`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 19
`Entered: May 17, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`DAIFUKU CO., LTD. AND DAIFUKU AMERICA CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MURATA MACHINERY, LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01538
`Patent 6,113,341
`_______________
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, BARRY L. GROSSMAN, and
`BRIAN P. MURPHY, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MURPHY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-01538
`Patent 6,113,341
`
`Having considered Patent Owner’s Motion For an Extension of Time
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.5 to File a Replacement Patent Owner’s
`Response and a Replacement Exhibit 2022, the Declaration of Mark Garrett,
`and Petitioner’s opposition to the motion, Patent Owner’s motion is
`granted. Under the specific facts and circumstances established by Patent
`Owner in this proceeding, the absence of prejudice to Petitioner is sufficient
`for allowing the relief granted under either the “good cause” or the “interests
`of justice” standard of 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)(3). The Board expects that, in the
`future, the parties will resolve such administrative matters jointly in a
`prompt professional manner and without imposing unnecessarily on the
`Board’s time.
`So ORDERED.
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Mark J.Thronson
`Dipu A. Doshi
`Blank Rome LLP
`MThronson@BlankRome.com
`Daifuku.IPR@BlankRome.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Mark T. Garrett
`David H. Ben-Meir
`Stephanie N. DeBrow
`Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
`mark.garrett@nortonrosefulbright.com
`david.ben-meir@nortonrosefulbright.com
`stephanie.debrow@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`Thomas King
`Haynes Boone
`thomas.king@haynesboone.com
`
`2
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
