throbber
IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`ASML NETHERLANDS B.V., EXCELITAS TECHNOLOGIES CORP., AND
`QIOPTIQ PHOTONICS GMBH & CO. KG,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ENERGETIQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`_____________
`
`MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
`MOTION TO FILE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`PURUSANT TO 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 & 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54, Patent Owner Energetiq
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`
`
`Technology, Inc. (“Energetiq”) respectfully submits this Motion to Seal portions of
`
`Energetiq’s Patent Owner Response and certain exhibits thereto.
`
`I.
`
`
`
`Background
`
`Energetiq is submitting materials in this proceeding that contain highly
`
`sensitive technical and business information belonging to Energetiq as well as a
`
`third party, a competitor of Petitioner ASML. On February 16, 2016, a conference
`
`call was held among respective counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner, and
`
`Judges Medley, Chang, and Parvis, to discuss submission of these materials under
`
`a revised Protective Order.
`
`
`
`The same day, the Board issued paper 18, which, among other things, urged
`
`Patent Owner to contact the third party regarding de-designating or redacting to
`
`eliminate third party confidential information that Patent Owner seeks to submit.
`
`Paper 18 at 3, 5. The Board additionally required that the Patent Owner remind the
`
`third party that information submitted in these IPR proceedings may be made
`
`public, as set forth in the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, so as to ensure that the
`
`third party’s agreement to the use of its information in these IPR proceedings is
`
`with the knowledge of the risks associated with the submission of the information
`
`to the Board.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner has complied with the Board’s requests. In response to Patent
`
`2
`
`

`
`Owner’s relaying the above information to the third party, the third party has
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`agreed to Patent Owner’s submitting redacted copies of its materials under seal,
`
`with certain material withheld due to the competitive situation that exists between
`
`it and ASML Netherlands B.V. Patent Owner now moves to the Board to enter the
`
`default Protective Order, attached as Appendix A, and moves to file these redacted
`
`third party papers—in addition to certain other materials discussed below—under
`
`seal.
`
`II. Good Cause Exists for Sealing Certain Confidential Information
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(1) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.14, papers filed in an inter
`
`
`partes review are open and available to the public by default; however, a party may
`
`file a motion to seal, in which case the information at issue remains sealed pending
`
`the outcome of the motion. Id. Generally, only “confidential information” is
`
`protected from disclosure. 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(7). The standard for granting a
`
`motion to seal is “for good cause.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.54(a).
`
`
`
`Patent Owner submits that portions of its Response and each of the Proposed
`
`Exhibits summarized in the table below contains confidential trade secret,
`
`business, and/or commercial information of either Energetiq or a third party. In the
`
`table below, Patent Owner provides detailed reasons demonstrating good cause to
`
`seal each of the Proposed Exhibits.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Exhibit Good Cause for Filing Under Seal
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`2008  “A Novel Electrodeless Light Source for Wafer Inspection
`Applications,” (January 4, 2006)

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq proprietary design information and third party business
`strategy information.
`2010  Bucksbaum Declaration

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`multiple references to documents having proprietary design
`information and business strategy information of Energetiq and third
`parties.
`
`Patent Owner is also submitting a redacted (public) version of this
`Exhibit. 
`2016  Smith Declaration

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`multiple references to documents having proprietary design
`information and business strategy information of Energetiq and third
`parties.
`
`Patent Owner is also submitting a redacted (public) version of this
`Exhibit. 
`2027  “Light Source Proposal…” (12/15/2005)

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq proprietary design information and third party business
`strategy information.
`2028  2007 ASML/Energetiq Email

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq proprietary technical and business strategy information and
`confidential ASML information.
`2030  Project Agreement for Feasibility Study (May 3, 2006) 
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`This document contains Energetiq and third-party proprietary
`business strategy and technical information. 
`2036  Presentation to ASML, “LDLS Laser Driven Light Sources for i-
`Line” (10/25/2007)

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq proprietary design information.
`2037  Presentation to ASML, “Next Generation LDLS UV Lamp for
`ASML” (2/12/2008)

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq proprietary design information and confidential ASML
`information. 
`2040  2007 Energetiq License Agreement
`
`This document contains Energetiq and third party confidential
`licensing and financial information.
`2041  2010 Energetiq License Agreement
`
`This document contains Energetiq and third party confidential
`licensing and financial information.
`2042  Email from Energetiq to ASML

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq business strategy information and confidential ASML
`information. 
`2043  Email from Qioptiq to Energetiq dated September 29, 2014

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq business strategy information.
`2065  ASML BV LDLS Roadmap (6/11/2013)

`This document contains confidential information in the form of
`Energetiq business strategy and technical information and
`confidential ASML information.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`In addition, Patent Owner submits a redacted version of its Response. The
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`Response contains confidential material at least to the extent that it reflects the
`
`confidential material outlined in the above exhibits.
`
`III. Certificate of Conference
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §42.54(a), Patent Owner hereby certifies that it has conferred
`
`in good faith and Petitioners do not oppose this motion under the Board’s Default
`
`Protective Order, attached as Appendix A.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Proskauer Rose LLP
`
`/ Joseph A. Capraro Jr. /
`Joseph A. Capraro Jr., Reg. No. 36,471
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 1, 2016
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`ASML NETHERLANDS B.V., EXCELITAS TECHNOLOGIES CORP., AND
`QIOPTIQ PHOTONICS GMBH & CO. KG,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ENERGETIQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01375
`U.S. Patent No. 9,048,000
`_____________
`
`DEFAULT PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`
`
`This standing protective order governs the treatment and filing of confidential
`
`information, including documents and testimony.
`
`1. Confidential information shall be clearly marked ‘‘PROTECTIVE ORDER
`
`MATERIAL.’’
`
`2. Access to confidential information is limited to the following individuals
`
`who have executed the acknowledgment appended to this order:
`
`(A) Parties. Persons who are owners of a patent involved in the proceeding and
`
`other persons who are named parties to the proceeding.
`
`1
`
`

`
`(B) Party Representatives. Representatives of record for a party in the
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`proceeding.
`
`(C) Experts. Retained experts of a party in the proceeding who further certify in
`
`the Acknowledgement that they are not a competitor to any party, or a
`
`consultant for, or employed by, such a competitor with respect to the subject
`
`matter of the proceeding.
`
`(D) In-house counsel. In-house counsel of a party.
`
`(E) Other Employees of a Party. Employees, consultants or other persons
`
`performing work for a party, other than in-house counsel and in-house
`
`counsel’s support staff, who sign the Acknowledgement shall be extended
`
`access to confidential information only upon agreement of the parties or by
`
`order of the Board upon a motion brought by the party seeking to disclose
`
`confidential information to that person. The party opposing disclosure to
`
`that person shall have the burden of proving that such person should be
`
`restricted from access to confidential information.
`
`(F) The Office. Employees and representatives of the Office who have a need
`
`for access to the confidential information shall have such access without the
`
`requirement to sign an Acknowledgement. Such employees and
`
`representatives shall include the Director, members of the Board and their
`
`2
`
`

`
`clerical staff, other support personnel, court reporters, and other persons
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`acting on behalf of the Office.
`
`(G) Support Personnel. Administrative assistants, clerical staff, court reporters
`
`and other support personnel of the foregoing persons who are reasonably
`
`necessary to assist those persons in the proceeding shall not be required to
`
`sign an Acknowledgement, but shall be informed of the terms and
`
`requirements of the Protective Order by the person they are supporting who
`
`receives confidential information.
`
`3. Persons receiving confidential information shall use reasonable efforts to
`
`maintain the confidentiality of the information, including:
`
`(A) Maintaining such information in a secure location to which persons not
`
`authorized to receive the information shall not have access;
`
`(B) Otherwise using reasonable efforts to maintain the confidentiality of the
`
`information, which efforts shall be no less rigorous than those the recipient
`
`uses to maintain the confidentiality of information not received from the
`
`disclosing party;
`
`(C) Ensuring that support personnel of the recipient who have access to the
`
`confidential information understand and abide by the obligation to maintain
`
`the confidentiality of information received that is designated as confidential;
`
`and
`
`3
`
`

`
`(D) Limiting the copying of confidential information to a reasonable number of
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`copies needed for conduct of the proceeding and maintaining a record of the
`
`locations of such copies.
`
`4. Persons receiving confidential information shall use the following
`
`procedures to maintain the confidentiality of the information:
`
`(A) Documents and Information Filed With the Board.
`
`(i) A party may file documents or information with the Board under seal,
`
`together with a non-confidential description of the nature of the
`
`confidential information that is under seal and the reasons why the
`
`information is confidential and should not be made available to the
`
`public. The submission shall be treated as confidential and remain under
`
`seal, unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on the issue, or
`
`sua sponte, the Board determines that the documents or information do
`
`not to qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(ii) Where confidentiality is alleged as to some but not all of the information
`
`submitted to the Board, the submitting party shall file confidential and
`
`non-confidential versions of its submission, together with a Motion to
`
`Seal the confidential version setting forth the reasons why the
`
`information redacted from the non-confidential version is confidential
`
`and should not be made available to the public. The nonconfidential
`
`4
`
`

`
`version of the submission shall clearly indicate the locations of
`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`information that has been redacted. The confidential version of the
`
`submission shall be filed under seal. The redacted information shall
`
`remain under seal unless, upon motion of a party and after a hearing on
`
`the issue, or sua sponte, the Board determines that some or all of the
`
`redacted information does not qualify for confidential treatment.
`
`(B) Documents and Information Exchanged Among the Parties. Information
`
`designated as confidential that is disclosed to another party during discovery
`
`or other proceedings before the Board shall be clearly marked as
`
`‘‘PROTECTIVE ORDER MATERIAL’’ and shall be produced in a manner
`
`that maintains its confidentiality.
`
`(j) Standard Acknowledgement of Protective Order. The following form may be
`
`used to acknowledge a protective order and gain access to information covered by
`
`the protective order:
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`ASML NETHERLANDS B.V., EXCELITAS TECHNOLOGIES CORP., AND
`QIOPTIQ PHOTONICS GMBH & CO. KG,
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`ENERGETIQ TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01375
`U.S. Patent No. 9,048,000
`_____________
`
`
`
`Standard Acknowledgment for Access to Protective Order Material
`
`I _____________, affirm that I have read the Protective Order; that I will abide by
`
`its terms; that I will use the confidential information only in connection with this
`
`proceeding and for no other purpose; that I will only allow access to support staff
`
`who are reasonably necessary to assist me in this proceeding; that prior to any
`
`disclosure to such support staff I informed or will inform them of the requirements
`
`of the Protective Order; that I am personally responsible for the requirements of the
`
`terms of the Protective Order and I agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the Office
`
`and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for
`
`6
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`purposes of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order and providing remedies for
`
`its breach.
`
`
`
`[Signature]
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`
`IPR2015-01362
`U.S. Patent No. 8,969,841
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that on March 1, 2016 this motion and copies of
`
`the three redacted documents are being served pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6
`
`electronically on Petitioner (by consent of the parties) to the following email
`
`addresses:
`
`Don.Steinberg@wilmerhale.com
`David.Cavanaugh@wilmerhale.com
`MichaelH.Smith@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Proskauer Rose LLP
`
`/ Morgan J. Peterson /
`Morgan J. Peterson
`Project Assistant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 1, 2016
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, Massachusetts 02110

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket