`
`___________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`
`
`GOOGLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2016-002121
`Patent 7,974,339 B2
`___________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00215 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00212 of
`Patent No. 7,974,339 B2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s May 20, 2016 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 9), Petitioner Google Inc. respectfully requests oral argument, which
`
`is currently scheduled for February 14, 2017. Petitioner requests at least 45
`
`minutes per side for the oral argument.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether claims 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 of the ’339 patent are
`
`obvious over Spriggs (GOOG 1005) in view of Golin (GOOG 1006)
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`2. Whether claims 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 of the ’339 patent are
`
`obvious over Belfor (GOOG 1007) in view of Thyagarajan (GOOG
`
`1008), and further in view of Golin (GOOG 1006) pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`3. Issues raised in the Petition, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response,
`
`Patent Owner’s Response, Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to
`
`Amend and corresponding Oppositions and Replies, Petitioner’s
`
`Reply, Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply, and any Motion to Exclude, Motion
`
`to Strike, or Motion for Observation on Cross Examination and
`
`corresponding Oppositions and Replies (if filed);
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-00212 of
`Patent No. 7,974,339 B2
`4. Any issues specified by Patent Owner Vedanti Systems Limited in its
`
`Request for Oral Argument;
`
`5. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`6. Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector,
`
`and screen.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Michael Messinger/
`
`Michael V. Messinger, Reg. No. 37,575
`Michelle K. Holoubek, Reg. No. 54,179
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`Date: January 10, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served electronically via e-mail on
`
`January 10, 2017, in its entirety on the following:
`
`Robert M. Asher
`John J. Stickevers
`SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP
`125 Summer Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`Tel: (617) 443-9292
`Fax: (617) 443-0004
`rasher@sunsteinlaw.com
`jstickevers@sunsteinlaw.com
`sunsteinip@sunsteinlaw.com
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Michael Messinger/
`
`Michael V. Messinger, Reg. No. 37,575
`Michelle K. Holoubek, Reg. No. 54,179
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`Date: January 10, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`4957777_1.docx