`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MYLAN LABORATORIES
`LIMITED,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UCB PHARMA GMBH
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2016-00510
`Patent No. 6,858,6501
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Petitioner Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited from IPR2016-01596, Torrent
`Pharmaceuticals Limited from IPR2016-01636, and Amerigen Pharmaceuticals
`Limited from IPR2016-01665 have been joined as Petitioners to this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s July 20, 2017, Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper No. 13), Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan Laboratories
`
`Limited, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Limited, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited, and
`
`Amerigen Pharmaceuticals Limited (collectively, “Petitioner”), respectfully submit
`
`this Request for Oral Argument. As set forth in the Scheduling Order, the Board
`
`has currently scheduled the oral hearing for April 5, 2017 (Id. at 6).
`
`Issues For Hearing
`
`I. Whether claims 1-5 and 21-24 of the ’650 Patent are obvious over the
`
`combination of Postlind, Bundgaard, Bundgaard PCT, Detrol Label, and
`
`Berge;
`
`II. Whether claims 1-5 and 21-24 of the ’650 Patent are obvious over Brynne,
`
`Bundgaard, Bundgaard PCT, and Johansson;
`
`III. Whether Patent Owner has established any secondary considerations,
`
`namely, unpredictable or unexpected properties or long felt need, sufficient
`
`to overcome Petitioner’s prima facie case of obviousness;
`
`IV. Any issues identified in Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument;
`
`V. Any other issues raised in papers filed in this proceeding, including issues
`
`raised in papers yet to be filed, such as Motions to Exclude or Motions for
`
`Observations on Cross Examination; and
`
`
`
`
`
`VI. Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`Petitioner requests permission to use audio/visual equipment to display
`
`demonstrative exhibits, including a projector and screen for Power Point or other
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Mitchell G. Stockwell
`Mitchell G. Stockwell
`Registration No. 39,389
`
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner Mylan
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan
`Laboratories Limited
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electronic materials.
`
`Dated: March 8, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of PETITIONER’S REQUEST
`
`FOR ORAL ARGUMENT was served on March 8, 2017, by filing this document
`
`through the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End system, as well as
`
`delivering a copy via US Mail upon the following attorneys of record:
`
`Jeffrey Ginsberg
`Kenyon & Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, New York 10004-1007
`
`with a courtesy copy to counsel for Pfizer Inc. and UCB Pharma GMBH, Plaintiffs
`
`in the underlying litigation, via email as follows:
`
`Jack Blumenfeld
`jbbefiling@mnat.com
`
`
`
`Dimitrios T. Drivas
`Jeffrey J. Oelke
`James S. Trainor, Jr.
`Ryan P. Johnson
`Robert Counihan
`ddrivas@whitecase.com
`joelke@whitecase.com
`jtrainor@whitecase.com
`rjohnson@whitecase.com
`rcounihan@whitecase.com
`
`
`By: /s/ Mitchell G. Stockwell
`Registration No. 39,389
`Counsel for Petitioner
`
`
`
`Dated: March 8, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
