throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2016-00213, Paper 44
`IPR2016-00295, Paper 36
`Entered: February 15, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`FPUSA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`M-I LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00213 (Patent 9,004,288 B2)
`Case IPR2016-00295 (Patent 9,074,440 B2)
`____________
`
`
`Before JAMES A. TARTAL, CARL M. DEFRANCO, and
`TIMOTHY J. GOODSON, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GOODSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00213 (Patent 9,004,288 B2)
`IPR2016-00295 (Patent 9,074,440 B2)
`
`
`
`Patent Owner requests an oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a).
`
`IPR2016-00213, Paper 39; IPR2016-00295, Paper 31. Patent Owner’s requests are
`
`granted. Although the cases captioned above are not consolidated, the hearings
`
`will be held together and one transcript will be provided for both cases.
`
`The Scheduling Order in these cases set Due Date 7 as March 1, 2017.
`
`IPR2016-00213, Paper 15, 6; IPR2016-00295, Paper 10, 6. However, in an email
`
`to the Board dated February 10, 2017, Patent Owner requested postponement of
`
`the hearing in view of its pending motion to terminate these proceedings, which
`
`Patent Owner argues may eliminate the need for a hearing on the merits. See
`
`IPR2016-00213, Paper 42; IPR2016-00295, Paper 34. Patent Owner’s email
`
`indicated that Petitioner joins in the request to postpone the hearing. Consistent
`
`with the parties’ joint postponement request, the hearing will commence at
`
`1:00 PM ET, on April 24, 2017, on the ninth floor of Madison Building East,
`
`600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. If either party has a conflict with this
`
`date it must notify the Board within three business days of entry of this Order.
`
`Petitioner is allotted 60 minutes of total argument time for both cases. Likewise,
`
`Patent Owner is allotted 60 minutes of total argument time for both cases.
`
`Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at issue in these
`
`reviews are unpatentable. Therefore, at the hearing, Petitioner will proceed first to
`
`present arguments with regard to the challenged claims and grounds on which
`
`basis we instituted trial in these proceedings. Petitioner may reserve a portion of
`
`its argument time for rebuttal after Patent Owner has responded to Petitioner’s
`
`initial presentation. Thereafter, Patent Owner will argue its opposition to
`
`Petitioner’s case, having available to it the entirety of its allotted argument time.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00213 (Patent 9,004,288 B2)
`IPR2016-00295 (Patent 9,074,440 B2)
`
`
`
`To the extent Petitioner reserves rebuttal time, Petitioner then may make use of its
`
`rebuttal time responding to Patent Owner.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served at least
`
`five business days before the hearing. The parties also shall provide a courtesy
`
`copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least five business days prior to
`
`the hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties shall not file any
`
`demonstrative exhibits in these proceedings without prior authorization from the
`
`Board. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v.
`
`The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB
`
`Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content of
`
`demonstrative exhibits. The parties shall meet and confer to discuss any objections
`
`to demonstrative exhibits at least three business days before the hearing. If any
`
`issues regarding demonstratives remain unresolved after the parties meet and
`
`confer, the parties shall file jointly a one-page list of objections to the
`
`demonstrative exhibits at least two business days before the hearing. For each
`
`objection, the list must identify with particularity the demonstratives subject to the
`
`objection and include a short, one-sentence statement explaining the objection. We
`
`will consider the objections and schedule a conference call if necessary.
`
`Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the objections until the hearing or after the
`
`hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits not presented timely will be
`
`considered waived. We take this opportunity to remind the parties that the
`
`demonstrative exhibits presented in these cases are not evidence and are intended
`
`only to assist the parties in presenting their oral argument to the panel.
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00213 (Patent 9,004,288 B2)
`IPR2016-00295 (Patent 9,074,440 B2)
`
`
`
`One or more members of the panel hearing this case will attend the hearing
`
`remotely via a videoconferencing device and will not be able to view the projection
`
`screen in the hearing room. Consequently, the presenter should identify clearly
`
`and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) or
`
`page of the record referenced during the hearing.
`
`We expect lead counsel for each party to be present in person at the hearing.
`
`Lead or backup counsel, however, may present the party’s argument. If either
`
`party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be attending the hearing, that party
`
`should initiate a joint telephone conference with the other party and the panel no
`
`later than two business days prior to the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`We will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s transcript
`
`will constitute the official record of the hearing. Each party shall provide a hard
`
`copy of their demonstratives to the court reporter at the hearing. Requests for
`
`audio-visual equipment will not be honored unless presented in a separate
`
`communication directed to Trials@uspto.gov not less than five days before the
`
`4
`
`hearing.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-00213 (Patent 9,004,288 B2)
`IPR2016-00295 (Patent 9,074,440 B2)
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Brad Chin
`Brad.chin@bgllp.com
`
`Kevin Tamm
`Kevin.tamm@bgllp.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Barry Schindler
`Schlumberger-440-228-IPRs@gtlaw.com
`schindlerb@gtlaw.com
`
`
`
`Heath Briggs
`briggs@gtlaw.com
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket