises several different functional
`components that work together to provide MH services. The model can be applied to a number of different
`physical and organizational configurations.
`
`7.1
`
`Description of the MHS model
`
`A functional view of the MHS model is shown in Figure t/XAOO. In this model, a user is either a person
`or a computer process. Users are either direct users (ie. engage in message handling by direct use of MHS), or are
`indirect users (i.e. engage in message handling through another communication system (eg. a physical delivery
`system) that is linked to MHS). A user is referred to as either an originator (when sending a message) or a
`recipient (when receiving a message). Message handling elements of service define the set of message types and the
`capabilities that enable an originator to transfer messages of those types to one or more recipients.
`
`An originator prepares messages with the assistance of his user agent. A user agent (UA) is an application
`process that interacts with the message transfer system (MTS) or a message store (MS), to submit messages on
`behalf of a single user. The MTS delivers the messages submitted to it, to one or more recipient UAs, access units
`(AUs), or M85, and can return notifications to the originator. Functions performed solely by the UA and not
`standardized as part of the message handling elements of service are called local functions. A UA can accept
`delivery of messages directly from the MTS, or it can use the capabilities of an MS to receive delivered messages
`for subsequent retrieval by the UA.
`
`The MTS comprises a number of message transfer agents (MTAs). Operating together,
`forward manner, the MTAs transfer messages and deliver them to the intended recipients.
`
`in a store-and—
`
`Access by indirect users of MHS is accomplished by AUs. Delivery to indirect users of MHS is
`accomplished by AUs, such as in the case of physical delivery, by the physical delivery access unit (PDAU).
`
`The message store (MS) is an optional general purpose capability of MHS that acts as an intermediary
`between the UA and the MTA. The MS is depicted in the MHS functional model shown in Figure I/XAOU. The
`MS is a functional entity whose primary purpose is to store and permit retrieval of delivered messages. The MS
`also allows for submission from, and alerting to the UA.
`
`The collection of UAs, MSs, AUs and MTAs is called the message handling system (MHS).
`
`Faseicle VIIIJ‘ — Rec. X400
`
`11
`
`QI-_.____
`
`Page 11 of 75
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 75
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`Note — Message input from PD Services to MHS is for further study. Flow from PD Services to the PDAU shown is for notifications.
`
`FIGURE 111L400
`
`MHS {unctienal model
`
`7.2
`
`Structure of messages
`
`The basic structure of messages conveyed by the MTS is shown in Figure 2/X.400. A message is made up
`of an envelope and a content. The envelope carries information that is used by the MTS when tranSforring the
`message within the MTS. The content is the piece of information that the originating UA wishes delivered to one
`or more recipient UAs. The MTS neither modifies or examines the content, except for conversion {see § 16).
`
`+
`
`Content
`
`Envelope
`
`CCI'IT — 0‘00580788
`
`FIGURE QIXADU
`
`Basic message structure
`
`[2
`
`Fasciclc VIIUr — Rec. X400
`
`Page 12 of 75
`
`Page 12 of 75
`
`

`

`7.3
`
`Application of the MHS model
`
`1.3.1
`
`Physical mapping
`
`Users access UAs for message processing purposes, for example, to create, present, or file messages. A user
`can interact with 3 HA via an input/output device or process (e.g. keyboard, display, printer, etc.). A UA can be
`implemented as a {set of) computer process(es) in an intelligent terminal.
`A UA and MTA can be co-located in the same system, or a UA/MS can be implemented in physically
`separate systems. In the first case the UA accesses the MT elements of service by interacting directiy with the
`MTA in the same system. In the second case,
`the UA/MS will communicate with the MTA via standardized
`protocols specified for MHS. It is also possible for an MTA to be implemented in a system without UAs or MSs.
`Some possible physical configurations are shown in Figures 3/XAOO and 4/X.40t}. The different physicai
`systems can be connected by means of dedicated lines or switched network connections.
`
`
`
`
`UO device
`
`
`GCI'ET — 0100590
`
`Processing system
`
`FIGURE BJXAOD
`
`Covresident HA and MTA
`
`U0 device
`
`I
`
`terminal
`"l ntelligent"
`
`L
`
`-
`
`w
`
`l
`
`l
`
`__.J CCIT'TrO‘lOOBOO-SB
`.-
`_
`Processing system
`
`FIGURE 4IX.4DO
`
`Stand—alone UA and ctr-resident MSIMTA and USJMTA
`
`7.3.2
`
`Organizational mapping
`
`An Administration or organization can play various roles in providing message handling services. An
`organization in this context can be a company or a non—commercial enterprise.
`-
`The collection of at least one MTA, zero or more UAs, zero or more M55, and zero or more AUs
`operated by an Administration or organization constitutes a management domain (MD). An MD managed by an
`Administration is called an Administration management domain (ADMD). An MD managed by an organization
`other
`than an Administration is called a private management domain (PRMD). An MD provides message
`handling services
`in accordance with the classification of elements of service as described in §l9. The
`relationships between management domains is shown in Figure 5/X400.
`
`Faseiclc VIIIJ -— Rec. X400
`
`13
`
`M P
`
`age 13 of 75
`
`Page 13 of 75
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`MTA
`
`MFA
`
`CCITT — 0100321 -sa
`
` |
`
`| ]
`
`1 i
`
`Countryr 8
`
`FIGURE SHEA-DI]
`
`Relationships between management domains
`
`Note I a It should be recognized that the provision of support of private messaging systems by CCITT
`members falls within the framework of national regulations. Thus the possibilities mentioned in this paragraph
`may or may not be offered by an Administration which provides message handling services. In addition, the UAs
`depicted in Figure S/XAUO do not imply that UAs belonging to an MD must be exclusively located in the same
`country as their MDS.
`interactions between PRMDs and internal interactions within an MD are outside the
`Note 2 7 Direct
`scope of this Recommendation
`
`Note 3 — An Administration, in the context of CCITT, that manages an ADMD, is understood as being
`a member of ITU or a recognized private operating agency (RPOA), registered by a country with the ITU.
`
`7.3.3
`
`Administration management domain
`
`In one country one or more ADMDs can exist. An ADMD is characterized by its provision of relaying
`functions betWeen other management domains and the provision of messageitransfer service for the applications
`provided within the ADMD.
`
`An Administration can provide access for its users to the ADMD in one or more of the following ways:
`— users to Administration provided UA
`— private UA to Administration MTA
`7 private UA to Administration MS
`— private UA to Administration MTA
`— user to Administration provided UA.
`
`See also the examples of configurations shown in Figure 3/X.400 and Figure 4/X.400.
`
`14
`
`Fascicle VIIIJ' — Rec. X400
`
`Page 14 of 75
`
`Page 14 of 75
`
`

`

`Administration provided UAs can exist as part of an intelligent terminal that the user can use to access
`MHS. They can also exist as part of Administration resident equipment being part of MHS, in which case the user
`obtains access to the LEA via an I/O device.
`
`In the case of a private UA, the user has a private stand—alone UA which interacts with the Administration
`provided MTA or MS, using submission, delivery and retrieval functions. A private, stand—alone UJA can be
`associated with one or more MDs, provided that the required naming conventions are preserved.
`
`A private MTA as part of an PRMD can access one or more ADMDs in a country, following national
`regulations.
`
`Access can also be provided by Administration provided AUs described in §§ 10 and ll.
`
`7.3.4
`
`Private management domain
`
`An organization other than an Administration can have one or more MTA(s), and zero or more UAs, AUs
`and MSs forming a PRMD which can interact with an ADMD on an MD to MD (MTA to MTA) basis. A
`PRMD is characterized by the provision of messaging functions within that management domain.
`
`the PRMD can have
`A PRMD is considered to exist entirely within one country. Within that country,
`access to one or more ADMDs as shown in Figure S/XAOD. However,
`in the ease of a specific interaction
`between a PRMD and an ADMD (such as when a message is transferred between MDs), the PRMD ,is considered
`to be associated only with that ADM D. A PRMD will not act as a relay between two ADMDs.
`
`In the interaction between a PRMD and an ADMD, the ADMD takes responsibility for the actions of the
`PRMD which are related to the interaction. In addition to ensuring that the PRMD properly provides the message
`transfer service, the ADMD is responsible for ensuring that the accounting, logging, quality of service, uniqueness
`of names, and related operations of the PRMD are correctly performed. As a national matter,
`the name of a
`PRMD can be either nationally unique or relative to the associated ADMD. If a PRMD is associated with more
`than one ADMD, the PRMD can have more than one name.
`
`7.4
`
`Message store
`
`Because UAs can be implemented on a wide variety of equipment, including personal computers, the MS
`can complement a UA implemented,
`for example, on a personal computer by providing a more secure,
`continuously available storage mechanism to take delivery of messages on the user agent‘s behalf. The MS
`retrieval capability provides users who subscribe to an MS with basic message retrieval capabilities potentially
`applicable to messages of all types. Figure 6/X.400 shows the delivery, and subsequent retrieval of messages that
`are delivered to an MS, and the indirect submission of messages via the MS.
`
`Retrieval
`
`Delivery
`
`l—I-—submlssmn
`
`submiSSion
`
`com 7 01006l0-EB
`
`FIGURE 6/1400
`
`Submission and delivery with an MS
`
`One MS acts on behaif of only one user (one O/R address), i.e. it does not provide a common or shared
`MS capability to several users (see also PRMD} of Figure 5/X.400).
`When subscribing to an MS, all messages destined for the UA are delivered to the MS only. The UA, if on
`line, can receive alerts when certain messages are delivered to the MS. Messages delivered to an MS are
`considered delivered from the MTS perspective.
`
`When 21 HA submits a message through the MS, the MS is in general transparent and submits it to the
`MTA before confirming the success of the submission to the UA. However, the MS can expand the message if the
`UA requests the forwarding of messages that exist in the MS.
`
`Fascicle V1113? — Ree. X400
`
`15
`
`
`infiage 15 of 75
`
`Page 15 of 75
`
`

`

`.
`;
`
`Users are also provided with the capability to request the MS to forward selected messages automatically
`upon delivery.
`The elements of service describing the features of the MS are defined in Annex B and classified in § 19.
`Users are provided with the capability based on various criteria, to get counts and lists of messages, to fetch
`messages, and to delete messages, currently held in the MS.
`is
`
`7.4.1
`
`Physical configurations
`
`to the MTA in a number of ways. The MS can be
`The MS can be physically located with respect
`co-located with the UA, co—located with the MTA, or stand-alone. From an external point of view, a co—located
`UA and MS are indistinguishable from a stand-alone UA. (Io—locating the MS with the MTA offers significant
`advantages which wiil probably make it the predominant configuration.
`
`7.4.2
`
`Organizational configurations
`
`Either ADMDs or PRMDs can operate MSs. In the case of Administration supplied MSs, the subscriber
`either provides his own UA or makes use of an Administration supplied UA via an I/O device. In either case, all
`the subscriber’s messages are delivered to the MS for subsequent retrieval.
`
`The physical and organizational configurations described above are examples only and other equally cases
`can exist.
`i"
`
`8
`
`Message transfer service
`
`The MTS provides the general, application independent, store—and-forward message transfer service. The
`elements of service describing the features of the MT service are defined in Annex B and classified in § 19.
`Provision of public message transfer service by Administrations is described in Recommendation E410.
`
`8.1
`
`Submission and delivery
`
`The MTS provides the means by which UAs exchange messages. There are two basic interactions between
`MTAs and UAs and/or M85:
`
`1) The submission interaction is the means by which an originating UA or MS transfers to an MTA the
`content of a message and the submission envelope. The submission envelope contains the information
`that the MTS requires to provide the requested elements of service.
`2) The delivery interaction is the means bywhich the MTA transfers to a recipient UA or MS the
`content of a message plus the delivery envelope. The delivery envelope contains information related to
`delivery of the message.
`
`In the submission and delivery interactions, responsibility for the message is passed between the MTA and
`the UA or MS.
`
`8.2
`
`Tranyer
`
`the message
`Starting at the originator’s MTA, each MTA transfers the message to another MTA until
`reaches the recipient’s MTA, which then delivers it to the recipient UA or MS using the delivery interaction.
`
`The transfer interaction is the means by which one MTA transfers to another MTA the content of a
`message plus the transfer envelope. The transfer envelope contains the information related to the operation of the
`MTS plus information that the MTS requires to provide elements of service requested by the originating UA.
`
`MTAs transfer messages containing any type of binary coded information. MTAs neither interpret not
`alter the content of messages except when performing a. conversion.
`
`3.3
`
`Notifications
`
`Notifications in the MT service comprise the delivery and non-delivery notifications. When a message. or
`probe, cannot be delivered by the MTS, a non-delivery notification is generated and returned to the originator in
`a report signifying this. In addition, an originator can specificaliy ask for acknowledgement of successful delivery
`through use of the delivery notification element of service on submission.
`
`16
`
`Fascicle VIIIJ —— Rec. X400
`
`HI Page 16 of 75
`
`Page 16 of 75
`
`

`

`,
`
`
`
`3.4
`
`User agent
`
`The UA uses the MT service provided by the MTS. A UA is a functional entity by means of which a
`gingie direct user engages in message handiing.
`UAs are grouped into classes based on the type of content of messages they can handle.__1The MTS
`provides a UA with the ability to identify its class when sending messages to other UAs. UAs within aégiven class
`are referred to as cooperating UAs since they cooperate with each other to enhance the communication amongst
`their respective users.
`Note — A UA can support more than one type of message content, and hence belong to several UA
`
`classes.
`
`8.5
`
`Message store
`
`The message store (MS) uses the MT service provided by the MTS. An MS is a functional entity associated
`with a user’s UA. The user can submit messages through it, and retrieve messages that have been delivered to
`the MS.
`
`8.6
`
`Access unit
`
`An access unit (AU) uses the MT service provided by the MTS. An AU is a functional entity associated
`with an MTA to provide for intercommunication between MHS and another system or service.
`
`8.7
`
`Use of the MTS in the provision of various services
`
`The MTS is used by application specific services for the provision of message handling services of various
`types. The interpersonal messaging service, described in § 9, is one example of this. Other services can be built on
`the foundation of the MTS, either with corresponding recommendations or as private applications.
`
`9
`
`IPM service
`
`The interpersonal message service (IPM service) provides a user with features to assist in communicating
`with other IPM service users. The IPM service uses the capabilities of the MT service for sending and receiving
`interpersonal messages. The elements of service describing the features of the IPM service are defined in Annex B
`and classified in § 19. The provision of public interpersonal messaging service by Administrations is described in
`Recommendation R420.
`
`9.1
`
`IPM service functional model
`
`Figure 7/X.t$00 shows the functional model of the IPM service. The UAs used in the IPM service
`(IPM—UAs) comprise a specific class of cooperating UAs. The optional access units shown (TLMA, PTLXAU)
`allow for teletex and telex users to intercommunicate with the IPM service. The optional access unit (TLMA) also
`allows for teletex u

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket