throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 29
`Date: May 23, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`DERMIRA, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PUREPHARM, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-01594
`Patent 8,252,316 B2
`____________
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, DEBORAH KATZ, and ZHENYU YANG,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Lifting Stay of Examination of Reissue Application No. 15/148,510
`35 U.S.C. § 315(d) and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.3, 42.122
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01594
`Patent 8,252,316 B2
`
`
`On January 7, 2016, the Board instituted an inter partes review of claims 1–
`
`8 of U.S. Patent No. 8,252,316 B2. Paper 6. On May 6, 2016, Purepharm, Inc.
`
`(“Patent Owner”) filed reissue application 15/148,510 (“the ’510 reissue
`
`application”) for the ’316 patent. Paper 23. On June 7, 2016, the Board issued an
`
`order, staying examination of the ’510 reissue application pending the completion
`
`or termination of this proceeding. Paper 24.
`
`On December 27, 2016, the panel entered a Final Written Decision holding
`
`that Petitioner has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1–3 and
`
`5–8 of the ’316 patent are unpatentable, but has failed to meet its burden of proof
`
`regarding the unpatentability of claim 4. Paper 28.
`
` A party dissatisfied with a final decision of the Board may file a request for
`
`rehearing, but must do so within 30 days of the entry of a final decision. 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.71(d)(2). In addition, a party dissatisfied with a final decision of the Board
`
`may appeal the Board’s decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit. 35 U.S.C. § 141. When doing so, the party must file the notice of
`
`appeal “no later than sixty-three (63) days after the date of the final Board
`
`decision.” 37 C.F.R. § 90.3(a)(1). The deadlines for filing the request for
`
`rehearing and notice of appeal have expired. Neither party has filed such a request
`
`or appeal. Thus, this proceeding is completed and it is now appropriate to lift the
`
`stay of examination of the ’510 reissue application.
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the stay of examination of reissue application 15/148,510 is
`
`hereby lifted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that time periods for filing papers in reissue
`
`application 15/148,510 are restarted.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01594
`Patent 8,252,316 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Matthew Smith
`smith@turnerboyd.com
`
`Keeley Vega
`vega@turnerboyd.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER
`
`Christopher Brody
`cbrody@clarkbrody.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket