`________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________________
`
`LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and
`LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`TOSHIBA SAMSUNG STORAGE TECHNOLOGY KOREA CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`________________________
`
`Case IPR2015-01644
`Patent No. 6,785,065
`________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNERS’ DEMONSTRATIVES FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owners’ Demonstratives for Oral Hearing Case IPR2015-01644
`
` Patent 6,785,065
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b) and the Board’s September 12, 2016 Order
`
`(Paper 32), Patent Owner Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea
`
`Corporation submits the enclosed demonstratives for the oral hearing scheduled for
`
`October 6, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 4, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph A. Rhoa /
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Reg. No. 37,515
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Patent Owners’ Demonstratives for Oral Hearing Case IPR2015-01644
`
` Patent 6,785,065
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing Patent
`
`Owners’ Demonstratives for Oral Hearing was served on Petitioners LG
`
`Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics, U.S.A., Inc. on October 4, 2016 by emailing
`
`a copy to counsel at the email addresses listed below:
`
`btollefson@rfem.com
`slieberman@rfem.com
`mbattaglia@rothwellfigg.com
`spanda@rfem.com
`mjones@rfem.com
`
`/Joseph A. Rhoa/
`Joseph A. Rhoa
`Reg. No. 37,515
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Nixon & Vanderhye • nixonvanderhye.com
`
`U.S. Patent 6, 785,065
`
`IPR 2015-01644
`
`Demonstratives
`
`Oral Hearing
`
`PATENT OWNER TSST-K
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 2
`
`_________________ [IPR2015·0_1_6A4~U_S 6,785,065 Fig. 4]
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`FCS
`
`Jc1 ~ I TRACK COIL I
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`12
`
`10 30
`~
`
`15b
`
`0
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`I TRACK COIL ~ T~
`
`14
`
`I I
`
`l
`.
`
`\
`
`I
`
`,
`
`,
`
`I
`
`27
`
`TILT COIL
`FOCUS &
`
`FIG. 4
`
`BOBBIN
`
`The '065 Patent
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 3
`
`--______ [leR2015-0_1_6AA~u_s 6,785,065_Fig. 3]
`
`DIRECTION
`TILT
`RADIAL
`
`F
`
`FOCUS DIRECTION
`
`DIRECTION
`TRACK
`T
`
`TILT DIRECTION
`TANGENTIAL
`
`~*Tu
`
`F
`
`15b
`
`15
`
`FIG. 3
`
`The '065 Patent
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 4
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[IP~015·016~---us 6,785,065 Fig. 7~& Fig. 8~
`
`10
`-5...._ __ ...___... __ __.. __ ___..... __ _._ __ __,_ __ _._ __ _,_ __ _,_ __ ~
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`5--~~----------,..~----------------~---~-
`
`FIG. BA
`
`10
`-5'--____ __....____.. __ _. __ _... __ _._ __ _._ __ _...._ __ _,_ __ ~
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`9
`
`5------------~----~---------------------------
`
`FIG. 7A
`
`[see '065 Patent at 6:43-54]
`Drives the Bobbin in thel FOCUS DIRECTION
`'065 Figures 7 A and SA Illustrate the Signal Set That
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST ·K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 5
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[IPR2015·016~---US 6,785,065 Fig. 78 ~Fig. 88]
`
`10
`
`9
`
`B
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`-s-------------------------------------------
`0
`
`2
`
`I
`I
`
`1
`
`0
`
`5--------~--~__,.-----.----....------r---_,.....---.----.
`
`10
`
`a
`
`a
`
`1
`
`FIG. BB
`s
`4
`
`s
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`0
`
`-5.._ ___________________ __..__ ____________ ~-------
`
`5------------------------....---..--~r-----..---,
`
`FIG. 7B
`
`[see '065 Patent at 6:55-67]
`That Drives the Bobbin in thel TILT DIRECTION
`'065 Figures 78 and 88 Illustrate the Signal Set
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 6
`~~~~~~~~~~~~~~[IPR2015-016~---US 6,785,065 Fig. 7C ~Fig. SC]
`
`10
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`-5--------__. __ ___. __ __.. __ __.. ____ ~--~---------~--
`
`o
`
`s-----.,.-----.-----..----......----.----..----..----.-------.
`
`FIG. BC
`
`0
`
`10
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7
`
`6
`
`5
`
`4
`
`3
`
`2
`
`1
`
`-5-----------------------~--~--~--~----
`
`o
`
`0
`
`5----------~---~----------....----.....-----..---~...----......----.
`
`[see '065 Patent at 7:21-46]
`Directions. See Claims 3 -4.
`that Drives the Bobbin in the IFOCUS! AND[ TILT
`'065 Figures 7C and SC Illustrate the Signal Set
`
`FIG. 7C
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 7
`
`_[e.sp_e_ctiYely_.~[See e.g., '065-Figs. ZC_&_8C, and-Bogy Decl.~Ex._2003 at 111140-43.]-
`
`applied to the first and second coil sets,
`recited first and second input signals are
`in both the focus and tilt directions when the
`expressly requires the actuator to be driven
`Consistent with Figures 7C and SC, claim 3
`
`[IPR2015-01644 • US 6, 785,065 Claim 3]
`
`through fourth focus and tilt coils.
`first and second sets include corresponding ones of the first
`and a second inp_!J.t signal is ~plied to a second set, and the
`and tilt directions, a first input signal is applied to a first set
`claim 2, wherein,'in order to drive the actuator in the focus
`3. The optical recording and/or reproducing apparatus of
`
`'065 Patent Claim 3
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 8
`
`[E.g., Petition at p. 55-56]
`Wakabayashi's signals in Akanuma.
`for claim 3, and argues using
`
`• Petitioner thus relies on Wakabayashi
`
`the Signals Of Claim 3. [E.g., Petition at p. 55]
`reference Akanuma fails to disclose
`
`• Petitioner concedes that base
`
`Petitioner's Position
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 9
`
`a given signal set.
`direction movement would still not be controlled by
`were substituted into Akanuma, both tilt and focus
`
`• Even if arguendo ANY of Wakabayashi's signals
`
`-Controlling both tilt and focus direction movement
`
`with a given signal set as in claim 3.
`
`• Wakabayashi DOES NOT disclose:
`
`(e.g., Abstract, Col. 6:26-30)
`
`-Focus direction movement
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 10
`-------[IPR2015-0t644 E-x-.---1.007~· Wakabayashi et al-US 5905255 at-7-:21-33]~-
`
`objective lens 1 is corrected.
`error between the disk 10 and the optical axis J of the
`on the permanent magnets 3a and 3b, whereby the angle
`Accordingly, a moment according to the tilt error signal acts
`signal are applied to the focusing coils 7b and 7d.
`the reverse rotation driving amplifier 13 and the focus error
`applied to the focusing coils 7a and 7c, and the output from
`rotation driving amplifier 12 and the focus error signal are
`rotation driving amplifier 13. The output from the normal
`driving amplifier 12 while the other is input to the reverse
`is divided into two, and one is input to the normal rotation
`K, is performed as follows. First of all, the tilt error signal
`Tilt drive, i.e., rotation drive around the tangent direction
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set (e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 11
`
`[IPR2015-01644 Ex. 1007 ·Wakabayashi et al US 5905255 at 7:34-36]
`
`FIGS. 5 and 6. It is assumed that a tilt driving current
`the tracking direction Twill be described with reference to
`Further, tilt drive when the movable member 20 moves in
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 12
`
`[IPR2015-01644 Ex. 1007 ·Wakabayashi et al US 5905255 Abstract]
`
`direction. Furthermore, since the point of action of driving
`~isplacemenf_in the focusing direction1 and the tracking
`axis of tilt drive is fixed, there arises no crosstalk of
`position of the movable member. Further, since the rotation
`
`(e.g., Abstract, Col. 6:26-30)
`
`-Focus direction movement
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 13
`
`a given signal set.
`direction movement would still not be controlled by
`were substituted into Akanuma, both tilt and focus
`
`• Even if arguendo ANY of Wakabayashi's signals
`
`-Controlling both tilt and focus direction movement
`
`with a given signal set as in claim 3.
`
`• Wakabayashi DOES NOT disclose:
`
`(e.g., Abstract, Col. 6:26-30)
`
`-Focus direction movement
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:34-8:5)
`
`-Controlling tilt and tracking direction with signals
`
`(e.g., Col. 7:21-33)
`
`-Controlling tilt with a given signal set
`• Wakabayashi discloses the following:
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644-6,785,065-Patent Owner TSST-K-Oral Hearin Demonstrative 14
`
`as in claim 3.
`"tilt drive." NOT for tilt AND focus,
`• This superposed signal is only for
`
`[IPR2015-01644 Ex. 1007 ·Wakabayashi et al US 5905255 at 8:52-56]
`
`error sig11al to the tilt driving coils.
`implemented by using tilt drivi11g coils and applyi11g the tilt
`an(l tilt error signal to the focusing coils, tilt drive may be
`is implemented by applying su perpose(l focus error signal
`Furthermore, although in this first embodiment tilt drive
`
`Wakabayashi is misplaced:
`
`• Petitioner's reliance on Col. 8:52-56 of
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 15
`
`meet claim 3.
`
`• Thus, even the alleged combination fails to
`
`signal set.
`directions when applying a given
`movement in both the focus and tilt
`
`• No cited reference discloses controlling
`
`signal set, as in claim 3.
`directions when applying a given
`movement in both the focus and tilt
`
`• Wakabayashi fails to disclose controlling
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 16
`
`cannot meet its burden in this proceeding.
`modify Akanuma and Wakabayashi to use such signals, and
`• Petitioner does not allege that it would have been obvious to
`
`Wakabayashi.
`not disclosed in Wakabayashi and certainly are not inherent in
`• However, these hypothetical signals (e.g. "1" and "2" above) are
`
`[Petitioner Reply at p. 22]
`from amplifier 11 were 1 and the focus error signal were 2."
`would 'focus and tilt at the same time' if the tilt error signal output
`"TSST-K's expert even agreed that the bobbin of Wakabayashi
`
`-
`
`petitioner manufactures a CAPABILITY argument to fill the gap:
`
`• Recognizing this fundamental deficiency in Wakabayashi,
`
`6:38-39) -NOT a tilt and focus control circuit.
`
`• Wakabayashi describes Figure 2 as a "tilt control circuit" (Col.
`• However, Wakabayashi Figure 2 fails to disclose claim 3.
`• Petitioner relies on Figure 2 of Wakabayashi regarding claim 3.
`
`Wakabayashi -US 5,905,255 [IPR2015-01644 -Ex. 1007]
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 17
`
`• The alleged combination would have required
`
`(Ex. 2003 [Bogy Deel.] at 1J1J 76-84, 87-88.)
`operation and would not have been obvious.
`drastic changes to Akanuma's principle of
`
`• There would be no reasonable expectation of
`
`(Ex. 2003 [Bogy Deel.] at 1J1J 76-84, 87-88.)
`success by combining these references.
`
`perform as intended or as in Wakabayashi.
`Wakabayashi's signals to Akanuma would
`
`• There is no evidence that applying
`
`• The two references have very different coil and
`
`magnet structures, and signal applications.
`
`Combination Would NOT Have Been Obvious
`The Alleged Akanuma/Wakabayashi
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-01644 -6, 785,065 -Patent Owner TSST -K -Oral Hearin Demonstrative 18
`
`Appeal No. 2007-1317 (BPAI May 29, 2007).
`problem (tilt control). Ex Pa rte Rinkevich et al.,
`• There is no reason to solve an already-solved
`
`• There would have been no logical reason for the
`
`alleged modification.
`
`for the rejection of claim 1).
`drives in the focus and tilt directions (this is the basis
`
`• However, base reference Akanuma itself already
`
`56)
`Akanuma in the focus and tilt directions." (Petition at
`signals in Akanuma "in order to drive the actuator of
`have been obvious to have used Wakabayashi's
`• Petitioner argues regarding claim 3 that it would
`
`Combination Would NOT Have Been Obvious
`The Alleged Akanuma/Wakabayashi