`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`——————
`
`ALARM.COM INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIVINT, INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`——————
`
`Case IPR2016-00116
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`
`——————
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`US Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116 of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner Alarm.com Inc. hereby requests
`
`oral argument, currently scheduled for January 31, 2017, for case IPR2016-00116.
`
`See Scheduling Order, Paper 15 at p. 6. Petitioner further requests that this case
`
`be argued jointly with cases IPR2016-00161 and IPR2016-00173, which concern
`
`patents from the same family with common claim terms, present largely the same
`
`disputed issues, and which are also scheduled for oral argument on the same day.
`
`See IPR2016-00161, Paper 17 at p. 6; IPR2016-00173, Paper 15 at p. 6. Petitioner
`
`also requests that the hearing occur in Hearing Room A due to the number of
`
`counsel and client representatives anticipated in the three cases. Petitioner
`
`specifies the following issues to be argued, for all three cases (except for Issues 6
`
`and 7 below):
`
`1. That the Board has offered the broadest reasonable construction of the
`
`term “message profile containing outgoing message routing instructions”.
`
`2. That Shetty rendered obvious user-defined message profiles.
`
`3. That Shetty rendered obvious remote configuration or modification of
`
`user-defined message profiles.
`
`4. That Shetty in view of Britton rendered obvious normal status messages.
`
`5. That a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to
`
`combine features of Levac with Shetty.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`6. That Shetty in view of Levac rendered obvious selection of different
`
`Case IPR2016-00116 of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`
`
`user-defined communication devices to receive outgoing exception
`
`messages at different time periods. (IPR 2016-00116 only)
`
`7. That Shetty rendered obvious communication device identification codes
`
`stored in a second memory and configured in a plurality of user-defined
`
`message profiles. (IPR2016-00116 and IPR2016-00173 only)
`
`8. Any issues specified by Patent Owner or raised by Patent Owner at the
`
`hearing.
`
`Because these issues, with the exceptions of Issues 6 and 7 above, are
`
`common to each of the cases to be argued, Petitioner requests a total of ninety (90)
`
`minutes to address these issues in a single argument for all three cases combined.
`
`In the event that the Board does not grant Petitioner’s request to argue these
`
`cases in a single consolidated argument, Petitioner will need to present many of the
`
`same arguments in each case. In that event, Petitioner requests sixty (60) minutes
`
`of argument in the instant case.
`
`Should Patent Owner argue any motions to exclude evidence in any of the
`
`cases, Petitioner requests an additional five (5) minutes, or an amount of time
`
`equivalent to Patent Owner’s time spent arguing such motions, whichever is
`
`longer, to respond to those arguments.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116 of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use a laptop projector, Elmo projector, and
`
`screen for the purposes of displaying demonstrative exhibits.
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`Dated: December 20, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: / William H. Mandir/
`
`William H. Mandir
`
`Registration No. 32,156
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00116 of
`U.S. Patent No. 6,147,601
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the attached PETITIONER'S
`
`
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was sent via electronic mail on December
`
`20, 2016 to the following:
`
`Robert G. Sterne (rsterne-PTAB@skgf.com)
`Jason D. Eisenberg (jasone-PTAB@skgf.com)
`PTAB@skgf.com
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Counsel of Record for the Patent Owner in this proceeding
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Brian K. Shelton
`
`Brian K. Shelton
`
`Registration No. 50,245
`
`Backup Counsel for Petitioner
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 20, 2016
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
