throbber
Case No. IPR2016-00291
`U.S. Patent No. 5,732,375
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION
`
`Petitioner
`
`
`
`Patent No. 5,732,375
`Issue Date: March 24, 1998
`Title: METHOD OF INHIBITING OR ALLOWING AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`Case No. IPR 2016-00291
`
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`OF MARK A. CHAPMAN
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00291
`U.S. Patent No. 5,732,375
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), Petitioner Toyota Motor Corporation
`
`(“Toyota”) respectfully requests the pro hac vice admission of Mark A. Chapman as
`
`backup counsel for Toyota in the current proceedings.
`
`In support of this motion, a declaration of Mark A. Chapman is submitted as
`
`Exhibit 1013 explaining that he satisfies the criteria for pro hac vice admission as set
`
`forth in Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (Oct. 15,
`
`2013).
`
`1.
`
`Statement of Facts
`
`1.
`
`Lead counsel, John Flock, is a registered practitioner.
`
`2. Mr. Chapman is a litigation attorney experienced in patent cases and is a
`
`member in good standing of the New York Bar. He has not had any application denied
`
`for admission to practice, nor has he been sanctioned, cited for contempt, suspended
`
`or disbarred from practice, before any court or administrative body.
`
`3. Mr. Chapman has an established familiarity with the subject matter at
`
`issue in this proceeding, including U.S. Patent No. 5,732,375 (“the ’375 patent”), the
`
`petition for inter partes review, and the supporting expert declaration submitted by
`
`Petitioner in this matter as shown in his accompanying May 3, 2016 Declaration
`
`(“Chapman Declaration,” Ex. 1013).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`
`Case No. IPR2016-00291
`U.S. Patent No. 5,732,375
`In his declaration, Mr. Chapman also attests to each of the listed items
`
`
`
`4.
`
`required by the Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission – 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.10 in IPR2013-00639. Chapman Declaration ¶¶ 1-11 (Ex. 1013).
`
`
`2. Conclusion
`
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Toyota respectfully requests that the Board admit
`
`Mark A. Chapman pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`
`Date: May 3, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/ John Flock /
`John Flock
`Registration No. 39,670
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`Tel: (212) 425-7200
`Email: jflock@kenyon.com
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Toyota
`Motor Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00291
`U.S. Patent No. 5,732,375
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing MOTION FOR PRO
`
`HAC VICE ADMISSION OF MARK A. CHAPMAN and Exhibit 1013 were
`
`served via e-mail on May 3, 2016, in their entirety on the following:
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi (Reg. No. 41,402)
`Holly J. Atkinson (Reg. No. 69,934)
`Jason A. LaBerteaux (Reg. No. 65,724)
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`333 W San Carlos St., Suite 200
`San Jose, CA 95110
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`holly.atkinson@ascendalaw.com
`jason.laberteaux@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`_/ John Flock /______
`John Flock
`Reg. No. 39,670
`KENYON & KENYON LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
` Tel: (212) 425-7200
` Email: jflock@kenyon.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Toyota
`Motor Corporation
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket