throbber
27
`
`PSF improvements in single shot GRASE imaging
`
`T. Schaffter, P. Bériierti, D. Leilifritr.
`I‘ia(‘ltli£‘rPit‘l] (iheinie, Universitiit Bremen‘ l)-28355»! firemen. (iPrl]1?\l))';
`t l‘hihps ftesearcli. Department Technical Systeins, Roiitgeiistralie 24-'26. D—22Zt35 Hanihurg, (flei'iiiaiiy.
`
`Iiiti'<i(li1r:ti()1i:
`ln (‘f’M(il liased imaging sclieines like RARE or CHASE the
`[It|l]]i spread function (PSF) in the pliase—eii<'odiiig direction is
`'ls'lI‘rI]]l[1Ptl hy the transverse relaxation time T3. For species
`with short T3 21
`lirond PSF will occur. degrading image res—
`tiliitiriu Using snizill refocusing pulses ('9, < 180° high order
`uiitm of traiis\'erszi|
`iiiagiietizatioii are generated, which con
`triliiitv later to the detectable iiiagnctization
`For species
`with T1 >> T3 the llzihn echo aiiiplit.ud<~s in the CPi\‘l(i sequeiice
`’l<’t"|}' more slowly. hut
`instziliilities t“ripple") in the early erlioes
`:‘i'iI|
`l.e ff(>lI.\' et al
`[3] suggested an algoritlini to avoid these
`\.iri:iti<iiis in sigiizil amplitude using Varialile refocusing pulses.
`In this work [it] relax:ition was iieglected and the echo ampli~
`tiidws \\'-*r<‘ stahilized to a constant value. Taking relaxation in
`ihi
`liiglier order states into coiisideratioii after some time no
`Iitit‘_’llf‘il'(J1ti()H is left
`to stabilize to a constant value. i.e. a dis
`Itil’Itt'il1 of the PSF will O<'(’lH‘.
`ln this alistract
`the relaxation
`piucesses are taken into account. using an exponential signal
`ilcctiy with T which is greater tlian T-_i. This approach offers a
`sinnotli PSF and makes it possihle to image an ohject with fast
`lg relaxing species.
`"the nietliod was iuiplemented in a single
`~hot (IR v\‘il-I experiment
`Methods:
`.s'll0\\'l1 that after i-th pulse ?(i+ 1) longi—
`lii [l],[I§] it has l)P(‘ll
`pi and transvcrsal t/Q71,
`qt‘),
`qI‘- magv
`iiidinal p‘_l_I ,
`pi},
`Using the spinor formalism the echo
`:i+=ti'/atioii states exist
`it|il]ilttH(lt“ |q},l after the I-th refocusing pulse can he calculated
`tmiii the previous states using a hard pulse approxiinatioiiiu the
`lilrirli erpizitioiis. If the signal distribution of the (i— l )th state is
`l(lltt\\'li. the refociisiiig pulse for the f~tl] echo can he calciilzited,
`;»ir>l«ling the desired echo aniplitiide. The echo aiiiplitudes are
`\‘[[{i)illZl_‘(l to an exponential decay qf, = S’. : S0 -exp(—i-TE/T)
`witli
`the stahilizatioii zunplitude So. The flip angle (-)0 for the
`first echo is given ti} Gr) : 2-arcsin \/5'" -e:\'p(TE/T3). lfenough
`i
`signal is left
`in the high order states (1/‘ , 41"" ). the refoctising
`l‘tll.’~t‘.s (3),
`(‘an l)t‘Cdl(‘llldit‘(l31121l}'ii(‘all)'Z
`
`
`then all available transversal iiiagnetization has to he refocused
`((3 — 180°).
`fig.
`2 shows the resulting spin echo zunplitudes
`in the (i‘Pl\lC sequence. Theoretical (lines) and experiiiiental
`(points) Values are in good agreement except for the deviation
`in Sial\lll7,E\IlOHHl1][3litl1(lt? Sn 2 0.3 ¢ 0.34 : 48. The T : l0Oiiis
`curve (+) shows that the lifetiiiie ofrapidly relaxing transversal
`iiiagiietizatioii could be prolonged at
`least h_v a factor of 3 and
`with no ripple at
`the beginning of the echo train . This l’(‘tlllt't’S
`the distortioii in the PSF and narrows it in the image doiiiain.
`The Fllll|')ll[lt(l0 of the PSF is given by the integral of the echo
`decay in k—space. That ineans with regard to SNR.
`the areas
`under the curves in Fig. 2 indicate that the signal in an iriiage
`is only reduced l>_v ii factor of 0.675 using the stahiliqation with
`'1' : 10()ins. This factor increases if niore echoesiare used.
`lniages ohtaiiied with the stabilization niethod show a new
`contrast
`lieliavioiir.
`In these images fast relaxing tissue, e.g.
`liver or iniiscle.
`is clearly visible and distiiiguisliahle from siir—
`rouiidiiig tissiie. However, this heiiefit
`is associated with asriiall
`reduction of SIVR.
`
`Concli ‘ion:
`This work deinonstrates the feasibility of imaging rapidly re»
`laxing tissue using single shot GRASE imaging by improving the
`PSF. This can he advaiitageous in diaguozing different liver disv
`eases Stabilizing the Hahn echo amplitudes to an exponential
`decay offers new contrast lieliaviour. The reduced signal ampli—
`tudtrs caiisv only a small redurrtion in SNR.
`l“urthe.riiioi'e,
`the
`method seeins to he favorable to avoid SAR limitatioiis in high
`field applicatioiis. Future work will stuil_\' feasiliility of inea.'sur—
`ing siiigle sliot CHASE images with a larger matrix size (lt3U"'l.
`due to the prolonged lifetime Tofthe trziiisversal iiiagiietizatioii
`Refe1'eimes:
`IURR.
`.397.
`.l Magn. R(‘S0ll.. 78.
`.
`[1]
`llennig,
`.l
`f~’l “i°"‘~‘"”- D- 5- l- Clmmr Ph.V-‘iv 34- 3”-'>7i W51»
`Le Roux. Patrick. lliiiks. R. 9., Magn. Reson i’\Ied., 30, 183. 1119.3.
`[4] F(*rt1('ri,.l.T...9tark. D D.‘ .-\
`.l. R-4 155i 943,
`lf-J90.
`180
`
`innt -
`‘
`(—)il'l)
`«_;
`
`‘
`pffl
`‘(lift _ S,
`
`i
`
`‘
`\
`[fl
`/
`V Kq(l]—l \ H1 )
`
`_
`
`A
`:
`qt” ~ Si“
`q(zy~1 __ S,
`
`J
`
`(
`
`)
`
`i:'.ti
`1 W
`'
`
`V
`t.
`_
`_
`\[al)ili7/Ptl tn T : ‘ztlflms
`staliilized to T .. lUUnis
`>0 : 0.3- illii
`
`<>
`‘lr
`
`(2) g
`
` Hymns’ S4 Discussion:
`
`is determined
`75)). Otherwise O,
`: .8" -<‘.\'p(T];/(2
`wuli
`iiiiinerically li_v miiiiniiziiig the quadratic deviation from the de
`sired signal decay.
`
`(-), zinin (tifl, —— .5" )3)
`_‘
`‘
`_
`_
`'
`lhe stahilizing algoritliin was applied to a ( PMG sequence
`with 1.3 eclioes and an inter»echo time of 10 ms. The signal
`il»~r:i_x ofzi doped water tuhe (T1 : 38tJiii.s. '15 : Iifiins) was mea-
`siired on in modified O.-3T Wll()l(’4l)0(l'\'
`[‘t’St‘r'll‘(‘l1 iinager (Philips
`\lf*tl|t‘r’1l Systeiiis) The tlieoretiral predictions for two exporieii
`tin! t'ii~r;,_ys
`{Ls}, : ti 3 . ‘\[n_ T : ltttt ms or T : ‘20Un1s) were
`\:i|i<l:ite-l. To «|eiiit>nstrate the effect on image coiitmst
`the al-
`L”’iTilllllt \\'}l.\"t'l[ti\llt‘(l to 71 (JRASE sequence Single shot (JRASE
`uii;i_:,cs H28‘) with 20 spin echoes ((9 : 180°) and 5 gradient
`ecliiws pet
`llahn r’t‘llti were rihtained from the ah-.l0nniial region
`rl
`is healt|i_t volunteer
`lihc in|er~z-cho time was set
`to 13 ms.
`lhe iinagrs were coiiipareil \\'llll those olilained using stahiliza—
`lltilt
`to an e.\'ponenti:il decay Si; : 0.33
`ll”: T : ‘2UUiiis «if fast
`FI‘lit.\Plilt1IitlSS\lt‘,5\§Q1lH1ll]gtllZit Ti : -itlllllis and '[7_, : lthiis
`
`1 slimxs the xzilues of the i’ef<i<’ii.siiiL; pulse train for
`lilg
`\ti’tl’tlllZ£1tlOHSiOt\\'0tlliT€l't’l1lf‘X[IOl1t‘l1il«lltlt‘(‘Zt)5(.‘l[iC 1.3.
`/fl :
`ltttiiiis or T : ‘zllttinsi. For 7‘ I ltltliiis tinl} list
`1 was used
`liir T * ‘jtlfhiis the first
`ll]
`I't‘fU(‘ll\lI1LL [tl|l\>$ \Vt‘l‘t> t';ilt‘|Ili’it*".l
`tiiiiiii lit
`1.
`for the ilt‘\t
`liq
`'2 was iisril
`liliat
`lIlt‘(1ll\
`that
`wiwiigli signal
`t\ hft
`fwi ~litli|il/lit};
`thi
`lii~t
`ttll‘H\.
`l/ill
`aft.-i
`
`9,
`
`‘J0 K
`
`ti
`
`U
`
`Figure l
`
`2
`
`4
`
`8
`6
`E,C1mm”nhH.,
`refociisiug pulse angles used for stahilizatioii
`
`10
`
`1.2
`
`M
`
`tlivurethal
`,_
`qabillzw‘ W T ___ mm":
`dabmzmhn T : 100'» +
`G, : mm D
`
`‘
`
`_
`
`”
`
`3
`
`4
`
`R
`"
`Nil" ”"”‘l"‘f’
`liguiw '2 wclzim ziniplitiivlvs iiftvr -<t;itv.ili/.;iti'
`
`1'7‘
`
`H
`
`l‘
`
`ii
`
`General Electric Co. 1026 - Page 1
`
`General Electric Co. 1026 - Page 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket