throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Day, Evan S. (SDO)
`Coulson, Chris (CCoulson@kenyon.com); Ulrich, Clifford (CUlrich@Kenyon.com); Zachary, Michael
`Ng, Chun (SEA); Bernstein, Matthew C. (SDO); *Perkins-Service-MSFT-Bradium-IPR
`Bradium Technologies v Microsoft
`Monday, February 27, 2017 9:19:00 PM
`2017 02 13 Letter from C Coulson to E Day re Bradium-Microsoft IPRs.pdf
`2017 02 09 Letter from c coulson to C Ng re IPR2016-00448.pdf
`
`Counsel,
`
` I
`
` write in regard to Bradium’s request for a deposition of Yonatan Lavi. Microsoft has communicated
`Bradium’s request to Mr. Lavi. Mr. Lavi states he is seriously concerned about retaliation by Mr. Levanon
`(an owner of Bradium) if Mr. Lavi were to willingly provide testimony. We believe these concerns are not
`unfounded given Bradium already threatened Mr. Lavi (see, e.g. your letters of February 9, 2017 and
`February 13, 2017) (attached). Regardless, Mr. Lavi said he will not sit for a deposition unless compelled
`to do so (in which case he will cooperate with any process that he receives).
`
`In view of Mr. Lavi’s reluctance to testify, Microsoft proposes that the parties jointly seek authorization
`from the Board to submit a Letter of Request to the Israel Central Authority designated under the Hague
`Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters. Our understanding is that
`Israel is generally cooperative with Hague Convention requests and complies quickly; however, as we
`have previously indicated, Microsoft is also willing to stipulate or move the Board to adjust any due dates
`that may be necessary. Additionally, Microsoft is willing to reimburse Bradium for the reasonable travel
`costs incurred by the attorney taking the deposition on behalf of Bradium. I note that Microsoft previously
`offered to take the deposition of Mr. Levanon in Tel Aviv.
`
`Please advise regarding Bradium’s position on this proposal so that the parties can contact the Board.
`
`Best regards,
`Evan
`
`Evan Day | Perkins Coie LLP
`11988 El Camino Real Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`D. +1.858.720.5743
`F. +1.858.720.5799
`E. EDay@perkinscoie.com

`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1041
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

`

`
`
`Chris J Coulson
`Direct 212.908.6409
`ccoulson@kenyon.com
`
`Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`212.425.7200
`Fax 212.425.5288
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 9, 2017
`
`By Email to CNg@perkinscoie.com and Counsel of Record for IPR2016-00448
`
`Chun M. Ng, Esq.
`Perkins Coie LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101-3099
`
`
`
`
`Re: Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Technologies LLC, Inter Partes Review Proceeding
`IPR2016-00448 (United States Patent 7,908,343) Exhibit 10107
`
`Counsel:
`
`I write on behalf of Bradium Technologies LLC and Mr. Isaac Levanon regarding Exhibit 1017,
`“Declaration of Yonatan Lavi,” which Petitioner Microsoft publicly filed in Inter Partes Review
`Proceeding IPR2016-00448 (United States Patent 7,908,343).
`
`Our preliminary review1 of Exhibit 1017 indicates that Mr. Lavi’s declaration reveals
`confidential corporate information regarding which we understand Mr. Lavi is subject to
`confidentiality obligations based on his employment with GACentral.com, 3DVU, Ltd., and
`3DVU, Inc., which Mr. Lavi refers to collectively as “3DVU”.
`
`To allow us to complete an investigation of this issue and reduce, to the extent possible at this
`point, any prejudice, I write to request that Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) immediately
`request that Exhibit 1017 be sealed and that the public version of the declaration be expunged.
`
`We further ask that Microsoft, Perkins Coie LLP and Mr. Lavi preserve all documents, including
`e-mail communications, letters, draft declarations, and agreements regarding Microsoft’s contact
`with Mr. Lavi that may have resulted in his publicly revealing 3DVU’s confidential corporate
`information without notice or consent.
`
`It is unclear based on Microsoft’s reply and Mr. Lavi’s declaration whether Perkins Coie LLP is
`representing Mr. Lavi personally, or whether Perkins Coie LLP is representing only Microsoft.
`However, as you have clearly been working closely with Mr. Lavi, we ask that you immediately
`
`1 Although the declaration appears to have been executed on January 31, 2017, we received no
`notice of the declaration or its contents prior to its public filing by Microsoft, which were sent to
`counsel of record at 9:44 p.m. Eastern on Monday, February 6, 2017.
`
`NY01 4341208 v1
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Houston London New York Research Triangle Park Silicon Valley The Woodlands Washington, DC
`
`
`
`
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1041
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

`

`Chun M. Ng, Esq.
`February 9, 2017
`Page 2
`
`
`
`
`forward this correspondence to Mr. Lavi so that he is aware of the need to preserve, and not
`destroy, relevant documents. Please confirm that you have done this at your earliest opportunity.
`
`Regarding deposition, Bradium requests that Mr. Lavi be made available for deposition in the
`United States at our New York office at One Broadway, New York, New York, 10004 on March
`2, 2017. See 37 C.F.R. 42.53; Square, Inc. v. REM Holdings 3, LLC, Case No. IPR2014-00312,
`Paper 37 (PTAB, Dec. 9, 2014) (Order) (declarant residing outside of the United States required
`to travel to the United States for deposition). Although we will endeavor to complete Mr. Lavi’s
`deposition within a single day, Mr. Lavi should remain available in New York on Friday, March
`3, 2017 because, given the volume and nature of the materials in Mr. Lavi’s 31-page declaration
`(which includes six exhibits that total 40 pages), there is a significant chance that his deposition
`will need to continue on Friday, March 3.
`
`
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`/s/ Chris J. Coulson
`
`Chris J. Coulson
`
`
`NY01 4341208 v1
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1041
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`February 13, 2017
`
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`+1.212.425.7200 Phone
`+1.212.425.5288 Fax
`andrewskurthkenyon.com
`
`Chris Coulson
`+1.212.908.6409 Phone
`ccoulson@kenyon.com
`
`By Email to EDay@perkinscoie.com and Counsel of Record in IPR2016-00448
`
`
`
`
`Evan S. Day, Esq.
`Perkins Coie LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`
`
`
`Re: Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Technologies LLC, Inter Partes Review Proceeding
`IPR2016-00448 (United States Patent 7,908,343) and IPR2016-00449 (United
`States Patent 8,924,506) Exhibit 1017
`
`Counsel:
`I write on behalf of Bradium Technologies LLC and Mr. Isaac Levanon regarding Exhibit 1017,1
`“Declaration of Yonatan Lavi,” which Petitioner Microsoft publicly filed in Inter Partes Review
`Proceeding IPR2016-00448 (United States Patent 7,908,343) and, following my February 9, 2016
`letter, again filed publicly in IPR2016-00449 (United States Patent 8,924,506).
`
` I
`
` renew my request that Microsoft file this exhibit under seal. In addition to confidential
`information that Mr. Lavi obtained via his employment with 3DVU entities, Exhibit 1017 also
`contains DENSO confidential information at Paragraphs 20 and 22. Microsoft has in its
`possession a copy of the DENSO license agreement, which is Exhibit 2029, which was filed under
`seal and served on Microsoft in the IPR proceedings in November 2016.
`
`Also, I have not received a response to the following questions raised in my February 9 letter:
`• Does Perkins Coie LLP represent Mr. Lavi?
`• Will Petitioner Microsoft make Mr. Lavi available for deposition in the United States at
`our New York office at One Broadway, New York, New York, 10004 on March 2, 2017,
`and will Mr. Lavi remain available on March 3 if needed?
`
`
`Also, please confirm, as requested in my February 9 letter, that Perkins Coie LLP and Microsoft
`will retain and not destroy any and all communications, including drafts, exchanged with Mr. Lavi.
`Please also advise whether you have communicated with Mr. Lavi the request to retain all
`documents.
`
`
`
`
`1 As you responded to my February 9, 2017 letter directed to Mr. Ng., I direct this letter to you
`for your convenience.
`
`
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Houston London New York Research Triangle Park Silicon Valley The Woodlands Washington, DC
`NYC:378464.1
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1041
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

`

`
`February 13, 2017
`Page 2
`
`I would appreciate your response to the above at your earliest convenience.
`
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`/s/ Chris J. Coulson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Chris J. Coulson
`
`NYC:378464.1
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1041
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket