`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO CORRECT TYPOGRAPHICAL
`MISTAKE(S) UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.104(c)
`
`
`Petitioner respectfully moves to correct several typographical mistakes in
`
`
`
`petition as originally filed on January 22, 2016. The corrections requested in the
`
`petition, and remarks pertinent to each, are as follows:
`
`- At p.1, ¶2: replace “while the first box is enlarged, a second gesture is
`detected on a second box other than the first box; and in response to detecting
`the second gesture, the structured electronic document is translated so that the
`second box is substantially centered on the touch screen display”
`with
` “while the first box is enlarged, detecting a second gesture on a second box
`other than the first box; and in response to detecting the second gesture,
`translated [sic] the structured electronic document so that the second box is
`substantially centered on the touch screen display.”
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`CASE: IPR2016-00500
`
`PATENT: 7,864,163
`
`
`
`INTELLECTUAL INTEGRITY, LLC,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC,
`Patent Owner/Assignee.
`
`
`
`Remarks: The requested correction is intended only to reflect the actual claim
`
`language resulting from the Certificate of Correction issued with U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,864,163 (“the `163 Patent”). The changes made in the Certificate of
`
`Correction appear to be directed at merely changing the verb tense or voice.
`
`Petitioner avers that the correction of this typographical mistake in the
`
`petition does not affect or change the analysis or reasoning of the petition, nor
`
`does it alter the invalidity and/or unpatentability of the challenged claims;
`
`
`
`- At p.17, ¶1: replace “recites ‘while the first box is enlarged, a second gesture
`is detected on a second box other than the first box; and in response to
`detecting the second gesture, the structured electronic document is translated
`so that the second box is substantially centered on the touch screen display.’”
`with
`“recites ‘while the first box is enlarged, detecting a second gesture on a
`second box other than the first box; and in response to detecting the second
`gesture, translated [sic] the structured electronic document so that the second
`box is substantially centered on the touch screen display.’”;
`and replace “should be read as ‘while the first block is enlarged, a second
`touch interaction with the touch screen user interface is detected on a second
`block other than the first block; and in response to detecting the second touch
`interaction with the touch screen user interface, the browser compatible
`electronic document is translated so that the second block …’”
`with
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
` “should be read as ‘while the first block is enlarged, detecting a second touch
`interaction with the touch screen user interface on a second block other than
`the first block; and in response to detecting the second touch interaction with
`the touch screen user interface, translating the browser compatible electronic
`document so that the second block …’.”
`
`Remarks: Again, the requested correction is intended only to reflect the
`
`actual claim language resulting from the Certificate of Correction issued with
`
`the `163 Patent. The changes made in the Certificate of Correction appear to
`
`be directed at merely changing the verb tense or voice. Petitioner avers that
`
`the correction of this typographical mistake in the petition does not affect or
`
`change the analysis or reasoning of the petition, nor does it alter the invalidity
`
`and/or unpatentability of the challenged claims; and
`
`
`
`At p.22, ¶2: replace
`“Ronald W. Burns
`USPTO Reg. No. 44044
`Intellectual Integrity, LLC
`2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300
`Frisco, Texas 75034
`Phone: 972-632-9009
`rwburns@intellectualintegrity.net"
`
`with
`
`3
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“Ronald W. Burns
`USPTO Reg. No. 44044
`15139 Woodbluff Dr.
`Frisco, Texas 75035
`Phone: 972-632-9009
`rwburns@intellectualintegrity.net"
`
`Remarks: The requested correction is merely a correction of the registered
`
`attorney’s correspondence address.
`
`Petitioner respectfully submits that these mistakes were made without intent
`
`
`
`to mislead or unduly burden any party. Again, Petitioner avers that these corrections
`
`do not affect or change the analysis or reasoning of the petition, nor do they alter the
`
`invalidity and/or unpatentability of the challenged claims. Petitioner therefore
`
`respectfully submits that there is good cause for this motion, and respectfully
`
`requests that the corrections listed above be entered and/or made to the petition as
`
`originally filed.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted on behalf of
`Petitioner Intellectual Integrity, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Ronald W. Burns
`Ronald W. Burns (Reg. No. 44,044)
`15139 Woodbluff Dr.
`Frisco, TX 75035
`(972) 632-9009
`rwburns@intellectualintegrity.net
`
`
`
`5