throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 147
`Date: May 4, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RPX CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`APPLICATIONS IN INTERNET TIME, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`IPR2015-01750 (Patent 8,484,111 B2)
`IPR2015-01751 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`IPR2015-01752 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before SCOTT R. BOALICK, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
`JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, Deputy Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
`and SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`WEIDENFELLER, Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judge
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Regarding Confidential Information Subject to Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. § 42.541
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`I.
`
`
`1 This decision pertains to Cases IPR2015-01750, IPR2015-01751, and IPR2015-
`01752. Citations are to the paper numbers in Case IPR2015-01750.
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01750 (Patent 8,484,111 B2)
`IPR2015-01751, IPR2015-01752 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`
`
`On May 3, 2021, the panel held a conference call with the parties to discuss
`Petitioner’s request regarding the destruction of confidential information produced
`under the Protective Order in these proceedings, Ex. 3001. Petitioner argues that
`such information should be destroyed, consistent with paragraph (i) of the Board’s
`Protective Order Guidelines set forth in the Consolidated Trial Practice Guide:
`Disposal of Confidential Information. Within 60 days after final
`termination of a proceeding, including any appeals, or within 60 days
`after the time for appeal has expired, each party shall assemble all
`copies of all confidential information it has received, including
`confidential information provided to its representatives and experts,
`and shall return or destroy the confidential information and provide a
`certification of destruction to the party who produced the confidential
`information.
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 115 (Nov. 2019) (“TPG”), available at
`https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`The parties agreed to abide by this guideline, but they could not reach
`agreement concerning the timing for action to be taken with respect to the
`confidential information at issue in these IPRs. Petitioner argues that the deadline
`for disposing of confidential information was March 30, 2021, 60 days after the
`time for appeal of the rehearing decision expired. Patent Owner argues that there
`is no such deadline, as the Protective Order in these proceedings (unlike the
`Default Protective Order in the TPG) does not include a provision requiring such
`disposal. See Ex. 3001. Patent Owner is correct that there is no deadline expressly
`designated in the Protective Order in these proceedings, but we do not think delay
`is warranted in disposing of the confidential information, especially in light of the
`guidance presented in the TPG, as noted above. Accordingly, we order the parties
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01750 (Patent 8,484,111 B2)
`IPR2015-01751, IPR2015-01752 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`
`to destroy the confidential information of the other party on or before May 7,
`2021.2
`Petitioner also notes that the parties have access to such confidential
`information maintained in Board systems. Petitioner therefore also asks us to order
`the parties not to access such information. We agree, and we therefore order the
`parties not to access confidential information maintained in Board systems after
`May 7, 2021.
`
`II. ORDER
`
`It is hereby
`ORDERED that on or before May 7, 2021, each party shall assemble all
`copies of all confidential information it has received, including confidential
`information provided to its representatives and experts, and shall destroy the
`confidential information and provide a certification of destruction to the party who
`produced the confidential information; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that neither party shall access confidential
`information of the other party maintained in the Board’s systems.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2 Petitioner has represented that it will retain copies of its own confidential
`information that may be subject to a subpoena in a related matter.
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2015-01750 (Patent 8,484,111 B2)
`IPR2015-01751, IPR2015-01752 (Patent 7,356,482 B2)
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Richard Giunta
`Randy Pritzker
`Elisabeth Hunt
`Michael Rader
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`rgiunta-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`rpritzker-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`ehunt-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`mrader-ptab@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Steve Sereboff
`Jonathan Pearce
`SOCAL IP LAW GROUP LLP
`ssereboff@socalip.com
`jpearce@socalip.com
`
`Andrea Pacelli
`Robert Whitman
`KING & WOOD MALLESONS
`andrea.pacelli@us.kwm.com
`robert.whitman@us.kwm.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket