`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALARM.COM INCORPORATED,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIVINT, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116
`Patent 6,147,601
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s May 4, 2016 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 15), Patent Owner Vivint, Inc. respectfully requests oral argument,
`
`which is currently scheduled for January 31, 2017. Patent Owner also requests at
`
`least three hours total (90 minutes per side) for the oral argument. Patent Owner
`
`request Hearing Room A due to the number of counsel for each party and the
`
`number of potential client representatives that will attend the arguments. Finally,
`
`because the oral argument for IPR2016-00173 and IPR2016-00161 are scheduled
`
`for the same day with the same panel, Patent Owner requests a combined trial for
`
`these three cases starting at 11:00AM ET.
`
`Patent Owner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. The patentability of claims 1-2, 4, 5-15, 17-23, 25-31, 33-41 over the
`applied art including:
`(a) the patentability of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 10-13, 15, 17, 22, 23, 25-27,
`29, 33-35 and 38 over Shetty;
`(b) the patentability of claims 7, 19, and 28 over the combination of
`Shetty and Levac;
`(c) the patentability of claims 5, 8, 9, 21, 30, 31, 37, 39, and 40 over
`the combination of Shetty and Britton;
`(d) the patentability of claims 20 and 41 over the combination of
`Shetty, Levac and Britton;
`(e) the patentability of claims 14, 17, 18, 36, and 38 over the
`combination of Shetty and French; and
`(f) the patentability of claim 39 over the combination of Shetty,
`Levac, Britton and French.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`2. Any issues specified by Petitioner in its Request for Oral Argument;
`3. Rebuttal to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters; and
`4. Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Patent Owner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector,
`
`Elmo, and screen.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg, Registration No. 43,447
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`Date: December 20, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e))
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served electronically via e-mail in its
`
`entirety on December 20, 2016, upon the following:
`
`William H. Mandir (wmandir@sughrue.com) (Lead Counsel)
`Brian K Shelton (bshelton@sughrue.com) (Back-up Counsel)
`Roger G. Brooks (rgbrooks@cravath.com) (Back-up Counsel)
`Teena-Ann V. Sankoorikal (tsankoorikal@cravath.com) (Back-up Counsel)
`Marc J. Khadpe (mkhadpe@cravath.com) (Back-up Counsel)
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Jason D. Eisenberg/
`
`Jason D. Eisenberg, Registration No. 43,447
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Date: December 20, 2016
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
