throbber
HTITIL FlE>'STFlF1CT * Lll'll-CS
`
`JOURNAL OI’ APPLIED PHYSICS
`
`VOLUME 95, NUMBER 9
`
`I MAY 2004
`
`Experimental and theoretical investigations of a low-pressure He—Xe
`discharge for lighting purpose
`R. Bussiahn, S. Gortchakov, H. Lange, and D. Uhrlandta)
`[nstirz/lflir Niederlemperatur-Plusmaphysik Greiffs'wa/d, Fr.—L.—Jahn—SI‘r. 19, Greijfswa/d 17489, Germany
`
`(Received 29 December 2003; accepted 22 February 2004)
`
`Low-pressure cylindrical dc glow discharges in a mixture of helium and 2% xenon are studied by
`experiment and self-consistent modeling. They can be used for the design of mercury—free vacuum
`ultraviolet sources and fluorescent lamps for publicity lighting. Experimental diagnostics of the
`column plasma includes measurements of the axial electric field strength and of the axis densities of
`the four lowest excited states of xenon. The electric field is determined from probe measurements.
`The particle densities are derived from the results of tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy.
`Experimental investigations are assisted by a self-consistent analysis of the dc positive column
`plasma. A comparison between calculated and measured values of the axial electric field strength
`and the densities of excited xenon atoms is presented and discussed. The validated model is used for
`optimization of the discharge conditions by variation of the discharge current, gas pressure, and tube
`radius with respect to the radiation power and efficiency of the 147 nm resonance line of xenon. The
`discussion includes an analysis of the power budget of the column plasma. © 2004 American
`[n.s't1‘tL»/re 0fP/tysics.
`[DOII 10.1063/1.1704866]
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`In the last decade the environmental aspect became one
`of the important requirements in the development of light
`sources. From this point of view, weakly ionized plasmas in
`rare-gas mixtures containing xenon are favorite candidates
`for sources of vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation. In addi-
`
`tion, discharges in xenon based mixtures advise a large op-
`erating temperature range and an instant light output after
`switching on. By use of photoluminescence of appropriate
`phosphors they can also be applied as sources of visible
`light, Discharges in pure xenon or in mixtures operating at
`higher pressures and at relatively small electrode distances,
`such as microcellsm or dielectric barrier discharges} are ap-
`plied in plasma display panels4‘"7 or for backlighting. Under
`these conditions, the xenon exciincr radiation is the signifi-
`cant output. Contrary to this the low-pressure discharges pro-
`duce mainly the atomic resonance radiation8‘m and are pro-
`posed to design tube sources based on a very similar
`technology as for standard fluorescent lamps. One of the pos-
`sible applications of such sources is publicity lighting.”
`However, more investigations are needed to find optimal dis-
`charge parameters and operating conditions of such light
`sources concerning their radiation efficiency and output as
`well as their stable operation and life—time. Detailed experi-
`mental and theoretical investigations of the positive column
`plasma of a glow discharge in a mixture of 2% xenon and
`98% helium have been performed in the frame of the present
`work. The glow discharge is dc operated at total gas pres-
`sures in the range from 1.5 to 3.5 Torr and discharge currents
`from 10 to 100 mA. The measurements of the absolute den-
`sities of excited Xe metastable and resonance atoms are im-
`portant for testing model predictions of these discharges.
`
`""Electronic mail: uhrl@inp-greifswald.de
`
`Thus one of the objectives of this work is to apply a tech-
`nique based on tunable diode laser absorption measurements,
`which provides data for the four lowest excited states lsz
`— ls5 (Paschen notation) of xenon over an extended range of
`current and total gas pressure. The paper is organized as
`follows. In Sec. II the experimental apparatus and methods
`of investigations are presented. Section III gives an overview
`of the applied model. The results of measurements and cal-
`culations for the electric field strength and the densities of
`excited xenon atoms are compared in Sec. IV. The Validated
`model is used for the study of the influence of variations of
`discharge current, gas pressure, and tube radius on the VUV
`radiation power and efficiency with respect to the electrical
`input into the column plasma. Results of the calculations are
`presented and discussed.
`
`ll. EXPERIMENT
`
`A. Setup
`
`The experimental arrangement used for the laser absorp-
`tion measurements is shown in Fig. l. The main components
`are the discharge tube, the electric power supply, the tunable
`diode laser system with the detector, and electronics for sig-
`nal processing. In order to allow the laser beam to pass axi-
`ally through the positive column an U-shaped discharge tube
`with plane windows on both ends of the horizontal section is
`used. The electrodes are mounted in the vertical sections.
`
`Thus discharge regions close to the electrodes do not interact
`with the laser beam. An absorption length of 26.7 cm results
`along the part of the positive column in the horizontal sec-
`tion, which has an inner diameter of 17.5 mm. Electron-
`emitting tungsten coi1ed—coil filaments pasted with a mixture
`of Ba--Sr--Ca oxide are used as electrodes. The cathode is
`separately heated with a dc current of 1.5 A to force suffi-
`cient theirnoionic emission. Two tungsten probes of 50 ,um
`
`O021-8979/2004/95(9)/4627/8/$22.00
`
`4627
`
`
`
`© 2004 American Institute of Physics
`
`
`
`ASML 1125
`
`

`
`4628
`
`J. Appl. Phys, Vol. 95, No. 9, 1 May 2004
`
`Bussiahn et al.
`
`1GHz
`
`5Gs/s
`
`Digitizing Oscilloscope
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`neutral density filter
`pinhole G 0.6 mm
`interference filter
`focussing lens
`photo diode
`el. stat. voltmeter
`
`O7l'.h-[>0-7l\J-‘
`
`
`
`
`Laser-
`Laserhead -- Scope
`
`Power Supply
`
`_ O
`
`scilloscope
`
`
`
`(Controller and Display)
`Diode Laser Supply Rack
`
`
`FIG.
`
`l. Experimental setup for the investigation of the positive column plasma by laser atom absorption spectroscopy.
`
`in diameter and 2 mm in length, encapsulated in glass
`sleeves of less than 1 mm in diameter are used to measure
`the difference of the floating potentials at their positions by
`means of a statical voltmeter. The probes are positioned
`closed to the tube axis in a distance of 10 cm. Considering
`this distance one obtains the axial electric field E_.
`in the
`
`positive column which, in addition, acts as a very sensitive
`indicator of the discharge stability. Already slight variations
`of
`point to changes in the gas composition. The tube is
`mounted on a translation stage. By moving it perpendicular
`to the optical axis different radial positions of the positive
`column can be probed by the laser beam. The dc discharge is
`operated on a regulated power supply with a ballast resistor
`of 2 k!) in series with the tube. The voltage across the dis-
`charge tube and the discharge current are measured by digital
`multimeters.
`
`A servoloop inside the laser controller fits the diode injection
`current to the piezosignal in order to stabilize the adjusted
`laser mode.
`
`Because of piezohysteresis effects the laser frequency
`does not exactly follow the control signal. The tuning behav-
`ior is monitored by the so-called LASERSCOPE from TUIOP—
`TICS Corporation, Maitinsried, Gemiany. Its main component
`is an etalon with small finesse. Two 90° phase—shiftcd sinu-
`
`soidal signals are generated by the LASERSCOPE and can be
`displayed on an analog oscilloscope in XY—mode. Tuning the
`laser over a range that equals the free spectral range of the
`etalon causes a circle on the oscilloscope display. Mode—hops
`manifest itself in a reduced radius. Backrefiections into the
`laser diode occur as little oscillations along the circular are.
`
`In order to regulate the laser during a tuning cycle, the LA-
`SERSCOPE signal can be fed back into a servoloop.
`At the output of the etalon the laser beam is coupled into
`a fiber optical waveguide which is connected to an optical
`isolator. The laser beam leaves the fiber having a Gaussian
`
`Before the experiment starts, the discharge tube has been
`baked out at temperatures of 380°C for 8 h under high
`vacuum down to 10" 7 mbar. After this procedure the elec-
`trodes are processed at heating currents of about 1.5 A. Ad-
`ditional cleaning of the tube walls is achieved by several gas
`fillings with pure He and bum~ins at about 100 mA. The final
`state is reached after seine fillings with a gas mixture of ultra
`pure He(99,999%) and Xe(99,99%). Then the tube is filled
`up to the desired pressure and sealed.
`An external cavity diode laser (TUIOPTICS DLl00) in
`Littrow-configuration is used as a background radiation
`source for the absorption measurements. The laser frequency
`has a typical bandwidth of a few megahertz and can be tuned
`over a range of about 40 GHZ without mode—hopping by
`tilting the Littrow—Grating in front of the laser diode via a
`piezocrystal. The necessary signal
`(typically triangular
`shaped) is produced by a laser controller that includes also
`regulators for diode temperature and diode injection current.
`
`
`beam profile. Saturation of the observed optical transition is
`avoided by reducing the laser intensity via a neutral density
`filter within the optical path.
`The radial resolution of the experiment is determined by
`two pinholes with diameters of 0.6 mm which are arranged
`directly in front of and behind the plane windows, respec-
`tively, of the discharge tube. An interference filter in front of
`the detector is used to reduce stray light from the discharge.
`The laser radiation which is transmitted through the plasma
`
`is detected by means ofa photodiodc Soliton UPD SOOSP. To
`acquire the total transmitted laser intensity on the active di-
`ode area a shoit—focal-length lens focuses the laser beam
`onto this region. Finally, the photodiode signal is coupled to
`an oscilloscope via the internal 1 M0 terminator.
`
`

`
`J. Appl. Phys, Vol. 95, No. 9, 1 May 2004
`
`B. Theoretical background of absorption
`measurements
`
`The net intensity balance of laser radiation at frequency
`1/ that passes a layer dx of a medium, is influenced by ab-
`sorption and spontaneous as well as induced emission and
`given by the radiation transport equation
`
`a'I,,(x)
`dx
`
`: W Kr:(x>]u(x) + 3ir,iiid(X)1v(X) + 8 z».spon(x)a
`
`(1)
`
`where K,,(x) names the absorption coefficient and e,,‘;nd(x),
`e ,,VSp0,,(x) denote the coefficients of induced and spontaneous
`emission. Induced emission can be avoided by setting the
`laser power well below the saturation intensity I5( 1/) of the
`observed transition”
`
`1_\~( V) =
`
`2 \//Eh I/3,421
`2
`.
`C‘
`
`(2)
`
`with the transition probability A31 and the speed of light c.
`Under the given experimental conditions spontaneous emis-
`sion is also negligible” and than the solution of Eq.
`(1)
`yields the Lambert Beer’s—law
`
`I,.(L>=I.(0>e'.'fW-‘W.
`
`(3)
`
`which describes the decay of light intensity due to absorption
`within a medium of the length L. The exponent defines the
`optical depth T,,, hence
`
`'I.<L>)
`-_
`‘i
`,,—— (0 K,,(x)dx—- ~lni IV(0)
`
`(4)
`
`is obtained. The absorption coefficient itself can be written as
`
`/<,,(x):: U,,N,,(x).
`
`(5)
`
`Here, N,,(x) is the particle number density of the lower en-
`ergetic level, that is probed by the laser and
`
`62
`0—Iz~*—F4e0m,,c/’ilP"
`is the photoabsorption cross-section, where e denotes the el-
`ementary charge,
`e(,
`the permittivity,
`f,»,‘.
`the oscillator
`strength of the observed transition, and P, the line profile of
`the transition normalized according to f,,P,,a’v== 1.
`Using Eq. (5) and assuming homogeneous distributed
`absorbing species gives an expression for the particle num-
`ber density
`
`(6)
`
`V
`
`N
`
`4e0m,,c
`7',
`elf”. PuL
`
`7
`4e0m,,c“
`[KM
`e2/',»,‘.P,\L ni’0(7\)/
`
`(7)
`
`where P,=P,,c/x2, z(x)21,,(L) and z0(x).-.-1,,(0).
`
`C. Measurement of particle number densities
`
`
`
`Bussiahn et al.
`
`4629
`
`I
`
`‘
`
`ri__.__,I
`1.2
`L4
`
`
`
`4 ..
`
`3-.‘
`'
`_
`Z '
`I __
`
`/1
`Z
`C
`E
`.20
`V}
`
`,
`I
`/'
`;
`,
`
`I’
`
`‘
`8
`.
`,_
`0 -\ I,
`U,
`.
`3
`-
`\
`5 -1-
`‘\
`I)
`‘~—- channel A \-/
`'~ ““
`~~~ channel B
`‘
`_3 till I
`0.6
`0.8
`l
`1(5)
`
`\
`
`FIG. 2. Typical Laserscope signals; main frame: channels in y(I) mode
`with 90° phase shift, inlay: same signals in xy mode. The laser is tuned over
`O.8><FSR of the etalon.
`
`The determination of particle number densities of ex-
`cited xenon states by laser absorption spectroscopy requires
`two series of measurements. The first one is done in order to
`
`analyze I ,(0) in dependence on the laser frequency in ab-
`sence of absorbing species (plasma switched off). Herewith
`transmission properties of every optical component within
`the laser beam path are registered and the power modulation
`of the laser during scanning is considered. In the following
`the plasma is switched on and the actual absorption measure-
`merit is performed. Simultaneously with the laser intensity
`the LASERSCOPE signals are recorded in both series of 1nea—
`surements. The latter are used to realize a time correlation
`between the course of the laser intensity and the current laser
`frequency or its wavelength, respectively. The procedure is
`pointed out in the following.
`The exact determination of the actual laser wavelength is
`fundamental in the scope of absorption experiments. A com-
`mercially available tool for this task is a Wavemeter (Bur-
`leigh WA—4500, see Fig. 1) yielding absolute values with a
`limited temporal resolution of 0.1 s. Therefore, this device is
`used only for calibration. However, the LASERSCOPE can be
`applied for measuring relative laser frequency changes with
`the required temporal resolution of 0.2 ms during laser tun-
`ing. The free spectral range (FSR) of the LASERSCOPE etalon
`is determined once with the help of the Wavemeter. An ex-
`ample of typical LASERSCOPE signals is given in Fig. 2. The
`transfer function of the etalon is sinusoidal shaped. Display-
`
`ing both LASERSCOPE channels on an oscilloscope in xy
`mode results in a full circle if the laser is tuned over the FSR
`
`of the etalon. The value of the phase angle on this circle is a
`measure for the relative frequency shift.
`In practice,
`this
`measurement is done by analyzing the phase angle with the
`help of a LABVIEWTM program,” that fits an analytic function
`to the measured circle. Finally the program assigns the cal-
`culated A)\ scale to the measured photodetector signals in
`every point in time (see Fig. 3).
`Typically two tuning cycles of the laser are recorded for
`In the frame of the experimental work the four lowest
`one absorption measurement. This allows an averaging over
`exited states ls2— ls5 of xenon are probed by laser radia-
`four absorption profiles in the following data analysis. At
`tion. Therefore, the laser is tuned to the optical transitions
`first the optical depth in dependence on the wavelength is
`ls2<—>2p2 (826 nm),
`ls3++2p4 (820 rim),
`ls4<—>2p5 (828
`calculated. By area normalization of this curve a line profile
`rim), and ls5H2p6 (823 nm).
`
`1
`
`
`€
`

`
`4630
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 95, No. 9,
`
`1 May 2004
`
`12$
`
`"I §
`
`3 E
`
`Bussiahn er‘ a/.
`
`-unu-u
`
`u-u-nu-u
`
`----u
`
`-an-nun
`
`-nu.-nun.---a
`
`
`
`u-nunu-uun-uu-innnununuun-nu-uuuun---uuu
`‘'
`..1.=?9.1m1..........._.:..‘ "1'<i‘7'
`
`'11}-ii’
`
`
`
`Its)
`
`11
`
`I-1 C
`
`
`
`energy(eV) to
`
`FIG. 5. Xenon energy level scheme and processes considered in the model:
`excitation and deexcitation in electron collisions (solid arrows), ionization in
`electron collisions (dashed arrows), radiative transitions (dashed double line
`arrows), and quenching processes (double line arrows) with xenon and he-
`lium ground state atoms.
`
`potential, and the balance equation of the electron surface
`charge density at the tube wall. In particular, the radial space-
`charge potential as well as the electron production due to the
`ionization of ground-state and excited atoms are taken into
`account in the electron kinetic equation, which is solved ap-
`plying the two—tcnn approximation'°’”’ of the velocity distri-
`bution function. The electron kinetic treatment yields radially
`
`dependent transport coefficients and mean frequencies of the
`ionization and excitation in electron collisions which are
`
`used to solve the fluid equations. The iterative coupling of
`the electron kinetic treatment and the solution of the fluid-
`
`FIG. 3. Wavelength scaling of absorption signals; relative wavclength shift
`AA from the LaserScopc signal in the upper frame and photodetector signals
`of the laser intensity with (solid line) and without plasma (dashed line) in
`the lower frame in dependence on time I during laser tuning.
`
`function P()\) as shown in Fig. 4 is obtained. The shape ofa
`line profile function is mainly determined by the gas pressure
`of the tube filling. Hence for determining particle number
`densities at different discharge currents a reference line pro-
`file function is used, which has to be measured at a fixed
`
`discharge current whensoever a new gas pressure is to be
`investigated.
`
`III. DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL
`
`A detailed self-consistent model of the cylindrical posi-
`tive column of the xenon-helium dc discharge is used to
`assist
`in understanding the processes taking place in the
`plasma and in optimization of the VUV radiation output. The
`positive column is assumed to be axially symmetric and free
`of striations or other inhomogeneities, so that
`the plasma
`quantities can supposed to be invariant to translations along
`the discharge axis and time independent. The model includes
`a self—consistent treatment of the space-charge field, the ex-
`cited atom balances and the electron kinetics resolved in the
`
`radial space dimension. The cylindrical dc column plasma is
`described by a stationary hybrid method” which comprises
`the coupled solution of the space-dependent kinetic equation
`of electrons, the fluid equations of electrons, ions, and ex-
`cited atoms, the Poisson equation for the radial space-charge
`
`I-l
`
`
`
`PM)in)“m")
`
`050°33°o°o°a°o°a°o=nzmn
`
`(Jli_‘1
`---ouoooaoooou....-ooochoacoo
`
`
`-20 -l5 —l0
`-5
`0
`5
`I0
`15
`AX(pm)
`
`
`
`Poisson equation system leads to a sufficiently accurate de-
`scription of the space-charge confinement
`in the column
`plasma. The axial electric field is finally determined by a
`coupled treatment of the charge-carrier budget in the plasma
`volume and the plasma-wall interactions.”
`The basic equations and details of the solution method
`have been already described in previous papers,l5'”’ where
`the positive column plasma of a neon dc discharge has been
`studied. Specific aspects of the model to describe the colli-
`sion and radiation processes and to treat the balances of the
`excited species in the considered helium-xenon mixture are
`given in Ref. l8.
`However, an extension of the reaction kinetic model,
`which determines the densities of the most populated excited
`states in the helium-xenon column plasma and which is de-
`scribed in detail
`in Ref. 18 has been applied. The present
`model distinguishes 13 states of xenon:
`the ground state
`Xe(lp0), nine individual excited states, i.e., the metastable
`levels Xe(ls5) and Xe(ls3),
`the resonant
`levels Xe(ls4)
`and Xe(ls2),
`five lowest p-levels Xe(2pm), Xe(2p9),
`Xe(2p8), XC(2p7), Xe(2p6),
`two lumped statcs Xe(2p5
`+3d+3s,...,9s) [denoted further for brevity reasons as
`Xe(2p5)] and Xe(2p4W‘_,), and the ion Xe" in the ground
`state. Because of the high values of excitation thresholds of
`helium atoms a simplified level model of helium has been
`used.
`It
`includes the ground state, a lumped excited state
`FIG. 4. Line profile ‘unction of the 2p4<»—> ls; transition in Xe obtained at
`He*, and the ion He+ in the ground state. Figure 5 presents
`pi, = 2.5 Torr, I: = 60 mA.
`
`1 '
`
`

`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 95, No. 9,
`
`1 May 2004
`
`Bussiahn et a/.
`
`4631
`
`l
`T
`T
`‘
`(a) rw:O.87 cm .
`
`
`
`4 —
`
`->< experiment
`O- 0 model
`
`M
`
`3 .¢.L _% _
`0
`20
`40
`60
`30
`1 00
`I2 (mAl
`
`10
`
`-
`
`r
`
`'
`
`r
`'
`r
`(b) [20:25 Torr
`
`“‘**~—€
`
`3“
`
`E -
`-

`;- 6
`
`'
`
`311'"H.I
`.
`
`rH1 r
`
`
`
`
`
`rruulr-rrmrlr._rrruu|
`
`
`
`6
`
`6‘‘8‘\$_...
`as
`‘9“’5-Z§?_“~~-<->
`8“ 2 » o ..
`“if-+<
`1.12 cm
`"><
`.,
`
`-4
`
`1 0 '
`
`‘
`
`R
`
`X
`
`1
`I50
`
`4
`
`O
`
`i
`
`1
`
`x-~—>< experiment
`G—e model
`I
`.
`I
`.
`100 _,
`,
`50
`ll/rw‘ (mA cm ")
`
`'_.L..;.. J._i._l_i_L_r_.t._L_
`0
`0.2
`0.4
`r (em)
`
`0.6
`
`0.8
`
`FlG. 6. Radial variation of the densities Nk of excited xenon and helium
`atoms for L: 60 mA, p.,=: 2.5 Torr, and r,,.=0.87 cm.
`
`the xenon level scheme and the manifold of the processes
`included in the model. The reaction kinetic model takes into
`
`account over 190 plasma—chemical processes, including ex-
`citing, decxciting, and ionizing electron-heavy particle colli-
`sions, chemoionization, radiation, quenching, and formation
`of excimer molecules. The choice and the sources of the
`atomic data, rate constants, radiation life—times, as well as the
`description of the equation systems for the determination of
`densities of heavy particles and their radial variation are pre-
`sented in Ref. 18.
`
`The reaction kinetic model given in Ref. 18 has been
`extended
`by
`the
`individual
`treatment of
`the
`levels
`Xe(2p9),...,Xe(2p5) to improve the accuracy of the de-
`scription of the s-levels. This has been done because the
`'Xe(ls5) and Xe(1s4) states are closely coupled with these
`p-levels due to excitation processes in electron collisions and
`spontaneous emission processes in the singlet system. In ad-
`dition, qucnching processes between these p-levels and the
`Xe(1s3) and Xe( Isl) states are important for the establish-
`ment of the densities in the triplet system.”
`Additional data for
`the treatment of the individual
`
`p-levels have been taken also from the sources given in Ref.
`18, i.e., cross sections of Nakazakilg are used to describe the
`excitation of the p-levels from the ground state in electron
`collisions, stepwise excitation cross sections are calculated
`according
`to Vriens
`and
`Smeets,20 Deutsch—Mark
`formalismz‘ is used to detennine stepwise ionization cross
`sections.
`
`FIG. 7. Experimental data (crosses) and data predicted by the model
`(circles) for the axial electric field strength E; as a function of the discharge
`current
`I,
`for
`three different gas pressures pa and a tube radius r“.
`=0.87 cm (a) and for three different tube radii in the ease of p,,=2.5 Torr
`(b).
`
`densities of excited xenon atoms for the case of a gas pres-
`sure of 2.5 Torr, a tube radius of 0.87 cm, and a discharge
`current of 60 mA. The metastable Xe( 1 s 5) state is by far the
`most occupied excited level. Its density in the axis is by a
`factor of 105 smaller than the helium buffer gas density and,
`hence, by a factor of 103 smaller than the xenon ground state
`density under the considered conditions. Because of the pro-
`nounced radial space charge confinement of the plasma all
`excited atom densities decrease from their axis value by
`more than one order of magnitude over the column cross
`section.” The density of helium metastable atoms is by
`about six orders of magnitude smaller than the Xe( 155) den-
`sity. Hence, processes of excited helium atoms are of negli-
`gible importance in the reaction kinetics as well as in the
`charge carrier budget under the considered conditions.
`
`IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`A. Experimental results and validation of the model
`
`A detailed comparison between the model calculations
`and the measurements has been performed for the axial elec-
`tric field strength and for the axis densities of xenon atoms in
`four lowest excited states (ie, 155,
`ls4,
`ls3, and 133) in
`the column plasma.
`Figure 7 presents measured and calculated values of the
`axial electric field strength at different pressures and tube
`radii for varying discharge currents (data for the radius 1.12
`
`Figure 6 shows an example for the radial variation of the
`
`
`

`
`Bussiahn et al.
`
`’
`
`I
`
`'
`
`l
`
`'
`
`l
`
`’
`
`T
`
`’
`
`I
`
`J
`
`(a) pO=2.5 Torr
`X3055)
`17
`10 h -5
`
`:~r~
`‘E 10“
`8?
`2”‘
`10”
`
`10” _
`
`«E10,,
`if
`2
`
`1010
`
`i
`I
`X.
`“>6;-I‘ Xe(]s )
`109 Q J
`i
`l
`20
`40
`0
`
`I
`.
`x—-x experiment ‘
`I
`.L
`I
`z
`|
`I
`60
`80
`100
`1: (mA)
`
`3
`4
`
`v_
`
`109
`
`l
`l
`
`L
`
`3
`l
`
`><—x experiment ‘
`3
`4
`L
`I _,_
`I
`
`FIG. 8. Experimental data (crosses) and data predicted by the model
`(circles)
`for
`the axis densities of the excited xenon levels Xe( lS5),
`Xe( 134), Xe(l.r_-,), and Xe( 153) as a function ofthe discharge current I: for
`a pressure p(,= 2.5 Torr (a) and as a function ofp“ in case ofI_,.=60 in/\ (b).
`
`factor 2.5, which is quite satisfactory for the description of
`this level.
`
`Generally a good agreement between the results of
`model and the experiments has been reached. The maximum
`discrepancy in the axial electric field strength is below 12%.
`The differences in the axis values of Xe( ls5), Xe( ls4), and
`Xe(ls2) densities do not exceed a factor of about 1.2. Cal-
`culations reproduce well the experimental tendencies when
`the discharge conditions are varied. Therefore, the model can
`be used for reliable quantitative predictions and the study of
`larger ranges of the discharge conditions.
`
`B. Global power balance of the discharge plasma
`
`To evaluate the efficiency of the column plasma with
`respect to its use as a radiation source,
`the global power
`budget of the plasma must be analyzed in detail. To derive
`the global power balance equation the spatially resolved
`power balance of heavy particles has to be considered to-
`gether with the electron power balance.23 Finally, the global
`power balance equation becomes the form
`
`(L5/uv> +<1-fix) +<L3i:l> +<L‘°> +<1~§->+<1«°'>+ <L“>
`
`=E_,.Iz.
`
`(8)
`
`Here, (L{’,UV) and (LIVR) denote the losses due to the VUV
`and infrared (IR) radiation processes, respectively. (L‘°) de-
`scribes the ionization losses, the action of the radial electric
`
`Xe(.i—.s:—g_:::==Q:::::Q:::::Q :
`Q7-9‘
`3
`g
`“
`-
`3
`
`_
`
`-
`
`
`
`4632
`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 95, N0. 9, 1 May 2004
`
`cm are taken from Ref.
`
`l8). The axial field shows a pro-
`
`nounced pressure dependence. An increase of the pressure
`leads to higher elastic losses in the plasma and, consequently,
`to a higher axial electric field strength. The dependence on
`the discharge current is less pronounced. The growth of the
`discharge current is accompanied by a decrease of the elec-
`tric field. Such a behavior is typical for a subnormal dis-
`charge, where the total ionization of the gas is dominated by
`stepwise ionization processes. An increase of the tube radius
`causes also an increase of the axial electric field.
`As can be seen in Fig. 7, measured and calculated values
`of the axial field sufficiently well agree in the range of
`smaller discharge current densities, but discrepancies occur
`at currents larger than 60 mA. A detailed discussion of the
`accuracy of the applied model has been already given in Ref.
`18. The hybrid model is based on less approximations like
`the two-tenn approximation of the electron velocity distribu-
`tion but includes a strict description of the nonlocal electron
`kinetics and the spatial structure of the column plasma in
`radial direction. It has been shown, that main sources of er-
`
`rors are the inaccuracy of the used atomic data and devia-
`tions from the model assumptions.
`An important assumption of the model is that the posi-
`tive column plasma is in steady—state and homogeneous in
`axial direction. However, experimental investigations show,
`that this assumption is not fulfilled in the whole range of the
`discharge parameters considered here. The occurrence of dis-
`charge instabilities (c.g., moving striations) has been studied
`by analyzing the time-resolved signal from an optical probe.
`This signal shows fluctuations with an amplitude of about
`5% at a discharge current of 40 1nA and a tube radius of 0.87
`cm. The amplitude increases with the current and reaches
`about 12% at 60 mA. The observed instabilities are less im-
`
`pottant at lower currents but may be the reason for the de-
`viations of the model results from the measurements of the
`axial field at currents larger than 60 mA.
`The axis densities of the four lowest excited states of
`
`xenon in the positive column has been studied in a tube with
`a radius of 0.87 cm at different discharge currents and gas
`pressures. The experimental and theoretical results are coin-
`pared in Fig. 8. The measured densities of the metastable
`Xe(ls5) and Xe(ls_,) states show a slight decrease with
`growing discharge current. The axis densities of both reso-
`nance states increase with the discharge current. The depen-
`dence of the densities on the gas pressure is only weak. Cal-
`culated axis densities of the Xe(ls5)
`state and of both
`resonance states reproduce the dependencies found experi-
`mentally, and show a good quantitative agreement with the
`measured values.
`
`Predicted axis densities and the dependence on the dis-
`charge current of the Xe( ls 3) state do not coincide with the
`experimental results. Calculated values increase with the cur-
`rent, saturation occurs not until a discharge current of 80
`mA. Reasons for this discrepancy could be that coupling
`processes between Xe(ls3) and other excited xenon levels
`are not described well or are not included in the model be-
`cause of the absence or the inaccuracy of corresponding
`atomic data. However, the maximum discrepancy between
`calculated and measured data for Xe(ls3) does not exceed
`
`
`
`

`
`J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 95, No. 9, 1 May 2004
`
`Bussiahn et a/.
`
`4633
`
`
`
`'3
`5‘;
`9
`<:
`
`100
`
`10
`
`if
`E
`‘
`“
`
`0'10
`
`I
`2
`i
`Xe(1s4) gag,”
`_ Ag/gr‘
`I —_A’___‘
`‘h
`-
`O
`A "TA“““NA ————— ..A
`31
`E
`O:
`J
`:01
`A?
`A
`A---A efficiency
`9.9 power
`‘
`1
`l
`i
`l
`so
`100 0'01
`
`I
`
`i
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`F
`
`3
`_
`.
`
`C:
`E
`E
`:5
`
`' O H
`
`A
`
`‘O
`
`xe(is_,)
`Q7 '1
`A... “A, ..
`
`0
`
`A
`
`.
`
`1
`
`I
`20
`
`l
`40
`
`n
`
`I
`so
`12 (mA)
`
`FIG. 9. Important terms of the global power budget of the plasma in depen-
`dence on the gas pressure [70 at lz=60 mA; radially averaged power loss
`rates L). with respect to the power input E,.l_..
`
`FIG. 10. Effieiency nvuv (triangles) and output power Pym, (circles) of the
`VUV radiation generation from the levels Xe( 134) and Xe(l.s‘_-1) as a fune«
`tion of the discharge current I: for p(,=2.5 Torr and r,,=0.87 em.
`
`field (radial coolingof the electrons) corresponds to the term
`(Lcl)
`includes the power losses due to the elastic
`collisions of electrons with helium and xenon atoms. The
`losses due to the diffusion of the metastable xenon atoms
`onto the wall are described by the temi (zfgfif). The term (Lh)
`represents the losses due to the chemoionization.
`Figure 9 presents the important terms of the power bal-
`ance for the discharge current 13: 60 mA at varying gas pres-
`sure. The areas between the curves denote the proportions of
`the different
`losses with respect to the power input E513.
`Thus, the ratio (L{’,Uv)/E313 determines the efficiency of the
`VUV radiation. The dominant power loss in the helium-
`xenon plasma arises in the elastic collisions which consume
`up to 70% of the input power at a gas pressure above 2.5
`Torr. The next important contribution is the loss due to the
`VUV radiation. Comparable contributions to the power bal-
`ance result from IR radiation, ionization, and cooling of the
`electrons in the radial electric field. The variation of the gas
`
`pressure causes large variations of the loss proportions. A
`decrease of the gas pressure leads to a diminishing of elastic
`losses and a growth of all other contributions. The elastic
`collision losses decreases down to 30% at 1 Torr, while the
`
`efficiency of VUV radiation increases from 16% at 3.5 Torr
`to about 31% at
`1 Torr. The proportional
`loss due to the
`diffusion of the metastable xenon atoms onto the wall be-
`
`comes important at a gas pressure below 2 Torr and reaches
`about 5% at 1 Torr.
`
`The global power balance has also been analyzed for
`varying discharge currents. An increase of‘ the discharge cur-
`rent leads to a decrease of the contribution ofVUV radiation
`
`losses and a growth of elastic losses. All other contributions
`remain nearly independent from the discharge current.
`
`C. Optimization of discharge conditions
`
`lindrical column, 77VUV is the ratio of PVUV to the electrical
`input E3]: into the column plasma per unit length.
`Because of the very low density of excited helium atoms
`in the plasma, only the transitions from the resonance levels
`Xe(ls4) and Xe(1s3) to the ground state contribute to the
`VUV radiation. Figure 10 shows the efficiency and the out-
`put power of these two radiation channels at 2.5 Torr and
`varying discharge current. The density of the Xe(1s4) atoms
`is by about a factor of 50 higher than that of the Xe(1s2)
`atoms. Therefore,
`the corresponding contributions to the
`VUV radiation efficiency and power due to the radiation
`from the Xe(ls2) level with the wavelength of 130 nm
`reaches only about 3% of the contributions due to the
`Xe(1s4) radiation (147 nm). Therefore, the VUV radiation
`from the considered discharge is mainly due to the resonance
`radiation of the Xe(1s4) state, and further analysis will be
`performed for this transition only.
`Figure 11 presents the dependencies ofthe efficiency and
`power of the 147 nm radiation on the discharge current den-
`sity ],/ri, the gas pressure and the tube radius. The effi-
`ciency decreases with increasing cur

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket