throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 73
`Entered: March 9, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`NEPTUNE GENERICS, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ELI LILLY & COMPANY,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Cases IPR2016-00237, IPR2016-002401
`Patent 7,772,209 B2
`_______________
`
`Before JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY,
`Vice Chief Administrative Patent Judges, and LORA M. GREEN,
`Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Paul J. Skiermont
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`Cases IPR2016-00237, IPR2016-00240
`Patent 7,772,209 B2
`
`
`
`On October 27, 2016, Petitioner filed a motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Paul J. Skiermont. Paper 39 (“Motion”).2 The Motion is
`supported by a declaration of Mr. Skiermont. Ex. 1041. Patent Owner did
`not file an opposition to the motion.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c) have been met and there is good cause
`to admit Mr. Skiermont pro hac vice.
`Petitioner is reminded that a Power of Attorney in accordance with 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(b) must be submitted for Mr. Skiermont.
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice admission of
`Paul J. Skiermont are granted; Mr. Skiermont is authorized to act as back-up
`counsel in the instant proceedings only;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file updated mandatory
`notices identifying Mr. Skiermont as back-up counsel in accordance with 37
`C.F.R. §§ 42.8 and 42.10;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant
`proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Skiermont is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`2 For purposes of expediency, we refer to the papers filed in IPR2016-
`00237. Petitioner filed similar papers in IPR2016-00240.
`
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Cases IPR2016-00237, IPR2016-00240
`Patent 7,772,209 B2
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Skiermont is to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Sarah Spires
`237Neptune@skiermontderby.com
`Parvathi Kota
`237Neptune@skiermontderby.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Dov Grossman
`dgrossman@wc.com
`David Krinsky
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`Adam L. Perlman
`aperlman@wc.com
`
`James Leeds
`Leeds_james@lilly.com
`John Demeter
`Demeter_john_c@lilly.com
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket