throbber
·1· · · · · UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·3
`
`·4
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · THE BOEING COMPANY
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · Petitioner
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · v.
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · ·SEYMOUR LEVINE
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · ·Patent Owner
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12· · · · · · · · · · Case No. IPR2015-01341
`
`13· · · · · · · · · ·U.S. Patent No. RE39,618
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17· ·DEPOSITION OF:
`
`18· · · · · · · · · · · · SEYMOUR LEVINE
`
`19· · · · · · · · · · THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2016
`
`20· · · · · · · · · · · · · 9:56 A.M.
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23· ·REPORTED BY:
`
`24· · · · · · · · · ·SUSAN NELSON
`
`25· · · · · · · · · ·C.S.R. No. 3202
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 1 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·Deposition of SEYMOUR LEVINE, the witness, taken on
`
`·2· ·behalf of the petitioner, commencing at 9:56 A.M., on
`
`·3· ·THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2016, at 355 South Grand Avenue,
`
`·4· ·Los Angeles, California, before SUSAN NELSON, C.S.R.
`
`·5· ·No. 3202.
`
`·6
`
`·7· ·APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
`
`·8
`
`·9· ·FOR PETITIONER:
`
`10· · · · · · MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
`
`11· · · · · · BY:· TED G. DANE, ESQ.
`
`12· · · · · · 355 South Grand Avenue
`
`13· · · · · · 35th Floor
`
`14· · · · · · Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
`
`15· · · · · · (213) 683-9288
`
`16
`
`17· ·FOR THE PATENT OWNER:
`
`18· · · · · · QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`19· · · · · · BY:· BRUCE R. ZISSER, ESQ.
`
`20· · · · · · 865 South Figueroa Street
`
`21· · · · · · 10th Floor
`
`22· · · · · · Los Angeles, California 90017
`
`23· · · · · · (213) 443-3434
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 2 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X
`
`·2· ·WITNESS· · · · ·EXAMINATION· · · · ·PAGE
`
`·3· ·SEYMOUR LEVINE
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · ·By Mr. Dane· · · · ·5, 128
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · ·(P.M. Session)· · · 75
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · ·By Mr. Zisser· · · ·125
`
`·7
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · ·E X H I B I T S
`
`·9· ·NO.· · · · · · ·PAGE· · · DESCRIPTION
`
`10· ·Exhibit 1043· · 25· · · · 5/6/18/96 Handwritten Notes
`
`11· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Levine Ex. 2002
`
`12· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·(LEV004229-4233)
`
`13· ·Exhibit 2013· · 126· · · ·09/16/96 Remote Flight
`
`14· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Recorder and Timely Aircraft
`
`15· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Advisory System, RAFTS,
`
`16· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Abstract
`
`17· · · · · · · · ·PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
`18· ·NO.· · · · · · ·PAGE· · · DESCRIPTION
`
`19· ·Exhibit 1001· · 54· · · · Patent Number US RE39,618
`
`20· ·Exhibit 2002· · 19· · · · 5/18/96 Handwritten Notes
`
`21· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·(LEV004229-4237)
`
`22· ·Exhibit 2003· · 34· · · · 10/09/96 Remote Flight
`
`23· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Recorder and Timely Aircraft
`
`24· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Advisory System, RAFTS,
`
`25· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Abstract
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 3 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · · · · · ·PREVIOUSLY MARKED EXHIBITS
`
`·2· ·NO.· · · · · · ·PAGE· · · DESCRIPTION
`
`·3· ·Exhibit 2004· · 51· · · · 10/23/96 Remote Flight
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Recorder and Timely Aircraft
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Advisory System, RAFTS,
`
`·6· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Abstract
`
`·7· ·Exhibit 2008· · 53· · · · 11/19/96 Document to
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·Mr. Levine from Mr. Townsley
`
`·9· ·Exhibit 2009· · 18· · · · Declaration of Seymour Levine
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 4 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · · · · · · LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA;
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · ·THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2016;
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · · · · ·9:56 A.M.
`
`·4
`
`·5· · · · · · · · · · · ·SEYMOUR LEVINE,
`
`·6· · · · · · · having been first duly sworn, was
`
`·7· · · · · · · examined and testified as follows:
`
`·8
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · EXAMINATION
`
`10
`
`11· ·BY MR. DANE:
`
`12· · · · Q.· Good morning, Mr. Levine.
`
`13· · · · A.· Good morning.
`
`14· · · · Q.· Could you please state your name for the
`
`15· ·record for me.
`
`16· · · · A.· My name is Seymour Levine.· S-e-y-m-o-u-r,
`
`17· ·last name Levine, L-e-v-i-n-e.
`
`18· · · · Q.· And have you ever been deposed before?
`
`19· · · · A.· No.
`
`20· · · · Q.· Have you had a chance to discuss deposition
`
`21· ·procedures with your counsel?
`
`22· · · · A.· Yes, a little bit.
`
`23· · · · Q.· Okay.· Let me just go over a couple of the
`
`24· ·basics.· So I will be asking you questions, as you
`
`25· ·know, during the day.· I would ask that you please
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 5 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·listen carefully to my questions and if you don't
`
`·2· ·understand any of my questions, please let me know.
`
`·3· ·I'll try to clarify the question and make it clearer to
`
`·4· ·you.
`
`·5· · · · · · Also, please wait until I complete my question
`
`·6· ·before you answer.· This is a somewhat artificial
`
`·7· ·process.· It's not like a normal conversation.· You may
`
`·8· ·know exactly where I'm going with my question and may
`
`·9· ·want to go ahead and answer it, but that makes for a
`
`10· ·confusing record for the court reporter.
`
`11· · · · · · So if you can wait until I complete the
`
`12· ·question before you give your answer, and I'll extend
`
`13· ·you the same courtesy, and I'll do my best not to
`
`14· ·interrupt any of your answers.
`
`15· · · · · · Is that okay?
`
`16· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q.· At any point during the deposition, if you
`
`18· ·would like to take a break, just let me know and we can
`
`19· ·do that.· The only exception I would add is that if
`
`20· ·I've asked you a question that you have not yet
`
`21· ·answered, I would ask that you complete your answer
`
`22· ·before you take a break unless there's some matter of
`
`23· ·confidentiality or privilege that you feel that you
`
`24· ·need to talk to your lawyer about.· Okay?
`
`25· · · · A.· (Nods head.)
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 6 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · Q.· Is there any reason that you cannot provide
`
`·2· ·your best testimony today?
`
`·3· · · · A.· No.
`
`·4· · · · Q.· Okay.· If you could briefly, sir, describe for
`
`·5· ·me your educational history, beginning with college.
`
`·6· · · · A.· Okay.· I went to high school at night. I
`
`·7· ·graduated New York University Engineering School at
`
`·8· ·night, and I graduated Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute
`
`·9· ·for my graduate degrees.
`
`10· · · · Q.· And what were your graduate degrees?
`
`11· · · · A.· Master of science in electrical engineering,
`
`12· ·systems engineering.
`
`13· · · · Q.· And what year did you obtain those degrees?
`
`14· · · · A.· I think I got my degrees '96.· And, I don't
`
`15· ·know, '58, I guess, '59 was my bachelor's.
`
`16· · · · Q.· Okay.· '96 for the master's?
`
`17· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`18· · · · Q.· And can you review your employment history
`
`19· ·beginning post college?
`
`20· · · · A.· I don't remember all, but I was with a company
`
`21· ·called Sperry Gyroscope and I was with them for
`
`22· ·21 years approximately.
`
`23· · · · · · And, after that, I was with Litton Industries,
`
`24· ·okay, out here in California for about six years.
`
`25· · · · · · And after that, I was with Northrop,
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 7 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·electronic systems division, and I was with them for
`
`·2· ·ten years.
`
`·3· · · · · · And subsequent to that, I taught high school
`
`·4· ·at Los Angeles High School in the science department.
`
`·5· ·And I also taught a little bit at Western Lake College
`
`·6· ·and ITT.· Okay?
`
`·7· · · · · · I left Northrop in '95.· I think that's
`
`·8· ·correct.· That's what I believe.
`
`·9· · · · Q.· So working backwards, were you at Litton
`
`10· ·immediately prior to Northrop, so 1979 to '85
`
`11· ·approximately?
`
`12· · · · A.· Something like that, yeah.· It goes from --
`
`13· ·Northrop was -- I left in June of '95 and therefore
`
`14· ·I -- ten years prior to that, I was at Litton for six
`
`15· ·years.
`
`16· · · · Q.· And did you work at Sperry immediately prior
`
`17· ·to working at Litton, so late fifties to '79?
`
`18· · · · A.· Yeah.· Oh, yeah.
`
`19· · · · Q.· And what jobs did you hold at Sperry?
`
`20· · · · A.· I was senior research section head.
`
`21· · · · Q.· In any particular department?
`
`22· · · · A.· Guidance, inertial guidance.
`
`23· · · · Q.· And was that for the entire 21 years?
`
`24· · · · A.· Pretty much so.
`
`25· · · · Q.· And what were your responsibilities as senior
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 8 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·research section head?
`
`·2· · · · A.· I had a group of engineers working for me.
`
`·3· ·Designed the navigation system for the Polara
`
`·4· ·submarine.· Defined something called the north fighting
`
`·5· ·module which went on a lot of tanks and all that --
`
`·6· ·things.
`
`·7· · · · · · I did the guidance system for the Ethan Allen
`
`·8· ·submarine, which was the one used in the book The Hunt
`
`·9· ·for Red October.· It was very neat.· But I did the real
`
`10· ·one.
`
`11· · · · Q.· Any work involving avionics during the time
`
`12· ·that you were at Sperry?
`
`13· · · · A.· Yes.· I did the first inertial system for
`
`14· ·commercial navigation.· It was called the SGN-10.
`
`15· · · · Q.· And when you say you did that, did you design
`
`16· ·it?
`
`17· · · · A.· I have -- yeah, I have a patent on that.
`
`18· ·While I was a research section head.
`
`19· · · · Q.· And did Sperry then commercialize that system?
`
`20· · · · A.· Yes, it was a commercial system.
`
`21· · · · Q.· Was there a name given to it?
`
`22· · · · A.· The SGN-10.
`
`23· · · · Q.· I'm sorry.
`
`24· · · · A.· It went on a Pan Am plane, Pan American.· 707.
`
`25· · · · Q.· And was that the only -- was that the one
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 9 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·avionics project that you had at Sperry or were there
`
`·2· ·any others?
`
`·3· · · · A.· I don't recall, but I think that was the only
`
`·4· ·avionics one.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· Okay.· Let's turn to Litton.· What were your
`
`·6· ·jobs at Litton?
`
`·7· · · · A.· I got hired as a dep- -- well, trying to think
`
`·8· ·of what it was.· I'm not sure.· Section head or some --
`
`·9· ·oh, director -- I got hired as director.· They -- there
`
`10· ·was a gyro compass that I worked on at -- for a land
`
`11· ·compass for -- at Sperry, and then they had a marine
`
`12· ·problem, which is ships, the problem, and they
`
`13· ·recruited me to come out because they were -- and had
`
`14· ·this contract and they were having problems with their
`
`15· ·inertial system.
`
`16· · · · · · So two things in there.· One was the marine
`
`17· ·compass and everything and they just want the tide
`
`18· ·compasses, land compasses, so they were -- but the real
`
`19· ·thing was they had a problem with the marine compass
`
`20· ·that they had.
`
`21· · · · Q.· You said you were hired as a director.
`
`22· ·Director of what group or department?
`
`23· · · · A.· I don't remember exactly, but later on, it
`
`24· ·became director of support equipment.· But I wasn't --
`
`25· ·I didn't go there originally for support equipment.· It
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 10 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·was for this problem that they had.· They hired me,
`
`·2· ·recruited me, paid my way to California.
`
`·3· · · · Q.· Did you do any work involving avionics during
`
`·4· ·the time you were at Litton?
`
`·5· · · · A.· I'm trying to think.· Not anything major,
`
`·6· ·nothing.
`
`·7· · · · Q.· Can you describe the positions that you held
`
`·8· ·at Northrop?
`
`·9· · · · A.· I came in as a research engineer, senior
`
`10· ·research engineer.· And then I advanced to program
`
`11· ·manager for the B-2 stealth bomber and then to chief
`
`12· ·engineer of the electronics division.
`
`13· · · · Q.· Okay.· Starting out with your work as a
`
`14· ·research -- senior research engineer, what were your
`
`15· ·job responsibilities as senior research engineer?
`
`16· · · · A.· I got hired primarily for the B-2 stealth
`
`17· ·guidance system, which was being built, and it was
`
`18· ·designed and they -- they probably needed help in that
`
`19· ·area.
`
`20· · · · Q.· And so was your work related to the guidance
`
`21· ·system, essentially further design and development of
`
`22· ·the system?
`
`23· · · · A.· Yes.· It was a stellar inertial.
`
`24· · · · Q.· And what is a stellar inertial guidance
`
`25· ·system?
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 11 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · A.· Well, it's a star tracker.· The B-2 didn't
`
`·2· ·want to depend on radio waves.· So, to get accuracy,
`
`·3· ·the plane could look at the stars and update the
`
`·4· ·inertial system with the stars, which is no different
`
`·5· ·than what the Polara system did.
`
`·6· · · · Q.· And what were your responsibilities as the
`
`·7· ·chief engineer of the electronics division at Northrop?
`
`·8· · · · A.· Oh, it was a lot of different things.· It
`
`·9· ·covered the gamut of guidance.· Okay?· But Northrop
`
`10· ·had, I guess, decided to close the Palos Verdes
`
`11· ·research center, so several really well-qualified
`
`12· ·research engineers at Palos Verdes were assigned to me.
`
`13· ·And what we did is laser work for a whole bunch of
`
`14· ·different types of programs, holographic memories and
`
`15· ·guidance.· So I still had some responsibility for
`
`16· ·making sure the guidance system for the B-2 worked.
`
`17· · · · · · Oh, also Peacekeeper, which was a missile
`
`18· ·system which was a guidance system that Northrop had.
`
`19· ·Missile system.
`
`20· · · · Q.· And can you break down for me for the ten
`
`21· ·years that you were at Northrop what period of time you
`
`22· ·held these different positions, senior research
`
`23· ·engineer working on the B-2 stealth bomber and then --
`
`24· · · · A.· Probably even --
`
`25· · · · Q.· -- the chief engineer?
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 12 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · A.· -- about three years apiece.
`
`·2· · · · · · THE REPORTER:· I'm sorry.· Say again.
`
`·3· ·"Probably"?
`
`·4· · · · · · THE WITNESS:· Probably even, about three years
`
`·5· ·apiece.
`
`·6· ·BY MR. DANE:
`
`·7· · · · Q.· That's an example of where, if you can, if you
`
`·8· ·can wait till I finish the question just to make it
`
`·9· ·easier on the court reporter.
`
`10· · · · A.· Oh, yes.· No, that's fine.· Yeah, it's my
`
`11· ·fault.
`
`12· · · · Q.· Did you do any work on commercial avionics
`
`13· ·during the time that you were at Northrop?
`
`14· · · · A.· No.
`
`15· · · · Q.· Did you do any work related to aircraft
`
`16· ·maintenance during the time that you were at Northrop?
`
`17· · · · A.· No.
`
`18· · · · Q.· Are you familiar with ARINC?
`
`19· · · · A.· A little bit.
`
`20· · · · Q.· What is your understanding of ARINC?
`
`21· · · · A.· It's a group of people that get together and
`
`22· ·write specs for commercial airlines.
`
`23· · · · Q.· And, more specifically, do you understand that
`
`24· ·those are specs that relate to commercial airlines
`
`25· ·communication systems?
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 13 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · A.· Relates to a lot of things.
`
`·2· · · · Q.· Including aeronautical communication systems?
`
`·3· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`·4· · · · Q.· And do you understand that ARINC also develops
`
`·5· ·standards related to aeronautical communication
`
`·6· ·systems?
`
`·7· · · · A.· Some of them.
`
`·8· · · · Q.· During your work at Northrop, did you have any
`
`·9· ·occasion to work with any of the ARINC standards?
`
`10· · · · A.· No.· My work at Sperry where I did the
`
`11· ·commercial inertial, then I had things where ARINC
`
`12· ·didn't have specs for inertial at all.· It came out of
`
`13· ·Pan Am.· And during that particular time, ARINC
`
`14· ·contacted me and wanted to have specs because they sort
`
`15· ·of -- Boeing didn't believe inertial would work.· Okay?
`
`16· ·But Pan Am believed it, and Pan Am wanted to have
`
`17· ·inertial systems to get rid of the navigator.
`
`18· · · · · · There used to be three pilots aboard a plane,
`
`19· ·one of which was a navigator.· And they advertised and
`
`20· ·they worked on it -- Boeing, you know, including --
`
`21· ·said that the man navigator is much, much better than
`
`22· ·gyro navigator, inertial navigator.· But Pan Am wanted
`
`23· ·to get rid of that extra pilot position.· And they made
`
`24· ·a deal with the navigator that if inertial system was
`
`25· ·put on, he would get paid whether he would -- and that
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 14 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·pushed it through.· But up to that time, the propaganda
`
`·2· ·was the navigator makes it safer, but it turns out the
`
`·3· ·inertial system is much safer than the navigator.
`
`·4· · · · Q.· Do you recall approximately when it was that
`
`·5· ·Pan Am contacted you about -- I'm sorry -- that ARINC
`
`·6· ·contacted you about possible standards for an inertial
`
`·7· ·navigation system?
`
`·8· · · · A.· Oh, it's a long time ago.· I think it's
`
`·9· ·about -- I don't remember when the SE antenna was
`
`10· ·developed.· Yeah, I'm not sure.· It's prior to going to
`
`11· ·Litton, so it's in the fifties, early sixties, 1960s.
`
`12· ·Something like that.
`
`13· · · · · · Then one of the engineers working for me
`
`14· ·eventually went to Boeing and he contacted me and he
`
`15· ·said, "Can I use the spec?"· Because Boeing now
`
`16· ·believed in inertial systems.
`
`17· · · · · · And I told him, "Sure, there's no problem with
`
`18· ·the spec."
`
`19· · · · · · So it's in the early -- it's in the early
`
`20· ·sixties, I would guess.
`
`21· · · · Q.· Was there ever a standard that was developed
`
`22· ·out of your work on the inertial navigation systems?
`
`23· · · · A.· What do you mean?
`
`24· · · · Q.· Was there an ARINC standard --
`
`25· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 15 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · Q.· -- or any other industry standard?
`
`·2· · · · A.· Oh, yeah.· Both Boeing and ARINC took the spec
`
`·3· ·that we had, and we had no problem with that, so there
`
`·4· ·was no -- no issue.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· Okay.· Was that also in the 1960s time period?
`
`·6· · · · A.· Yeah, it's the end of -- I'd have to take a
`
`·7· ·look.· It was -- it's close to the end of my
`
`·8· ·employment.
`
`·9· · · · · · The inertial system was finished and it was on
`
`10· ·to these tank systems.· So that was in that period of
`
`11· ·time, sometime in the sixties, early sixties.· But
`
`12· ·there was no spec like that.
`
`13· · · · · · They -- basically, Boeing and ARINC didn't
`
`14· ·believe in inertial system.· And somehow Pan Am got
`
`15· ·into it and they put out this spec they -- that they
`
`16· ·wanted an inertial system and Sperry won that inertial
`
`17· ·system.· So when they won the inertial system, the
`
`18· ·first thing that people do is write a spec so you can
`
`19· ·start doing work.
`
`20· · · · · · And when it proved -- when it got -- when the
`
`21· ·FAA certified the system, then they were all
`
`22· ·interested.· Boeing was interested in the other thing,
`
`23· ·and that's how it came about.
`
`24· · · · Q.· Are you familiar with ACARS?
`
`25· · · · A.· A little bit.
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 16 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · Q.· And what is your understanding of what ACARS
`
`·2· ·is?
`
`·3· · · · A.· I don't know exactly.· It's -- I don't know
`
`·4· ·what the whole thing on ACARS is.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· Do you understand it to be a data link system
`
`·6· ·for transmitting messages from an aircraft to a --
`
`·7· · · · A.· It's a --
`
`·8· · · · Q.· -- ground station?
`
`·9· · · · A.· Yeah, it's -- ACARS is a communication system.
`
`10· · · · Q.· Did you have any work involving ACARS during
`
`11· ·any of the jobs --
`
`12· · · · A.· No.
`
`13· · · · Q.· -- that you had in avionics?
`
`14· · · · A.· No.
`
`15· · · · Q.· Do you know who developed ACARS?
`
`16· · · · A.· I'm not familiar, but it comes out of ARINC
`
`17· ·and the people there.
`
`18· · · · Q.· Do you have any understanding of when the
`
`19· ·first ACARS protocol was developed?
`
`20· · · · A.· No.
`
`21· · · · Q.· Do you recall it being roughly in the
`
`22· ·seventies?
`
`23· · · · A.· I don't recall much about it.
`
`24· · · · Q.· Okay.· I'm going to ask you some questions
`
`25· ·about the declaration you gave in the case.· Let me get
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 17 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·that for you.· And this is Exhibit 2009.
`
`·2· · · · · · · · (The document referred to was
`
`·3· · · · · · marked as previously Exhibit 2009.)
`
`·4· ·BY MR. DANE:
`
`·5· · · · Q.· Mr. Levine, I've handed you a document
`
`·6· ·entitled "Declaration of Seymour Levine in Support of
`
`·7· ·Patent Owner's Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Section
`
`·8· ·42.120."
`
`·9· · · · · · And I'll ask you if you recognize this
`
`10· ·document?
`
`11· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`12· · · · Q.· And is this a declaration that you prepared?
`
`13· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`14· · · · Q.· And if you look at the third page, there's a
`
`15· ·signature.· Is that your signature?
`
`16· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`17· · · · Q.· Okay.· I just want to go through some of the
`
`18· ·statements that you have and ask you some questions
`
`19· ·about them.
`
`20· · · · · · And first asking about paragraph 2.· The first
`
`21· ·sentence there says:
`
`22· · · · · · · · "On or before May 18th, 1996, I
`
`23· · · · · · conceived, in the United States, of
`
`24· · · · · · the inventions disclosed and claimed
`
`25· · · · · · in U.S. Patent RE 39,618."
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 18 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · · · Do you see that?
`
`·2· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`·3· · · · Q.· And is it okay with you if during the course
`
`·4· ·of the day if I refer to your patent as the '618 patent
`
`·5· ·just as an abbreviation?
`
`·6· · · · A.· That's fine.
`
`·7· · · · Q.· Okay.· You go on to say:
`
`·8· · · · · · · · "I recorded the details of my
`
`·9· · · · · · invention in contemporaneous
`
`10· · · · · · handwritten notes, true and correct
`
`11· · · · · · copies of which are contained in
`
`12· · · · · · Exhibit 2002."
`
`13· · · · · · I just want to give you those notes.
`
`14· · · · A.· Thank you.
`
`15· · · · · · · · (The document referred to was
`
`16· · · · · · marked as previously Exhibit 2002.)
`
`17· ·BY MR. DANE:
`
`18· · · · Q.· So, first of all, in the declaration you
`
`19· ·indicate that you conceived of your invention on or
`
`20· ·before May 18th, 1996.· And what I wanted to ask you
`
`21· ·is, is Exhibit 2002, which bears the date May 18th,
`
`22· ·1996, is this the first written document that you have
`
`23· ·that includes a description of your invention?
`
`24· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`25· · · · Q.· Okay.
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 19 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · A.· I thought about it, the one prior to that, but
`
`·2· ·I -- going in my head, but I decided to write it down.
`
`·3· ·And this is the first written document.
`
`·4· · · · Q.· Okay.· And at this time, had you left
`
`·5· ·Northrop?· Were he no longer employed by Northrop at
`
`·6· ·the time?
`
`·7· · · · A.· Yes, this is -- oh, I left Northrop in 6/95.
`
`·8· ·June of '95.
`
`·9· · · · Q.· So were you teaching high school at this time?
`
`10· · · · A.· I was -- I started high school about -- I had
`
`11· ·to get some teaching credentials and stuff like that.
`
`12· ·I started high school about a year or so later than
`
`13· ·this.· So during that time, I was retired.
`
`14· · · · Q.· Okay.· Let me just ask you generally, how did
`
`15· ·it come to be that you came up with the idea for this
`
`16· ·invention?
`
`17· · · · A.· I had one of these super engineers that were
`
`18· ·in the Palos Verdes report to me.· His name was Dave
`
`19· ·Garber.· And I had a work assignment from people
`
`20· ·request -- from Rolling Meadows, Chicago, for a
`
`21· ·software engineer temporarily.· And I asked this
`
`22· ·engineer, who was a software engineer, would he like to
`
`23· ·go to that at least for a few weeks.· And he said he'd
`
`24· ·like to go.· He said it would be okay with him.
`
`25· · · · · · So I sent Dave Garber to Chicago and then Dave
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 20 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·Garber, for whatever reason -- okay.· I know the
`
`·2· ·reason.· He wanted to visit his mother on his birthday.
`
`·3· ·He didn't tell his mother that he was coming.· And he
`
`·4· ·took an airplane, a 737, and he died in the Aliquippa
`
`·5· ·crash.· Okay.
`
`·6· · · · · · And when he died in the Aliquippa crash,
`
`·7· ·Boeing was saying air turbulence between the planes.
`
`·8· ·And I had people -- I don't remember the contract which
`
`·9· ·was -- had laser -- turbulence sensors, and it didn't
`
`10· ·make any sense to me at all on the Aliquippa crash.
`
`11· ·And that was 1994.
`
`12· · · · · · And he decided, once again, to visit his
`
`13· ·parents, not telling them, to go from Chicago to
`
`14· ·Pittsburgh.· Everybody was wondering where's Dave when
`
`15· ·he came back.· He died in that crash.· That was the
`
`16· ·rudder problem.· But I didn't -- nobody knew the rudder
`
`17· ·problem.· They were saying air turbulence.· And I
`
`18· ·looked at the thing and it looked like several crashes,
`
`19· ·fatal crashes.
`
`20· · · · · · And I called the FAA.· And they said, "Oh, no,
`
`21· ·Boeing has it.· It's air turbulence."
`
`22· · · · · · I said, "It doesn't make sense to me."
`
`23· · · · · · And then I called the NTSB and they said, "Oh,
`
`24· ·no, Boeing is there.· They've got a big program going
`
`25· ·on it."· But it didn't make sense to me.· And I had to
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 21 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·tell them it didn't make sense, but they said they were
`
`·2· ·working on it, and that's it.
`
`·3· · · · · · When the investigation started to develop,
`
`·4· ·they found that -- eventually, that it was a rudder
`
`·5· ·problem.· And the whole thing didn't make any sense to
`
`·6· ·me.
`
`·7· · · · · · Here's multiple fatal crashes and the system
`
`·8· ·didn't work right.· So that's -- so I said when I
`
`·9· ·retired, I never had any anybody die from me.· I've had
`
`10· ·people, all sorts of things, but never had -- so when I
`
`11· ·retired and they offered me a retirement package and
`
`12· ·everything like that, I thought when I get some time, I
`
`13· ·want to look into this whole thing of avionics.· I was
`
`14· ·always trained as a systems engineer.
`
`15· · · · · · And then sometime in '96, 1996, around -- I
`
`16· ·guess around June of 1996, I sat down and tried to
`
`17· ·think about what's going on here.
`
`18· · · · · · And then I came up to the conclusion, part of
`
`19· ·the thing is there was no data and they had no data.
`
`20· ·And they have flight recorders and -- that record data
`
`21· ·as well as a different one that record voice.· And I
`
`22· ·said the flight recorder should be on the ground,
`
`23· ·telemeter to the ground.· They should be -- if you want
`
`24· ·to keep a flight recorder on a plane, that's fine, but
`
`25· ·the data should be on the ground.· You shouldn't have
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 22 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·to look for flight recorders.
`
`·2· · · · · · So the first thing came out, and I put
`
`·3· ·together in this document here (indicating), a remote
`
`·4· ·flight recorder, which still is in existence right now.
`
`·5· ·There's no remote flight recorder.· To me, that's a
`
`·6· ·sin.
`
`·7· · · · · · But that said, the work here is really devoted
`
`·8· ·to this fellow Dave Garber.
`
`·9· · · · · · And I just spoke in Orange County at the
`
`10· ·American Institute of Aeronautical Engineers on
`
`11· ·something to prevent that type of stuff.
`
`12· · · · Q.· Was there ever a determination by the FAA that
`
`13· ·the rudder was the problem for that particular crash?
`
`14· · · · A.· Oh, yeah.· They fixed them.· 737 is a much
`
`15· ·safer plane.· It's pretty safe now.· But, meanwhile,
`
`16· ·there were several fatal crashes that -- at least a
`
`17· ·couple of them should have easily been prevented.· In
`
`18· ·my opinion.
`
`19· · · · Q.· Okay.· Let me ask you, with regard to the
`
`20· ·notes that are marked as Exhibit 2002, is this your
`
`21· ·handwriting?
`
`22· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`23· · · · Q.· And did you draw these figures that appear in
`
`24· ·this?
`
`25· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 23 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · Q.· And so if we look at the second page, up at
`
`·2· ·the top, there's a date of May 23rd, 1996.
`
`·3· · · · · · Do you see that?
`
`·4· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`·5· · · · Q.· And was that the date at which you prepared
`
`·6· ·this figure?
`
`·7· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`·8· · · · Q.· And if we go over to the following page.
`
`·9· · · · A.· I think the pages are out of order.· You'll
`
`10· ·see page numbers on the top, so what page number do you
`
`11· ·want to go on?
`
`12· · · · Q.· Oh, yeah, fair enough.
`
`13· · · · · · So this is -- so the next page in the document
`
`14· ·is -- looks like it's page 4?
`
`15· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`16· · · · Q.· And what's the date there?
`
`17· · · · A.· May 18th, 1996.
`
`18· · · · Q.· Okay.· And is that your name --
`
`19· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`20· · · · Q.· -- signed above that?
`
`21· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`22· · · · Q.· And the following page in the exhibit, which
`
`23· ·bears number 3, that's also May 18th, 1996?
`
`24· · · · A.· Correct.
`
`25· · · · Q.· And that's also your signature?
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 24 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`·2· · · · Q.· And turning to the next page in the exhibit,
`
`·3· ·which bears page 9, is that May 20th, 1996?
`
`·4· · · · A.· I think it's 28th, 1996.· I don't remember
`
`·5· ·what --
`
`·6· · · · Q.· And is that also the date for the following
`
`·7· ·page in the exhibit, which bears page number 7 in the
`
`·8· ·upper right corner?
`
`·9· · · · A.· Yes.
`
`10· · · · Q.· And also for the next page, which bears
`
`11· ·page 8?
`
`12· · · · A.· Correct.
`
`13· · · · Q.· And, lastly, also for the next page in the
`
`14· ·exhibit, which bears page 5?
`
`15· · · · A.· No, that says 5/27.
`
`16· · · · Q.· Oh, sorry.· Thank you.
`
`17· · · · A.· Is it all right if I take the document apart
`
`18· ·and put them in page order?· I could leave it the way
`
`19· ·it is if you tell me the page.
`
`20· · · · Q.· But, yeah, we can do that.· Why don't we -- I
`
`21· ·have an extra one.· Let me give it to you.· Leave that
`
`22· ·one as it is because that will be the already-marked
`
`23· ·exhibit.· We'll create a new exhibit.
`
`24· · · · · · Let's mark this 1043.
`
`25· · · · · · · · (The document referred to was
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 25 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · · · marked as Exhibit 1043.)
`
`·2· ·BY MR. DANE:
`
`·3· · · · Q.· Okay.· I'll hand you what's been marked as
`
`·4· ·1043, Mr. Levine.· I tried to put these in order.· And
`
`·5· ·you can look through to see if I've done that
`
`·6· ·correctly.· It looks like we're missing page 6, but,
`
`·7· ·otherwise, I think it should be in order.
`
`·8· · · · A.· Yes, it looks in order.
`
`·9· · · · Q.· Okay.· So in this May document prepared at
`
`10· ·various points in May of 1996, did you discuss anywhere
`
`11· ·as part of your invention the use of GPS data or
`
`12· ·inertial navigation of data?
`
`13· · · · A.· I think it's in here.
`
`14· · · · Q.· Okay.
`
`15· · · · A.· But it may not be easy for you to read.
`
`16· · · · Q.· If it is, if you could point it out.
`
`17· · · · A.· If you go to page 5, it says the sensors "S1
`
`18· ·to SN."· See it there?
`
`19· · · · Q.· No.
`
`20· · · · A.· Look at the picture, under "RFRT."
`
`21· · · · Q.· Okay.
`
`22· · · · A.· Okay.· That would include inertial data
`
`23· ·because of the sensors aboard the plane, the inertial
`
`24· ·is providing the roll, pitch, and heading, and position
`
`25· ·for the navigator for a commercial nav.
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 26 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· · · · · · Then if you look at the bottom one, it says
`
`·2· ·"PI," aircraft position.· That's not a sensor on the
`
`·3· ·plane.· That's receiving information.· So that's where
`
`·4· ·what you'd call GPS would come in.
`
`·5· · · · · · Then if you go to the next page, page 7, on
`
`·6· ·the bottom, in the first paragraph to the bottom, it
`
`·7· ·says:
`
`·8· · · · · · · · "Position is used such as GPS
`
`·9· · · · · · global positioning satellite aircraft
`
`10· · · · · · frames acceptance" --
`
`11· · · · Q.· Excuse me.· I'm sorry.· I'm sorry.· If you
`
`12· ·could just slow down a second and direct me to where
`
`13· ·you're reading from?
`
`14· · · · A.· Go to the bottom of the paragraph, "when radio
`
`15· ·position is used."· Can you see it on the bottom?· Over
`
`16· ·here (indicating).
`
`17· · · · Q.· Oh, got it.· Okay.
`
`18· · · · A.· Okay.· So there it is.
`
`19· · · · · · And you got to remember that GPS has a lot of
`
`20· ·different names and it's really radio position
`
`21· ·satellite.· The Navy used to use Transit, which was a
`
`22· ·satellite nav system, and now there's a Russian system
`
`23· ·and a Chinese system and all that other stuff.· So it's
`
`24· ·a radio position thing I gave you such as GPS, which is
`
`25· ·another name for the same thing, and it gets really
`
`BOEING Exhibit 1043
`Page 27 of 161
`
`

`
`·1· ·high performance.· So there it is.
`
`·2· · · · · · So you could augment an inertial system with
`
`·3· ·external positioning, and on the B-2, it would be
`
`·4· ·stellar.· But on a commercial plane, it's got to be
`
`·5· ·radio position.· They don't use stellar.
`
`·6· · · · Q.· If we could go back to the page 7 that you've
`
`·7· ·started to read from.· Just for the record, if you
`
`·8· ·could read the whole sentence that begins "when radio
`
`·9· ·position is used."
`
`10· · · · A.· · · "When radio position is used,
`
`11· · · · · · such as in GPS, global positioning
`
`12· · · · · · satellite system, differential
`
`13· · · · · · actually provides exceedingly high
`
`14· · · · · · performance."
`
`15· · · · Q.· Okay.· Thank you for that.
`
`16· · · · · · Does this set of notes, the May 1996 notes, do
`
`17· ·they discuss the use of your invention in order to
`
`18· ·generate aircraft maintenance advice?
`
`19· · · · A.· I have to go read it more, but.
`
`20· · · · · · But -- it has maintenance advice in it, but I
`
`21· ·have to read it more.
`
`22· · ·

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket