throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`___________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`___________________
`
`
`
`GOOGLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VEDANTI SYSTEMS LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2016-002121
`Patent 7,974,339 B2
`___________________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00215 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00212 of
`Patent No. 7,974,339 B2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s May 20, 2016 Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 9), Petitioner Google Inc. respectfully requests oral argument, which
`
`is currently scheduled for February 14, 2017. Petitioner requests at least 45
`
`minutes per side for the oral argument.
`
`Petitioner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether claims 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 of the ’339 patent are
`
`obvious over Spriggs (GOOG 1005) in view of Golin (GOOG 1006)
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`2. Whether claims 1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 of the ’339 patent are
`
`obvious over Belfor (GOOG 1007) in view of Thyagarajan (GOOG
`
`1008), and further in view of Golin (GOOG 1006) pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 103(a);
`
`3. Issues raised in the Petition, Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response,
`
`Patent Owner’s Response, Patent Owner’s Contingent Motion to
`
`Amend and corresponding Oppositions and Replies, Petitioner’s
`
`Reply, Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply, and any Motion to Exclude, Motion
`
`to Strike, or Motion for Observation on Cross Examination and
`
`corresponding Oppositions and Replies (if filed);
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00212 of
`Patent No. 7,974,339 B2
`4. Any issues specified by Patent Owner Vedanti Systems Limited in its
`
`Request for Oral Argument;
`
`5. Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all matters;
`
`6. Any other outstanding motions and pleadings, and other issues that
`
`the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final Written Decision.
`
`Petitioner requests the ability to use audio visual equipment to display
`
`possible demonstratives and exhibits, including the use of a computer, projector,
`
`and screen.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Michael Messinger/
`
`Michael V. Messinger, Reg. No. 37,575
`Michelle K. Holoubek, Reg. No. 54,179
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`Date: January 10, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PETITIONER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served electronically via e-mail on
`
`January 10, 2017, in its entirety on the following:
`
`Robert M. Asher
`John J. Stickevers
`SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP
`125 Summer Street
`Boston, MA 02110
`Tel: (617) 443-9292
`Fax: (617) 443-0004
`rasher@sunsteinlaw.com
`jstickevers@sunsteinlaw.com
`sunsteinip@sunsteinlaw.com
`
`
`
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`
`/Michael Messinger/
`
`Michael V. Messinger, Reg. No. 37,575
`Michelle K. Holoubek, Reg. No. 54,179
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`Date: January 10, 2017
`1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3934
`(202) 371-2600
`
`4957777_1.docx

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket