throbber
Paper 95
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: July 26, 2019
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`AMERIGEN PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED and
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-002861
`Patent 8,822,438 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before JEFFREY N. FREDMAN, KRISTINA M. KALAN and
`JACQUELINE T. HARLOW, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KALAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Expunge
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14, 42.56
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-01317 has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00286
`Patent 8,822,438 B2
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.56, Janssen Oncology, Inc. (“Patent
`Owner”) moves to expunge Exhibits 2038, 2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and
`2118. Paper 94, 1 (“Motion”). Patent Owner attests Petitioner does not
`oppose the Motion. Id. at 1. For the reasons set forth below, we grant
`Patent Owner’s Motion.
`A strong public policy exists for making information filed in an inter
`partes review publicly available. 37 C.F.R. § 42.14; see also Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48760–61 (Aug. 14, 2012). The
`public’s interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history is
`balanced with the party’s interest in protecting its truly sensitive,
`confidential information. 77 Fed. Reg. at 48760–61. Because sealed
`information ordinarily becomes publicly available after final judgment, a
`party wishing to preserve its confidentiality may file a motion to expunge
`the information from the record. Id.; 37 C.F.R. § 42.56.
`We previously determined good cause existed to seal Exhibits 2038,
`2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118, because they contain non-public research
`summaries, non-public research and development information, and
`testimony that relies on those documents. Paper 89, 2. As we stated in our
`Order granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Seal, it was not necessary to
`identify, nor discuss in detail, any confidential information in rendering our
`Final Decision. Id. at 3. As such, expunging these exhibits would not
`hinder the public’s ability to understand the Final Decision or the trial at
`large. We therefore agree with Patent Owner that the public’s interest in
`being able to access this information does not outweigh Patent Owner’s need
`to protect its confidential information.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00286
`Patent 8,822,438 B2
`
`
`Accordingly, we grant Patent Owner’s request to expunge Exhibits
`2038, 2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118.
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion to Expunge is granted, and
`Exhibits 2038, 2044, 2092, 2093, 2094, and 2118 are expunged.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00286
`Patent 8,822,438 B2
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`William Hare
`bill@miplaw.com
`
`Gabriela Materassi
`materassi@miplaw.com
`
`Teresa Rea
`trea@crowell.com
`
`Shannon Lentz
`slentz@crowell.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Dianne Elderkin
`delderkin@akingump.com
`
`Barbara Mullin
`bmullin@akingump.com
`
`Ruben Munoz
`rmunoz@akingump.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket