throbber
Acta Radiologica
`
`ISSN: 0001-6926 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iaro20
`
`Catheter Replacement of the Needle in
`Percutaneous Arteriography: A new technique
`
`Sven Ivar Seldinger
`
`To cite this article: Sven Ivar Seldinger (1953) Catheter Replacement of the Needle in
`Percutaneous Arteriography: A new technique, Acta Radiologica, 39:5, 368-376
`
`To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00016925309136722
`
`Published online: 14 Dec 2010.
`
`Submit your article to this journal
`
`Article views: 406
`
`View related articles
`
`Citing articles: 81 View citing articles
`
`Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
`http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iaro20
`
`Download by: [173.68.147.2]
`
`Date: 09 February 2016, At: 09:29
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 1
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`FROM THE KOENTBEN DIAQNOSTIC DEPARTMENT (DIRECTOR: PROFESSOR KNUT LIKDBLOM),
`KAROLINSKA SJUKIiUSET, STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN
`.~
`
`CA'l'HE'l'ER IZEI'LACEMENT OF THE NEEDLE 1N
`PERCUTANEOUS AltTERlOGItAPHY
`A new technique
`by
`S v e n I v a r S e l d i n g e r
`
`The catheter method of angiography has become more popular in
`the past few years, as it provides the following advantages over the
`method of injecting the contrast medium by means of a simple needle:
`1) The contrast medium may be injected into a vessel at any level
`desired.
`2) Risk of extravascular injection of the contrast medium is mini-
`mised.
`3) The patient may be placed in any position required.
`4) The catheter may be left in situ without risk while the films are
`being developed, thus facilitating re-examination if necessary.
`Until recently, however, the use of the catheter method was restricted
`because of the lack of a suitable flexible thin-walled catheter which
`could be used percutaneously. FARINAS, in 1941, described a method in
`which a urethral catheter was passed up into the aorta through a trocar
`inserted in the exposed femoral artery. In 1947, RADNER catheterized
`the exposed and ligated radial artery and performed vertebral angio-
`graphy and later thoracic aortography. Since then, many authors have
`catheterized arteries for various purposes, by surgical exposure followed
`by ligature or resuturing of the artery. In 1949, JONSSON performed
`thoracic aortography after puncture of the common carotid artery by
`means of a blunt cannula provided with an inner sharp needle. The
`cannula, guided by a silver thread, was then directed downwards. Later
`Ihiefly presented at the Congress of the Northern Association of Medical Radiol-
`ogy, Helsinki, June, 1952; submitted for publication, October 28, 1952.
`
`~~
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 2
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`369
`
`I
`I
`
`CATHETER REPLACEMENT OF THE NEEDLE 1N PERCCTANEOUS ARTERIOGRAPHY
`the procedure was abandoned, partly because
`it was considered that the cannula might in-
`jure the aortic wall. This percutaneous method
`might have proved more useful if a technique
`for using a flexible catheter of adequate lumen
`had been available a t the time.
`The artery exposure technique of catheter-
`ization is time-consuming, troublesome and
`may present certain risks. The thin-walled poly-
`ethylene tube, however, makes percutaneous
`catheterization possible, as reported by PEIRCE
`in 1951, who passed in the tubing through a
`large bore needle. This method was suitable
`for aortography via the femoral artery. In the
`same year, DONALD, KESMODEL, ROLLINS and
`PADDISON, employing a similar technique, cath-
`eterized the common carotid artery in cere-
`bral angiography . The method necessitates the
`use of a large bore needle which may make
`puncture difficult and limits its use to com-
`paratively large arteries, hence PEIRCE'S at-
`tempts to catheterize the brachial artery were
`disappointing. There is also extra damage to
`the artery and, as the hole in the artery is
`larger than the catheter, haemorrhage after
`removal of the needle may be troublesome. To
`prevent bleeding, the needle may be kept in
`situ during the investigation; this, however, in-
`creases the risk of injury to the patient during
`movement.
`There is a simple method, however, of using
`a catheter the same size as the needle, and
`which has been used at Karolinska Sjukhuset
`since April 1952. The main principle consists
`in the catheter being introduced o'n a flexible
`leader through the puncture hole after withdrawal of the puncture
`needle. The details are as follows:
`Epuipnaent. (Supplied by A. B. Stille- Werner, Stockholm.)
`I ) A puncture needle with stilette.
`2) A flexible rounded-end metal leader with increased flexibility
`of its distal 3 cm.
`3) A polyethylene tube, of the same diameter as the needle, with
`an adapter for the attachment of a syringe.
`26 -530088. Actcc Rncliologiccc. 1'01. 39.
`
`Fig. 1. The equipment. The
`stilette is removed and the
`leader inserted through the
`needle (left) and the catheter
`(right).
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 3
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`370
`
`SVEN IVAR SELDINGEH
`
`Q
`
`C
`
`d
`
`e
`f
`Pig. 2. Diagrani of the technique used. a) The artery punctured. The needle pushed
`upwards. b) The leader inserted. c) The needle withdrawn and the artery compressed,
`d) The catheter threaded on to the leader. e) The catheter inserted into the artery.
`f ) The leader withdrawn.
`
`The leader should have a diameter slightly less than the bore of
`the needle and the catheter, so that it is capable of passing through
`both, and should be at least 8-9
`ern longer than the latter; on the other
`hand it should just fit the lumen of the catheter (Fig. 1). The tip of the
`catheter may be cut before use as shown in Fig. 2.
`
`Technique (see Pig. 2).
`a) After local anaesthesia, the artery is punctured percutaneously
`at a relatively small angle.
`After puncture it is best to rotate the needle 180" and push it a little
`into the artery using the bleeding as a guide to ensure that the needle
`remains in the artery. Puncture of arteries smaller than the femoral
`artery is facilitated by using an inner needle as a guide over which the
`outer needle is directed into the artery.
`b) The supple tip of the leader is inserted a very short distance
`into the lumen of the artery through the needle.
`c) The leader is held in place and the needle removed.
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 4
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`CATIIETER REI’IIACEMII,ST OF THE NEEDLE IN PERCUTAhEOUP dn’IEBI@GI{AI’IIP
`
`371
`
`Pig. 3. Hypoplastic lowrr pole of the right kidney. I3lood supply from two branchesIof
`A sinall alwrarrt nrtrry. Catheter inscrtetl through the right femoral artery with tip 2 cm
`below the rerial arteries.
`
`At this nioineiit bleeding should be controlled by pressure on the
`mtery proximal to the puncture site, because the diameter of the leader
`is srnaller than the hole in the artery.
`d) The catheter is threaded on to the leader; when the tip reaches
`the skin the free end of the leader must protrude from the catheter.
`e) The catheter and leader are gripped near the skin through which
`they are inserted. The catheter enters the artery easily as an opening
`has already been made by the needle. The catheter and leader are pushed
`just far enough to ensure that the tip of the former is in the lumen of
`the vessel.
`f) The leader is removed and the catheter directed to the leveI
`required, after good arterial bleeding through the catheter has been
`obtained. The unsupported catheter is usually pushed up the vessel
`without difficulty, but occasionally the leader must be re-introduced
`into the catheter in order to support it. The leader should not be passed
`beyond the tip of the catheter.
`This technique is simpler than appears on paper and after a little
`practice should present no difficulties. It is important that the leader
`passes into the artery easily. JVhen the tip of the catheter enters the
`artery, the same resistance is often felt as when puncturing is perfarmed
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 5
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`372
`
`SVEN IVAR SELDlNGER
`
`b.
`a.
`Fig. 4. Left-sided ectopic kidney in pelvis. (Right kidney absent.) Blood supply by
`one artery from the iliac bifurcation and one from the left internal iliac artery. Catheter
`inserted through the right femoral artery with tip a t the bifurcation. a. Arterial phase.
`b. Capillary phase.
`
`by means of a needle. However, the resistance is generally but slight or
`may be completely absent. If considerable resistance be encountered,
`it is probable that the tip of the leader is obstructed and force must
`therefore never be applied.
`Polyethylene tubing is unfortunately not radio-opaque. For this
`reason, in aortography via the femoral artery, a small amount of contrast
`medium may be injected and followed by a test exposure. This will
`show the position of the catheter and also the exact situation of the
`renal arteries and of the iliac bifurcation. When the brachial artery is
`catheterized, the procedure is carried out in the fluoroscopy room and
`the leader used as an indicator of position; the catheter is then kept
`free from blood by the injection of saline solution.
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 6
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`CATllETER IW,I’LACEMI<NT OF THE NWDLE IN PERCUTAkEOUS ARTEklOGRAPIIY
`
`373
`
`Pig. r).
`(la\c~rnoris nngionias of thr
`11ed -4rterial phasr. Catheter inserted
`through the fwioral artery with tip in
`the popliteal artery. The difficult p n c -
`ture of the popliteal artery was replaced
`Ily the easily perfornircl catheterization
`from the ingiiiii:il region.
`
`Fig. 6. Occlusion of the right external iliac
`artery. Collaterals from the superior gluteal to
`the deep femoral artery. Jnner part of the thigh
`supplied from the inferior gluteal artery. Catheter
`inserted through the left femoral artery with
`tip a t the bifurcation. G. cr. = superior gluteal
`artery. G. mud. = inferior gluteal artery. P. f. :
`deep femoral artery.
`
`S11tllIlli1ry of Inrestigatioiis l’erforined
`10 arterial cathetcriz:Ltions have been carried out; of these, 35 were aortographies
`via the femoral artery, 3 subclavian arteriographies by means of puncture of the brachial
`artery in the antecubital fossa, and 2 catheterizations of the femoral artery in a distal
`tlirection. In no case was general anaesthesia employed. Injection was made throughout by
`hand. The contrast medium used was 30 cc of Umbradil in each irijection with a concen-
`tration of 35 o/o in peripheral arteriographies and 70 yo in aortographies except in those
`cases in which compression of the femoral arteries was used, when a 50 yo solution was
`t.mployed. The tubing used was in all cases No. 200 (internal diameter 1.40 mm, external
`diameter l.:)n mm) or No. 205 ( 1 . 5 7 mm and 2.08 mm). The latter seemed to be the op-
`timal one for aortograpliy. As the thickness of the wall of the needles available is nearly
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 7
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`374
`
`SVEN IVAR SELDIXBEK.
`
`Fig. 7. Catheter inserted through the antecubital artery of both sides.
`The tip in the subclavian artery. (The metal tip is no longer in use.)
`The left inferior thyroid artery forks into two branches, the termina-
`tions of the longer and 1owr.r one of which run in a markwl curve dowti-
`wards and laterally as if around a tumour: examination of a resected
`part of the left lower lobe of the thyroid showed adenoniatous para-
`thyroid tissue in the parenchyma.
`
`the same as that of the catheter, a needle of 2 mm outer diameter is required. If the
`catheter is 40-45 cm long it permits a faster iiijection of the contrast nittlium than the
`12-15 mni needle of 1 niin lumen, used in this department €or translumbar aortography.
`25 catheterizations were performed by the author atid 1.5 by four other workers
`in the department.
`In one patient catheterization did not succeed, in spite of 3 atteinpts on the ftmoral
`arteries. as sufficient blood-flow through the catheter was not obtained. In one patient
`no attempt a t catheterization was made as resistance to the leadw was encountered.
`I n one obese patient, introduction of the catheter into the right femoral artery failed.
`but was carried out without difficulty on the left side. In the other cases the cathetri
`was inserted easily a t the first puncture and the investigation resulted in good filiiis
`excepting in two cases in which the tip of the catheter did not reach the level required.
`In one of the paticntr, 75 years old, resistance was encountered after 6-7 cm, and in
`another the deep femoral artery instead of the superficial one. was persistently catheter-
`ized.
`In 6 of the aortographies and in the 3 subclavian arteriographies the catheter was
`fitted with a metal tip (Pig. 7), but this was abandoned I)ec.:iuse it was found easirr t o
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 8
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`CATLIRTER RISl’LACEMEXT 01?’ T H E KEEDLE I N PERCUTANEOUS ARTENIOQRAI~HP 375
`
`Fig. 8. Saturiil size. The middle needle permits, with the
`technique described, the insertion of a catheter (in this case
`No. 203) which requires R needle of the size of that pictured
`on the Icft, were it to be passed through the lumen of the
`needle. The same relative advantage exists between the right
`:tilt1 niitldle needles.
`
`insert the catheter without it, and the artery wall sometimes contracted around it
`during its renioval. Furthermore, it was realized that it might damage the arterial wall
`as happened in one of the subclal ian arteriographies, so that part of contrast medium
`was injected extmvascularly.
`As regards complications any tendency t o bleed a t the site of puncture was unini-
`portant and was mostly observed in elderly patients. No haematoma of clinical conse-
`quence e\ er formed. No thrombosis or any kind of circulatory disturbance in the region
`of the artery punctured was observed. There was no case of extravascular injection
`except the one previously mentioned. In the unsuccessful attempts a t catheterization.
`the leader probably passed through the posterior wall of the artery or its intima via a
`hole made during puncture. In these cases the needle could not be pushed far enough
`u p into the artery. In neither did the patient suffer any ill effects. No kinking or rupture
`of the catheter, or arterial spasin around it occurred. After local anaesthesia, the patients
`felt nothing during the manipulations and following the injection of the contrast medium
`thrre was, with intlividual variations, only the wellknown, rapidly passing discomfort.
`In one case the patient was operated on two weeks after bilateral femoral cathe-
`terization and both arteries were exposed. Traces of blood under the fascia intlicated
`the situation, but the exact site of puncture could not be discerned.
`Figs. 3-7
`form representative illustrations.
`
`Discussion
`The advantage of the author’s method of percutaneous cstheteriza-
`tion is the smaller size of needle required for a given catheter. As the
`catheter needs a certain clearance to enable it to glide through the bore
`of a needle, the difference is more marked than would appear from the
`thickness of the material (Fig. 8).
`In other words, a larger catheter can be inserted by the same sized
`needle. POISEUILLE’S
`law states that when pressure and viscosity are con-
`stant, the rate of flow through narrow tubes is:
`inversely proportional to the length of the tube, and
`directly proportional to the 4th power of the radius of the tube.
`This shows the dominant influence of the cross section of the catheter.
`Catheter No. 205, used here for abdominal aortography, has an inner
`If a pressure
`diameter, corresponding to a heart catheter No. 9-10.
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 9
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530
`
`

`
`3 T G
`SVEN IVAR PELDINOER
`apparatus were used, the gauge might doubtlessly be diminished con-
`siderably, i. e. to a size No. 160, corresponding t o a heart catheter No. 8,
`and which may be inserted with the help of a needle, 1 . 5 mm in external
`diameter.
`Though the extra manipulation with the leader is a disadvantage,
`it is very quickly performed. Furthermore, there is a little risk that the
`leader, when handled unskilfully, will pass through the posterior wall of
`the artery, although, no doubt, experience and improved equipment
`will eliminate this possible complication and avoid failure.
`
`SUMMARY
`The author describes a method by which it is possible, after percutaneous puncture,
`to insert a catheter of the same size as the needle used into an artery.
`Z U S A M M E N F .i4 S S U N G
`Der Verf. beschreibt eine Methode, die es ermoglicht, nach perkutaner Punktion
`rinen Katheter von derselben Grosse wie die benutzte Nadel in eine Arterie einzufiihren.
`R E S U M E
`L’auteur decrit une methode qui permet, a p r b ponction percutanee, d’introduire
`dans une artbe un catheter de m&me calibre que l’aiguille utilisde.
`
`L I T E R A T U R E
`DONALD, D. C., KESMODEL, K. F., ROLLINS, S. L. and PADDISON, R. M.: An improved
`technic for percutaneous cerebral angiography. Arch. Neurol. and Psych. 65 (1951),
`508.
`FARIGAS, P. L.: A new technique for the arteriographic examination of the abdominal
`aorta and its branches. Am. J. Roentgenol. 46 (194l), 641.
`JONSSON, G.: Thoracic aortography by means of a cannula inserted percutaneously into
`the common carotid artery. Acta radiol. 31 (1949), 376.
`PEIRCE, E. C.: Percutaneous femoral artery catheterization in man with special reference
`to aortography. Surg., Gynec. & Obst. 93 (1951), 56.
`RADNER, S.: Intracranial angiography via the vertebral artery. Preliminary report of a
`new technique. Acta radiol. 28 (1947), 838.
`
`h
`
`Downloaded by [173.68.147.2] at 09:29 09 February 2016
`
`ENDOHEART AG, EX. 2001 Page 10
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION (PETITIONER) v. ENDOHEART AG (PATENT OWNER)
`Case No.: IPR2016-00299, U.S Patent No. 8,182,530

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket