`Filed: January 10, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`STELLAR ENERGY AMERICAS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TAS ENERGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`____________
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`BARRY L. GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Joint Motion to Terminate Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`
`
`
`I. Introduction
`
`
`
`On December 6, 2016, Petitioner, Stellar Energy Americas, Inc.
`
`(“SEA”), and Patent Owner, TAS Energy, Inc. (“TAS”) (collectively the
`
`“parties”) filed a Joint Motion to Terminate this inter partes review. Paper
`
`11 (“Joint Motion to Terminate”). Along with the Joint Motion to Terminate,
`
`the parties a true copy of a written settlement agreement (Ex. 1235), as well
`
`as a joint request to have their settlement agreement treated as business
`
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`(Paper 12).
`
`II. Discussion
`
`The parties are reminded that the Board is not a party to the
`
`settlement, and may identify independently any question of patentability. 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(a). Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding
`
`will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this
`
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” The
`
`requirement for terminating review with respect to SEA is met.
`
`
`
`Furthermore, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[i]f no petitioner remains in
`
`the inter partes review, the Office may terminate the review or proceed to a
`
`final written decision under section 318(a).” SEA is the sole petitioner in
`
`this inter partes review, such that termination with respect to SEA means
`
`that no petitioner remains in the proceeding. The Board, thus, has discretion
`
`to terminate this review with respect to TAS.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`
`
`
`The panel entered a Decision to institute trial on July 1, 2016 (Paper
`
`
`
`7). TAS has filed no Patent Owner Response. Thus, briefing is not
`
`complete in this proceeding. The parties also state that they “have settled
`
`their dispute,” and represent the following:
`
`On December 2, 2016, the parties filed dismissal notices
`in the related district court litigations TAS Energy Inc. v. Stellar
`Energy Americas, Inc., et al., Case No. 8:14-cv-3145-T-30MAP
`(M.D. Fla.) and TAS Energy Inc. v. Direct Energy, Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 4:14-cv-512 (S.D. Tex.), and the parties are
`concurrently filing joint motions to terminate related Inter Partes
`Reviews IPR2016-00294, IPR2016-00335, IPR2016-00425, and
`IPR2016-00426. In addition, the parties moved to dismiss Patent
`Owner's appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the
`Federal Circuit of the final written decisions in IPR 2015-00882
`and IPR 2015-00886. The Federal Circuit granted that motion
`and dismissed the appeals on December 5, 2016. The parties are
`not aware of any other related pending litigation involving the
`subject patent. In addition, the parties are not contemplating any
`litigation or proceeding involving the subject patent in the
`foreseeable future.
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate 1–2.
`
`
`
`Upon consideration of the circumstances of this case, the panel has
`
`determined to terminate this inter partes review as to both SEA and TAS
`
`without rendering a final written decision.
`
`It is
`
`III. Order
`
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate this proceeding in
`
`
`
`
`
`(Paper 11) is granted, and this proceeding is hereby terminated; and
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, as was requested timely by the parties
`
`(Paper 12), the settlement agreement and license agreement (Exhibit 1235)
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`
`
`
`will be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Steven Schwarz
`Tamatane Aga
`VENABLE LLP
`sjschwarz@venable.com
`tjaga@venable.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jonathan Pierce
`Derek V. Forinash
`PORTER HEDGES, LLP
`Jpierce@porterhedges.com
`dforinash@porterhedges.com