throbber
(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:48)(cid:47)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:20)(cid:25)6
`
`LMSA
`
`

`
`Handbook of Laser Technology and Applications
`
`Volume III: Applications
`
`Edited by
`
`Colin E Webb
`
`University of Oxford
`
`and
`
`Julian D C Jones
`
`Heri0r—Watt University
`
`I0P
`
`Institute of Physics Publishing
`Bristol and Philadelphia
`
`

`
`© IOP Publishing Ltd 2004
`
`All rights reserved. No part ofthis publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted
`in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior
`permission of the publisher. Multiple copying is permitted in accordance with the terms of licences issued
`by the Copyright Licensing Agency under the terms of its agreement with Universities UK (UUK).
`
`The publisher has attempted to trace the copyright holders of all the figures reproduced in this publication
`and apologizes to them if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained.
`British Library Cataloguing—in—Publicati0n Data
`
`A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
`
`ISBN 0 7503 0960 1 (Vol. I)
`
`0 7503 0963 6 (Vol. II)
`
`0 7503 0966 0 (Vol. III)
`
`0 7503 0607 6 (3 Vol. set)
`
`Library of Congress Cat‘ai0ging-in—Publicari0n Data are available
`
`
`
`Development Editor: David Morris
`Production Editor: Simon Laurenson
`
`Production Control: Sarah Plenty
`Cover Design: Victoria Le Billon
`
`Marketing: Nicola Newey and Verity Cooke
`
`Published by Institute of Physics Publishing, wholly owned by The Institute of Physics, London
`
`Institute of Physics Publishing, Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol BS1 61313, UK
`
`US Office: Institute of Physics Publishing, The Public Ledger Building, Suite 929, 150 South Independence
`Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA
`
`Typeset in DTEX 25 by Text 2 Text Limited, Torquay, Devon
`Index by Indexing Specialists (UK) Ltd, Hove, East Sussex
`Printed in the UK by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`VOLUME III: APPLICATIONS
`
`PART D
`
`APPLICATIONS: CASE STUDIES
`
`D1
`
`D1.1
`
`D12
`
`D13
`
`D1.4
`
`D1.5
`
`D1.6
`
`Dl.7
`
`D1.8
`
`D2
`
`D2.1
`
`D22
`
`D2.3
`
`D24
`
`D25
`
`D2.6
`
`D2.7
`
`D2.8
`
`D3
`
`D3.1
`
`D32
`
`Materials processing
`Clive Ireland
`
`Welding
`HHiigel and C Schinzel
`Cutting
`John Powell and Claes Magnusson
`
`Laser marking
`Terry J McKee
`
`Drilling
`S Williams
`
`Photolithography
`Shinji Okazaki
`
`Laser micromachining
`Malcolm Gower
`
`Rapid manufacturing
`Gary K Lewis
`
`Pulsed laser deposition of thin films
`Ian Boyd and D B Chrisey
`
`Optical measurement techniques
`Julian Jones
`
`Fundamental length metrology
`
`J Fliigge, F Riehle and H Kunzmann
`
`Laser velocimetry
`C Tropea
`Laser vibrometers
`
`Neil A Halliwell
`
`Electronic speckle pattern interferometry (ESPI)
`
`Dave Towers and Clive Buckberry
`
`Optical fibre hydrophones
`
`Geoffrey A Cranch and Philip J Nash
`
`Optical fibre Bragg grating sensors for strain measurement
`David A Jackson and David J Webb
`
`High—speed imaging _
`Adam Whybrew
`
`Particle sizing
`
`Nils Damaschke, Maurice Wedd, Adam Whybrew and Damien Blondel
`Medical
`
`Terence A King and Brian C Wilson
`Light—tissue interactions
`Steven Jacques and Michael Patterson
`Therapeutic applications: introduction
`Reginald Birngruber
`
`D3.2.1
`
`Therapeutic applications: ophthalmology
`Reginala' Birngruber
`
`ix
`
`1557
`
`1559
`
`1561
`
`1587
`
`1613
`
`1633
`
`1653
`
`1661
`
`1693
`
`1705
`
`1721
`
`1723
`
`1749
`
`1779
`
`1805
`
`1839
`
`1881
`
`1919
`
`1931
`
`1951
`
`1955
`
`1995
`
`£999
`
`

`
`D3.2.2 Therapeutic applications: refractive surgery
`Giovanni Cennamo and Raimondo Forte
`
`D3.2.3 Therapeutic applications: photodynamic therapy
`Brian C Wilson and Stephen G Bown
`D3.2.4 Therapeutic applications: thermal treatment of tumours
`Stephen G Bown
`D3.2.5 Therapeutic applications: dermatology—selective photothermolysis
`Sean Lanigan
`
`D3.2.6 Therapeutic applications: lasers in vascular surgery
`Mahesh Pai
`
`D3.2.7 Therapeutic applications: hardtissue/dentistry
`Rairnund Hibst
`
`D3.2.8 Therapeutic applications: free—electron laser
`E Duco Jansen, Michael Copeland, Glenn S Edwards, William Gabella,
`Karen Joos, Mark A Mackanos, Jin H Shen and Stephen R Uhlhorn
`D3.3 Medical diagnostics
`Brian C Wilson
`
`D3.4
`
`Laser applications in biology and biotechnology
`
`D3.5
`
`D4
`
`D4.1
`
`D42
`
`D4.3
`
`D4.4
`
`D4.5
`
`D4.6
`
`D5
`
`D5.l
`
`Sebastian Wachsmann—Hogiu, Alexander J Annala and Daniel L Farkas
`Biomedical laser safety
`Harry Moseley and Bill Davies
`Communications
`
`John Marsh
`
`The basic point—to—point communications system
`John Gowar
`
`High—capacity optical transmission systems
`Paul Urquhart
`Local area networks
`
`J Lehman and K L Johnson
`
`Fibre—to—the—chip: development of vertical cavity surface emitting
`laser arrays designed for integration with VLSI circuits
`A V Krishnamoorrhy, L M F Chirovsky, K W Goosen, J Lopata
`and WS Hobson
`
`Optical satellite communications
`A C0ello- Vera and M Maignan
`Smart pixel technologies and optical interconnects
`Marc P YDesmulliez and Brian S Wherretr
`
`Optical information storage
`John Marsh
`
`Optical data storage
`Tom D Milsrer
`
`D5.2
`
`Lasers in printing
`
`Atsushi Kawamura, Seizo Suzuki and Yashinori Hayashi
`
`D6
`
`D6.l
`
`Spectroscopy
`Colin Webb
`
`Laser cooling and trapping
`C SAa’ams and I G Hughes
`
`Contents
`
`2009
`
`2019
`
`2037
`
`2045
`
`2055
`
`2065
`
`2075
`
`2087
`
`2123
`
`2155
`
`2181
`
`2183
`
`2231
`
`2289
`
`2321
`
`2345
`
`2363
`
`2389
`
`2391
`
`2421
`
`2463
`
`2465
`
`

`
`Contents
`
`D62
`
`D63
`
`D7
`
`D7.l
`
`D"/‘.2
`
`D8
`
`D8.l
`
`D9
`
`D9.l
`
`D10
`
`Dl0.l
`
`Dl0.2
`
`IontrapphngandlaserapphcafionstolengU1andtnneIneuIflogy
`P Gill and G P Barwood
`
`Tirne—resoIved spectroscopy
`Gavin D Reid and Klaas Wynne
`Earth and environmental sciences
`
`Lance Thomas
`
`Satelhtelaserranging
`Roger Wood and Graham Appleby
`
`Ijdarforannospherk:ozonerennnesenang
`Gérard Ancellet
`
`Lasers in astronomy
`R C Powell
`
`Lasers in astronomy
`Renaud Foy and Jean—Paul Pique
`Holography: holographic optical elements and computengcneraied
`holography
`
`Mohammad R Taghizadeh
`Holography: holographic optical elements—computer—generated
`holography—diffractive optics
`Hans Peter Herzig
`High-intensity lasers for plasma studies
`Ckdbxlflebb
`
`High-power lasers for plasma physics
`M H R Hutchinson
`
`High—power lasers and the extreme conditions that they can produce
`SJROM
`
`Index
`
`xi
`
`2485
`
`2507
`
`2529
`
`2531
`
`2563
`
`2579
`
`2581
`
`2625
`
`2627
`
`2643
`
`2645
`
`2657
`
`2665
`
`

`
`Cutting
`
`D1.2
`
`Cutting
`
`1587
`
`John Powell and Claes Magnusson
`
`D1.2.1
`
`Introduction
`
`Most laser cutting is carried out using CO2 or Nd:YAG lasers. The general principles of cutting are similar for
`
`both types of laser although CO2 lasers (see chapter B3.l) dominate the market. For this reason the following
`sections will concentrate on CO2 taser cutting and compare this with Nd:YAG laser cutting in section D1.2.5.
`(however, readers interested solely in Nd:YAG laser cutting need to read the following sections first). Most
`
`of the following information is paraphrased from two books: C02 Laser Cutting by J Powell [1] and Laser
`
`Institute ofAmerica Guide to Laser Cutting by J Powell [2].
`The basic mechanism of laser cutting is extremely simple and can be summarized as follows:
`
`(1)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`
`(5)
`
`A high intensity beam of infrared light is generated by a laser.
`
`This beam is focused onto the surface of the workpiece by means of a lens.
`
`The focused beam heats the material and establishes a very localized melt (generally smaller than 0.5 mm
`
`diameter) throughout the depth of the sheet.
`
`The molten material is ejected from the area by a pressurized gas jet acting coaxially with the laser beam
`as shown in figure D1.2.1. (NB: With certain materials this gas jet can accelerate the cutting process by
`doing chemical as well as physical work. For example, carbon or mild steels are generally cut in a jet of
`pure oxygen. The oxidation process initiated by the laser heating generates its own heat and this greatly
`adds to the efficiency of the process.)
`
`This localized area of material removal is moved across the surface of the sheet thus generating a cut.
`Movement is achieved by manipulation of the focused laser spot (by CNC mirrors) or by mechanically
`moving the sheet on a CNC X-1’ table. ‘Hybrid’ systems are also available where the material is moved
`in one axis and the laser spot moved in the other. Fully robotic systems are available for profiling three-
`dimensional shapes. Nd:YAG lasers can utilize optical fibres rather than mirrors (see section Dl.2.5)
`but this option is not available for the longer wavelength C0; laser.
`
`Before moving on to a more detailed description of the cutting process, now is a good time to summarize
`the benefits of laser cutting:
`
`The process cuts at high speed compared to other profiling methods. For example, a 1500 W CO2 laser
`will cut 2 mm thick mild steel at 7.5 m min". The same machine will cut 5 mm thick acrylic sheet at
`~12 m min‘1_
`
`in most cases (e. g. the two previous examples) the cut components will be ready for service immediately
`after cutting without any subsequent cleaning operation.
`
`The cut width (kerf width) is extremely narrow (typically 0.1-1.0 mm). Very detailed work can be
`carried out without the restriction of a minimum internal radius imposed by milling machines and
`similar mechanical methods.
`
`

`
`
`
`1533 Cutting
`
`F light
`tube
`
`
`
`Water cooled
`
`tilt adjustable
`45° mirror
`
`Manual or
`automatic
`height
`adjustment
`
`'0' ring type seals
`
`Lens
`
`Pressure
`gauge
`
`C tt_
`u ing
`gas
`inlet
`
`--'*
`
`Lens mount
`
`Nozzle
`
`Work piece
`
`I
`\Cut
`
`Figure D1.2.1. A schematic diagram of laser cutting. The lens mount or nozzle (or both) can be adjusted from left to
`right or into and out of the plane of the sketch. This allows for centralization of the focused beam with the nozzle. The
`vertical distance between the nozzle and lens can also be adjusted.
`
`o
`
`o
`
`a
`
`The process can be fully CNC controlled. This, combined with the lack of necessity for complex jigging
`arrangements, means that a change of job from cutting component ‘A’ out of steel to cutting component
`‘B’ out of a polymer can be carried out in seconds.
`(Note: Nd:YAG lasers cannot cut most plastics
`because they are transparent to Nd:YAG laser light—see section D1.2.5.)
`
`Although laser cutting is a thermal process, the actual area heated by the laser is very small and most
`of this heated material is removed during cutting. Thus, the thermal input to the bulk of the material is
`very low, heat affected zones are minimized and thermal distortion is generally avoided.
`
`It is a non-contact process which means that material needs only to be lightly clamped or merely
`
`

`
`Cutting non—metals (CO2 laser)
`
`1589
`
`positioned under the beam. Flexible or flimsy materials can be cut with great precision and do not distort
`
`during cutting as they would when cut by mechanical methods.
`
`o
`
`Owing to the CNC nature of the process, the narrowness of the kerf width and the lack of mechanical
`
`force on the sheet being cut, components can be arranged to ‘nest’ very close together. Hence, material
`waste can be reduced to a minimum. In some cases this principle can be extended until there is no waste
`material at all between similar edges of adjacent components.
`
`a
`
`c
`
`o
`
`Although the capital cost of a laser cutting machine is substantial, the running costs are generally low.
`Many industrial cases exist where a large installation has paid for itself in under a year.
`
`The process is extremely quiet compared to competing techniques, a factor which improves the working
`environment and the efficiency of the operating staff.
`
`Laser cutting machines are extremely safe to use in comparison with many of their mechanical counter-
`parts.
`
`D1.2.2 Cutting non-metals (CO2 laser)
`
`D}.2.2.I General notes
`
`There are three groups of non—meta1lic materials which are commonly cut by C02 lasers: polymers, wood-
`based products and ceramics. These will be discussed separately in the following sections. Although
`figure D1.2.2 is a good starting point for a description of laser cutting, it does not give a complete picture.
`Lasers are capable of cutting by mechanisms other than simple melting. In some cases (acrylic, polyacetal)
`the material is vaporized rather than melted in the cut zone and in others (epoxy resins, wood products) the
`material cannot melt and must be locally burnt away. These different cutting mechanisms affect the quality
`of the eventual cut edge in ways which are described later.
`
`DI.2.2.2 Polymers
`
`Polymers can be divided up into two main groups:
`
`(1) Thermoplastics: These are polymers that can be repeatedly melted down and cast into new shapes. They
`include polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethylene (polythene), polyamide (nylon) and others.
`
`(2) Thermosets: These materials cannot be remelted once they have been made into their initial shape.
`They sometimes involve the mixing of two liquids which then set hard. This group includes epoxy and
`phenolic resins, fibreglass, kevlar and most natural rubber products.
`
`D1.2.2.2.1 Cutting thermoplastics
`
`Figure D1 .22 is a good description of how most thermoplastics are cut by a C0; laser. The laser produces a
`melt which is then blown out of the cut zone by a gas jet (usually air). This type of cutting is known as ‘melt
`shearing’ for obvious reasons (some workers also call it ‘fusion cutting’). The resulting cut edge is of good
`quality but covered in microscopic ripples.
`
`Not all the liquid is blown out of the cut zone and it is common to have a residue of resolidified melt or
`‘dross’ on the lower edge of the cut. Thermoplastics can be cut at high speed and relatively thick sections
`can be profiled (See table D12. 1).
`There are two important thermoplastics that do not cut by the melt shearing mechanism:
`
`(1) Polyvinyl chloride‘(PVC): this material degrades chemically when heated by the laser. The fumes given
`off contain high levels of hydrogen chloride which is extremely corrosive and very toxic. For this reason
`PVC must never be cut by laser unless suitable ventilation is arranged.
`
`

`
`
`
`1590 Cutting
`
`/
`
`Y
`
`Laser beam
`and gas jet
`
`workpiece
`surface
`
`X
`
`
`
`Cutting direction ~
`
`Figure D1.2.2. Laser cutting by melt shearing. The incident focused laser melts through the material and the gas jet
`
`acting with the laser removes the melt from the cut zone. Thermoplastics are cut in this way using air as the cutting gas
`jet. Metals are also cut by this mechanism if gases other than oxygen are used (e.g. argon for titanium or nitrogen for
`stainless steel).
`
`(2) Polymethyl methacrylate (acrylic, plexiglass etc): this material boils] rather than melts during the cutting
`process and, under the correct conditions can produce a polished cut edge. This process is known as
`cutting by vaporization. As the boiling vapour is blown away from the cut zone, it leaves a thin liquid
`layer on the cut edges. If the gas jet blowing the vapour away flows gently over this liquid layer, it will
`dry like paint to produce a glossy edged cut. If, however, the gas jet is above a minimum velocity, the
`solidifying liquid will become frosted.
`
`D].2.2.2.2 Cutting thermosetplastics
`
`Thermoset plastics are not cut by the melt shearing mechanism shown in figure D1.2.2 for the simple
`reason that they cannot melt.
`In this case the laser burns the workpiece, reducing the plastic to a smoke
`made up of carbon and the other constituents of the original material. This process is known as cutting by
`chemical degradation. Because this process takes more energy than simple melting, cut speeds and maximum
`thicknesses for thermosets are lower than for thermopl astics (see table D 1 2.2). The cut edge of such materials
`is generally flat, smooth and covered with a thin layer of carbon.
`
`1 To be accurate it should be mentioned that this is not really a boiling process. The laser heats up the solid polymer until it becomes a
`liquid which then depolyrnerizes giving off a vapour of the monomer (methyl methacrylate).
`
`

`
`Cutting non-metals (C0; laser)
`
`1591
`
`D1.2.2.3 W0od—based products
`
`Wood and wood—based products are cut by a similar mechanism to thermoset plastics. The laser burns through
`the material to produce a cut and the carbon—based smoke is blown out of the cut zone by a gas jet, which is
`usually air. The top and bottom surfaces of the workpiece retain their original appearance but the cut edge is
`covered in a layer of carbon which darkens it. Low density woods such as pine cut faster than high density
`material such as teak (see table D1.2.3). The cut edge also becomes darker as the density is increased.
`
`D1.2.2.4 Ceramics and glasSe.s'
`
`D1.2.2.4.1 Ceramics
`
`The ceramic of most interest to laser cutting is alumina which is used to produce micro-electronic sub-
`
`strates. This high—melting—point material cuts very slowly if full penetration cutting by the melt shearing
`(figure D 1 .22) method is employed (see table D l 2.4). Fortunately, most applications merely require cutting
`sheets of the material into rectangles and another faster technique called scribing can be used. Scribing
`involves the drilling of lines of small blind holes in the material surface using a single pulse of energy for
`each hole. The lines of holes are mechanically weak and can be used to accurately snap the workpiece into
`the rectangles required. Scribing speeds in excess of 20 m min” are common, which is a factor of ten faster
`than full penetration cutting. Full penetration cutting is useful, however, if curves or circles need to be cut.
`
`D1.2.2.4.2 Glasses
`
`Most glasses have a high absorptivity to CO2 laser light and can be cut by the melt shearing process
`(figure D1.2.2). However, the problem with these materials is that of cracking along the cut edge as a
`result of the rapid thermal cycle associated with laser cutting. Most glasses are not laser cut but quartz and
`heat—resistant glasses can be cut effectively. Scribing (see previous section) can also be used to produce lines
`for subsequent snapping.
`
`D1.2.2.5 Other non-metals
`
`The range of non-metals which can be cut by C0; laser is enormous. Cutting speeds exist in the literature
`for materials as diverse as boron epoxy composites and leather.
`Trial and error is really the only way to investigate a new material but a literature search or contact with
`
`a laser supplier may help. It is necessary to be cautious of the fumes given off from any unknown material,
`particularly if it might contain PVC (see section Dl.2.2.2).
`One final note of interest: C0; laser cutting of foodstuffs is generally pointless. Good cut speeds and
`cut qualities may be achievable but the charred nature of the cut edge makes it taste unpleasant.
`
`

`
`Cutting
`1592
`
`Table D1.2.1. Typical cutting speeds for thermoplastic polymers using a 500 W CO2 laser [1]. Notes:
`
`(1) Cutting
`
`speeds can be changed dramatically by changes in molecular weight, degrees of crystallinity, and porosity. (2) As a first
`approximation, cutting speeds and maximum material thickness can be assumed to vary in a linear manner with laser
`power (between 100 and 1500 W). Maximum material thickness for 500 W = 1530 mm depending on material type.
`(3) The cutting gas is usually air at moderate pressures (1-4 bar). Nozzle diameters are 1-2 mm.
`If a glossy edge is
`required on acrylic, gas pressures may be dropped to below 0.25 bar and nozzle diameters increased.
`
`Thickness
`(mm)
`
`Acrylic (PMMA)
`(m min-1)
`
`Polyethylene
`(rn min‘1)
`
`Polypropylene
`(m min_l)
`
`Nylon
`(m min"1)
`
`ABS
`(m mar‘)
`
`Polycarbonate
`(m marl)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`12
`
`35.0
`15.0
`3.0
`5.5
`4.5
`3.5
`3.0
`2.3
`1.9
`1.5
`1.2
`
`11.0
`4.0
`2.2
`1.5
`1.2
`1.0
`0.8
`0.6
`0.5
`0.4
`0.3
`
`17.0
`7.0
`4.0
`2.8
`2.0
`1.6
`1.3
`1.1
`0.9
`0.7
`0.4
`
`20.0
`8.0
`4.8
`3.5
`2.6
`2.0
`1.6
`1.2
`1.0
`0.8
`0.5
`
`21.0
`8.2
`5.0
`3.6
`2.7
`2.1
`1.7
`1.3
`1.1
`0.9
`0.6
`
`21.0
`8.2
`5.0
`3.6
`2.7
`2.1
`1.7
`1.3
`1.1
`0.9
`0.6
`
`Table D1.2.2. Cutting speeds for selected thermoset plastics, rubbers and fibre-reinforced materials with a C02 laser {1].
`
`Notes: (1) Cutting speeds for materials such as fibreglass depend on the relative proportion of glass, resin and trapped
`
`air in the material. (2) Cutting gas is usually high pressure air (3-10 bar), nozzle diameters 1-2 mm. (3) Cutting speeds
`will increase dramatically if porous grades of rubber are cut+figures given here are for fully dense material.
`
`Material
`
`Formica
`
`Phenolic resin
`
`Rubber
`
`Rubber (carbon filled, black)
`
`Laser power
`(W)
`
`Thickness
`
`(mm)
`
`Cutting speed
`(In min“1)
`
`400
`1 200
`400
`400
`400
`400
`400
`400
`400
`400
`400
`400
`
`1.6
`1.6
`3.0
`3.0
`6.0
`3.0
`6.0
`9.0
`3.0
`6.0
`9.0
`12.0
`
`7.8
`14.0
`2.8
`2.9
`1.1
`4.0
`1.6
`0.9
`3.0
`1.2
`0.7
`0.4
`
`Fibreglass (glass fibre reinforced
`epoxy resin)
`
`5.2
`1.6
`450
`15.0
`1 200
`1.6
`2.4
`3.2
`400
`2.6
`3.0
`400
`Glass filled nylon
`
`

`
`Cutting non-metals (C0; laser)
`
`1593
`
`Table D1.2.3. Cutting results for wood and wood-based products using a C02 laser [1]. Note‘. Generally use high
`pressure air as assist gas (340 bar. nozzle diameter l~2 mm).
`
`Material
`
`Poplar
`Scotch Pine
`Teak
`Oak
`
`Ebony
`Pine
`Pine
`Pine
`
`Plywood
`Plywood
`Plywood
`MDF“
`MDF“
`MDF“
`Hardboard
`Hardboard
`
`Corrugated card
`Paper
`
`Laser power
`(W)
`
`Thickness
`(mm)
`
`Cutting speed
`(m min’l)
`
`500
`500
`500
`500
`
`500
`1000
`1000
`1000
`
`1000
`1000
`1000
`1000
`1000
`1000
`500
`500
`
`500
`500
`
`10
`10
`10
`10
`
`10
`6
`12
`20
`
`6
`12
`20
`6
`12
`20
`3
`4
`
`3
`0.1
`
`5.0
`3.3
`3.5
`2.9
`
`1.2
`8.0
`3.2
`1.6
`
`7.0
`3.0
`1.5
`9.0
`4.0
`2.0
`10.0
`7.0
`
`25.0
`5000+
`
`Medium density fibreboard.
`
`Table Dl.2.4. Cutting data for full—penetrati0n profiling of ceramic materials using a C02 laser [1].
`
`Material
`
`Glass
`
`Alumina
`
`Silica
`Ceramic tile
`
`Laser power
`(W)
`
`Thickness
`(mm)
`
`Cutting speed
`(m min”)
`
`500
`500
`500
`500
`500
`1000
`1200
`1200
`
`1
`2
`3
`1
`2
`2
`1
`6.3
`
`1.5
`1.0
`0.5
`1.4
`0.6
`2.0
`0.6
`0.6
`
`

`
`
`
`1 594 Cutting
`
`D1.2.3 Cutting mild and carbon steels
`
`D1.2.3.1 General,’
`
`In the previous section we have seen that CO2 lasers can cut non-metallic materials by one of three mecha-
`nisms:
`
`(1) melt shearing (melting),
`
`(2) vaporization (boiling) and
`
`(3)
`
`chemical degradation (burning)
`
`Some materials are cut by a combination of these mechanisms: for example, polycarbonate involves all
`three and a microscopically rippled, slightly charred cut edge is the result.
`Mild and carbon steels are cut by a combination of melt shearing (see figure D1.2.2 ) and a chemical
`reaction with the cutting gas jet, which in this case is pure oxygen. The cutting mechanism is, for obvious
`reasons, known as oxidation cutting. Inside the cut zone the oxygen jet reacts with the iron in the steel to
`
`produce iron oxides. The reaction has two beneficial effects on the cutting process:
`
`(1) The chemical reaction produces heat which speeds up the cutting process. Typical cutting speeds are
`given in table D1 .2.5.
`
`(2)
`
`chemical reaction produces an oxidized liquid with a lower melting point than steel, which does not
`adhere well to the solid steel and is easily blown away by the oxygen jet. This results in a dross-free cut
`edge and cut components which are ready for immediate use.
`
`D1.2.3.2 Oxidation cutting
`
`When cutting mild steel with oxygen, research has demonstrated that approximately half the energy supplied
`to the cut zone comes from the laser and the other half is produced by the chemical reaction [3]:
`
`Fe + To; = FeO (AH = —257.5s kJ mor‘
`
`at 2000 K [4]).
`
`The oxidation Cutting reaction produces regularly spaced striations on the cut edge even if the laser is used in
`its non—pulsed mode (i.e. cw or ‘continuous wave‘). An example of a typical mild steel cut edge is shown in
`figure D1 .23 and these striations are clearly visible. Much research has been expended on the cyclic nature
`of the oxidation reaction which gives rise to these striations [5—8]), but no clear answer has emerged. The
`use of pulsed or modulated laser beams can reduce cut—edge roughness or the burning of small details. This
`replaces the naturally generated striation pattern with a finer one produced by the overlapping laser pulses.
`Although the physics of striation generation is unclear the overall cutting mechanism is straightforward:
`the laser pre—heats the steel to a temperature at which iron burns spontaneously in an oxygen jet. The burning
`reaction is continuously extinguished by the surrounding cold metal and perpetuated by the encroachment of
`the moving laser beam.
`
`In areas where a lot of detail is to be cut (e.g. when cutting saw teeth), the cutting of one area can
`overheat the next area to be cut. If this happens the burning reaction can possibly cover a larger area than
`usual and the shape of the final product can be affected as well as the cut-edge quality. Reducing the laser
`power or increasing the cut speed can minimize this problem.
`
`DI.2.3.3
`
`The importance ofaxial symmetry ofthe energy input to the cutting zone
`
`It is clear that during the cutting of mild steel a delicately balanced dynamic equilibrium is established, rather
`than a steady state, where a continuous input of energy is matched by a continuous flow of material out of
`the cut zone. The striation—generation reactions take place in a circular manner around the centre line of the
`
`

`
`Cutting stainless steel and non—ferrous metals (C0; laser)
`
`1595
`
`Figure D1.2.3. A typical mild steel cut edge which clearly shows the regularly spaced striations caused by the intrinsically
`cyclic oxidation reaction.
`
`movement of the laser across the workpiece. It is therefore very important that the energy input to the area
`is axially symmetric (i.e. identical in cross section in all directions). The axial symmetry of the energy input
`can be affected in any of four ways:
`
`(1) The symmetry of the laser mode can be imperfect clue to poor tuning or damaged optics.
`
`(2) Any linear polarization of the beam can be considered as asymmetry as the beam will cut better in certain
`directions than others (see section Dl.2.4.2).
`
`(3) The symmetry of the oxygen jet can be disturbed by nozzle damage or contamination.
`
`(4)
`
`If the symmetry of the oxygen jet and the laser mode are individually very good, the symmetry of their
`combination can be upset if the two are not coaxial, due to incorrect centring of the nozzle with the
`beam.
`'
`
`Any lack of symmetry will result in inferior cutting in certain directions. Symptoms of this inferior
`cutting will take the form of increased cut edge roughness, adherent dross on the lower lip of the cut edge,
`material burning at corners and reduced cutting speeds.
`
`D1.2.4 Cutting stainless steel and non-ferrous metals (C0; laser)
`
`D1.2.4.I General
`
`Most metals can be laser cut although for any alloy there will be a limiting maximum thickness. For example,
`a high—power laser cutting machine of 3 or 4 kW power will commercially cut. mild steel in thicknesses up to
`approximately 20 mm, stainless steel up to 15 mm, aluminium up to 8 mm and copper up to 6 mm. Relative
`cutting speeds for these different materials will decrease with maximum thickness (i.e. copper will cut slower
`than stainless steel etc).
`
`The physical properties of materials which affect the laser cutting speed are:
`
`o
`
`thermal conductivity,
`
`

`
`
`
`1596 Cutting
`
`Table D1.2.5. Approximate cutting speeds for mild and carbon steels. Notes: (l)Powers shown here and on other tables
`
`are measured at the workpiece. (2) When cutting the highest thickness for each power, cut—edge quality is reduced. (3).
`Results can be improved if the focal length of the lens is increased with material thickness (e.g. 63.5 mm (2.5 in) focal
`
`length up to 3 mm thick, 127 mm (5 in) from 3-8 mm, 190.5 mm (7.5 in) above 8 mm). (4) Many highervpower (e.g.
`3 kW+) machines cut at lower speeds than expected at thinner sections (e.g. a commercially available 3.5 kW machine
`may only cut 1 mm thick mild steel at 9 m min“' ). This is because these machines are programmed to reduce their
`output power for thin sections in order to increase accuracy. At thicker sections full power is used and so, for example,
`the same 3.5 kW machine will cut 15 mm thick mild steel at 1.1 rn min"'1.
`
`Cutting
`speed at
`500 W
`(m min”)
`
`Cutting
`speed at
`1000 W
`(in min71)
`
`Cutting
`speed at
`1500 W
`(m min""1)
`
`Thickness
`(mm)
`
`Oxygen
`pressure
`(bar)
`
`Nozzle
`diameter
`(mm)
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`
`5.0
`2.8
`1.7
`1.2
`0.5
`—
`-—
`—
`—
`—
`—
`-
`—
`——
`—
`
`8.0
`5.0
`3.2
`2.2
`1.5
`1.2
`0.8
`0.6
`0.5
`0.4
`-
`-
`—
`—
`—
`
`11.0
`7.5
`5.0
`3.5
`2.5
`1.8
`1.5
`1.2
`1.0
`0.8
`0.7
`0.6
`0.5
`0.5
`0.4
`
`2-4
`2-3
`2-3
`1.5-2.5
`1.5-2.5
`1-2
`1-2
`0.5-1.5
`0.5-1.5
`0.5-1.5
`0.4—1_2
`0.4-1.2
`0.3-1.0
`0.3-1.0
`0.3-1.0
`
`1.1-1.5
`1.1-1.5
`1.1-1.5
`1.2-1.6
`1.2-1.6
`1.3-1.8
`1.3-1.8
`1.3-1.8
`1.3-1.8
`1.5-2.0
`1.5-2.0
`1.5-2.0
`1.5-2.0
`1.5-2.0
`1.5-2.0
`
`o
`
`a
`
`0
`
`a
`a
`
`refiectivity.
`
`melting point,
`
`density,
`
`specific heat and
`latent heat of fusion.
`
`As any or all of these properties rise, the cutting speeds decrease as does the maximum thickness which
`can be cut.
`
`The main process parameters which influence cutting speed are:
`
`a
`
`a
`
`laser power density and
`
`type of cutting gas.
`
`Laser power density is obviously a function of the laser power and the focused spot diameter. If this
`density is low, cutting speeds will be low. As power is increased and/or the spot size decreased, the cutting
`speed will increase until an optimum is reached. If, however, the spot size is reduced down to a few tens of
`micrometres in diameter the cutting process may suffer because the kerf width will be too small to allow the
`passage of enough cutting gas. Sufficient gas must be allowed to travel through the cut zone to remove the
`melt. Also, if the power density is allowed to rise above an optimum range, the metal may boil rather than
`
`

`
`Cutting stainless steel and non-ferrous metals (C02 laser)
`
`1597'
`
`melt. Boiling requires considerably more energy than melting and, in addition to this, the vapour generated
`absorbs the incoming laser beam. For this reason it is important to keep the power density of the laser high
`but below that level at which boiling becomes the preferred material response.
`
`The type of cutting gas used basically falls into two categories: reactive and non—reactive (or inert).
`Metals generally experience exothermic oxidation reactions which can benefit cutting speeds. However, an
`oxidized cut edge is of inferior quality to a n0n—oxidized edge. In the early 1990s stainless steel was usually
`cut using oxygen because standard laser cutting machines had powers of between 1 and 2 kW and extra energy
`
`from the oxidation reactions was needed to increase cutting speeds. However, the melt generated when using
`oxygen for stainless steel had a high surface tension and this resulted in resolidified melt or dross on the
`bottom edge of the cut. Higher laser powers were available but these machines had poor quality modes which
`were not axially symmetrical (see section D1 2.3.3). Towards the end of the 19905 3 and 4 kW machines of
`
`cutting mode quality became available. These machines could cut stainless steel quickly and at sections up
`to 12 mm thick using high—pressure nitrogen rather than oxygen. The resulting cuts were of higher quality
`and nitrogen cutting of stainless steel became the norm.
`Most nickel alloys are also cut with nitrogen but many copper alloys have to be cut using oxygen because
`of the material’s high reflectivity. An oxide layer is continuously created in and around the cut zone and this
`helps absorb the incident laser light.
`
`Titanium alloys react uncontrollably when laser heated in an oxygen jet and, in any case, the mechanical
`properties are ruined by the presence of oxygen. The material even reacts with nitrogen and must therefore
`be cut in a stream of genuinely inert gas such as argon or helium.
`
`D1.2.4.2 Polarization
`
`CO2 lasers generate a beam which is polarized and this can have a deleterious effect on the cutting process
`when cutting electrically conductive materials such as metals.
`The symptom of cutting metals with a polarized beam is that the beam is deflected in different directions
`depending on the cutting direction. If such a beam is used to cut a 100 mm square in 10 mm thick metal, the
`top of the cut product may be correctly 100 mm X 100 mm but the bottom could be 99 mm x 101 mm.
`For this reason laser cutting machines have a phase shifting mirror incorporated into them which
`delivers the beam to the workpiece in a random or circularly polarized condition. The cut front then remains
`perpendicular to the material surface at all times and the laser cuts equally well in all directions.
`
`D1.2.4.3 Cutting speeds
`
`Tables D1.2.5—Dl.2.ll present a series of cutting speed results to be expected in a job shop environment,
`i.e. where a general-purpose laser cutting machine is expected to change materials and thicknesses regularly.
`Higher speeds can be achieved on machines dedicated to thin section slitting and profiling (e.g.
`1 mm sheet
`aluminium; 40-50 m min‘1,
`1 mm stainless steel; 30-40 m min”, 1 mm mild steel; 30 m min’1, all at
`
`a laser power of 2.5 kW [12]). These high—speed, thin—sheet machines are starting to replace some of the
`traditional stamping methods employed by the automobile industry.
`
`

`
`1598
`Cutting
`
`Table D1.2.6. Approximate cutting speeds for stainless steel cut with oxygen. Notes: (1) Cuts produced with oxygen
`
`are o

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket