throbber
Original Research
`
`Comparing the FAISE Method
`withConventiona1 Dual-Echo
`Sequences1
`
`Philippe S. Melki, MD Robert V. Mulkern, PhD
`Lawrence P. Panych, MS
`Ferenc A. Jolesz, MD
`
`The FAISE (fast-acquisition interleaved spin-
`echo) technique consists of a hybrid rapid-acqui-
`sition relaxation-enhanced (RARE] sequence
`combined with a specific phase-encode reorder-
`ing method. Implemented on a 1.6-T unit. this
`multirrection, high-rerolution technique permits
`convenient contrast manipulation similar to that
`of spin-echo imaging, with selection of a pseudo-
`echo-time parameter and a TR interval. With a
`TR of 2 seconds, eight 266 X 266 images are ob-
`tained in 34 second. with either T2 or proton-
`density weighting. A direct comparison between
`FAISE and spin echo for obtaining T2-weighted
`head images in healthy subjects indicates that
`FAISE and spin-echo images are qualitatively
`and quantitatively similar. Image artifacts are
`more pronounced on “proton-density” FAISE
`images than on the T2-weighted FAISE images.
`T1 contrast can be obtained with inversion re-
`covery and short TR FAISE images. Preliminary
`temperature mcamrements in dine phantoms
`do not indicate u c d v e temperature increases
`with extended FAISE acquisitions. However, ex-
`tensive studies of radio-frequency power depocli-
`tion effects should be performed if the FAISE
`technique i. to be fully exploited.
`
`Index terms: Head, MR studles. 10.1214. Physics Pulse se-
`quences Rapid imaging
`JMRI 1881; 1:319-326
`
`Abbrcviatiorm C/N = contrast-to-noise ratio. CPMG = Carr-
`Purcell-Meiboom-Gl11, FAISE = fast-acquisltion interleaved
`spin-echo. IPS = initial phases skipped. pTE = pseudo echo
`time. RARE = rapid-acquisition relaxatlon-enhanced. RF = ra-
`dio frequency. TI = Inversion tlme.
`
`’ From the Department of Radlology. Brigham and Women’s
`
`Hospital. Harvard Medical School. 75 Francis St. Boston. MA
`02115(P.S.M..L.P.P..F.A.J.):and theDepartmentofRadiolcgy.
`Children’s Hospital. Boston (R.V.M.). Recelved October 4, 1990:
`revlslon requested November 13; revislon recelved December
`26: accepted January 7 , 1991. Addmu reprint requmtm to
`P.S.M.
`0 SMRI, 1991
`
`THE DEVELOPMENT OF FAST IMAGING methods
`has been the focus of increased interest since the
`early stages of clinical magnetic resonance (MR)
`imaging. Besides the economic aspects associated
`with decreasing acquisition times, development of
`fast imaging methods is also motivated by the re-
`duction in artifact due to gross patient motion,
`three-dimensional acquisition and visualization of
`imaging data, and the possibility of observing dy-
`namic changes with MR imaging. Despite the rela-
`tively long data acquisition times, spin-echo se-
`quences remain the “gold standard” among MR
`pulse sequences for routine screening procedures.
`Any technique designed to replace the spin-echo
`method must realistically exploit the same basic
`contrast mechanisms and should produce images
`with the same overall quality.
`Our goal was to determine the extent to which
`the FAISE (fast-acquisition interleaved spin-echo)
`method can yield head images that compare with
`conventional dual-echo spin-echo images in terms
`of contrast-to-noise ratios (C/Ns), noise levels, and
`overall image quality.
`
`0 METHODS
`The FAISE method was implemented on a 1.5-T
`Signa system (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee)
`equipped with actively shielded gradient coils, digi-
`tal transmitter and receiver, and a 4.x hardware/
`software configuration. A radio-frequency (RF)
`transmit-receive head coil operated in quadrature
`was used for all studies. The FAISE method uses
`the hybrid RARE (rapid-acquisition relaxation-en-
`hanced) sequence discussed by Hennig et a1 (1,2).
`RF-refocused echoes are individually phase-en-
`coded prior to readout and phase “unwound” after
`readout, as depicted in Figure 1. The FAISE se-
`quence consisted of a 16-echo CPMG train with an
`echo spacing of 15 msec and an acquisition window
`of 8.2 msec. In some cases, the acquisition window
`was reduced to 4.1 msec, permitting 11.5-msec
`echo spacings. A total of 16 “shots.” or spin excita-
`tions, of the CPMG sequence covers k space with
`data suitable for a 256 X 256 image matrix. With a
`2-sec TR between successive spin excitations, the
`
`319
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Gz ~L..JI
`1 n m
`
`I
`I
`
`G X
`
`n
`
`,$/
`
`I
`I
`
`m ,//’ m
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`krnln
`
`I
`
`7
`
`Figure 1. The hybrid RARE pulse sequence for generat-
`ing individually phase-encoded echoes within a Carr-Pur-
`cell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) echo train.
`
`kmln
`
`I l l I V I I
`
`I
`
`krnax
`
`kmax
`
`total imaging time is 34 sec, a time period that in-
`cludes a baseline shot. A n echo spacing of 15 msec
`places the last echo of each train at 240 msec, per-
`mitting eight sections to be excited within the 2-sec
`TR period. Alternatively, the number of echoes col-
`lected after the excitation pulse may be reduced to
`eight or four. With a reduced echo train, an in-
`creased number of sections may be excited at the
`expense of imaging time [increased number of
`shots).
`Each separate echo train covers a discontinuous
`region of k space. The k-space traverses are succes-
`sively interleaved in the course of a full FAISE ac-
`quisition. The resulting T2 contrast within the 16-
`echo, 16-shot FAISE acquisition is controlled by al-
`tering the order in which phase encoding is applied
`to the RF spin echoes. Because overall image con-
`trast is dominated by those signals acquired with
`the smallest phase-encoding gradient amplitudes
`(3,4), the T2 contrast may be controlled by acquir-
`ing these data lines at a user-selected pseudo echo
`time [pTE). Figure 2 illustrates the interleaving pro-
`cess that permits contrast manipulation. For sim-
`plicity, a four-shot, four-echo FAISE sequence with
`only 16 total phase-encoding steps is considered.
`The vertical axes in the three plots represent sig-
`nal-intensity decay with echo number (Arabic nu-
`merals) within each of the four shots [Roman nu-
`merals). The horizontal axes in Figure 2 are the
`phase-encoding axes in k space. The top plot illus-
`trates how the least T2-weighted images, associat-
`ed with a short pTE value, are obtained. Note that
`within each shot, the early echoes are phase-en-
`coded with the smallest gradient amplitudes. An in-
`termediate T2 weighting is obtained with the
`phase-encoding interleaving scheme illustrated in
`the middle plot in Figure 2. In this pattern, both
`negative and positive phase-encoding gradients oc-
`cur within two of the shots (broken arrows, shots 111
`and IV). The bottom plot illustrates the correlation
`
`320 0 JMRl May/June 1991
`
`I l l
`
`I V I I
`
`I
`
`kmax
`kmin
`Figure 2. The FAISE method of phase reordering for ob-
`taining short pTE (proton-density) images (top), interme-
`diate T2-weighted images (middle), and heavily T2-
`weighted images (bottom]. The FAISE technique is illus-
`trated with a four-shot, four-echo sequence in which only
`16 phase-encoding steps are acquired. Each shot (echo
`train) is labeled with a Roman numeral and each echo
`with an Arabic numeral. The vertical axis in each plot
`represents the relative T2 weighting. With an echo spac-
`ing of 15 msec, the three plots can be associated with
`pTEs of 15.30, and 60 msec (top to bottom], because the
`first, second, and fourth echoes, respectively, have been
`acquired near the origin of k space.
`
`between the phase-encoding axis and echo number
`that yields the most heavily T2-weighted images,
`the late echoes being encoded with the smallest
`phase-encoding gradient amplitudes.
`For a complete description of the k-space tra-
`verse as covered with multiple-echo trains, a gener-
`al algorithm for hybrid RARE sequences has been
`developed. This algorithm calculates for each echo
`numberj. collected during echo train, or shot, i, a
`specific phase-encoding gradient amplitude Gy[t, j)
`for each line in k space. Each Gy[i, j ) amplitude,
`which ranges from a maximum negative phase-en-
`coding gradient amplitude Gymin to a maximum pos-
`itive amplitude Gymax. is related to an index A[i.J),
`ranging from 1 to Ly, where ty is the total number
`of phase-encoding steps. Each A(1. j) also corre-
`sponds to a k-space line index (3) and is used for
`proper signal reordering of the raw data matrix pri-
`or to image reconstruction. The formalism reads as
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 2
`
`

`
`follows:
`Gy(Lj) = Gym,, + [A(iJ) - 1I[Gymax - GyminI/[Ly - 11,
`(1)
`where for 1 I i 5 NJ2,
`A[L,j) = [(L,/2 -jNs/2 + 1 - 1 + IPS)mod[L,)] + 1,
`( 2 4
`and for Ns/2 < i I Ns,
`A[i, j ) = [[L,/2 + (j - 2)Ns/2 + t - 1 + IPS)mod(L,)] + 1.
`(2b)
`These relations completely define the correlation
`existing between each RF echo, indexed by the ( t , j )
`variables, and its corresponding k-space phase-en-
`coding gradient amplitude G,(i,j). They hold gener-
`ally for any number of echoes Ne and for an arbi-
`trary number of phase-encoding steps L,. where
`the number of shots Ns obeys the relation Ns = Ly/
`Ne. The modulus function [mod) operates on the
`terms in parentheses. The operator-chosen vari-
`able IPS (initial phases skipped) may range from 0
`to L,/2 and is the number of phase-encoding steps
`[from the 0 phase-encoding step) that are skipped
`in the initial shot (1 = 1). IPS is varied to manipulate
`T2 contrast. We now define the convenient pTE pa-
`rameter and relate it to the IPS value through the
`following set of relations:
`pTE = 27, for IPS = 0,
`pTE = 275 for (j - 1)Ns/2 < IPS 5jNs/2,
`where 27 is the echo spacing of the CPMG se-
`quence. Note, however, that for a 16-echo, 16-shot
`sequence, eight IPS values correspond to a single
`pTE. Therefore, IPS values are reported along with
`the more "user friendly" pTE value for the sake of
`precision.
`FAISE head images in healthy volunteers were
`obtained with various pTE values and a TR of
`2,000 msec between shots. Conventional spin-echo
`images with the same TR and TEs of 30 and 90
`msec (TR msec/TE msec = 2,000/30,90) were also
`collected. The total data acquisition time for the
`single-excitation, 256 X 256 matrix, spin-echo se-
`quence was 8 minutes 56 seconds. Signal intensi-
`ties were measured in selected regions and C/Ns
`were calculated for cerebrospinal fluid and white
`matter and for gray matter and white matter with
`use of the relation
`C/N = [Si- S,)/Np,
`(4)
`where S1 and S2 are the mean values of signal in-
`tensities from selected regions of interest (ROIs) in
`the two tissue types. Np is the mean value of the
`noise signal intensity measured in ROIs along the
`phase-encoding direction and outside the imaged
`object. Mean values and standard deviations of
`noise signal intensities (NR) in ROIs outside the im-
`aged object and along the readout direction were
`also measured and compared with Np. These mea-
`surements were performed in selected regions
`
`(34
`(3b)
`
`with more than 300 pixels.
`Two approaches were used to obtain T1 contrast
`with FAISE: inversion recovery and partial satura-
`tion. The inversion-recovery experiments were per-
`formed by application of a section-selective 180"
`pulse at an inversion time [TI) of 600 msec before
`each excitation pulse. Partial-saturation T 1 -
`weighted images were obtained by decreasing the
`TR between FAISE shots to 500 msec. The echo
`spacing of the CPMG trains was reduced to 1 1.5
`msec by reducing the acquisition window to 4.1
`msec, with a subsequent increase in bandwidth
`and reduction in signal-to-noise ratio. Both experi-
`ments were performed in a healthy volunteer.
`Experiments designed to measure RF-induced
`temperature changes in a phantom consisting of
`100 mL of 0.9 wt% saline in an insulated Styro-
`foam cup were performed. A thermocouple consist-
`ing of constantan-copper wire was inserted into the
`saline phantom. The thermocouple was connected
`to a two-wire thermocouple transmitter (model
`TX52; Omega Engineering, Stamford, Conn) that
`generates a standard 4-20-mA output current pro-
`portional to the millivolt thermocouple signal. Mea-
`surements were made both before and after appli-
`cation of a five-section 16-echo, 16-shot FAISE se-
`quence (TR = 2 sec) but with nine signal averages
`per phase encoding (total data acquisition time,
`290 sec). For comparison, thermocouple voltage
`changes were also recorded before and after a 290-
`sec application of a 20-section, four-echo sequence
`with the same number of 180" RF pulses per TR as
`the FAISE sequence. Voltage changes on the load
`resistor in the current loop were converted to tem-
`perature changes (6T in degrees centigrade) with a
`calibration plot previously obtained with a tem-
`perature-regulated water bath. The amplitude fluc-
`tuations of measured temperatures during typical
`baseline temperature measurements were on the
`order of 0.025OC. Four separate before/after tem-
`perature measurements were made for each se-
`quence, and the mean values and standard devi-
`ations of the temperature increases were calculat-
`ed.
`Specific absorption rates were estimated with the
`manufacturer-supplied software (GE Medical Sys-
`tems, Milwaukee) for typical FAISE acquisitions
`and patient weights ranging from 50 to 100 kg.
`
`0 RESULTS
`Sagittal FAISE head images (256 X 256 matrix)
`obtained with pTEs of 45.75, 105, and 165 msec
`(IPS values of 20.36, 52, and 84, respectively) are
`shown in Figure 3. The echo spacing was 15 msec
`and a 2,000-msec TR was used between shots. The
`images, obtained in a healthy volunteer, reveal how
`image contrast is influenced by the pTE value.
`Axial FAISE head images in a healthy volunteer,
`obtained through the ventricles and acquired with
`pTEs of 30 and 90 msec (IPS values of 12 and 44,
`respectively: a 256 X 256 matrix, 5-mm thick sec-
`tions, an echo spacing of 15 msec, and a TR of
`2,000 msec], are shown in Figure 4. The corre-
`sponding 256 X 256 spin-echo images, obtained
`with the same TR and with TEs of 30 and 90 msec.
`
`Volume 1 Number 3
`
`JMRl
`
`321
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 3
`
`

`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`d.
`C.
`Figure 3. Manipulation of T2 contrast by varying pTE by means of the IPS parameter in a FAISE sequence performed in
`a healthy volunteer (TR = 2,000 msec, 15-msec echo spacing, 256 X 256 matrix size, 5-mm section thickness). The pTEs
`were 45 (a), 75 (b), 105 (c), and 165 msec (a).
`
`are shown in Figure 5. The Table lists C/N values
`obtained from these spin-echo images and the
`FAISE images. Also tabulated are C/N results ob-
`tained from FAISE acquisitions with other pTE/IPS
`values (images not shown]. Figure 6 shows axial
`head images obtained through the circle of Willis,
`one with FAISE with a pTE of 90 msec (1 5-msec
`echo spacing, TR of 2,000 msec, and IPS of 44) and
`the other a corresponding second-echo image of a
`dual-echo spin-echo sequence (2,000/30, 90). Both
`images are clearly T2 weighted, but the FAISE im-
`age demonstrates increased signal intensity within
`the substantia nigra, smaller-diameter vascular lu-
`
`mina, and a persistence of subcutaneous fat signal
`not apparent on the spin-echo image.
`The T1 -weighted FAISE images obtained with in-
`version-recovery and partial-saturation techniques
`are shown in Figure 7. The inversion-recovery
`FAISE image was obtained in a healthy volunteer
`with a TI of 600 msec, a TR of 2,000 msec, and a
`pTE of 69 msec (IPS of 44, 34-sec acquisition). The
`partial-saturation image was acquired in 9 sec,
`with a TR of 500 msec and pTE of 34.5 msec (IPS of
`20). For both T1 acquisitions, the 4-msec acquisi-
`tion window was used to reduce the echo spacing
`within the CPMG echo train.
`
`322 JMRl May/June 1991
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 4
`
`

`
`NP
`
`NR
`
`NPINR
`
`16.9 f 8.3
`16.0 f 7.9
`
`13.9 f 6.6
`13.9 f 6.5
`
`1.22
`1.15
`
`4.73
`6.00
`
`-5.27
`16.25
`
`Contrast-to-Noise Ratios of Dual-Echo Sdn-EChO and FAISE Ima#les
`Sequence
`(GM-WM)/Np
`(CSF-WM)/Np
`Spin echo
`TE msec
`30
`90
`FAISE
`pTE msec (IPS)
`19.8f 10.0
`1.38
`14.3 f 6.6
`-3.46
`2.30
`15 (0)
`19.5 f 9.8
`1.79
`3.79
`1.35
`14.4 f 6.7
`30 (121
`1.20
`14.4 f 6.9
`17.3 f 8.5
`3.38
`4.90
`60 (281
`17.8 f 8.5
`9.15
`5.13
`14.0 f 6.5
`1.27
`75 (36)
`16.99
`7.23
`16.1 f 7.9
`1.15
`14.0 f 6.5
`90 (44)
`15.4 f 7.4
`26.48
`6.48
`150 (76)
`1.09
`14.1 f6.8
`14.6 f 7.1
`29.94
`5.42
`210(116)
`1.04
`14.1 f 6.7
`for gray matter-white matter (GM-WM) and cerebrospinal fluid-white matter (CSF-WM) from images in a healthy
`Note.-C/Ns
`volunteer obtained with a double-echo spin-echo sequence (2,000/30. 90) and with several pTE values of a FAISE sequence ( 15-
`msec echo spacing). Included are noise measurements (mean f standard deviation) made along the phase-encoding (NP] and read
`gradient (NR) axes and their ratio.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Figure 4. FAlSE images
`in a healthy volunteer ac-
`quired with pTE values of
`30 (a) and 90 msec (b), an
`echo spacing of 1 5 msec, a
`TR of 2,000 msec, a 5-mm
`section thickness, and a n
`acquisition time of 34 sec.
`
`Figure 5. Spin-echo im-
`ages (2,000/30.90) corre-
`sponding to those in
`Figure 4.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Volume1 Number3
`
`JMRl
`
`323
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 5
`
`

`
`Figure 6. (a) FAISE im-
`age with pTE of 90 msec
`and (b) spin-echo image
`with TE of 90 msec ob-
`tained through the circle of
`Willis with the same TR
`(2,000 msec) and 5-mm
`section thickness. Note the
`narrower appearance of
`the arteries and the persis-
`tence of subcutaneous fat
`signal on the FAlSE image.
`There is also less signal in-
`tensity in the substantia
`nigra on the spin-echo im-
`age.
`
`Figure 7. T1-weighted
`images (5-mm section
`thickness) obtained with
`(a) the inversion FAISE se-
`quence (TI = 600 msec, TR
`= 2.000 msec, pTE = 69
`msec, 34-sec acquisition
`time) and (b) a FAISE se-
`quence with a reduced TR
`interval (TR = 500 msec,
`pTE = 34.5 msec, 9-sec ac-
`quisition time).
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Mean values and standard deviations of the tem-
`perature increases in the 100-mL-saline phantom
`were 0.20"C f 0.06"C for the FAISE sequence and
`0.15"C f 0.08"C for the four-echo spin-echo se-
`quence (results obtained from four separate trials).
`
`0 DISCUSSION
`In his original work, Hennig demonstrated the
`clinical utility of RARE sequences for imaging
`structures with long T2 values and has promoted
`the technique for its myelographic and urographic
`effects (1,2). With the phase-reordering algorithm
`
`we have introduced, hybrid RARE sequences are
`used to traverse k space in a manner that allows
`straightforward T2 contrast manipulation (Eq [2a].
`[2b]). The covering of k space with multiple shots
`increases the overall data acquisition time when
`compared with single-shot RARE methods (1.2.41,
`which can have overall acquisition times on the or-
`der of 1 sec. However, the use of a reduced number
`of echoes, compared with 128 or 256, permits
`multisection acquisitions within standard TRs
`while maintaining small time-per-image values and
`allows short TR acquisition to be performed. If the
`
`324
`
`JMRl May/June1991
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 6
`
`

`
`length of the echo train is made short with respect
`to the cardiac cycle, the potential may exist for syn-
`chronizing acquisitions with cardiac motion. The
`image quality we have observed with FAISE se-
`quences, as currently implemented, has led us to
`compare FAISE images with conventional spin-
`echo images of brain.
`Figure 3 illustrates how changing the pTE value
`systematically changes the T2 weighting of the im-
`ages. The pTEs in Figure 3 range from 45 to 165
`msec. Note the brightening of cerebrospinal fluid
`spaces and the gradual decrease in signal intensity
`in the corpus callosum as the pTE increases. In Fig-
`ures 4b and 5b. the T2-weighted axial views of a
`normal head obtained with FAISE and spin-echo
`sequences are strikingly similar. White matter/gray
`matter differentiation, deep gray matter structures,
`and overall image details are well depicted on both
`sets of images, with similar contrast distributions.
`The qualitative similarity in T2 weighting is further
`supported by the C/N measurements shown in the
`Table, where FAISE images with pTEs of 75 and 90
`msec have C/N values closely corresponding to
`those obtained from the spin-echo image with a TE
`of 90 msec. However, when FAISE and spin-echo
`methods for obtaining proton-density images (Figs
`4a, 5a) are compared, differences can be noted. The
`FAISE axial view of the head, acquired with a pTE
`of 30 msec (Fig 4a), suffers from a blurring effect
`common in RARE sequences (1.4). This is well ap-
`preciated at the border of gray matter and white
`matter structures in Figure 4a. In addition, the pro-
`ton-density FAISE image exhibits edge-enhance-
`ment artifacts at the interface between brain and
`cerebrospinal fluid structures. Some gyri with ori-
`entations perpendicular to the phase-encoding di-
`rection (horizontal) show increased signal intensi-
`ty, although most of the parietal gyri oriented in
`this direction appear as dark lines (Fig 4a). We be-
`lieve that both of these effects are related to the T2
`decay process occurring during data collection. The
`Table reveals that for higher pTE values, both
`types of FAISE images have phase-encoding noise
`values similar to those obtained for the spin-echo
`sequences and the Np values approach the read
`gradient values NR.
`Several other features differentiate FAISE and
`spin-echo images, and these must be addressed.
`For instance, Figure 6 demonstrates higher signal
`intensity in the substantia nigra on the FAISE im-
`age as opposed to the corresponding spin-echo im-
`age. In addition, there is a persistence of subcuta-
`neous fat signal in heavily T2-weighted FAISE im-
`ages compared with the long TE spin-echo images.
`These features have also been observed when indi-
`vidual images are constructed from each echo of a
`CPMG sequence with the same echo spacing and
`TR as in the FAISE sequence (images not shown).
`We believe, therefore, that the contrast mecha-
`nisms influencing CPMG and FAISE images are
`closely related and that when this contrast differs
`from that of a conventional spin-echo image ac-
`quired at the same TE or pTE, the difference is re-
`lated to a T2 dependence on echo spacing.
`Several well-known mechanisms lead to a
`
`lengthening of T2 as the echo spacing is decreased
`(5-1 1). These include homonuclear coupling inter-
`actions (5.6). chemical exchange between sites
`with distinct chemical shifts (7.8). and proton diffu-
`sion in the presence of microscopic or macroscopic
`field gradients (9-1 1). The first of these effects ap-
`pears quite pronounced in the subcutaneous fat, a
`tissue in which spin-spin splittings and chemical
`shift effects are active in determining relaxation.
`The second effect is noticeable in the substantia ni-
`gra. in which paramagnetic iron-containing moi-
`eties (1 2) generate microscopic field gradients re-
`sponsible for a diffusion-related dephasing phe-
`nomenon. Both of these mechanisms, which
`depend on echo spacing, apparently lead to longer
`T2s at the short echo spacings used in either FAISE
`or CPMG sequences. Therefore, the short echo
`spacings used in FAISE may lead to decreased sen-
`sitivity to susceptibility effects than routine dual-
`echo sequences that use longer echo spacings. This
`feature may prove advantageous when imaging re-
`gions such as the temporal lobes, pontocerebellar
`angle, and spinal structures in contact with bone.
`It may prove disadvantageous, however, when he-
`morraghic lesions are imaged. However, further
`studies are required to assess all of the detailed
`contrast mechanisms influencing the FAISE im-
`ages.
`The vascular structures in the FAISE image in
`Figure 6 appear narrower than the corresponding
`structures in the spin-echo image. This may in part
`be due to the postulated decreased susceptibility
`sensitivity of FAISE sequences to paramagnetic
`blood products. However, flow-related phenomenon
`influencing routine spin-echo sequences, most
`probably influence FAISE images differently be-
`cause of the different acquisition method. A thor-
`ough analysis of the effects of flow on signal inten-
`sity in FAISE images is certainly required if fea-
`tures like the ghosting artifact seen along the
`phase-encoding direction adjacent to the lower por-
`tion of the superior longitudinal sinus in Figure 6a
`are to be understood.
`Figure 7 demonstrates the ability to obtain T1
`contrast with FAISE. Ideally, short pTEs are re-
`quired if T2 weighting is to be minimized. However,
`the pTEs of 69 and 34 msec (Figure 7a and 7b, re-
`spectively) were used to reduce blurring effects as-
`sociated with the shortest pTEs. Both images repro-
`duce the typical T 1 -weighted contrast associated
`with inversion-recovery spin-echo and partial-sat-
`uration spin-echo sequences. Partial-saturation
`FAISE images, which are acquired in less than 10
`sec, could be used to perform contrast enhance-
`ment studies.
`If one assumes that image quality and tissue con-
`trast are not compromised with use of FAISE in
`place of spin echo, it is important to ask what effi-
`ciency advantage FAISE might have over dual-echo
`spin-echo sequences. Considering only 256 X 256
`image matrices, a 16-shot, 16-echo FAISE se-
`quence with 15-msec echo spacing yields eight sec-
`tions with a single (operator chosen) T2 weighting
`in 34 sec. This results in a theoretical time-per-im-
`age value of 4.25 sec. With our standard dual-echo
`
`Volume 1 Number3
`
`JMRl
`
`325
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 7
`
`

`
`spin-echo sequence (2.000/30.80), a total of 18
`sections are acquired (with two separate weightings
`per section) in 8 minutes 56 seconds. This leads to
`a time-per-image value of 14.8 sec. The decrease in
`the time-per-image of FAISE relative to that of the
`dual-echo sequence is. therefore, greater than a
`factor of three. To cover the same volume and pro-
`vide the same T2 weighting as the dual-echo se-
`quence, the FAISE sequence described above would
`require six serial acquisitions. To increase the
`number of sections acquired with FAISE, longer
`TRs or echo trains consisting of fewer echoes may
`be used at the expense of imaging time. Only two
`serial acquisitions would then be required to obtain
`two different T2 weightings over the required vol-
`umes.
`Finally, there is the issue of increased RF power
`deposition associated with FAISE. The general
`guidelines underlying RF power deposition levels
`are based on the restriction that tissue temperature
`increases should not exceed 1 "C (1 3). To test
`whether the high density of 180" refocusing pulses
`used in our FAISE method could potentially lead to
`such temperature increases, the saline phantom
`experiments were performed. The temperature in-
`creases observed in four separate trials with both
`the four-echo multiplanar sequence and the 16-
`echo FAlSE sequence were between 0.1 and 0.2"C.
`The temperature increases are small enough to
`suggest that irradiated regions of perfused tissue,
`with its inherent cooling capacity, should not be
`damaged. However, RF power deposition-induced
`temperature increases in saline phantoms are only
`crude indicators of potential temperature increases
`in actual applications to humans, where the load-
`ing of the RF coil and geometrically influenced eddy
`currents in the body are different. Estimated spe-
`cific absorption rate values for the FAISE sequence
`ranged from 0.1 16 to 0.130 W/kg for the eight-sec-
`tion FAISE acquisition (1 6-echo, 16-shot, TR =
`2,000 msec, 27 = 15 msec) performed with the head
`coil configuration. These estimated values are well
`below the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lim-
`it of 3.2 W/kg (14). In other applications, however,
`it may be found that specific absorption rate values
`for maximum-volume FAISE sequences exceed
`FDA guidelines. In this case, it is possible to gener-
`ate echo trains in which the flip angles of the refo-
`cusing pulses are less than 180" (1 5), thus lowering
`RF power deposition levels to within FDA-approved
`limits at the expense of signal-to-noise ratio. Alter-
`natively, the number of sections can be reduced to
`remain within the guidelines, permitting fast, safe
`acquisitions over limited volumes.
`In conclusion, the FAISE sequence demonstrated
`here decreases theoretical time-per-image values
`by more than a factor of three compared with dual-
`echo spin-echo sequences while maintaining the
`overall contrast and quality of the latter for T2-
`weighted images. The proton-density images ob-
`tained with FAISE are not entirely equivalent to
`proton-density spin-echo images. However, it is
`possible that further reductions in echo spacing,
`shorter echo trains, and/or the application of k-
`
`326
`
`JMRl May/June1991
`
`space corrections in the postprocessing stage (1 6)
`could substantially improve proton-density FAlSE
`images. If the additional RF power deposition can
`be shown to involve minimal risk, the acquisition of
`larger matrix sizes (eg, 5 12 X 5 12) in reasonable
`time periods becomes feasible within a multisection
`two-dimensional format. Alternatively, the exten-
`sion of the two-dimensional Fourier transform
`FAISE techniques to three-dimensional Fourier
`transform methods (4) could permit the acquisition
`of a three-dimensional spin-echo-like data set in
`imaging times of less than 5 minutes. 0
`
`Acknowledgments: Dr Melki is grateful for financial sup-
`port from the Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche
`Medicale (INSERM) for pursuing this work while on leave from
`the Unite 31 6 de I'INSERM (Systeme nerveux du foetus a I'en-
`fant) in the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau de
`Tours, France. He thanks Prof Leandre Pourcelot for encour-
`aging this work. The authors also acknowledge Peter Jakab,
`MSE. David Feinberg, MD, PhD, Nobuya Higuchi. MD, and
`Sam Wong, PhD, for their interest and helpful discussions
`during the course of this work.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`References
`1.
`Hennig J. Naureth A. Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a
`fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med
`1986; 3:823-833.
`Hennig J, Friedbug H. Clinical applications and meth-
`odological developments of the RARE technique. Magn
`Reson Imaging 1988: 6:391-395.
`Twieg DB. The k-space trajectory formulation of the
`NMR imaging process with applications in analysis and
`imaging methods. Med Phys 1983: 10:610-621,
`Mulkern RV. Wong STS. Winalski C. Jolesz FA. Con-
`trast manipulation and artifact assessment of 2D and
`3D RARE sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8:557-
`566.
`Santyr GE. Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ. Variation in
`measured transverse relaxation in tissue resulting from
`spin locking with the CPMG sequence. J Magn Reson
`1988; 79:28-44.
`Allerhand A. Analysis of Carr-Purcell spin-echo NMR
`experiments on multiple-spin systems. 1. The effect of
`homonuclear coupling. J Chem Phys 1966: 44: 1-9.
`Carver JP. Richards RE. A general two-site solution for
`the chemical exchange produced dependence of T2 upon
`the Carr-Purcell pulse separation. J Magn Reson 1972:
`6:89-105.
`8.
`Gutowsky HS, Vold RL, Wells EJ. Theory of chemical
`exchange effects in magnetic resonance. J Chem Phys
`1965: 43:4107-4 125.
`Bendel P. Spin-echo attenuation by diffusion in non-
`uniform field gradients. J Magn Reson 1990; 86:509-
`515.
`Rozenman Y, Zou X, Kantor HL. Signal loss induced by
`superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in NMR spin-
`echo images: the role of diffusion. Magn Reson Med
`1990; 14:31-39.
`Mulkern RV, Spencer RGS. Diffusion imaging with
`paired CPMG sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 1988:
`6:623-631.
`Drayer BP. Burger P, Darwin R, et al. Magnetic reso-
`nance imaging of brain iron. AJNR 1986: 7:373-380.
`Saunders RD, Smith H. Safety aspects of NMR clinical
`imaging. Br Med J 1984; 40: 148- 154.
`Federal Register 1988; 53:48981.
`Hennig J. Multiecho imaging sequences with low refo-
`cusing flip angles. J Magn Reson 1988: 78:397-407.
`Oshio K, Singh M. A computer simulation of T2 decay
`effects in echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1989;
`1 1 :389-397.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`15.
`
`16.
`
`General Electric Co. 1008 - Page 8

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket