throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 25
`Entered: October 7, 2016
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`TWILIO INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TELESIGN CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2016-00360 (US 7,945,034 B2)
`IPR2016-00450 (US 8,462,920 B2)
`IPR2016-00451 (US 8,867,038 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JUSTIN T. ARBES, and KIMBERLY
`MCGRAW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`McGRAW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Sarah J. Guske
`to Appear Pro Hac Vice on Behalf of Petitioner
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`1 This decision addresses issues common to the above identified cases.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each
`case. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any papers.
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00360 (US 7,945,034 B2)
`IPR2016-00450 (US 8,462,920 B2)
`IPR2016-00451 (US 8,867,038 B2)
`
`
`On October 5, 2016, in each proceeding, Petitioner filed a motion for
`pro hac vice admission of Sarah J. Guske (IPR2016-00360, Paper 31)2 along
`with a supporting affidavit by Ms. Guske (id., Exhibit B).3 Petitioner states
`Patent Owner does not oppose Petitioner’s motions. Id. at 2.
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel pro hac
`vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to the
`condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. A motion for pro
`hac vice admission must contain a statement of facts showing there is good
`cause for us to recognize counsel pro hac vice during the proceeding and be
`accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to
`appear. See Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-
`00639, slip op. at 3–4 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (setting forth the
`requirements for pro hac vice admission).
`Petitioner’s lead counsel, Wayne Stacy, is a registered practitioner.
`Paper 32, 1. Petitioner has shown by its Motion and Ms. Guske’s affidavit
`that Ms. Guske is an experienced litigating attorney and has an established
`familiarity with the subject matter at issue in the proceeding. Paper 31, 1–2,
`Exhibit B ¶¶ 2–4; 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). In addition, Ms. Guske’s affidavit
`
`
`2 For convenience, paper and exhibit numbers refer to IPR2016-00360;
`corresponding papers may be found in the record of IPR2016-00450 and
`IPR2016-00451.
`3 The parties are reminded that declarations and other evidence must be filed
`separately as exhibits, rather than as attachments to papers, and numbered
`sequentially in the appropriate range. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.63.
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00360 (US 7,945,034 B2)
`IPR2016-00450 (US 8,462,920 B2)
`IPR2016-00451 (US 8,867,038 B2)
`
`complies with the other requirements for pro hac vice admission. Id.,
`Exhibit B ¶¶ 5–12; see Unified Patents, slip op. at 3–4.
`Based upon consideration of the motions and the record before us, we
`grant Petitioner’s motions for admission of Ms. Guske.
`It is therefore ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed motions for pro
`hac vice admission of Ms. Guske to represent Petitioner as back-up counsel,
`are granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in each of the instant proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Guske is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Guske is to be subject to the Office’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`4
`
`IPR2016-00360 (US 7,945,034 B2)
`IPR2016-00450 (US 8,462,920 B2)
`IPR2016-00451 (US 8,867,038 B2)
`
`PETITIONER
`Wayne Stacy
`wayne.stacy@bakerbotts.com
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`eliot.williams@bakerbotts.com
`
`Sarah J. Guske
`sarah.guske@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER
`Tawni Wilhelm
`TWILHELM@shb.com
`
`Elena McFarland
`EMCFARLAND@shb.com
`TeleSignIPR@shb.com
`
`Jesse Camacho
`JCAMACHO@shb.com
`
`Amy Foust
`AFOUST@shb.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket