throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 22
` Entered: May 11, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AUTOMOTIVE DATA SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AAMP OF FLORIDA, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00061
`Patent 9,165,593 B2
`
`
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, KRISTEN L. DROESCH, and
`TRENTON A. WARD, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`DROESCH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00061
`Patent 9,165,593 B2
`
`
`
`Patent Owner filed a Motion to Seal Exhibits 2001, 2029, and 2030,
`
`and the Preliminary Response referencing the aforementioned Exhibits.
`
`Paper 20 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Patent Owner filed redacted versions of
`
`Exhibits 2001, 2029, and 2030 and the Preliminary Response (Paper 18) to
`
`be available to the public. Along with its Motion, Patent Owner indicated
`
`that Petitioner and Patent Owner stipulate to entry of the Default Protective
`
`Order, and attached the Default Protective Order set forth in the OFFICE
`
`PATENT TRIAL PRACTICE GUIDE 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,771 (Aug. 14,
`
`2012) as Appendix A to its Motion. Mot. 2., Mot. Ex. A.
`
`
`
`As a preliminary matter, the form in which Petitioner provided the
`
`Default Protective Order is not acceptable because it is a copy of page
`
`48,771 of the Federal Register, volume 77. See Mot. Ex. A. Patent Owner
`
`is ordered to file the stipulated Default Protective Order as a separate
`
`numbered exhibit, properly captioned for entry in the case, formatted
`
`consistent with other papers in this case, and excluding extraneous matter.
`
`
`
` The standard for granting a motion to seal is “good cause.” 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.54. There is a strong public policy that favors making information filed
`
`in an inter partes review open to the public. See Garmin Int’l v. Cuozzo
`
`Speed Techs., LLC, Case IPR2012-00001, slip op. at 1–2 (PTAB Mar. 14,
`
`2013) (Paper 34) (discussing the standards applied to motions to seal). The
`
`moving party bears the burden of showing that the relief requested should be
`
`granted. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(c). The burden includes showing why the
`
`information is confidential. See Garmin, slip op. at 3.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner asserts good cause exists for granting the motion
`
`because the confidential information in Exhibits 2001, 2029, and 2030, and
`
`referenced in the Preliminary Response reflect Patent Owner’s confidential
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00061
`Patent 9,165,593 B2
`
`sales information of its products, which Patent Owner has a compelling
`
`interest to protect. Mot. 1–2.
`
`
`
`We have considered Patent Owner’s Motion and the information
`
`contained in Exhibits 2001, 2029, and 2030, and the Preliminary Response.
`
`We are persuaded Patent Owner has demonstrated sufficiently why Exhibits
`
`2001, 2029, and 2030, and the Preliminary Response each include
`
`confidential information that should be sealed. Accordingly, we grant Patent
`
`Owner’s Motion to Seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the Default Protective Order set forth in the OFFICE
`
`PATENT TRIAL PRACTICE GUIDE 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,771 (Aug. 14,
`
`2012) as Appendix A (Mot. Ex. A) governs the treatment of confidential
`
`information in these proceedings;
`
`
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal Exhibits 2001, 2029,
`
`and 2030, and the Preliminary Response is GRANTED; and
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner has FIVE business days
`
`from the date of this Decision, to file the stipulated Default Protective Order
`
`(Mot. Ex. A) in proper form as a numbered exhibit, properly captioned for
`
`entry in the case, formatted consistent with other papers in this case, and
`
`excluding extraneous matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00061
`Patent 9,165,593 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`R. Joseph Trojan
`Fredrick S. TsangTROJAN LAW OFFICES
`Trojan@Trojanlawoffices.com
`Tsang@Trojanlawoffices.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Greg F. LoCascio
`Brian A Verbus
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`glocascio@kirkland.com
`Brian.verbus@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`Joel Weiss
`WEISS & ARONS, LLP
`jweiss@weissarons.com
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket