throbber
www.archive.org
`
`415.561.6767
`
`415.840-0391 e-fax
`
`Internet Archive
`
`300 Funston Avenue
`
`San Francisco. CA 94118
`
`AFFIDAVIT OF CHRISTOPHER BUTLER
`
`1.1 am the Office Manager at the Internet Archive, located in San Francisco,
`California. I make this declaration of my own personal knowledge.
`2. The Internet Archive is a website that provides access to a digital library of
`Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form. Like a paper library, we provide
`free access to researchers, historians, scholars, and the general public. The Internet
`Archive has partnered with and receives support from various institutions, including the
`Library of Congress.
`3. The Internet Archive has created a service known as the Wayback Machine. The
`Wayback Machine makes it possible to surf more than 400 billion pages stored in the
`Internet Archive's web archive. Visitors to the Wayback Machine can search archives
`by URL (i.e., a website address). If archived records for a URL are available, the visitor
`will be presented with a list of available dates. The visitor may select one of those
`dates, and then begin surfing on an archived version of the Web. The links on the
`archived files, when served by the Wayback Machine, point to other archived files
`(whether HTML pages or images). If a visitor clicks on a link on an archived page, the
`Wayback Machine will serve the archived file with the closest available date to the page
`upon which the link appeared and was clicked.
`4. The archived data made viewable and browseable by the Wayback Machine is
`compiled using software programs known as crawlers, which surf the Web and
`automatically store copies of web files, preserving these files as they exist at the point of
`time of capture.
`5. The Internet Archive assigns a URL on its site to the archived files in the format
`http://web.archive.org/web/fYear in yyyy][Month in mm][Day in dd][Time code in
`hh:mm:ss]/[Archived URL], Thus, the Internet Archive URL
`http://web.archive.Org/web/19970126045828/http://www.archive.org/ would be the
`URL for the record of the Internet Archive home page HTML file
`(http://www.archive.org/) archived on January 26, 1997 at 4:58 a.m. and 28 seconds
`(1997/01/26 at 04:58:28). A web browser may be set such that a printout from it will
`display the URL of a web page in the printout's footer. The date assigned by the Internet
`Archive applies to the HTML file but not to image files linked therein. Thus images that
`appear on a page may not have been archived on the same date as the HTML file.
`Likewise, if a website is designed with "frames," the date assigned by the Internet
`Archive applies to the frameset as a whole, and not the individual pages within each
`frame.
`6. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are true and accurate copies of printouts of the
`Internet Archive's records of the HTML files for the URLs and the dates specified in the
`footer of the printout.
`7 . 1 d e c l a r e u n d e r p e n a l t y o f p e r j u r y t h a t t h e f o r e g o i n g i s t r u e a n d c o r r e c t .
`
`DATE:_ 5 (t*< j t 3
`
`_
`
`Christopher Butler
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 1 of 31
`
`

`

`CALIFORNIA JURAT
`
`See Attached Document.
`
`State of California
`County of San Francisco
`
`A notary public or other officer completing this
`certificate verifies only the identity of the
`individual who signed the document to which this
`certificate is atached, and not the truthfulness,
`accuracy, or validity of that document.
`
`Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on
`this
`
`Christopher Butler,
`
`proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
`the person who appeared before me.
`
`Signature:,^
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 2 of 31
`
`

`

`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`IBM-1010
`
`Page 3 of 31
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 3 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`1 of 28
`
`m
`
`REC-xml-19980210
`
`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`W3C Recommendation 10-February-1998
`
`This version:
`http://www.w3 .org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210
`http://www.w3.Org/TR/1998/RF.C-xml-l 9980210.xml
`http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.html
`http://www.w3 .org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210.pdf
`http://www.w3 .org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210,ps
`Latest version:
`http: // www.w3 .org/TR/REC-xml
`Previous version:
`http://www.w3 .org/TR/PR-xml-971208
`Editors:
`Tim Bray (Textuality and Netscape) <tbrav@textualitv.com>
`Jean Paoli (Microsoft) <ieanpa@microsoft.com>
`C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (University of Illinois at Chicago) <cmsmcq@uic.edu>
`
`Abstract
`
`The Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a subset of SGML that is completely described in this document. Its goal is to
`enable generic SGML to be served, received, and processed on the Web in the way that is now possible with HTML. XML
`has been designed for ease of implementation and for interoperability with both SGML and HTML.
`
`Status of this document
`
`This document has been reviewed by W3C Members and other interested parties and has been endorsed by the Director as
`a W3C Recommendation. It is a stable document and may be used as reference material or cited as a normative reference
`from another document. W3C's role in making the Recommendation is to draw attention to the specification and to promote
`its widespread deployment. This enhances the functionality and interoperability of the Web.
`This document specifies a syntax created by subsetting an existing, widely used international text processing standard
`(Standard Generalized Markup Language, ISO 8879:1986(E) as amended and corrected) for use on the World Wide Web. It
`is a product of the W3C XML Activity, details of which can be found at http://www.w3.org/XML. A list of current W3C
`Recommendations and other technical documents can be found at http://www.w3 .org/TR.
`This specification uses the term URI, which is defined by IBerners-I.ee et al.1. a work in progress expected to update
`IIETF RFC17381 and 1IETF RFC 18081.
`The list of known errors in this specification is available at http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-19980210-errata.
`Please report errors in this document to xml-editor@w3.org.
`
`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`Table of Contents
`
`1. Introduction
`1.1 Origin and Goals
`1.2 Terminology
`2. Documents
`2.1 Well-Formed XML Documents
`2.2 Characters
`
`https://web .archive.org/web/19980213212127/http:/www 13 .w3 .org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 4 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`2 of 28
`
`2.3 Common Syntactic Constructs
`2.4 Character Data and Markup
`2.5 Comments
`2.6 Processing Instructions
`2.7 CDATA Sections
`2.8 Prolog and Document Type Declaration
`2.9 Standalone Document Declaration
`2.10 White Space Handling
`2.11 End-of-Line Handling
`2.12 Language Identification
`3. Logical Structures
`3.1 Start-Tags. End-Tags, and Empty-Element Tags
`3.2 Element Type Declarations
`3.2.1 Element Content
`3.2.2 Mixed Content
`3.3 Attribute-List Declarations
`3.3.1 Attribute Types
`3.3.2 Attribute Defaults
`3.3.3 Attribute-Value Normalization
`3.4 Conditional Sections
`4. Physical Structures
`4.1 Character and Entity References
`4.2 Entity Declarations
`4.2.1 Internal Entities
`4.2.2 External Entities
`4.3 Parsed Entities
`4.3.1 The Text Declaration
`4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities
`4.3.3 Character Encoding in Entities
`4.4 XML Processor Treatment of Entities and References
`4.4.1 Not Recognized
`4.4.2 Included
`4.4.3 Included If Validating
`4.4.4 Forbidden
`4.4.5 Included in Literal
`4.4.6 Notify
`4.4.7 Bypassed
`4.4.8 Included as PE
`4.5 Construction of Internal Entity Replacement Text
`4.6 Predefined Entities
`4.7 Notation Declarations
`4.8 Document Entity
`5. Conformance
`5.1 Validating and Non-Validating Processors
`5.2 Using XML Processors
`6. Notation
`
`Appendices
`
`A. References
`A.l Normative References
`A.2 Other References
`B. Character Classes
`C. XML and SGML. INon-Normativel
`D. Expansion of Entity and Character References (Non-Normative)
`E. Deterministic Content Models (Non-Normative)
`F. Autodetection of Character Encodings ("Non-Normative)
`G. W3C XML Working Group (Non-Normative)
`
`https://web .archive .org/web/19980213212127/http:/www 13 .w3 .org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 5 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`3 of 28
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Extensible Markup Language, abbreviated XML, describes a class of data objects called XML documents and partially
`describes the behavior of computer programs which process them. XML is an application profile or restricted form of
`SGML, the Standard Generalized Markup Language IISO 88791. By construction, XML documents are conforming SGML
`documents.
`XML documents are made up of storage units called entities, which contain either parsed or unparsed data. Parsed data is
`made up of characters, some of which form character data, and some of which form markup. Markup encodes a description
`of the document's storage layout and logical structure. XML provides a mechanism to impose constraints on the storage
`layout and logical structure.
`A software module called an XML processor is used to read XML documents and provide access to their content and
`structure. It is assumed that an XML processor is doing its work on behalf of another module, called the application. This
`specification describes the required behavior of an XML processor in terms of how it must read XML data and the
`information it must provide to the application.
`
`1.1 Origin and Goals
`
`XML was developed by an XML Working Group (originally known as the SGML Editorial Review Board) formed under
`the auspices of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) in 1996. It was chaired by Jon Bosak of Sun Microsystems with the
`active participation of an XML Special Interest Group (previously known as the SGML Working Group) also organized by
`the W3C. The membership of the XML Working Group is given in an appendix. Dan Connolly served as the WG's contact
`with the W3C.
`The design goals for XML are:
`
`1. XML shall be straightforwardly usable over the Internet.
`2. XML shall support a wide variety of applications.
`3. XML shall be compatible with SGML.
`4. It shall be easy to write programs which process XML documents.
`5. The number of optional features in XML is to be kept to the absolute minimum, ideally zero.
`6. XML documents should be human-legible and reasonably clear.
`7. The XML design should be prepared quickly.
`8. The design of XML shall be formal and concise.
`9. XML documents shall be easy to create.
`10. Terseness in XML markup is of minimal importance.
`
`This specification, together with associated standards (Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646 for characters, Internet RFC 1766 for
`language identification tags, ISO 639 for language name codes, and ISO 3166 for country name codes), provides all the
`information necessary to understand XML Version 1.0 and construct computer programs to process it.
`This version of the XML specification may be distributed freely, as long as all text and legal notices remain intact.
`
`1.2 Terminology
`
`The terminology used to describe XML documents is defined in the body of this specification. The terms defined in the
`following list are used in building those definitions and in describing the actions of an XML processor:
`
`may
`
`must
`
`Conforming documents and XML processors are permitted to but need not behave as described.
`
`Conforming documents and XML processors are required to behave as described; otherwise they are in error.
`error
`A violation of the rules of this specification; results are undefined. Conforming software may detect and report an
`error and may recover from it.
`fatal error
`An error which a conforming XML processor must detect and report to the application. After encountering a fatal
`error, the processor may continue processing the data to search for further errors and may report such errors to the
`application. In order to support correction of errors, the processor may make unprocessed data from the document
`(with intermingled character data and markup) available to the application. Once a fatal error is detected, however, the
`processor must not continue normal processing (i.e., it must not continue to pass character data and information about
`the document's logical structure to the application in the normal way).
`
`https://web.archive.org/vveb/19980213212127/http:/www 13 ,w3 .org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 6 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`4 of 28
`
`at user option
`Conforming software may or must (depending on the modal verb in the sentence) behave as described; if it does, it
`must provide users a means to enable or disable the behavior described,
`validity constraint
`A rule which applies to all valid XML documents. Violations of validity constraints are errors; they must, at user
`option, be reported by validating XML processors,
`well-formedness constraint
`A rule which applies to all well-formed XML documents. Violations of well-formedness constraints are fatal errors,
`match
`(Of strings or names:) Two strings or names being compared must be identical. Characters with multiple possible
`representations in ISO/IEC 10646 (e.g. characters with both precomposed and base+diacritic forms) match only if
`they have the same representation in both strings. At user option, processors may normalize such characters to some
`canonical form. No case folding is performed. (Of strings and rules in the grammar:) A string matches a grammatical
`production if it belongs to the language generated by that production. (Of content and content models:) An element
`matches its declaration when it conforms in the fashion described in the constraint "Element Valid",
`for compatibility
`A feature of XML included solely to ensure that XML remains compatible with SGML,
`for interoperability
`A non-binding recommendation included to increase the chances that XML documents can be processed by the
`existing installed base of SGML processors which predate the WebSGML Adaptations Annex to ISO 8879.
`
`2. Documents
`
`A data object is an XML document if it is well-formed, as defined in this specification. A well-formed XML document
`may in addition be valid if it meets certain further constraints.
`Each XML document has both a logical and a physical structure. Physically, the document is composed of units called
`entities. An entity may refer to other entities to cause their inclusion in the document. A document begins in a "root" or
`document entity. Logically, the document is composed of declarations, elements, comments, character references, and
`processing instructions, all of which are indicated in the document by explicit markup. The logical and physical structures
`must nest properly, as described in "4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities".
`
`2.1 Well-Formed XML Documents
`
`A textual object is a well-formed XML document if:
`
`1. Taken as a whole, it matches the production labeled document.
`2. It meets all the well-formedness constraints given in this specification.
`3. Each of the parsed entities which is referenced directly or indirectly within the document is well-formed.
`
`Document
`
`HI document :: = prolog element Mise*
`
`Matching the document production implies that:
`
`1. It contains one or more elements.
`2. There is exactly one element, called the root, or document element, no part of which appears in the content of any
`other element. For all other elements, if the start-tag is in the content of another element, the end-tag is in the content
`of the same element. More simply stated, the elements, delimited by start- and end-tags, nest properly within each
`other.
`
`As a consequence of this, for each non-root element c in the document, there is one other element p in the document such
`that c is in the content of p, but is not in the content of any other element that is in the content of p. p is referred to as the
`parent of c, and c as a child of p.
`
`2.2 Characters
`
`A parsed entity contains text, a sequence of characters, which may represent markup or character data. A character is an
`atomic unit of text as specified by ISO/IEC 10646 USQ/IEC 106461. Legal characters are tab, carriage return, line feed, and
`
`https://vveb.archive.Org/vveb/19980213212127/http:/vvwvvl3.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 7 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`5 of 28
`
`the legal graphic characters of Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646. The use of "compatibility characters", as defined in section 6.8
`of rUnicodel, is discouraged.
`
`Character Range
`
`[2] Char ::=#x9 | #xA | #xD j [#x20-#xD7FF]
`1 [#xE000-#xFFFD] j [#xl0000-#xl0FFFF]
`
`/* any Unicode character, excluding the
`surrogate blocks, FFFE, and FFFF. */
`
`The mechanism for encoding character code points into bit patterns may vary from entity to entity. All XML processors
`must accept the UTF-8 and UTF-16 encodings of 10646; the mechanisms for signaling which of the two is in use, or for
`bringing other encodings into play, are discussed later, in "4.3.3 Character Encoding in Entities".
`
`2.3 Common Syntactic Constructs
`
`This section defines some symbols used widely in the grammar.
`s (white space) consists of one or more space (#x20) characters, carriage returns, line feeds, or tabs.
`
`White Space
`
`[3] S::=(#x20 | #x9 | #xD | #xA) +
`
`Characters are classified for convenience as letters, digits, or other characters. Letters consist of an alphabetic or syllabic
`base character possibly followed by one or more combining characters, or of an ideographic character. Full definitions of the
`specific characters in each class are given in "B. Character Classes".
`A Name is a token beginning with a letter or one of a few punctuation characters, and continuing with letters, digits,
`hyphens, underscores, colons, or full stops, together known as name characters. Names beginning with the string "xmi", or
`any string which would match (( • x' | 'x') ( 'm' | • m1) ('L | ' 1')), are reserved for standardization in this or future
`versions of this specification.
`Note: The colon character within XML names is reserved for experimentation with name spaces. Its meaning is expected
`to be standardized at some future point, at which point those documents using the colon for experimental purposes may need
`to be updated. (There is no guarantee that any name-space mechanism adopted for XML will in fact use the colon as a
`name-space delimiter.) In practice, this means that authors should not use the colon in XML names except as part of
`name-space experiments, but that XML processors should accept the colon as a name character.
`An Nmtoken (name token) is any mixture of name characters.
`
`Names and Tokens
`
`[4] NameChar : :=Letter | Diqit | | | 1 ' | ' ' | CombininqChar | Extender
`
`[5]
`
`[5]
`
`Name : := (Letter | 11 |
`
`(NameChar)*
`
`Names : : = Name (S Name)*
`
`[7] Nmtoken : := (NameChar)+
`
`fg] Nmtokens : : = Nmtoken (S Nmtoken)*
`
`Literal data is any quoted string not containing the quotation mark used as a delimiter for that string. Literals are used for
`specifying the content of internal entities (EntityValue), the values of attributes (Attvalue), and external identifiers
`(systemLiteral). Note that a SystemLiteral can be parsed without scanning for markup.
`
`Literals
`
`PEReference | Reference)*
`
`C«
`
`<
`
`EntityValue :
`
`II
`
`[9]
`
`( r % & ] | PEReference | Reference)*
`Reference)*
`
`u3
`V
`<
`
`1
`
`AttValue :
`
`II
`
`[10|
`
`< r < & ] | Reference)*
`I
`[11] SystemLiteral : : = ( " " [ A " l * ' " ) 1
`I a , I *
`(
`
`)
`
`[12] PubidLiteral : ,i,i pubidchar* | (PubidChar - "1 " )*
`
`[13J
`
`PubidChar : :=#x20 ] #xO | #xA | [a-zA-ZO-9] | [-'() + ,./: = ?;!*#@$_%]
`
`2.4 Character Data and Markup
`
`Text consists of intermingled character data and markup. Markup takes the form of start-tags, end-tags, empty-element
`tags, entity references, character references, comments, CDATA section delimiters, document type declarations, and
`
`https://vveb.archive.Org/web/19980213212127/http:/wvvvvl3.vv3.org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 8 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`6 of 28
`
`processing instructions.
`All text that is not markup constitutes the character data of the document.
`The ampersand character (&) and the left angle bracket (<) may appear in their literal fonn only when used as markup
`delimiters, or within a comment, a processing instruction, or a CDATA section. They are also legal within the literal entity
`value of an internal entity declaration; see "4.3.2 Well-Formed Parsed Entities". If they are needed elsewhere, they must be
`escaped using either numeric character references or the strings "&amp;" and "&lt;" respectively. The right angle bracket (>)
`may be represented using the string "&gt;and must, for compatibility, be escaped using "sgt;" or a character reference
`when it appears in the string " ] ]>" in content, when that string is not marking the end of a CDATA section.
`In the content of elements, character data is any string of characters which does not contain the start-delimiter of any
`markup. In a CDATA section, character data is any string of characters not including the CDATA-section-close delimiter,
`
`To allow attribute values to contain both single and double quotes, the apostrophe or single-quote character (') may be
`represented as "sapos;and the double-quote character (") as "squot;".
`
`Character Data
`
`[14] CharData ::= [A<&]* - ( [ * < & ] *
`
`' ] ] > ' [ ' < & ] * )
`
`2.5 Comments
`
`Comments may appear anywhere in a document outside other markup: in addition, they may appear within the document
`type declaration at places allowed by the grammar. They are not part of the document's character data; an XML processor
`may, but need not, make it possible for an application to retrieve the text of comments. For compatibility, the string "—"
`(double-hyphen) must not occur within comments.
`
`Comments
`
`[15] Comment
`
`' ( (Char -
`
`) | (
`
`(Char - '-')))*
`
`An example of a comment:
`
`<!— declarations for <head> & <body> —>
`
`2.6 Processing Instructions
`
`Processing instructions (Pis) allow documents to contain instructions for applications.
`
`Processing Instructions
`
`[16]
`
`PI ::= '<?' PITarqet (S (Char* - (Char* '?>' Char*)))? ' ?>'
`
`[17] PITarget : : = Name - (('X' | ' x' ) ('M' | 'm') ('L' | '1'))
`
`Pis are not part of the document's character data, but must be passed through to the application. The PI begins with a
`target (piTarqet) used to identify the application to which the instruction is directed. The target names "XML", "xmi", and so
`on are reserved for standardization in this or future versions of this specification. The XML Notation mechanism may be
`used for formal declaration of PI targets.
`
`2.7 CDATA Sections
`
`CDATA sections may occur anywhere character data may occur; they are used to escape blocks of text containing
`characters which would otherwise be recognized as markup. CDATA sections begin with the string "<! [CDATA[" and end
`with the string "] ]>":
`
`CDATA Sections
`
`[18] CDSect : := CDStart CData CDEnd
`
`[19] CDStart : := '<![CDATA['
`
`[20] CData : := (Char* - (Char* ']]>' Char*))
`
`[21] CDEnd ::= '])>'
`
`Within a CDATA section, only the CDEnd string is recognized as markup, so that left angle brackets and ampersands may
`
`https://vveb .archi ve.org/web/19980213212127/http;/w ww 13 .vv3 .org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 9 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`7 of 28
`
`occur in their literal form; they need not (and cannot) be escaped using "&lt;" and "samp;CDATA sections cannot nest.
`An example of a CDATA section, in which "<greeting>" and "</greeting>" are recognized as character data, not
`markup:
`
`<![CDATA[<greeting>Hello, world!</greeting>]]>
`
`2.8 Prolog and Document Type Declaration
`
`XML documents may, and should, begin with an XML declaration which specifies the version of XML being used. For
`example, the following is a complete XML document, well-formed but not valid:
`
`<?xml version="l 0" ?>
`<greeting>Hello, world!</greeting>
`
`and so is this:
`
`<greeting>Hello, world!</greeting>
`
`The version number "l. o" should be used to indicate conformance to this version of this specification; it is an error for a
`document to use the value "l.o" if it does not conform to this version of this specification, ft is the intent of the XML
`working group to give later versions of this specification numbers other than "l.o", but this intent does not indicate a
`commitment to produce any future versions of XML, nor if any are produced, to use any particular numbering scheme.
`Since future versions are not ruled out, this construct is provided as a means to allow the possibility of automatic version
`recognition, should it become necessary. Processors may signal an error if they receive documents labeled with versions they
`do not support.
`The function of the markup in an XML document is to describe its storage and logical structure and to associate
`attribute-value pairs with its logical structures. XML provides a mechanism, the document type declaration, to define
`constraints on the logical structure and to support the use of predefined storage units. An XML document is valid if it has an
`associated document type declaration and if the document complies with the constraints expressed in it.
`The document type declaration must appear before the first element in the document.
`
`Prolog
`
`[22]
`
`prolog : : = XMLDecl? Mise* (doctypedecl Mise* ?
`
`VersionNum ")
`
`XMLPecl : := '<?xml' Versionlnfo EncodingDecl? SDDecl? S? '?>'
`[23]
`[24] Versionlnfo : :=S 'version' Ecj (' VersionNum ' I
`Eq : .= S? '=1 S?
`[25]
`[26] VersionNum : := ([a-zA-Z0-9_.: I
`Mise : := Comment | PI | s
`
`[27]
`
`• - • > +
`
`The XML document type declaration contains or points to markup declarations that provide a grammar for a class of
`documents. This grammar is known as a document type definition, or DTD. The document type declaration can point to an
`external subset (a special kind of external entity) containing markup declarations, or can contain the markup declarations
`directly in an internal subset, or can do both. The DTD for a document consists of both subsets taken together.
`A markup declaration is an element type declaration, an attribute-list declaration, an entity declaration, or a notation
`declaration. These declarations may be contained in whole or in part within parameter entities, as described in the
`well-formedness and validity constraints below. For fuller information, see "4. Physical Structures".
`
`Document Type Definition
`
`
`[28] doctypedecl : := '<!DOCTYPE' S Name (S ExternallD)? S? ('[' [28] doctypedecl :
`(markupdeel | PEReference | S)* ']' S?)? 1>'
`[29] markupdeel : := elementdecl | AttlistDecl | EntityDecl
`| NotationDecl | PI | Comment
`
`[ VC: Root Element Type 1
`
`f VC: Proper Declaration/PE
`Nesting ]
`
`[ WFC PEs in Internal
`Subset 1
`
`The markup declarations may be made up in whole or in part of the replacement text of parameter entities. The
`productions later in this specification for individual nonterminals (elementdecl, Attlistpecl, and so on) describe the
`declarations after all the parameter entities have been included.
`Validity Constraint: Root Element Type
`The Name in the document type declaration must match the element type of the root element.
`Validity Constraint: Proper Declaration/PE Nesting
`Parameter-entity replacement text must be properly nested with markup declarations. That is to say, if either the first
`
`https://vveb.archive.Org/vveb/19980213212127/http:/vvvvwl3.w3.org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 10 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`8 of 28
`
`character or the last character of a markup declaration (markupdecl above) is contained in the replacement text for a
`parameter-entity reference, both must be contained in the same replacement text.
`Well-Formedness Constraint: PEs in Internal Subset
`In the internal DTD subset, parameter-entity references can occur only where markup declarations can occur, not within
`markup declarations. (This does not apply to references that occur in external parameter entities or to the external subset.)
`Like the internal subset, the external subset and any external parameter entities referred to in the DTD must consist of a
`series of complete markup declarations of the types allowed by the non-terminal symbol markupdecl, interspersed with
`white space or parameter-entity references. However, portions of the contents of the external subset or of external parameter
`entities may conditionally be ignored by using the conditional section construct; this is not allowed in the internal subset.
`
`External Subset
`
`130]
`
`extSubset :;- TextDecl? extSubsetDecl
`
`[31] extSubsetDecl ::= ( markupdecl | conditionalSect | PBReference [ S )*
`
`The external subset and external parameter entities also differ from the internal subset in that in them, parameter-entity
`references are permitted within markup declarations, not only between markup declarations.
`An example of an XML document with a document type declaration:
`
`<?xml version="1.0"?>
`<!DOCTYPE greeting SYSTEM "hello.dtd">
`<greeting>Hello, world!</greeting>
`
`The system identifier "hello.dtd" gives the URI of a DTD for the document.
`The declarations can also be given locally, as in this example:
`
`<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
`<!DOCTYPE greeting [
`<!ELEMENT greeting (#PCDATA)>
`]>
`<greeting>Hello, world!</greeting>
`
`If both the external and internal subsets are used, the internal subset is considered to occur before the external subset. This
`has the effect that entity and attribute-list declarations in the internal subset take precedence over those in the external
`subset.
`
`2.9 Standalone Document Declaration
`
`Markup declarations can affect the content of the document, as passed from an XML processor to an application;
`examples are attribute defaults and entity declarations. The standalone document declaration, which may appear as a
`component of the XML declaration, signals whether or not there are such declarations which appear external to the
`document entity.
`
`Standalone Document Declaration
`
`[32] SDDecl :;=S 'standalone' Eq
`('yes' | 'no') '"
`
`( (
`
`) )
`
`('yes' j
`
`' no' )
`
`) | ( ' " '
`
`[VC: Standalone Document
`Declaration ]
`
`In a standalone document declaration, the value "yes" indicates that there are no markup declarations external to the
`document entity (either in the DTD external subset, or in an external parameter entity referenced from the internal subset)
`which affect the information passed from the XML processor to the application. The value "no" indicates that there are or
`may be such external markup declarations. Note that the standalone document declaration only denotes the presence of
`external declarations', the presence, in a document, of references to external entities, when those entities are internally
`declared, does not change its standalone status.
`If there are no external markup declarations, the standalone document declaration has no meaning. If there are external
`markup declarations but there is no standalone document declaration, the value "no" is assumed.
`Any XML document for which standaione="no" holds can be converted algorithmically to a standalone document,
`which may be desirable for some network delivery applications.
`Validity Constraint: Standalone Document Declaration
`The standalone document declaration must have the value "no" if any external markup declarations contain declarations of:
`
`• attributes with default values, if elements to which these attributes apply appear in the document without
`specifications of values for these attributes, or
`• entities (other than amp, it, gt, apos, quot), if references to those entities appear in the document, or
`• attributes with values subject to normalization, where the attribute appears in the document with a value which will
`
`https://web.archive.org/web/19980213212127/http:/www 13 .w3 .org/TR/REC-xml
`
`IBM-1010
`Page 11 of 31
`
`

`

`Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0
`
`9 of 28
`
`change as a result of normalization, or
`• element types with element content, if white space occurs directly within any instance of those types.
`
`An example XML declaration with a standalone document declaration:
`
`<?xml version="1.0" standalone=1 yes'?>
`
`2.10 White Space Handling
`
`In editing XML documents, it is often convenient to use "white space" (spaces, tabs, and blank lines, denoted by the
`nonterminal s in this specification) to set apart the markup for greater readability. Such white space is typically not intended
`for inclusion in the delivered version of the document. On the other hand, "significant" white space that should be preserved
`in the delivered version is common, for example in poetry and source code.
`An XML processor must always pass all characters in a document that are not markup through to the applica

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket