`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`
`HTC CORPORATION, AND HTC AMERICA, INC.
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`NONEND INVENTIONS, N.V.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225
`
`Patent No. 8,099,513 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317
`
`AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`129051591.2
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225
`Patent No. 8,099,513 B2
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(a)-(b), Petitioners HTC
`
`Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively, “HTC”) and Patent Owner
`
`Nonend Inventions, N.V. (“Nonend”) jointly move to terminate the present inter
`
`partes review proceeding in light of the parties’ resolution of their dispute relating
`
`to U.S. Patent No. 8,099,513 B2 (“the ’513 patent”) and the executed written
`
`agreement regarding the parties’ resolution. (This proceeding has already been
`
`terminated as to petitioner Microsoft Corporation.)
`
`Termination is appropriate in the instant proceeding because the dispute
`
`between HTC and Nonend has been resolved. The IPR petition was accorded a
`
`Nov. 20, 2015 filing date and this proceeding is at a sufficiently early stage.
`
`As required by 35 U.S.C. § 317(b), the parties are filing, concurrently
`
`herewith, a true copy of their executed written agreement as Exhibit 1067. The
`
`parties further request, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), that the agreement be
`
`treated as confidential business information and kept separate from the files of the
`
`involved patent. The parties are filing, concurrently herewith, a motion to treat the
`
`settlement agreement as confidential business information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`129051591.2
`
`1
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225
`Patent No. 8,099,513 B2
`
`
`
`The applicable statute, 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), provides that an inter partes
`
`review proceeding “shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the
`
`joint request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” (emphasis
`
`added). Moreover, strong public policy considerations favor settlement between
`
`parties to an inter partes review proceeding. Indeed, the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide provides:
`
`N. Settlement. There are strong public policy reasons to favor
`settlement between the parties to a proceeding. The Board will be
`available to facilitate settlement discussions, and where appropriate,
`may require a settlement discussion as part of the proceeding. The
`Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a
`settlement agreement, unless the Board has already decided the merits
`of the proceeding.
`
`The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14
`
`2012).
`
`Notably, the IPR petition was filed on Nov. 20, 2015 and thus this
`
`proceeding is at a sufficiently early stage where no motions or actions are
`
`outstanding and the Board has not invested significant resources in this proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response is due March 9, 2016 and has not been filed
`
`yet. The due date for the Board’s institution decision is June 9, 2016. Therefore,
`
`
`129051591.2
`
`2
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225
`Patent No. 8,099,513 B2
`
`
`
`the Office has not decided the merits of the proceeding. No public interest factors
`
`militate against termination of this proceeding.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), because Petitioner HTC and Patent Owner
`
`Nonend request this termination, no estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e) shall attach
`
`as to Petitioner HTC.
`
`Wherefore, HTC and Nonend respectfully request termination of the Inter
`
`Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,099,513, PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Matthew J. Antonelli/
`Lead Counsel
`
`Matthew J Antonelli
`Zachariah Harrington
`Kris Yue Teng
`Larry Dean Thompson , Jr
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Nonend Inventions, N.V.
`
`Dated: February 23, 2016
`
`
`
`Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson LLP
`4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450
`Houston, TX 77006
`
`
`
`
`129051591.2
`
`3
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225
`Patent No. 8,099,513 B2
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Bing Ai/
`Lead Counsel
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Matthew C. Bernstein, Pro Hac Vice
`Kevin J. Patariu, Reg. No. 63,210
`Christopher L. Kelley, Reg. No. 42,714
`Vinay P. Sathe, Reg. No. 55,595
`Philip A. Morin, Reg. No. 45,926
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`HTC
`
`Dated: February 23, 2016
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
`
`129051591.2
`
`4
`
`
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2016-00225
`Patent No. 8,099,513 B2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE (37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), 42.105(a))
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing JOINT
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74 and supporting materials have been served in its entirety this 23rd Day of
`
`February 2016 on the following parties via electronic mail:
`
`Bing Ai
`Matthew C. Bernstein
`Kevin J. Patariu
`Christopher L. Kelley
`Vinay P. Sathe
`Philip A. Morin
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`PerkinsServiceMSFT-Nonend-IPR@perkinscoie.com
`
`
` /Matthew J. Antonelli/
`Reg. No. 45,973
`4306 Yoakum Blvd., Ste. 450
`Houston, TX 77006
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`Nonend Inventions, N.V.
`
`
`
`
`
`129051591.2