throbber
our necropsy and prostatectomy series supports the concept
`that carcinoma seen at necropsy, clinically detected
`carcinoma, and metastatic carcinoma represent different
`phases along the biological continuum of a single type of
`cancer. The apparent unpredictability of behaviour in
`prostate cancer need not imply the existence of a second type
`that is innately innocuous or "latent". It may be mainly a
`function of the large proportion of tumours under 1 ml in
`volume which would probably remain clinically silent for a
`very long time. It has been suggested that this unusual
`volume distribution may simply be the result of a slow growth
`rate for this tumour in its early phases There is no evidence
`that carcinoma in the prostate is in any other way
`substantially different from or less predictable than that of
`any other organ.
`
`The volume distribution of histological differentiation
`further supports the concept that progression in the
`acquisition of malignant characteristics with time and
`increasing volume is an important feature of the biology of
`prostate cancer. The only likely explanation for these data is
`that the great majority of prostate cancers are at least
`moderately differentiated at first and subsequently lose.
`differentiation. That this phenomenon is similar but not
`identical for all tumours is implied by the range of
`differentiation found in even the smallest tumours, as well as
`the age differences and possibly racial differences found
`among larger tumours. The reported poor prognosis for
`prostate cancer among black men15 may be largely explained
`by a greater tendency toward loss of differentiation with
`increasing volume.
`
`Our data indicate that carcinoma of the prostate follows a
`predictable natural history and that precise determination of
`volume and capsule invasion should improve the estimation
`of prognosis in the individual patient. In both our series, the
`highest category of either volume or capsule penetration
`identified the cases with metastasis at least as accurately as did
`the presence of seminal vesicle invasion. Unlike seminal
`vesicle invasion, volume and capsule invasion are continua,
`and the division points and ranges of probable greatest
`significance along these continua have been identified here,
`though the numerical values we have defined may change as
`we study more cases and accumulate data from long-term
`follow-up. The ranges of greatest interest are potentially
`within reach of measurement by in-vivo imaging techniques.
`Though the significance of capsule penetration has been
`debated, 16,17
`it has been clarified here by precise
`determination of both depth and extent of penetration of the
`capsule.
`
`The predictive value of histological grade was
`unexpectedly low in both series, even though for all 9
`metastatic carcinomas either primary or secondary grade was
`4. Poor differentiation became prevalent in a volume range
`considerably below that at which metastasis was first seen,
`and in the necropsy series 5% oftumours under 0 - 46 ml were
`grade 4. This suggests that grade 4 tumours may be a
`heterogeneous group in terms of their biological malignant
`potential; we are currently investigating this possibility.
`Attempts to improve the predictive value of histological
`grading should be specifically directed toward finding
`morphological features of differential prognostic significance
`within the grade 4 category. Improvements here combined
`with estimation of cancer volume and extent of complete
`capsule penetration by in-vivo imaging could achieve a
`
`63
`
`degree of accuracy in estimation of prognosis of prostate
`cancer at least equal to that of any other malignant disorder.
`We thank Dr Lincoln E. Moses for help with statistical analyses. This work
`was partly supported by grants from the Richard M. Lucas Cancer Foundation
`(J. E. McN.) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant
`GM07781 (D. G. B.).
`Correspondence should be addressed to J. E. McN., Department of
`Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
`
`’
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Whitmore WF. The natural history of prostatic cancer. Cancer 1973; 32: 1104-12.
`2. Stamey TA. Cancer of the prostate: an analysis of some important contributions and
`dilemmas. Monogr Urol 1982; 3: 67-94.
`3. Franks LM Latent carcinoma of the prostate. J Pathol Bacteriol 1954; 68: 603-16.
`4. Gleason DF. Histologic grading and clinical staging of prostatic carcinoma. In:
`Tannenbaum M, ed. Urologic pathology: the prostate. Philadelphia: Lea and
`Febiger, 1977.
`5. McNeal JE. Origin and development of carcinoma in the prostate. Cancer 1969; 23:
`24-34.
`6. McNeal JE. The prostate gland: morphology and pathobiology. Monogr Urol 1983; 4:
`3-33.
`7. Foulds L. The experimental study of tumor progression: a review. Cancer Res 1954; 14:
`327-39.
`8. Nowell PC. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations. Science 1976; 194: 23-28.
`9. Fidler IJ, HartIR. Biologic diversity in metastatic neoplasms: origins and implications.
`Science 1982; 217: 998-1003.
`10. Poste G, Greig R. On the genesis and regulation of cellular heterogeneity in malignant
`tumors. Invasion Metastasis 1982; 2: 137-76.
`11. Goldie JH, Coldman AJ. A mathematical model for relating the drug sensitivity of
`tumors to their spontaneous mutation rate. Cancer Treat Rep 1979; 63: 1727-31.
`12. McNeal JE. Regional morphology and pathology of the prostate. Am J Clin Pathol
`1968; 49: 347-57.
`13. Moses LE, Emerson JD, Hosseini H. Analyzing data from ordered categories. N Engl J
`Med 1984; 311: 442-48.
`14. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley, 1973.
`15. Ernster VL, Wilkenstein W, Selvin S, Brown SM. Race, socioeconomic status and
`prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 1977; 61: 187-91.
`16. Jewett HJ. The case for radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 1970; 103: 195-99.
`17. Myers RP, Fleming TR. Course of localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated by
`radical prostatectomy Prostate 1983; 4: 461-72.
`
`PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL
`VALVULOPLASTY OF ACQUIRED AORTIC
`STENOSIS IN ELDERLY PATIENTS: AN
`ALTERNATIVE TO VALVE REPLACEMENT?
`
`ALAIN CRIBIER
`NADIR SAOUDI
`JACQUES BERLAND
`Service des Soins Intensifs Cardiologiques et des Explorations
`Hémodynamiques Cardiovasculaires, Centre Hospitalier et
`Universitaire, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
`
`THIERRY SAVIN
`PAULO ROCHA
`BRICE LETAC
`
`Summary
`
`Percutaneous transluminal balloon catheter
`aortic valvuloplasty (PTAV) was carried out
`in three elderly patients with acquired severe aortic valve
`stenosis. Transvalvular systolic pressure gradient was
`considerably decreased at the end of the procedure, during
`which there were no complications. Increased valve opening
`was confirmed by angiography and echocardiography.
`Subsequent clinical course showed a pronounced functional
`improvement. PTAV is recommended as a simple alternative
`to aortic valve replacement in elderly and/or high-risk
`patients.
`
`Introduction
`PERCUTANEOUS transluminal balloon catheter angioplasty
`is a recognised treatment for peripheral and coronary artery
`stenoses. This technique has also been used successfully in
`certain forms of coarctation of the aorta,’ pulmonary
`stenosis,2-6 congenital aortic valve stenosis,7,8 and mitral
`stenosis,9 but not previously in adults with acquired aortic
`valve stenosis. It might be thought impossible to dilate such
`long-standing and usually calcified lesions; if feasible,
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1028, pg. 1
`
`

`
`64
`
`however, percutaneous transvalvular aortic valvuloplasty
`(PTAV) would be an appropriate alternative treatment
`whenever surgical valve replacement proved impracticable.
`We have now carried out PTAV in 3 adults with isolated
`severe calcific aortic stenosis; in all 3 cases, severity of
`progression made valve replacement appear both mandatory
`and urgent. We elected to attempt valvuloplasty, however,
`because advanced age and poor physical condition made the
`operative risk very high in 2 patients, while the third refused
`to contemplate surgery.
`
`Case 1
`
`Case-reports
`
`A 77-year-old woman had been treated for 10 years for angina
`pectoris. In August, 1984 several syncopal attacks on mild exertion
`led to the discovery of aortic stenosis. Angina and exertional
`dyspnoea severely limited physical activity. Physical examination
`showed a mid-systolic grade 3/6 murmur at the aortic area, radiating
`to the cervical vessels, an absent second heart sound, and a grade 1/6
`diastolic murmur. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed pronounced
`left ventricular hypertrophy, and the left ventricle was moderately
`enlarged on the chest radiograph. Two-dimensional (2D) echo-
`cardiogram showed severe aortic stenosis with calcifications and
`satisfactory left ventricular function. In view of the severity of
`symptoms, cardiac catheterisation was proposed for preoperative
`evaluation, but the patient withheld her consent for a year, during
`which symptoms steadily worsened, with nocturnal angina and two
`episodes of syncope at rest.
`Left ventricular catheterisation showed left ventricular pressures
`of 245/28 mm Hg and aortic pressures of 155/70 mm Hg (systolic
`pressure gradient 90 mm Hg). Aortic valve cusps were moderately
`calcified. Selective left ventricular angiography showed a normal
`diastolic volume (73 ml/m2), with normal left ventricular function
`(ejection fraction 77%) and clearly thickened walls. Post-stenotic
`dilatation of the ascending aorta and slight aortic regurgitation were
`seen on aortic angiography. Selective coronary arteriography did
`not show any significant coronary lesions. The patient gave
`informed consent for PTAV as an alternative to surgical valve
`replacement and this was done three weeks later.
`
`Case 2
`A 68-year-old woman had had aortic stenosis diagnosed 15 years
`previously. Her clinical status deteriorated progressively over the
`years (New York Heart Association functional class III) and angina
`appeared and became progressively worse. Admission for further
`investigation was precipitated by an attack of severe chest pain
`when walking against the wind, followed by syncope. Physical
`examination on admission showed a grade 3/6 systolic murmur at
`the base, absent second heart sound, and a grade 2/6 diastolic
`murmur. There were clearcut signs of left ventricular hypertrophy
`on ECG and the chest radiograph showed slight cardiomegaly. 2D
`echocardiogram showed severe calcific aortic stenosis with normal
`left ventricular function.
`Cardiac catheterisation demonstrated ventricular pressures of
`230/22 mm Hg and aortic pressures of 100/50 mm Hg (systolic
`pressure gradient 130 mm Hg). The aortic valve was massively
`calcified. Right heart pressures and cardiac index were normal. Left
`ventricular angiography showed a normal end-diastolic volume
`(94 ml/m2) with slightly reduced ejection fraction (54%) and
`thickened walls. The ascending aorta was moderately dilated, and
`aortic regurgitation was insignificant. Selective coronary arterio-
`gram was normal.
`Severity of both symptoms and haemodynamic data led us to
`propose immediate valve replacement, but the patient would not
`contemplate surgery. However, she accepted PTAV, which was
`done a month later.
`
`Case 3
`A 79-year-old man who had complained of progressive exertional
`dyspnoea for 10 years was admitted after three syncopal attacks
`
`brought on by mild exertion. Aortic stenosis was diagnosed.
`Physical examination on admission showed a grade 4/6 mid-systolic
`murmur at the base, with an absent second heart sound. ECG
`showed severe left ventricular hypertrophy and the chest
`radiograph mild cardiomegaly and signs of mild pulmonary
`hypertension. 2D echocardiogram showed severe aortic stenosis
`with considerable valve calcification and severe left ventricular
`dilatation with impaired ventricular function. Two days after
`admission, the patient had an episode of acute, massive pulmonary
`oedema which was brought under control with difficulty by high
`doses of frusemide.
`At cardiac catheterisation, left ventricular pressure was 140/28
`mm Hg (systolic pressure gradient 60 mm Hg) and the aortic valves
`were massively calcified. Left ventricular angiography confirmed
`left ventricular dysfunction, with an increased diastolic volume
`(190 ml/m2) and greatly decreased ejection fraction (20%). Selective
`coronary arteriography showed major multiple vessel lesions with
`proximal left-anterior-descending occlusion. These findings made
`us reluctant to recommend valve replacement and, with informed
`consent, we decided to attempt PTAV.
`
`Methods
`The same procedure for PTAV was followed in all 3 patients.
`Premedication consisted of intravenous atropine sulphate 1 mg,
`clorazepate 50 mg, and heparin 100 u/kg bodyweight. A surgical
`team was on standby.
`For continuous aortic pressure monitoring, a 5F catheter was
`inserted into the descending thoracic aorta. In addition, a Swan-
`Ganz thermodilution catheter was inserted into the pulmonary
`artery in patients 2 and 3 for measurement of cardiac output. Left
`ventricular catheterisation was carried out via the brachial approach
`which made it easier to cross the stenosed aortic orifice (and was also
`necessitated by the short length [60 cm] of the dilatation catheters
`available in our laboratory). A 7F Sones catheter was inserted into
`the aorta and then in the left ventricle. After simultaneous left
`ventricular and aortic pressure recording, right-anterior-oblique
`angiograms of the left ventricle and of the aortic root were done. A
`Cordis straight guidewire, diameter 0 - 38 mm, length 270 cm, was
`inserted into the left ventricle via the Sones catheter to enable its
`replacement by the dilatation catheter.
`We used 9F balloon catheters designed for dilatation of congenital
`valve stenosis (Meditech, Waterton, Massachusetts). Two radio-
`opaque markers gave the positions of the distal and proximal ends of
`the balloon, thus ensuring correct transvalvular positioning which
`was also confirmed by narrowing of the balloon where it crossed the
`stenosis during inflation (fig 1). The balloons were 40 mm long.
`Inflations were carried out by injecting 10 ml of a 50/50 mixture of
`saline solution and contrast medium, up to pressures of 6-8 atm.
`Three inflations, lasting 20-60 s, were successively done with three
`balloons whose maximum inflatable diameters were 8, 10, and
`12 mm, respectively. In order to stabilise the balloon in its
`transvalvular position, the guidewire was left in the ventricular
`cavity during inflation.
`ECG and aortic pressure were continuously recorded during the
`procedure. Ventricular and aortic pressures were simultaneously
`measured after each series of inflations. At the end of the procedure,
`an aortic root angiogram was done to assess valve opening and
`residual aortic regurgitation.
`
`Results
`The haemodynamic and clinical response to the inflations
`was good. There was no loss of consciousness when the
`balloon was inflated in transvalvular position. The first
`patient complained of moderate chest pain after 15-20 s of
`inflation, at the same time as ST-segment depression was
`noted in the antero-lateral precordial leads. In patients 2 and 3
`the three inflations each lasted 1 min without any ill-effects.
`During inflation, the aortic pressure never decreased below
`60 mm Hg (fig 2). The obstruction caused by the inflated
`balloon was therefore incomplete; this was confirmed by
`manual injection of a few ml of contrast medium into the
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1028, pg. 2
`
`

`
`65
`
`EARLY INFLATION
`FULL INFLATION
`Fig 1-Correct position of the balloon centred across the stenotic aortic valve during early and full balloon inflation to a diameter of 10 mm.
`Indentation from the stenotic valve is clearly seen at early inflation and disappears at full inflation. The guidewire is placed in the left ventricle to stabilise the
`balloon during inflation.
`
`ventricular cavity during one inflation (via the angioplasty
`catheter with guidewire removed). A few premature
`ventricular contractions occurred infrequently during the
`inflations.
`In the first patient, transvalvular gradient was 90 mm Hg at
`the start of the procedure and remained unchanged after the
`first two series of inflations, with the 8 and 10 mm balloons.
`After a series of three inflations with the 12 mm balloon, it
`decreased to 40 mm Hg (fig 3). In the second patient, the
`initial gradient was found to be 80 mm Hg (rather than the
`130 mm Hg measured during the initial catheterisation) and
`decreased to 70, 60, and finally 30 mm Hg after each series of
`inflations. In the third patient, improvement of systolic
`gradient was very similar-from 60 mm Hg to 50, 40, and
`finally 30 mm Hg. In patients 2 and 3 in whom cardiac output
`was measured before and after valvuloplasty, valve surface
`calculated according to Gorlin’s formulalo increased from
`0-46 cm’ to 0-96 cm2 and from 0-50 cm2 to 0-75 cm2,
`respectively.
`Aortic root angiography showed no worsening of the aortic
`regurgitation. Valve motion, which was considerably
`impaired before the procedure, was greatly improved,
`especially in the second patient. These results were
`supported by the findings of 2D echocardiography done 24 h
`later: in the parasternal long-axis view, opening of the aortic
`valve increased from 0-45 to 0 - 77 cm in the first case; from
`0 - 41 to 0 - 72 cm in the second (fig 4); and from 0 - 32 to 0 - 48
`cm in the third. In the cross-sectional view, valve opening was
`also clearly improved, mainly in the second patient.
`Clinical course during the eight days in hospital after the
`procedure was uneventful in the first two patients, and before
`discharge both climbed three flights of stairs without any pain
`or dyspnoea-a striking functional improvement. At four
`weeks follow-up, the improvement persisted: there had been
`no syncope, no pain, and very little dyspnoea, even though
`the patients had by then resumed a normal lifestyle. Follow-
`up of the third patient has been shorter, but it was uneventful
`after fifteen days, with no more functional signs, including
`dyspnoea.
`
`Discussion
`To our knowledge, the 3 patients reported here are the first
`to undergo PTAV of adult acquired aortic stenosis.
`Immediate results appear very encouraging, since the
`dilatation resulted in a change from severe to moderate aortic
`stenosis according to the usual haemodynamic criteria-a
`pronounced decrease in the ventriculo-aortic systolic
`pressure gradient, with a residual gradient of 40 mm Hg in
`one patient, and of 30 mm Hg in the other two.
`From the angiographic and echocardiographic data,
`improvement in the gradient is a consequence of better
`systolic valve opening. The balloon inflations probably
`resulted in a partial tear of the stenosed valve. Although the
`valve orifice is often hard to cross in severe adult calcific aortic
`stenosis, we experienced no technical difficulty in passing the
`dilatation catheters via the aortic orifice and in reaching a
`good transvalvular position. The excellent patient tolerance
`of the inflations is worth emphasising, since we had feared
`that inflation of the balloon in a stenosed aortic orifice might
`lead to syncopal circulatory arrest. During the inflations, the
`aortic pressure remained satisfactory, suggesting that the
`
`Fig 2-ECG (lead V5) and aortic pressure continuous recording
`during a 40 s balloon inflation-deflation cycle.
`Inflation was associated with a slight decrease in systolic aortic pressure
`from 85 to 70 mm Hg. There was no change in heart rate and only one
`premature ventricular contraction.
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1028, pg. 3
`
`

`
`66
`
`Fig 3-Simultaneous recording of left ventricular and aortic
`pressures before (left) and at the end ofPTAV (right) in case 1.
`Transvalvular systolic gradient decreased from 90 to 40 mm Hg.
`
`inflated balloon was not totally occlusive, probably due to the
`irregular shape of the aortic orifice. There were no
`complications during or after the procedure, although
`calcium embolism could be considered a risk. 11 1
`It is too early to predict the possible place of PTAV in the
`treatment of severe adult acquired aortic stenosis from so few
`patients. Nevertheless, our 3 cases illustrate the feasibility of
`the procedure, its good patient tolerance, and the resulting
`haemodynamic and clinical improvement. Although the
`results are unlikely to compare in quality with those of valve
`replacement, PTAV can offer a simple therapeutic alternative
`to patients, mostly elderly, in whom surgery would be too
`risky or impossible.
`We thank Dr N. Moore for his help in translation of the typescript.
`Correspondence should be addressed to A. C., Service des Soins Intensifs
`
`Fig 4-2D echocardiogram (parasternal long axis view) in case 2 before (left) and 24 h after (right) PTAV.
`Maximum aortic valve opening (arrows) increased from 0’41 to 0-72 cm. Ao =aorta; LA=left atrium; LV=left ventricle.
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1028, pg. 4
`
`

`
`Cardiologiques et des Explorations Hemodynamiques Cardlovasculaires,
`Centre Hospnalier et Universitaire, Hopital Charles Nicolle, 1 rue de
`Germont, 76031 Rouen Cedex, France.
`
`Addendum
`Follow-up in the three patients described here has now
`been uneventful for 15, 10, and 9 weeks respectively. In
`addition, PTAV has been carried out in another eleven
`patients with similar results.
`REFERENCES
`
`1 Cooper RS, Ritter SB, Golinko RJ. Balloon dilatation angioplasty: Nonsurgical
`management of coarctation of the aorta. Circulation 1984; 70: 903-07.
`2 Kan JS, White RI, Mitchell SE, Anderson JH, Gardner TJ. Percutaneous transluminal
`balloon valvuloplasty for pulmonary valve stenosis. Circulation 1984; 69: 554-60.
`3 Lababidi Z, Wu JR Percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol
`1983; 52: 560-62
`4 Pepine CJ, Gessner IH, Feldman RL Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty for
`pulmonic valve stenosis in the adult. Am J Cardiol 1982; 50: 1442-45.
`5 Rey C, Marache P, Matina D, Mouly A Valvuloplastie transluminale percutanée des
`sténoses pulmonaires A propos de 24 cas. Arch Mal Coeur 1985; 78: 703-10.
`6 Rocchini AP, Kveselis DA, Crowley D, Dick Mac D, Rosenthal A. Percutaneous
`balloon valvuloplasty for treatment of congenital pulmonary valvular stenosis in
`children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 1005-12.
`7 Lababidi Z, Wu JR, Walls JT. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty: Results in 23
`patients Am J Cardiol 1984, 53: 194-97.
`8 Walls JT, Lababidi Z, Curtis JJ, Silver D. Assessment of percutaneous balloon
`pulmonary and aortic valvuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 88: 352-56.
`9. Inoue K, Owaki T, Nakamura T, Kitamura F, Miyamoto N. Clinical application of
`transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc
`Surg 1984, 87: 394-402
`10 Cohen MV, Gorlin R Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve area.
`Am Heart J 1972, 84: 839-40.
`1 1 Brockmeier LB, Adolph RJ, Gustin BW, Holmes JC, Sacks JG. Calcium emboli to the
`retinal artery in calcific aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 1981; 101: 32-37.
`
`COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF
`PREDICTING OUTCOME IN PERINATAL
`ASPHYXIA
`
`M. I. LEVENE
`HELEN GRINDULIS
`
`CAROLINE SANDS
`J. R. MOORE
`Department of Child Health, University of Leicester School of
`Medicine, and Leicester Royal Infirmary
`
`Summary
`
`In a follow-up study of 122 full-term infants
`in whom postasphyxial encephalopathy
`occurred the incidence of death or severe handicap was 1 in
`1000 deliveries. The abilities of two methods of diagnosing
`intrapartum asphyxia to predict outcome at a median age of
`2· 5 years were compared. A decision matrix calculation was
`undertaken to assess the sensitivity and specificity of low
`Apgar score and postasphyxial encephalopathy. A 10 min
`Apgar score ≤5 was the most sensitive of six different Apgar
`ratings in predicting adverse outcome (sensitivity 43%,
`specificity 95%) but even this was much less sensitive than
`the presence of moderate or severe encephalopathy in
`predicting death or severe handicap (sensitivity 96%).
`Introduction
`ASPHYXIA is the most common cause of major cerebral
`birth injury in the perinatal period; its incidence in full-term
`infants varies between 2’9 and 9-0 cases per thousand.l-6
`There have been several attempts to relate either low Apgar
`scores or abnormal neurological findings after asphyxia 3,1-9
`to outcome. If we are to use an assessment of asphyxia at birth
`to predict neurological sequelae, the ability of the method to
`evaluate prognosis should be tested.
`We have assessed two methods of diagnosing intrapartum
`asphyxia (low Apgar score and postasphyxial encephal-
`opathy) for their ability to identify infants with a poor
`prognosis as well as those likely to have a good prognosis. We
`have used a decision matrix10 to assess the sensitivity and
`specificity of both methods in predicting outcome. Sensi-
`tivity measures the proportion of infants with adverse
`
`67
`
`outcome detected by the method and specificity the propor-
`tion of infants predicted to have a favourable outcome. Our
`aim was to determine which method would enable clinicians
`to give the most reliable prognostic information to the parents
`of asphyxiated infants.
`Patients and Methods
`We have previously reported the incidence of encephalopathy
`after intrapartum asphyxia in our university obstetric department.
`Encephalopathy was graded as: mild (minor disturbances of tone,
`hyperalertness, and slight feeding difficulties, recovering by 48 h
`after birth); moderate (lethargy, more pronounced abnormalities of
`tone, poor feeding, and convulsions, with signs of recovery by 7
`days); and severe (coma, failure to maintain adequate ventilation,
`profound hypotonia, and seizures). The infants previously reported
`represent the population of full-term infants born in a teaching
`hospital maternity unit in the 4 years from 1980. Leicestershire
`Health District provides both obstetric and paediatric care for
`almost all the families living in the geographical area. Leicester
`Royal Infirmary undertakes care of high-risk pregnancies and at-
`risk infants, and severely handicapped children born anywhere in
`Leicestershire are subsequently assessed at the child development
`centre attached to the main hospital.
`Children surviving postasphyxial encephalopathy were regularly
`assessed. We were unable to trace 4 children (3%) for follow-up. 6
`others had moved out of Leicestershire and information on their
`developmental achievements and neurological function was
`obtained from general practitioners and health visitors. All 6
`children were reported to be functioning normally. The age at
`follow-up of the 122 children was between 1 and 5 years (median 2 - 5 5
`years). Any child with equivocal neurodevelopmental assessment or
`neurological signs was assessed by one of us. Children with
`developmental delay were further assessed by an educational
`psychologist using the Bayley scales. Severe neurological
`abnormality was defined as cerebral palsy sufficient to impair
`independent locomotion, developmental delay probably severe
`enough to warrant special education, sensorineural hearing loss,
`visual impairment, or epileptic seizures (not associated with fever)
`requiring medication. Adverse outcome was defined as one or more
`of these severe neurological deficits and/or death.
`Since the index cases for follow-up consisted of children who had
`had postasphyxial encephalopathy, we made a thorough search for
`children who might have had brain damage as the result of asphyxia
`defined on the basis of low Apgar scores but who had shown no
`evidence of encephalopathy. We examined the notes of all children
`referred to the child development centre from January, 1981, to
`June, 1985 who had been born at full-term in Leicester Royal
`Infirmary. No handicapped children were found who had had low
`Apgar scores alone without encephalopathy.
`We first attempted to correlate the duration and severity of Apgar
`score depression defined in six different ways with outcome. For
`the main analysis two hypotheses were tested: that adverse outcome
`was predicted either by moderate and severe encephalopathy or by a
`low Apgar score (the sensitivity). This can be conversely stated
`as a favourable outcome predicted by mild postasphyxial encephal-
`opathy or a normal Apgar score (the specificity). The sensitivity is
`calculated as the proportion of infants with adverse outcome
`predicted by the method (true-positives divided by true-positives
`plus false-negatives). Specificity is the proportion of infants with
`favourable outcome predicted by the method (true-negatives
`divided by true-negatives plus false-positives).9
`Results
`- During the study period there were 20 975 full-term, live
`births; postasphyxial encephalopathy developed in 126
`infants-an incidence of 6’0 per 1000.6 Follow-up
`information was obtained for 122 of the 126. 14 children died:
`7 during the first week of life from the effects of severe
`cerebral asphyxia; 6 between 8 days and 9 months, all
`showing grossly abnormal neurological behaviour before
`death; and 1 aged 1 year after cardiac surgery (she had severe
`oculomotor apraxia).
`
`Edwards Exhibit 1028, pg. 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket