throbber
Paper 13
`Filed: January 10, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`STELLAR ENERGY AMERICAS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TAS ENERGY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`____________
`
`
`Before JOSIAH C. COCKS, MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK, and
`BARRY L. GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Joint Motion to Terminate Inter Partes Review
`35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`
`
`
`I. Introduction
`
`
`
`On December 6, 2016, Petitioner, Stellar Energy Americas, Inc.
`
`(“SEA”), and Patent Owner, TAS Energy, Inc. (“TAS”) (collectively the
`
`“parties”) filed a Joint Motion to Terminate this inter partes review. Paper
`
`11 (“Joint Motion to Terminate”). Along with the Joint Motion to Terminate,
`
`the parties a true copy of a written settlement agreement (Ex. 1235), as well
`
`as a joint request to have their settlement agreement treated as business
`
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`(Paper 12).
`
`II. Discussion
`
`The parties are reminded that the Board is not a party to the
`
`settlement, and may identify independently any question of patentability. 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(a). Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding
`
`will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756, 48,768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this
`
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” The
`
`requirement for terminating review with respect to SEA is met.
`
`
`
`Furthermore, under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[i]f no petitioner remains in
`
`the inter partes review, the Office may terminate the review or proceed to a
`
`final written decision under section 318(a).” SEA is the sole petitioner in
`
`this inter partes review, such that termination with respect to SEA means
`
`that no petitioner remains in the proceeding. The Board, thus, has discretion
`
`to terminate this review with respect to TAS.
`
`2
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`
`
`
`The panel entered a Decision to institute trial on July 1, 2016 (Paper
`
`
`
`7). TAS has filed no Patent Owner Response. Thus, briefing is not
`
`complete in this proceeding. The parties also state that they “have settled
`
`their dispute,” and represent the following:
`
`On December 2, 2016, the parties filed dismissal notices
`in the related district court litigations TAS Energy Inc. v. Stellar
`Energy Americas, Inc., et al., Case No. 8:14-cv-3145-T-30MAP
`(M.D. Fla.) and TAS Energy Inc. v. Direct Energy, Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 4:14-cv-512 (S.D. Tex.), and the parties are
`concurrently filing joint motions to terminate related Inter Partes
`Reviews IPR2016-00294, IPR2016-00335, IPR2016-00425, and
`IPR2016-00426. In addition, the parties moved to dismiss Patent
`Owner's appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the
`Federal Circuit of the final written decisions in IPR 2015-00882
`and IPR 2015-00886. The Federal Circuit granted that motion
`and dismissed the appeals on December 5, 2016. The parties are
`not aware of any other related pending litigation involving the
`subject patent. In addition, the parties are not contemplating any
`litigation or proceeding involving the subject patent in the
`foreseeable future.
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate 1–2.
`
`
`
`Upon consideration of the circumstances of this case, the panel has
`
`determined to terminate this inter partes review as to both SEA and TAS
`
`without rendering a final written decision.
`
`It is
`
`III. Order
`
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate this proceeding in
`
`
`
`
`
`(Paper 11) is granted, and this proceeding is hereby terminated; and
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, as was requested timely by the parties
`
`(Paper 12), the settlement agreement and license agreement (Exhibit 1235)
`
`3
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00426
`Patent RE44,079 E
`
`
`
`will be treated as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Steven Schwarz
`Tamatane Aga
`VENABLE LLP
`sjschwarz@venable.com
`tjaga@venable.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jonathan Pierce
`Derek V. Forinash
`PORTER HEDGES, LLP
`Jpierce@porterhedges.com
`dforinash@porterhedges.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket