throbber
FLIGHT MANAGEMENT
`COMPUTER SYSTEM
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702-6
`
`PUBLISHED: JUNE 10, 1994
`
`DOCUMENT
`
`AN
`Prepared by
`AIRLINES ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING COMMITTEE
`Published by
`AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC.
`2551 RIVA ROAD, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND 21401
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 1
`
`

`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`Copyright© 1994 by
`AERONAUTICAL RADIO, INC.
`2551 Riva Road
`Annapolis, Maryland 21401-7465 USA
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702-6©
`FLIGHT MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SYSTEM
`
`Published: June 10, 1994
`
`Prepared by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee
`
`Characteristic 702
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`December 7, 1978
`
`Characteristic 702
`
`Adopted by the Industry:
`
`February 28, 1979
`
`Characteristic 702-1
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`August 29, 1979
`
`Characteristic 702-2
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`March 12, 1981
`
`Characteristic 702-3
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`December 9, 1981
`
`Characteristic 702-4
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`October 25, 1989
`
`Characteristic 702-5
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`January 31, 1992
`
`Characteristic 702-6
`
`Adopted by the Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee:
`
`June 10, 1994
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 2
`
`

`
`ITEM
`
`1.0
`1.1
`1.2
`1.3
`1.4
`1.4.1
`1.4.2
`1.4.3
`1.5
`1.5.1
`1.5.2
`
`1.5.3
`1.6
`1.7
`
`2.0
`2.1
`2.2
`2.2.1
`2.2.2
`2.2.3
`2.3
`2.4
`2.4.1
`2.4.2
`2.4.3
`2.4.4
`2.5
`2.5.1
`2.5.1.1
`2.5.1.2
`2.6
`2.7
`2.8
`
`3.0
`3.1
`3.1.1
`3.1.2
`3.1.3
`3.2
`3.2.1
`3.2.1.1
`3.2.1.2
`3.2.1.3
`3.2.1.4
`3.2.2
`3.2.2.1
`3.2.2.2
`3.2.3
`3.2.3.1
`3.2.3.2
`3.2.4
`3.2.5
`3.2.6
`3.2.7
`3.2.8
`3.2.9
`3.3
`3.3.1
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SUBJECT
`
`PAGE
`
`INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION
`Purpose
`Summary of Operational Characteristics
`Brief Description of the System
`Unit Description
`Flight Management Computer (FMC) Unit
`Control/Display Unit (CDU)
`Flight Data Storage Unit (Optional)
`Interchangeability
`General
`Interchangeability Desired for the ARINC 702
`Flight Management Computer System
`"Generation Interchangeability" Considerations
`Integrity and Availability
`Regulatory Approval
`
`INTERCHANGEABILITY STANDARDS
`Introduction
`Form Factor, Connectors and Index Pin Coding
`Flight Management Computer
`Control/Display Unit (CDU)
`Optional Flight Data Storage Unit (FDSU)
`Interwiring
`Power Circuitry
`Primary Power Input
`Power Control Circuitry
`The Common Ground
`The AC Common Cold
`Environmental Conditions
`Thermal Interface and Design
`FMC
`CDU
`
`Weights
`System Functions and Signal Characteristics
`Grounding and Bonding
`
`SYSTEM DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
`System Configurations
`Single System Configuration
`Single System/Dual CDU Configuration
`Dual System Configuration
`Basic System Functions
`Performance Management
`General
`Performance Data Base
`Optimum Flight Path
`Performance Data Control and Display
`Lateral Navigation and Guidance
`Lateral Navigation
`Lateral Guidance
`Vertical Navigation and Guidance
`Vertical Navigation
`Vertical Guidance
`Thrust Axis Control
`4D Guidance (Growth Option)
`Electronic Flight Instrument System Management
`Data Update Interface
`IRS Initialization and Heading Set
`GNSS Initialization
`Operational Features and Technical Considerations
`Performance Management Computation
`
`iii
`
`1
`1
`1
`1
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`2
`
`2
`2
`2
`
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`3
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`4
`5
`5
`
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`7
`8
`8
`8
`8
`8
`8
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 3
`
`

`
`ITEM
`
`3.3.1.1
`3.3.1.2
`3.3.1.3
`3.3.1.4
`3.3.1.5
`3.3.1.6
`3.3.1.7
`3.3.1.8
`3.3.1.9
`3.3.1.10
`3.3.1.11
`3.3.2
`3.3.3
`3.3.4
`3.3.5
`3.3.6
`3.3.7
`3.3.8
`3.3.9
`3.3.10
`3.3.11
`3.4
`3.4.1
`3.4.1.1
`3.4.1.2
`3.4.1.2.1
`3.4.1.2.2
`3.4.1.2.3
`3.4.1.2.4
`3.4.1.2.5
`3.4.1.2.6
`3.4.1.2.7
`3.4.1.3
`3.4.1.3.1
`3.4.1.3.2
`3.4.1.3.3
`3.4.1.3.4
`3.4.1.3.5
`3.4.1.4
`3.4.1.4.1
`3.4.1.4.2
`3.4.1.4.3
`3.4.1.4.4
`3.4.1.4.5
`3.4.1.5
`3.4.1.6
`3.4.1.7
`3.4.1.8
`3.4.2
`3.4.3
`3.5
`3.5.1
`3.5.2
`3.6
`3.7
`3.8
`3.9
`
`4.0
`4.1
`4.1.1
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SUBJECT
`
`PAGE
`
`General
`Take Off Function
`Altitude Intercept Distance and Time
`Optimum Climb
`Optimum Cruise Altitude
`Maximum Range
`Maximum Endurance
`Fuel Remaining Over Destination
`Top of Descent
`Engine-Out Performance
`Turbulent Air Performance
`Flight Planning
`Data Retrieval and Verification
`Supplemental Navigation Information
`Slant Range Correction
`Automatic Station Selection and Tuning
`"Direct To" Function
`Detection of a Power Interrupt
`Self Test
`Immunity from Flight Path Perturbation
`Manual Override Inputs
`System Inputs
`Management and Control (Pilot and Program Inputs)
`System Initialization
`Initial Data Inputs
`Present Position
`Gross Weight
`Zero Fuel Weight
`Outside Air Temperature
`Airport Elevation
`Cost Index
`Greenwich Mean Time
`Waypoint Definition
`Waypoint Identifier
`Waypoint Latitude and Longitude
`Waypoint Reference Fix
`Waypoint Bearing from Station (Theta)
`Waypoint Distance from Station (Rho)
`Navaid Definition
`Station Identifier
`Station Frequency
`Station Elevation
`Station Declination
`Station Latitude and Longitude
`Cross Track Offset Distance
`Along Track Offset Distance
`Assigned Time at a Fix
`Manual Override Inputs
`Sensor Inputs
`Sensor Warning Inputs
`System Outputs
`System Integrity Monitoring and Failure Warning Outputs
`System Control Signals
`Growth Features
`Sensor Failures
`FMC Equipment Accuracy
`System Status Alert
`
`STANDARD SIGNAL CHARACTERISTICS
`General Accuracy and Operating Ranges
`Resolution
`
`iv
`
`8
`8
`8
`8
`8
`8
`9
`9
`9
`9
`9
`9
`9
`9
`9
`9
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`10
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`12
`13
`13
`13
`
`14
`14
`14
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 4
`
`

`
`ITEM
`
`4.1.2
`4.1.2.1
`4.1.2.2
`4.1.2.3
`4.1.2.4
`4.2
`4.2.1
`4.2.1.1
`4.2.1.2
`4.2.1.3
`4.2.1.4
`4.2.1.5
`4.2.1.6
`4.2.1.7
`4.2.1.8
`4.2.1.9
`4.2.1.10
`4.2.1.11
`4.2.1.12
`4.2.1.13
`4.2.1.14
`4.2.2
`4.2.2.1
`4.2.2.2
`4.2.2.3
`4.2.2.4
`4.2.2.5
`4.2.2.6
`4.2.2.7
`4.2.2.8
`4.2.3
`4.2.4
`4.3
`4.3.1
`4.3.2
`4.3.2.1
`4.3.2.1.1
`4.3.2.1.2
`4.3.2.1.3
`4.3.2.1.4
`4.3.2.1.5
`4.3.2.1.6
`4.3.2.1.7
`4.3.2.1.8
`4.3.2.1.9
`4.3.2.1.10
`4.3.2.2
`4.3.2.3
`4.3.2.4
`4.3.2.4.1
`4.3.2.5
`4.3.2.5.1
`4.3.2.5.2
`4.3.3
`4.3.4
`4.4
`4.5
`
`5.0
`5.1
`5.2
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SUBJECT
`
`PAGE
`
`Standardized Signals
`Digital Data Standards
`Standard "Applied Voltage"
`"Standard Ground" Signal
`"Standard Open" Signal
`Data Signals
`FMC Digital Data Inputs
`VOR Input Ports
`DME Input Ports
`ILS Input Port
`Air Data Input Ports
`IRS/AHRS Input Ports
`Flight Control System Input Ports
`Control Display Unit Input Ports
`Data Update Input Ports
`Intersystem Data Input Ports
`Propulsion/Configuration Data Input Ports
`Electronic Flight Instrument System Input Ports
`Digital Clock Input
`Reserved Ports for Growth Inputs
`GPS Input Ports
`FMC Digital Data Outputs
`FMC Intersystem Output
`General Data Output #1
`General Data Output #2
`Instrument Data Output
`CDU Output Port "A"
`CDU Output Port "B"
`Data Loader Output
`Data Link Output
`CDU Digital Data Inputs
`CMU Digital Data Outputs
`Control Signals
`Digital Control Inputs
`Discrete Inputs and Outputs
`Specifically Assigned FMC Discrete Inputs
`Off-side CDU Enable
`Autotone Master/Slave Discrete
`Oleo Strut Switch
`Maintenance Test Discrete
`Manual/Audio Discretes
`MAG/True Input Discrete No. 1
`Source/Destination Identifier
`Navigation Data Base Update Enable
`Operating Program Update Enable
`Performance Data Base Update Enable
`Reserved FMC Discrete Inputs for Future Specific Assignments
`Reserved FMC Discrete Inputs for Application-Unique Functions
`FMC Discrete Outputs
`CDU Message Alert Discrete
`CDU Discretes
`CDU Active Input Identification Discrete
`CDU Primary/Secondary Status Input Discrete
`Digital Control Outputs
`FMC "Data Loader Connected" Function
`FMC/FMC Intersystem Communications
`FMC/ACARS Interface
`
`CONTROL DISPLAY UNIT (CDU) DESIGN
`General
`Form Factor
`
`v
`
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`14
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`15
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`16
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`17
`
`18
`18
`18
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 5
`
`

`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SUBJECT
`
`PAGE
`
`18
`18
`18
`18
`18
`18
`
`19
`19
`19
`19
`
`20
`20
`20
`20
`20
`
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`21
`22
`22
`22
`22
`22
`22
`22
`22
`23
`23
`23
`23
`23
`23
`23
`24
`24
`24
`
`25
`26
`27
`28-33
`34-34A
`35-40
`41-43
`44-48
`49
`50-60
`
`ITEM
`
`5.3
`5.4
`5.5
`5.6
`5.7
`5.8
`
`6.0
`6.1
`6.1.1
`6.2
`
`7.0
`7.1
`7.2
`7.2.1
`7.2.2
`
`8.0
`8.1
`8.2
`8.3
`8.4
`8.4.1
`8.4.2
`8.4.3
`8.4.4
`8.4.5
`8.4.6
`8.4.7
`8.5
`8.5.1
`8.5.2
`8.5.3
`8.6
`8.6.1
`8.6.2
`8.6.3
`8.6.4
`8.6.5
`8.6.6
`8.6.7
`8.6.8
`8.6.9
`8.6.9.1
`8.6.9.2
`8.6.10
`
`Cooling
`Panel Illumination
`Keyboard
`Mode and Function Controls
`CDU Interface
`CDU Confidence Test
`
`DATA BASE STORAGE CONSIDERATIONS
`Performance Data
`Performance Data Update
`Navigation Data
`
`PROVISIONS FOR AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT
`General
`Unit Identification
`Pin Allocation
`Use of ATLAS Language
`
`ELECTRONIC FLIGHT INSTRUMENT INTERFACE
`Introduction
`FMC Outputs to EFI
`FMC Inputs from EFI
`EFI Design Features
`Map
`Plan
`Map Scales
`Map Projection
`Option Selection
`Symbol Repertoire
`EFI Data Conditioning
`FMC Design Features
`Navigation Data Base
`Flight Plans
`Map Display Edit Areas
`Interface Design
`General
`Map Data Updating
`Background Data Prioritizing
`Background Data Editing
`Mode Change Response
`Map Translation and Rotation Data
`Resolution
`Interface Data Errors
`FMC-to-EFI Data Transfer Protocol
`Data Block Format
`Data Type Word Formats
`EFI-to-FMC Data Transfer
`
`ATTACHMENTS
`
`1A
`1B
`1C
`2
`
`3
`4
`5
`6
`
`FMC Connector Positioning - Rear View
`Control/Display Unit (CDU)
`FDSU Connector Position
`Standard Interwiring
`Notes Applicable to the Standard Interwiring
`Connector Insert Pin Layouts
`Flight Management System
`Data Input/Output FMC Inputs
`Environmental Test Categories
`FMC/EFI Interface
`
`vi
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 6
`
`

`
`ITEM
`
`ATTACHMENTS (cont’d)
`
`7
`8A
`8B
`
`APPENDICES
`
`1
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`SUBJECT
`
`FMC/FMC Intersystem Communications
`FMC/ACARS Information Exchange
`Table-Based Formats for FMC IMI/IEI Messages
`
`Chronology and Bibliography
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`PAGE
`
`61
`62-67
`68-134
`
`135
`
`vii
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 7
`
`

`
`1.0 INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702 - Page 1
`
`1.1 Purpose
`
`This document sets forth the characteristics of a Flight
`Management Computer System specifically designed for
`installation in new generation commercial
`transport
`aircraft. The system is not designed for retrofit in any
`aircraft other than those utilizing ARINC 700 series
`equipment.
`
`1.2 Summary of Operational Characteristics
`
`The Flight Management Computer System (FMS)
`described herein is designed to provide performance data
`and fuel management display and control functions, and
`navigation and guidance to a desired flight plan based on
`energy efficient profiles.
`
`NOTE: This Characteristic describes an FMS which is
`capable of providing performance management
`and navigation/guidance functions from take-off
`to final approach. It is recognized, however, that
`a need also exists for a simpler version of the
`system designed
`to
`provide
`performance
`management combined with limited navigation
`and guidance. The intent
`in developing the
`simpler system is to achieve a lower cost system
`with reduced operating logistics compared with
`the more sophisticated system described.
`It is
`anticipated that equipment cost may be reduced
`by:
`
`a. Less complex software design
`
`b. Minimum bulk data storage requirements
`
`c. Simpler Control Display Unit (CDU)
`
`Operating logistics impact may,
`reduced by:
`
`in turn, be
`
`a. Minimized bulk data cost
`
`b. Less frequent data update
`
`c. Reduced crew training needs
`
`the intent herein to develop a
`is not
`It
`"Characteristic within a Characteristic", nor is it
`intended to describe two separate systems.
`Manufacturers wishing to develop the simpler
`system should decide which functions are needed
`for such a system, and design the system in
`accordance with the relevant sections of this
`Characteristic.
`It
`should be
`emphasized,
`however, that all systems should conform to the
`interchangeability standards set forth in Section 2
`of this Characteristic.
`
`The energy management functions performed by the FMS
`includes the computation of target parameters, flight
`profiles and guidance commands to optimize performance
`during all phases of flight. The optimization should, by
`selection, be based on cost,
`time,
`fuel or
`range.
`Provisions should also be included to enable overall
`
`modification of these computations by a factor based on
`individual airline operating economics, local fuel costs,
`etc. To achieve this performance optimization within the
`constraints of the air traffic environment,
`the energy
`management
`functions are integrated with a three
`dimensional, earth oriented navigation system employing
`mixing of available navigation sensor system inputs.
`Primary data for this function are IRS/AHRS, GNSS, air
`data, and bearing and distance data derived from ground
`based VORTACS and VOR and/or DME facilities, with
`provisions for growth inputs from additional sensors.
`
`The system provides for the automatic selection and
`tuning of VOR, DME and ILS systems. The FMS
`receives continuous inputs of altitude, airspeed, ground
`speed, fuel flow and fuel quantity, Engine Pressure Ratio
`(EPR) or revolution (N1), airplane configuration, etc. as
`required to support the energy management calculations.
`
`A data base is stored in the Flight Management Computer
`(FMC) unit which may include performance and limit data
`for a variety of engine types and airplane configurations
`and navigation data to support the airline requirements.
`
`Lateral guidance is computed with respect to great circle
`paths defined by the flight plan, and to transitional paths
`between the great circle paths, or to a preset heading or
`course. Vertical guidance is computed with respect to
`altitudes assigned to waypoints, or to paths defined by
`stored or computed profiles. Speed control along the
`desired path is provided during all phases of flight.
`
`Lateral and vertical guidance and speed/thrust commands
`are computed for automatic control through the Flight
`Control Computer System (FCCS) and Thrust Control
`Computer System (TCCS).
`Deviation signals are
`computed for display on flight instruments.
`
`Engagement of the FMS modes for automatic flight via
`the FCCS and TCCS is controlled through the FCCS
`Controller on the Mode Control Panel (MCP). Flight
`planning data entry and flight performance mode selection
`for FMC use
`is
`performed
`through
`the FMS
`Control/Display Unit (CDU).
`
`The system should be designed with growth potential to
`add real-time constraints to the guidance modes to provide
`a four-dimensional (4D) guidance capability.
`
`The system also has the optional capability to provide all
`the necessary signal processing the input/output functions
`to support a multi-function electronic display.
`
`1.3 Brief Description of the System
`
`The ARINC 702 Flight Management Computer System
`(FMS) comprises two units, one a rack-mounted computer
`unit and the other a cockpit-located control and display
`unit. The computer unit provides storage capability for all
`data needed for system operation.
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 8
`
`

`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702 - Page 2
`
`1.0 INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION (cont’d)
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`1.5.2 Interchangeability Desired for the ARINC 702
`Flight Management Computer System
`
`System interchangeability of the FMC and the CDU with
`respect
`to the standard aircraft
`installation is desired,
`regardless of the manufacturing source. The standards
`necessary to ensure this level of interchangeability are set
`forth in Section 2 of this Characteristic.
`
`1.5.3 "Generation Interchangeability" Considerations
`
`The air transport industry desires that future evolutionary
`equipment improvements and the inclusion of additional
`functions in new equipments during the next few years do
`not violate the interwiring and form factor standards set
`forth in this document. Provisions to ensure forward-
`looking "generation interchangeability" (as best can be
`predicted) are included in this document
`to guide
`manufacturers in future developments.
`
`1.6 Integrity and Availability
`
`Since it is anticipated that this equipment may become the
`primary means of navigation on some aircraft, the utmost
`attention should be paid to the need for integrity and
`availability in all phases of system design, production, and
`installation.
`
`1.7 Regulatory Approval
`
`The equipment should meet all applicable regulatory
`requirements. This Characteristic does not and cannot set
`forth the specific requirements that an equipment must
`meet to be assured of approval. Such information must be
`obtained from the appropriate regulatory authority.
`
`1.4 Unit Description
`
`1.4.1 Flight Management Computer (FMC) Unit
`
`The Flight Management Computer (FMC) unit should
`contain all of
`the components, electronic circuitry,
`memory, etc. incident to the functioning of the system.
`The unit should also contain, as a minimum, sufficient
`data storage for all required active engine and airplane
`performance data, all navigation data required to support
`the active flight plan, and any alternate flight plan which
`may have been entered into the system. The design goal
`should be that the FMC should be capable of storing all
`data required by the system. The computer should be
`designed such that normal and abnormal power switching
`transients and other primary power interruptions as defined
`in RTCA Document DO-160 do not cause essential
`memory contents to be lost.
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`Provisions should be made in the design of the
`computer to allow for future growth of the system.
`Expanding the capabilities of the computer should be
`possible with a minimum of
`rework and at a
`minimum cost to the airline customer. Section 3.6 of
`this Characteristic describes some possible "growth
`features".
`
`1.4.2 Control/Display Unit (CDU)
`
`The CDU should provide means for manually inserting
`system control parameters and selecting modes of
`operation. In addition, it should display various computer
`outputs as well as for the verification of data entered into
`memory.
`Certain annunciations
`related to system
`operation may also be included.
`
`When the FMC is used in conjunction with an IRS and/or
`GNSS Sensor, the CDU may also be used to control this
`equipment. Series control may be employed; i.e., the
`CDU interfaces only to the FMC and all communications
`with the IRS and/or GNSS are made via the FMC/IRS
`and/or FMC/GNSS interface.
`
`NOTE: This method of series control may also be applied
`to other systems inputs, such as Omega, referred
`to in Section 3.6 of this Characteristic.
`
`1.4.3 Flight Data Storage Unit (Optional)
`
`Section deleted by Supplement 2.
`
`1.5 Interchangeability
`
`1.5.1 General
`
`One of the primary functions of an ARINC Equipment
`Characteristic is to designate,
`in addition to certain
`performance parameters, the interchangeability desired for
`aircraft equipment produced by various manufacturers.
`The degree of interchangeability considered necessary is
`specified
`in
`the
`pertinent ARINC
`Equipment
`Characteristic.
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 9
`
`

`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702 - Page 3
`
`2.0 INTERCHANGEABILITY STANDARDS
`
`2.1 Introduction
`
`2.2.2 Control/Display Unit (CDU)
`
`This section of this Characteristic sets forth the specific
`form factor, mounting provisions, interwiring, input and
`output interfaces and power supply characteristics desired
`for the complete Flight Management Computer System.
`These standards are necessary to ensure the continued
`independent design and development of both the
`equipment and the airframe installations.
`
`The CDU should be packaged as a standard dzus-mounted
`control panel 9" high by 5.75" wide. The depth behind
`the panel
`should not exceed 10.5", excluding the
`connector. A connector type M83723/72R18-31N should
`be used having pin assignments as shown in Attachment
`2. Outline drawings showing the connector location are
`included in Attachment 1B to this Characteristic. More
`details on CDU design may be found in Section 5.0.
`
`Manufacturers should note that although this Characteristic
`does not preclude the use of different form factors and
`interwiring features, the practical problem of redesigning
`what will
`then be a standard aircraft
`installation to
`accommodate some special system could very well make
`the use of that other design prohibitively expensive for the
`customer. They should recognize, therefore, the practical
`advantages of developing equipment in accordance with
`the form factor, interwiring and signal standards of this
`document.
`
`2.2 Form Factor, Connectors and Index Pin Coding
`
`2.2.1 Flight Management Computer
`
`The FMC should comply with the dimensional standards
`in ARINC Specification 600, "Air Transport Avionics
`Interfaces" for the 8 MCU form factor. The FMC should
`also comply with ARINC 600 with respect to weight,
`racking attachments,
`front and rear projections and
`cooling.
`
`As an alternative, the 4 MCU form factor may be used.
`Equipment packaged in the 4 MCU form factor should be
`designated "ARINC 702S".
`The same functional
`guidelines and interwiring apply.
`
`The FMC should be provided with a low insertion force,
`size 2 shell ARINC 600 service connector.
`This
`connector should be located on the center grid of the FMC
`rear panel, and index code 04 should be used. The top
`and center inserts of the connector (TP and MP) should
`each provide 150 socket-type contacts. The lower insert
`(BP) should provide 11 pin-type contacts and spaces for
`two small diameter coaxial contacts. Attachment 1A to
`this
`document
`shows
`the
`connector
`arrangement.
`Attachment 2 shows the pin assignments.
`
`If functions not assigned pins on the service connector in
`Attachment 2 to this document are needed to be brought
`to the "outside world" to facilitate testing the FMC, they
`should be assigned pins on an auxiliary connector whose
`type
`and location is
`selected by the
`equipment
`manufacturer. The manufacturer should refer to ARINC
`Specification 600 when choosing the location for this
`connector and note that, other than to accommodate the
`needs for equipment identification by the ATE described
`in this document, he is free to make whatever pin
`assignments he wishes. The airlines do not want the
`unassigned ("future spare") pins of the service connector
`used for functions associated solely with ATE use.
`
`NOTE: As stated in Section 1.2 of this Characteristic, a
`need exists to allow manufacturers the flexibility
`to develop FMC systems with differing levels of
`capability in an effort to reduce airline cost and
`logistic problems.
`Part of
`the system cost
`reduction may be achieved by developing a
`smaller, simpler CDU. Differing feelings exist in
`the industry concerning the relative merits of
`dedicated key versus shared function alpha-
`numeric keyboards, and also on the trade-off
`between the amount of keyboard area versus
`display area. Thus, equipment manufacturers
`may be asked by their airline customers to supply
`CDUs of less than 9" panel height. Airframe
`manufacturers, however, should design cockpits
`to accommodate CDUs of the standard 9" height.
`
`2.2.3 Optional Flight Data Storage Unit (FDSU)
`
`Section deleted by Supplement 2.
`
`2.3 Interwiring
`
`the ARINC 702 Flight
`interwiring for
`The overall
`Management Computer System is set forth in Attachment
`2. The interwiring for a given installation, however, need
`only ensure interconnection with the sub-systems chosen
`to support operation of
`the FMC system. Wiring
`associated with alternate sub-systems shown in Attachment
`2 need not be installed. Equipment manufacturers are
`cautioned not to rely on special wires, cabling or shielding
`for their particular units because they will not exist in an
`ARINC 702 installation.
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`Why Standardize Interwiring?
`
`The standardized interwiring is perhaps the heart of
`all ARINC Characteristics.
`It is this feature which
`allows
`the
`airline
`customer
`to complete his
`negotiations with the airframe manufacturer so that
`the latter can proceed with engineering and initial
`fabrication prior to airline commitment on
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 10
`
`

`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702 - Page 4
`
`2.0 INTERCHANGEABILITY STANDARDS (cont’d)
`
`2.3 Interwiring (cont’d)
`
`2.4.4 The AC Common Cold
`
`REVISED: March 22, 1982
`
`a specific source of equipment. This provides the
`equipment manufacturer with many valuable months
`in which to put the final "polish" on his equipment in
`development.
`
`The reader’s attention is directed to the interwiring
`guidance in ARINC Report 414, Section 5.0. This
`material defines all of the basic standards utilized in
`airframe wiring installations and all equipment manu-
`facturers should make themselves familiar with it.
`
`The reader’s attention is also directed to the guidance
`in Section 2.2.1 and Appendix 1 of ARINC
`Specification 429 concerning the basic standards for
`digital interfaces in airframe wiring installations.
`
`The wire connected to the FMC connector pin labelled
`"115 VAC Cold" will be grounded to the same structure
`that provides the DC chassis ground but at a separate
`ground stud. Airframe manufacturers are advised to keep
`AC ground wires as short as practicable in order to
`minimize noise pick-up and radiation.
`
`2.5 Environmental Conditions
`
`The FMC and CDU should meet the requirements of
`RTCA Document DO-160.
`Attachment 5 of
`this
`Characteristic
`tabulates
`the
`relevant
`environmental
`categories.
`
`2.5.1 Thermal Interface and Design
`
`2.4 Power Circuitry
`
`2.4.1 Primary Power Input
`
`The FMC and the CDU should be designed to use 115
`volt 400Hz single phase power from a system designed for
`Category
`(A)
`utilization
`equipment
`per ARINC
`Specification 413A.
`
`The primary power inputs to the FMC and the CDU will
`each be protected by a circuit breaker of the size shown
`in Attachment 2 to this Characteristic.
`Installation
`designers should note that the FMC circuit breaker should
`also be capable of handling the current drain of an ARINC
`603 data loader. When such a device is used with the
`FMC, it derives its power from the FMC power source.
`
`The equipment designer should be aware that severe
`switching and other transient
`interruptions to primary
`power occur during normal aircraft operations. He should
`ensure that such interruptions do not cause the computer
`to lose the contents of its memory or impose the need to
`provide an external battery to maintain operations. No
`pilot action should be needed to cause the system to return
`to normal operation following such normal power
`interruptions.
`
`NOTE: Airframe installation designers should verify that
`the aircraft power systems satisfy the primary
`power
`interruption
`criteria
`of ARINC
`Specification 413A.
`
`2.4.2 Power Control Circuitry
`
`There should be no master on/off power switching within
`the FMC system. Any user desiring on/off control should
`provide, through the medium of an external switching
`function installed in the airframe, a means of interrupting
`the primary AC power to the system.
`
`2.4.3 The Common Ground
`
`The wire connected to the FMC connector pin labelled
`"Chassis Ground" should be employed as the DC ground
`return to aircraft structure. It is not intended as a common
`return for circuits carrying heavy AC currents, and
`equipment manufacturers should design their equipment
`accordingly.
`
`2.5.1.1 FMC
`
`The FMC should be designed to utilize, and the airframe
`installation should provide, cooling air in the manner
`described in Section 3.5 of ARINC Specification 600.
`The airflow rate provided to the FMC in the aircraft
`installation should be 44 Kg per hour and the pressure
`drop of the coolant airflow through the equipment should
`be 25 ± 5 mm of water at this rate. The unit should be
`designed to expend the pressure drop in a manner to
`maximize the cooling effect within the equipment.
`Adherence to the pressure drop standard is needed to
`allow interchangeability of equipment.
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`loss of
`The FMC should be designed such that
`cooling air flow does not produce immediate failure.
`Having made this statement,
`the airlines wish to
`remind airframe manufacturers that they may not
`interpret it as a release from the need to provide
`cooling air for the FMC as specified above.
`
`2.5.1.2 CDU
`
`The internal power dissipation of the CDU should not
`exceed 92W. The CDU cooling and thermal design
`should be in accordance with ARINC Specification 408A,
`Sections 2.3, 3.6 and 3.10. These sections define case
`temperature limits, the equipment cooling method, the
`thermal appraisal procedure and expected high temperature
`exposure conditions which should be considered for the
`equipment design.
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`ARINC 408A defines the standard interface between
`the aircraft and indicators; however,
`the thermal
`interface described should also be applied to the
`CDU.
`
`2.6 Weights
`
`System manufacturers should take note of the guidance
`information on weights contained in ARINC Specification
`600.
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 11
`
`

`
`2.0 INTERCHANGEABILITY STANDARDS (cont’d)
`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702 - Page 5
`
`2.7 System Functions and Signal Characteristics
`
`A complete list of the system functions and signal
`characteristics required to ensure the desired level of
`interchangeability is set forth in Sections 3.0 and 4.0.
`
`2.8 Grounding and Bonding
`
`The attention of equipment and airframe manufacturers is
`drawn to the guidance material in Section 3.2.4 of ARINC
`Specification 600 and Appendix 2 of ARINC Specification
`404A on the subject of equipment and radio rack
`grounding and bonding.
`
`COMMENTARY
`
`A perennial problem for the airlines is the location
`and repair of airframe ground connections whose
`resistances have risen as the airframe aged. A high
`resistance ground usually manifests itself as a system
`problem that
`resists
`all usual
`approaches
`to
`rectification, and invariably consumes a wholly
`unreasonable amount of time and effort on the part of
`maintenance
`personnel
`to
`fix.
`Airframe
`manufacturers are urged,
`therefore,
`to pay close
`attention to assuring the longevity of ground
`connections.
`
`BOEING
`Ex. 1016, p. 12
`
`

`
`ARINC CHARACTERISTIC 702 - Page 6
`
`3.0 SYSTEM DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
`
`REVISED: June 10, 1994
`
`3.1 System Configurations
`
`Three different configurations of the ARINC 702 Flight
`Management Computer System illustrated in Attachment
`3 to this Characteristic are described in this section. The
`FMC is
`expected
`to
`be
`capable
`of
`operating
`interchangeably in all three.
`
`3.1.1 Single System Configuration
`
`In this configuration, the FMC accepts inputs from one,
`two or three ARINC 704 IRS or ARINC 705 AHRS, one
`or two ARINC 743A GNSS Sensors, two each ARINC
`706 Air Data System, ARINC 711 VOR, and ARINC 709
`DME and one ARINC 710 ILS to compute the lateral and
`vertical navigation functions.
`
`Inputs of fuel quantity, fuel flow and engine and airplane
`configuration parameters and inputs from the thrust control
`computer combined with the air data inputs are used to
`compute the performance data and fuel management
`display or control outputs. Initial condition inputs may be
`inserted manually via the CDU or automatically from
`airplane sensor systems.
`
`3.2 Basic System Functions
`
`3.2.1 Performance Management
`
`3.2.1.1 General
`
`The Flight Management Computer should have the
`capability to calculate parameters for display or control
`purposes, compute the flight profiles and provide the
`guidance outputs for airplane performance in all phases of
`flight,
`including climb, cruise, holding, and descent.
`These computations may be optimized based on such
`criteria as: minimum trip fuel, minimum trip cost,
`minimum trip time, maximum rate of climb or descent,
`maximum angle of climb or descent and maximum
`holding endurance, either singly or in combination. The
`FMC may also provide data for turbulence penetration and
`engine-out conditions. These functions will be integrated
`with the flight planning function of the FMC (see Section
`3.3.2 of
`this Characteristic). All performance data
`computations may be modified according to the Cost
`Index function defined in Section 3.4.1.2.6 of
`this
`document.
`
`3.1.2 Single System/Dual CDU Configuration
`
`3.2.1.2 Performance Data Base
`
`In this configuration, the interface is the same as for the
`single system, with the addition of a second CDU. Both
`CDUs will have the capability of
`requesting and
`displaying data independently, and simultaneously on a
`time shared basis.
`
`NOTE: The question of which CDU is in command,
`particularly when changing data related to the
`engaged mode or active leg is one which requires
`study. Control authority may be delegated by
`means of a cockpit mounted switch or by
`software determination through keyboard action.
`Manufacturers are urged to review the thoughts
`of airlines and airframe manufacturers on this
`subject before a design decision is made. Most
`airlines will not want the switch, but for those
`that do, a discrete has been reserved for this
`function and is defined in Section 4.3.2.2 of this
`Characteristic.
`
`3.1.3 Dual System Configuration
`
`The basic interface for each FMC is the same in the dual
`config

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket