throbber
sequential shooting .
`
`.
`
`. the so-called ghost wave will be the reinforced seismic
`
`wave and will appear prominently on the seismic record.” Id. 8:21-24.
`
`59.
`
`The “ghost wave” referred to by Itria is a well-known phenomenon of
`
`seismic surveying. Whenever sources are located below the surface of the earth or
`
`the water, upgoing portions of the wave energy strike the interface between earth
`
`or water and air. The energy that is reflected back into the survey medium trails
`
`the primary seismic wave and eventually arrives at the receivers. This trailing
`
`wavefront is known as the ghost.
`
`60. A few characteristics of the ghost are important to know in this
`
`proceeding. First, the ghost reflection lags behind the primary signal by the
`
`amount of time it takes the ghost to reach the surface and return to the depth of the
`
`source. This delay is known as the ghost delay. Second, due to the difference in
`
`acoustic impedance between air and earth or water, the ghost reflections have
`
`opposite polarity to the primary seismic wave. This is depicted in the figure
`
`below. The left figure depicts the downgoing “direct” raypath and the upgoing
`
`ghost raypath that is reflected at the surface. The right figure depicts the direct and
`
`ghost waveforms as a function of time. Amplitude displacement to the right of the
`
`vertical time axis are positive amplitudes, amplitude displacement to the left are
`
`negative amplitudes.
`
`
`
`28
`
`IPR2016-00407 PGS Exhibit 1002
`
`PGS Exhibit 1020
`PGS v. WG
`
`PGS v. WG
`
`IPR2016-00407
`PGS Exhibit 1020
`PGS v. WG
`
`

`
`
`
`‘II
`
`Direct ray pth
`
`Third, the amplitude of the ghost wave is determined by the various environmental
`
`factors including the acoustic impedance of the two media at the point of
`
`reflection. In the marine context, ghost waves are typically quite strong; the
`
`reflection of seismic waves at the air-water interface in calm seas is almost
`
`perfectly efficient and the ghost has nearly the same amplitude, but opposite
`
`polarity, as the direct wave.
`
`61.
`
`Itria teaches that upward sequential shooting may be used to enhance
`
`the portion of the wavefront that travels upward and reflects off the surface
`
`interface. When this is done, the primary seismic wave is diminished, just as the
`
`ghost would be diminished by downward sequential shooting. Accordingly, the
`
`ghost wave, rather than the downward wave, will “appear prominently on the
`
`seismic record and contain the desired intelligence relative to the underlying
`
`subsurface formations.” Id. 8:21-25.
`
`62.
`
`Techniques for using vertically distributed sources continued to
`
`develop over the decades following Prescott and Itria. For example, U.S. Patent
`
`29
`
`IPR2016-00407 PGS Exhibit 1002
`
`PGS Exhibit 1020
`PGS v. WG
`
`PGS v. WG
`
`IPR2016-00407
`PGS Exhibit 1020
`PGS v. WG

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket