throbber
IPR 2015-01440
`Patent No. 7,706,778
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`UniKey Technologies, Inc.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ASSA ABLOY AB,
`Patent Owner
`________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01440
`Patent No. 7,706,778
`________________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES
`REVIEW OF USPN 7,706,778 PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2118/025100-0045
`8884629.1 a10/01/15
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01440
`Patent No. 7,706,778
`
`I.
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), Petitioner UniKey Technologies, Inc.
`
`(“Petitioner” or “UniKey”) and Patent Owner ASSA ABLOY AB (“Patent Owner”
`
`or “AAAB”) jointly request termination of this inter partes review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,706,778 (the ‘778 patent). Termination of this review is appropriate because
`
`the parties have settled their dispute with regard to the ‘778 patent and have
`
`reached an agreement to, among other things, terminate this review. Ex. 1007,
`
`Settlement Agreements (submitted as business confidential information pursuant to
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317 (b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 (c)).
`
`II.
`
`STATEMENT OF FACTS AND SUPPORT FOR TERMINATION
`
`UniKey filed this Petition on June 18, 2015. The Board has not entered a
`
`decision whether to grant the petition. 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) provides, in pertinent
`
`part, “[a]n inter partes review . . . shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner
`
`upon the joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has
`
`decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`
`“Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a
`
`settlement agreement.” Oracle Corp. v. Cmty. United IP, LLC, CBM2013-00015,
`
`Paper 13 (July 25, 2013) (citing Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg.
`
`48756, 48756-66 (Aug. 14, 2012)).
`
`2118/025100-0045
`8884629.1 a10/01/15
`
`
`-2-
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01440
`Patent No. 7,706,778
`Pursuant to a written agreement of the parties, the patent infringement
`
`lawsuit between the parties relating to the ‘778 Patent has been dismissed without
`
`prejudice. The parties also have entered into a further agreement relating to
`
`termination of this inter partes proceeding. Therefore, the parties submit this
`
`proceeding should be terminated. Conmed Corporation v. Bonutti Skeletal
`
`Innovations LLC, IPR2013-00624, Paper 27 (April 30, 2014).
`
`The parties have submitted true and correct copies of both agreements
`
`contemporaneously with this Joint Motion pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(b). The parties desire that their settlement agreements be filed and
`
`maintained as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), and have filed a separate joint request therefor. As
`
`stated in 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), because UniKey and AAAB jointly request this
`
`termination as to Petitioner UniKey, no estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e) shall
`
`attach to UniKey.
`
`
`
`
`
`2118/025100-0045
`8884629.1 a10/01/15
`
`
`-3-
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01440
`Patent No. 7,706,778
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`In light of the foregoing, Petitioner UniKey and Patent Owner AAAB
`
`respectfully request that the Board grant this Petition to Terminate this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: October 1, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /Ronald P. Oines/
`Ronald P. Oines
`Benjamin Deming
`RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP
`611 Anton Blvd., Suite 1400
`Costa Mesa, CA 92626
`T: 714-641-5100
`F: 714-546-9035
`roines@rutan.com
`bdeming@rutan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /Steven M. Bauer/
`Steven M. Bauer, Reg. No. 31,481
`Joseph A. Capraro Jr., Reg. No. 36,471
`PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, MA 02110
`Tel: (617) 526-9600
`Fax: (617) 526-9899
`PTABMattersBoston@proskauer.com
`jcapraro@proskauer.com
`Attorneys for UniKey Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`2118/025100-0045
`8884629.1 a10/01/15
`
`
`-4-
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01440
`Patent No. 7,706,778
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO
`TERMINATE INTER PARTES REVIEW OF USPN 7,706,778 PURSUANT
`TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 was served on October 1, 2015, in its entirety on the following
`via electronic filing with the Patent Review Processing System and via Federal
`Express:
`
`
`
`
`
`Steven M. Bauer
`Reg. No. 31,481
`Joseph A. Capraro, Jr.
`Reg. No. 36,471
`Proskauer Rose LLP
`One International Place
`Boston, MA 02110
`Tel: (617) 526-9700
`Fax: (617) 526-9899
`PTABMattersBoston@proskauer.com
`jcapraro@proskauer.com
`
`RUTAN & TUCKER LLP
`
`BY: /Benjamin C. Deming/
`Benjamin C. Deming
`
`2118/025100-0045
`8884629.1 a10/01/15
`
`
`-5-

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket