throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 22
`Entered: December 12, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`TELADOC, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`AMERICAN WELL CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00100
`Patent 7,590,550 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BRIAN J. McNAMARA, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Termination of Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317, 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00100
`Patent 7,590,550 B2
`
`I.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`On November 29, 2016, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`this proceeding (Paper 20) pursuant to a written agreement, as well as a Joint
`
`Request (Paper 21) to have the agreement treated as business confidential
`
`information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). The parties
`
`also filed a true copy of their written agreement. Ex. 1011. The parties
`
`contend that termination of this proceeding is appropriate, representing that
`
`they “have settled their disputes via a written agreement.” Paper 20, 2.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the
`
`merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” Further,
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b), “[a]ny agreement or understanding between the
`
`patent owner and a petitioner, including any collateral agreements referred to
`
`in such agreement or understanding, made in connection with, or in
`
`contemplation of, the termination of an inter partes review under this section
`
`shall be in writing and a true copy of such agreement or understanding shall
`
`be filed in the Office before the termination.”
`
`As the parties have filed their written agreement and jointly requested
`
`termination, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding
`
`without rendering a final written decision under 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) as to the
`
`patentability of claims 12, 13, 16–22, and 24–29 of the ’550 patent, which
`
`are all the claims on which trial has been instituted (Paper 10, 24). See 35
`
`U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00100
`Patent 7,590,550 B2
`
`II. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Request that their agreement
`
`(Ex. 1011) be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is GRANTED; and
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate this
`
`proceeding is GRANTED, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
`
`3
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael Solomita
`msolomita@sheppardmullin.com
`
`Jesse Salen
`jsalen@sheppardmullin.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Walter Renner
`IPR22569-0093IP2@fr.com
`
`Christina McDonough
`PTABInbound@fr.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket