throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY KOREA CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`________________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01644
`Patent No. 6,785,065
`________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNERS’ DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`Patent Owners’ Demonstratives for Oral Hearing Case IPR2015-01644
`
` Patent 6,785,065 
`

`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b) and the Board’s September 12, 2016 Order
`
`(Paper 32), Patent Owner Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea
`
`Corporation submits the enclosed demonstratives for the oral hearing scheduled for
`
`October 6, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 4, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph A. Rhoa /
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Reg. No. 37,515
`
`

`
`1
`
`

`
`Patent Owners’ Demonstratives for Oral Hearing Case IPR2015-01644
`
` Patent 6,785,065 
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owners’ Demonstratives for Oral Hearing was served on Petitioners LG
`
`Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. on October 4, 2016 by emailing
`
`a copy to counsel at the email addresses listed below:
`
`btollefson@rfem.com
`slieberman@rfem.com
`mbattaglia@rothwellfigg.com
`spanda@rfem.com
`mjones@rfem.com
`
`/Joseph A. Rhoa/
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Reg. No. 37,515
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`

`
`Nixon & Vanderhye • nixonvanderhye.com
`
`U.S. Patent 6, 785,065
`
`IPR 2015-01644
`
`Demonstratives
`
`Oral Hearing
`
`PATENT OWNER TSST-K
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 2
`
`_________________ [IPR2015·0_1_6A4~U_S 6,785,065 Fig. 4]
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`FCS
`
`Jc1 ~ I TRACK COIL I
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`12
`
`10 30
`~
`
`15b
`
`0
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`I TRACK COIL ~ T~
`
`14
`
`I I
`
`l
`.
`
`\
`
`I
`
`,
`
`,
`
`I
`
`27
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`FIG. 4
`
`BOBBIN
`
`The '065 Patent
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 3
`
`--______ [leR2015-0_1_6AA~u_s 6,785,065_Fig. 3]
`
`DIRECTION
`TILT
`RADIAL
`
`F
`
`FOCUS DIRECTION
`
`DIRECTION
`TRACK
`T
`
`TILT DIRECTION
`TANGENTIAL
`
`~*Tu
`
`F
`
`15b
`
`15
`
`FIG. 3
`
`The '065 Patent
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 4
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[IP~015·016~---us 6,785,065 Fig. 7~& Fig. 8~
`
`10
`-5...._ __ ...___... __ __.. __ ___..... __ _._ __ __,_ __ _._ __ _,_ __ _,_ __ ~
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`5--~~----------,..~----------------~---~-
`
`FIG. BA
`
`10
`-5'--____ __....____.. __ _. __ _... __ _._ __ _._ __ _...._ __ _,_ __ ~
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`9
`
`5------------~----~---------------------------
`
`FIG. 7A
`
`[see '065 Patent at 6:43-54]
`Drives the Bobbin in thel FOCUS DIRECTION
`'065 Figures 7 A and SA Illustrate the Signal Set That
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 5
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[IPR2015·016~---US 6,785,065 Fig. 78 ~Fig. 88]
`
`10
`
`9
`
`B
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`-s-------------------------------------------
`0
`
`2
`
`I
`I
`
`1
`
`0
`
`5--------~--~__,.-----.----....------r---_,.....---.----.
`
`10
`
`a
`
`a
`
`1
`
`FIG. BB
`s
`4
`
`s
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`-5.._ ___________________ __..__ ____________ ~-------
`
`5------------------------....---..--~r-----..---,
`
`FIG. 7B
`
`[see '065 Patent at 6:55-67]
`That Drives the Bobbin in thel TILT DIRECTION
`'065 Figures 78 and 88 Illustrate the Signal Set
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 6
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[IPR2015-016~---US 6,785,065 Fig. 7C ~Fig. SC]
`
`10
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`-5--------__. __ ___. __ __.. __ __.. ____ ~--~---------~--
`
`o
`
`s-----.,.-----.-----..----......----.----..----..----.-------.
`
`FIG. BC
`
`0
`
`10
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`-5-----------------------~--~--~--~----
`
`o
`
`0
`
`5----------~---~----------....----.....-----..---~...----......----.
`
`[see '065 Patent at 7:21-46]
`Directions. See Claims 3 -4.
`that Drives the Bobbin in the IFOCUS! AND[ TILT
`'065 Figures 7C and SC Illustrate the Signal Set
`
`FIG. 7C
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 7
`
`_[e.sp_e_ctiYely_.~[See e.g., '065-Figs. ZC_&_8C, and-Bogy Decl.~Ex._2003 at 111140-43.]-
`
`applied to the first and second coil sets,
`recited first and second input signals are
`in both the focus and tilt directions when the
`expressly requires the actuator to be driven
`Consistent with Figures 7C and SC, claim 3
`
`[IPR2015-01644 • US 6, 785,065 Claim 3]
`
`through fourth focus and tilt coils.
`first and second sets include corresponding ones of the first
`and a second inp_!J.t signal is ~plied to a second set, and the
`and tilt directions, a first input signal is applied to a first set
`claim 2, wherein,'in order to drive the actuator in the focus
`3. The optical recording and/or reproducing apparatus of
`
`'065 Patent Claim 3
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 8
`
`[E.g., Petition at p. 55-56]
`Wakabayashi's signals in Akanuma.
`for claim 3, and argues using
`
`• Petitioner thus relies on Wakabayashi
`
`the Signals Of Claim 3. [E.g., Petition at p. 55]
`reference Akanuma fails to disclose
`
`• Petitioner concedes that base
`
`Petitioner's Position
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 9
`
`a given signal set.
`direction movement would still not be controlled by
`were substituted into Akanuma, both tilt and focus
`
`• Even if arguendo ANY of Wakabayashi's signals
`
`-Controlling both tilt and focus direction movement
`
`with a given signal set as in claim 3.
`
`• Wakabayashi DOES NOT disclose:
`
`(e.g., Abstract, Col. 6:26-30)
`
`-Focus direction movement
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 10
`-------[IPR2015-0t644 E-x-.---1.007~· Wakabayashi et al-US 5905255 at-7-:21-33]~-
`
`objective lens 1 is corrected.
`error between the disk 10 and the optical axis J of the
`on the permanent magnets 3a and 3b, whereby the angle
`Accordingly, a moment according to the tilt error signal acts
`signal are applied to the focusing coils 7b and 7d.
`the reverse rotation driving amplifier 13 and the focus error
`applied to the focusing coils 7a and 7c, and the output from
`rotation driving amplifier 12 and the focus error signal are
`rotation driving amplifier 13. The output from the normal
`driving amplifier 12 while the other is input to the reverse
`is divided into two, and one is input to the normal rotation
`K, is performed as follows. First of all, the tilt error signal
`Tilt drive, i.e., rotation drive around the tangent direction
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set (e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 11
`
`[IPR2015-01644 Ex. 1007 ·Wakabayashi et al US 5905255 at 7:34-36]
`
`FIGS. 5 and 6. It is assumed that a tilt driving current
`the tracking direction Twill be described with reference to
`Further, tilt drive when the movable member 20 moves in
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 12
`
`[IPR2015-01644 Ex. 1007 ·Wakabayashi et al US 5905255 Abstract]
`
`direction. Furthermore, since the point of action of driving
`~isplacemenf_in the focusing direction1 and the tracking
`axis of tilt drive is fixed, there arises no crosstalk of
`position of the movable member. Further, since the rotation
`
`(e.g., Abstract, Col. 6:26-30)
`
`-Focus direction movement
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 13
`
`a given signal set.
`direction movement would still not be controlled by
`were substituted into Akanuma, both tilt and focus
`
`• Even if arguendo ANY of Wakabayashi's signals
`
`-Controlling both tilt and focus direction movement
`
`with a given signal set as in claim 3.
`
`• Wakabayashi DOES NOT disclose:
`
`(e.g., Abstract, Col. 6:26-30)
`
`-Focus direction movement
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 14
`
`as in claim 3.
`"tilt drive." NOT for tilt AND focus,
`• This superposed signal is only for
`
`[IPR2015-01644 Ex. 1007 ·Wakabayashi et al US 5905255 at 8:52-56]
`
`error sig11al to the tilt driving coils.
`implemented by using tilt drivi11g coils and applyi11g the tilt
`an(l tilt error signal to the focusing coils, tilt drive may be
`is implemented by applying su perpose(l focus error signal
`Furthermore, although in this first embodiment tilt drive
`
`Wakabayashi is misplaced:
`
`• Petitioner's reliance on Col. 8:52-56 of
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 15
`
`meet claim 3.
`
`• Thus, even the alleged combination fails to
`
`signal set.
`directions when applying a given
`movement in both the focus and tilt
`
`• No cited reference discloses controlling
`
`signal set, as in claim 3.
`directions when applying a given
`movement in both the focus and tilt
`
`• Wakabayashi fails to disclose controlling
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 16
`
`cannot meet its burden in this proceeding.
`modify Akanuma and Wakabayashi to use such signals, and
`• Petitioner does not allege that it would have been obvious to
`
`Wakabayashi.
`not disclosed in Wakabayashi and certainly are not inherent in
`• However, these hypothetical signals (e.g. "1" and "2" above) are
`
`[Petitioner Reply at p. 22]
`from amplifier 11 were 1 and the focus error signal were 2."
`would 'focus and tilt at the same time' if the tilt error signal output
`"TSST-K's expert even agreed that the bobbin of Wakabayashi
`
`-
`
`petitioner manufactures a CAPABILITY argument to fill the gap:
`
`• Recognizing this fundamental deficiency in Wakabayashi,
`
`6:38-39) -NOT a tilt and focus control circuit.
`
`• Wakabayashi describes Figure 2 as a "tilt control circuit" (Col.
`• However, Wakabayashi Figure 2 fails to disclose claim 3.
`• Petitioner relies on Figure 2 of Wakabayashi regarding claim 3.
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 17
`
`• The alleged combination would have required
`
`(Ex. 2003 [Bogy Deel.] at 1J1J 76-84, 87-88.)
`operation and would not have been obvious.
`drastic changes to Akanuma's principle of
`
`• There would be no reasonable expectation of
`
`(Ex. 2003 [Bogy Deel.] at 1J1J 76-84, 87-88.)
`success by combining these references.
`
`perform as intended or as in Wakabayashi.
`Wakabayashi's signals to Akanuma would
`
`• There is no evidence that applying
`
`• The two references have very different coil and
`
`magnet structures, and signal applications.
`
`Combination Would NOT Have Been Obvious
`The Alleged Akanuma/Wakabayashi
`
`

`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 18
`
`Appeal No. 2007-1317 (BPAI May 29, 2007).
`problem (tilt control). Ex Pa rte Rinkevich et al.,
`• There is no reason to solve an already-solved
`
`• There would have been no logical reason for the
`
`alleged modification.
`
`for the rejection of claim 1).
`drives in the focus and tilt directions (this is the basis
`
`• However, base reference Akanuma itself already
`
`56)
`Akanuma in the focus and tilt directions." (Petition at
`signals in Akanuma "in order to drive the actuator of
`have been obvious to have used Wakabayashi's
`• Petitioner argues regarding claim 3 that it would
`
`Combination Would NOT Have Been Obvious
`The Alleged Akanuma/Wakabayashi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket