throbber
i
`
`ASML 1218
`
`

`
`CODEN: JOSAAM
`
`ISSN: 0O30j394
`Jgousnsi. as me ®PTiCA1. Society or Aussies
`
`Joseph W. Goodman, Editor
`
`Honmai Goodman, Assistant to the Editor
`
`(1981)
`Term Ending 31 December 1981
`Darrell E. Burch
`C. E. Moore Sitterly
`David A. DeWolf
`David H. Rank
`
`James A. R. Samson William B. Bridges
`Georg H. Hass
`Robert E. Hufnagel Richard Tousey
`Steven F. Clifford
`R. Clark Jones
`A. Francis Turner
`B. Roy Frieden
`David L. MacAdam Dudley Williams
`Nicholas George
`
`Associate Editors
`(1983)
`Term Ending 31 December 1983
`David E. Aspnes
`Thomas Hirschfeld
`William M. Benesch
`Karl A. Stetson
`William Streifer
`Adriaan Walther
`James C. Wyant
`
`(1985)
`Term Ending 31 December 1985
`Kenneth L. Andrew
`Leo M. Hurvich
`Stanley S. Ballard
`Akira Ishimaru
`Richard G. Brewer
`B. E. A. Saleh
`William H. Carter
`Murray Sargent Ill
`Henry M. Crosswhite
`Jeffrey H. Shapirg
`David L. Fried
`Gerald Westheime;
`Carl W. Helstrom
`Gunter
`Wyszieck
`
`William B. Bridges, Chairman
`Robert M. Boynton, Color and Vision
`John C. Dainty, Holography and Information Processing
`Sumner P. Davis, Spectroscopy
`
`‘Panel of Topical Advisors
`Freeman F. Hall, Jr., Atmospheric Optics
`Peter Kaiser, Fiber and Integrated Optics
`James E. Pearson, Lasers and Electra-Optics
`William H. Price, Optical Engineering
`
`Editorial Staff at AIP: Lawrence Feinberg, Journal Supervisor; William L. Siletti, Senior Copy Editor
`
`
`
`Published monthly by the American Institute of Physics
`for the Optical Society of America, the Journal of the
`Optical Society of America contains papers and Letters
`that contribute significant new knowledge or under-
`standing of any optical phenomenon, principle, or method.
`Reports of officers and committees of the Society are also
`included.
`
`Submit manuscripts and all other materials for publi~
`cation, including books for review, to
`
`Dr. Joseph W. Goodman, Editor
`Journal of the Optical Society of America
`570 University Terrace
`Los Altos, California 94022
`
`V Submission is a representation that the manuscript has not
`been published previously or currently submitted for
`publication elsewhere. The manuscript should be ac-
`companied by a statement transferring copyright from the
`authors (or their employers——whoever holds the copyright)
`to the Optical Society of America; a form for copyright
`transfer is occasionally printed in the back of this journal
`and is available from the Editor’s office or AIP.
`
`Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with the
`requirements of the journal which are summarized on page
`(iii) of the January issue of the Journal of the Optical
`Society of America of this year. Authors should consult
`the Style Manual of AIP which can be obtained (for $7 .50
`prepaid) by writing to the American Institute of Physics,
`335 East 45th Street, New York, New York 10017. Man~
`uscripts submitted in a form which is not appropriate for
`the Journal will be returned to the authors.
`
`Publication Charge: Author’s institutions are ex—
`pected to pay a publication charge of $80.00 per printed
`page. Failure to honor the publication charge will usually
`delay publication.
`
`AIP’s Physics Auxiliary Publication Service
`(PAPS) is a low-cost depository for material which is part
`of and supplementary to a published paper, but is too long
`to be included in the Journal; inquire of the Editor.
`
`Proof and all correspondence concerning papers i
`the process of publication should be addressed as follow
`Supervisor, Editorial Department, American Institute
`Physics, 335 East 45th Street, New York, N.Y. 1001
`Reference must be to title, author, journal, and scheduled’
`date of publication. A limited number of alterations i
`‘
`proof are unavoidable, but the cost of making extensive,
`alterations after the article has been set in type will be?
`charged to the author.
`
`Indi-
`Copyright 1980, Optical Society of America.
`vidual readers of this journal and nonprofit libraries acting
`for them are freely permitted to make fair use of the ma-.0,
`terial in it, such as to copy an article for use in teaching or
`research. The code that appears on the first page of each‘
`article in this journal gives the per—article copying fee for
`each copy of the article made beyond the free copying
`permitted under Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Cop
`right Law. This fee should be paid through the Copyright
`Clearance Center, Inc., Box 765, Schenectady, New York:
`12301. The same fees and procedures are applicable to
`articles published in previous volumes of this journal.
`Permission is granted to quote excerpts from articles in this
`journal in scientific works with the customary acknowl 1
`edgement of the source, including the author’s name and the
`journal name, volume, page and year. Reproduction of
`figures and tables is likewise permitted in other articles and
`books, provided that the same information is printed with
`them and notification is given to the Optical Society of 1
`America. Republication or systematic or multiple re-
`production of any material in this journal (including ab-
`stracts) is permitted only under license from the Optical "A,
`Society of America; in addition, the Optical Society will
`require that permission also be obtained from one of the
`authors. Address inquiries and notices to the Executive 7
`Director, Optical Society of America, 1816 Jefferson Place,
`1
`N.W., Washington, D. C. 20036.
`In the case of authors who 9
`are employees of the United States government or of its 9,
`contractors or grantees, the Optical Society of America :
`recognizes the right of the United States government to _
`retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to use the au- '
`thor’s copyrighted article for United States government
`purposes.
`
`,
`
`The Journal of the Optical Society of America is published monthly for the Society by the American Institute of Physics.
`Second-class postage rates paid at Woodbury, N.Y. and additional mailing offices.
`
`ii
`
`ii
`
`

`
`Eleventh International Quantum Electronics Conference
`
`A.3. Singlet-Triplet Mixing by Hyper-
`fine Interactions in 3He, R. R. FREEMAN,
`P. F. LIAO, R. PANOCK, AND L. M. HUM-
`PHREY, Bell Telephone Laboratories,
`Holmdel, NJ 07733 (15 min.)
`
`A complete determination of the hyperfine
`structure of the 23P and 33D states of 3He
`through analysis of Doppler-free intermo-
`dulated fluorescence spectra is reported. We
`find the structure of the 33D state to be sig-
`nificantly modified by singlet-triplet mixing
`which is induced by hyperfine interactions.
`The hyperfine interaction is dominated by
`the Fermi contact interaction of the inner 13
`open shell electron with the nucleus and
`therefore does not decrease for higher lying
`states. Hence, unlike the case of one elec-
`tronlike spectra (e.g., alkali atoms) or mul-
`tielectron atoms with zero spin (e.g., 4He) the
`high Rydberg states of 3He will have their
`electronic structures completely dominated
`by the hyperfine interaction.
`In particular,
`the hyperfine induced singlet-triplet mixing
`for 3He will increase rapidly with increasing
`principal quantum number n. Our results
`are in good agreement with theoretical cal-
`culations of the hyperfine interaction.
`In Fig. 1 we showva portion of our spectrum
`which contains transitions associated with
`the 23P1_2 levels to the 33D1,2,3 states of 3He.
`These states were obtained in a dc discharge
`tube operated with 0.8 Torr of 3He. The tube
`is probed with two counterpropagating tun-
`able laser beams which are chopped at dif-
`ferent frequencies. By monitoring fluores-
`
`cence at the difference frequency we obtain
`the Doppler-free spectrum shown in Fig. 1.
`This spectrum is fit‘ to a parametrized hy-
`perfine Hamiltonian and the calculated res-
`onance positions and line strength from the
`fit are shown in the figure. We find the ma-
`jority of the interaction is due to the Fermi
`contact term of the 1s electron and that this
`term is nearly the same for the 2P and 3D
`states as expected. This term produces
`sizeable singlet-triplet mixing which must be
`included to correctly give the structure. The
`dotted lines show resonance positions if one
`neglects this mixing.
`Because the hyperfine interaction is es-
`sentially constant, our results, along with
`published fine structure measurements allow
`a precise determination of the structure of all
`higher lying states in 3He. We find, for ex-
`ample, we can reproduce the two-photon
`spectra recently obtained by Giacobino et al. 1
`and also predict the hyperfine splittings of
`the n 1D; states observed in level crossing
`experiments? In Table I we give our calcu-
`lated values for these splittings and the
`measured experimental values. There is
`excellent agreement. As one of the simplest
`atoms, helium is amenable to accurate cal-
`culations.
`In Table I we also include the re-
`sults of a theory based on hydrogenic elec-
`tronic wave functions and good agreement
`with our calculations is again found.
`In conclusion we have made a determina-
`tion of the hyperfine interaction in 3He. This
`determination shows
`important singlet-
`triplet mixing effects which will dominate the
`
`Session A
`
`8:30 A.M.
`
`Monday, June 23, 1980
`Independence Room
`Laser Spectroscopy I
`Chairman: P. F. Liao
`
`A.l. Doubly Excited Alkaline Earth
`Atoms* (Invited), T. F. GALLAGHER, K. A.
`SAFINYA, A_ND w. SANDNER, SR1 Inter-
`national, Menlo Park, CA, AND W. E.
`COOKE, University of Southern California,
`Los Angeles, California.
`(30 min.)
`
`We describe recent experiments to probe
`the properties of doubly excited autoionizing
`atoms using a laser spectroscopic technique.
`The physical basis of the excitation process
`as well as experiments to probe the autoion-
`ization process are described.
`‘This work supported by AFOSR, NSF, and
`DOE.
`
`A.2. Rydberg Atom Masers (Invited), S.
`HAROCHE, c. FABRE, P. GOY, M. caoss.
`AND B. MOI, Laboratoire de Physique de
`l’Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris,
`France.
`(30 min.)
`
`Using optically pumped alkali Rydberg
`atoms as the active medium, we have recently
`developed new types of pulsed maser sources
`with unusual characteristics. Due to the
`giant electric dipole matrix elements of the
`Rydberg states, these masers have extremely
`low inversion thresholds~several orders of
`magnitude smaller than those of conventional
`masers~and “microscopic” energy outputs.
`Very sensitive detection procedures have to
`be used in order to observe their emission.
`An indirect detection method consists in
`studying the field ionization characteristics
`of the atoms, which is strongly modified when
`maser action occurs. Direct detection of the
`tiny microwave bursts has also been achieved
`by a heterodyne technique with a very sen-
`sitive Schottky diode mixer. Using both
`methods, we have made a detailed study of
`the emission characteristics (typical number
`of inverted atoms at threshold ~1O4; pulse
`energy ~1 to 10 eV; peak emission power
`~10‘12 W; pulse duration ~O.5 us).
`Owing to the large number of energy levels
`near the ionization limit, these new masers
`can be operated at many wavelengths ranging
`from the centimeter to the submillimeter
`range.
`In fact, the source should contin-
`uously evolve from the maser to the laser case
`when the binding energy of the levels in-
`volved in the emission is increased. These
`new coherent sources are bound to have very
`interesting applications in fundamental
`physics (study of superradiance of very small
`systems of atoms) and for the technology of
`millimeter and submillimeter wave detectors
`as well.
`
`577
`
`llil
`23/2-CROSSOVER Z3/2-CROSSOVER
`
`23/2CROSSOVER
`
`23/2-23/2
`
`11/2CRO$$OVElI
`
`11/2CROSSOVEI
`
`23/2-35/2
`
`LJ -
`KMI>O(I)InOKDIN\I’)
`
`2.5/2-23/2
`
`11/2-13/2
`
`N
`
`13/Z-CROSSOVER
`
`13/2-25/2 23/2-11/2
`
`25/2-37/2 25/2-35/2 13/2-13/2
`
`FIG. 1.
`
`Portion of Doppler-free spectrum of 230-330 transitions in °He. The levels are marked by (2-"HF—
`(23D)F’. The upper trace is the transmission of an interferometer having an FSR = 122.4 MHz. The solid
`lines show the calculated positions and intensities including singlet-triplet mixing. The dotted lines show
`the calculated positions if singlet-triplet mixing is ignored.
`
`

`
`cm“1. The magnitude of the cross section for
`collisional deexcitation by spontaneous
`emissions, as, was determined by measuring
`the total number of signal photons integrated
`over the emission bandwidth and using, for
`the number of detected photons,
`
`N[Ba(5d 1D2)]N[Tl(6p 2P3/2)]asl7'r Vof,
`
`where N[Ba(5d 1D2)] and N [Tl(6p 2P3/2)] are
`the number densities for the initial storage
`levels, V is the mean velocity of collision, T is
`the effective radiating time, V0 is the effective
`radiating volume, and §' is the ratio of de-
`tected to generated photons.
`In this manner
`we obtain a measured value for the cross
`section for dipole-quadrupole collisional
`deexcitation of as = 1.5 X 10‘22 cm2, with an
`overall experimental uncertainty of ap-
`proximately a factor of 7.
`The results of this experiment have ap-
`plication to the construction of low-gain,
`high—energy storage media and to the spec-
`troscopic study of the interaction potentials
`of colliding atoms.
`‘S. E. Harris and J. C. White, IEEE J. Quantum
`Electron. 13, 972 (1977).
`2J. C. White, G. A. Zdasiuk, J. F. Young, and S. E.
`Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1709 (1978); 42, 480(E)
`(1979).
`3W. R. Green, M. D. Wright, J. Lukasik, J. F. Young,
`and S. E. Harris, Opt. Lett. 4, 265 (1979).
`
`J.8. Sodium Plasmas Produced by Mil-
`liwatt cw Laser Irradiation,* M. E.
`KOCH, K. K. VERMA, AND W. C. STWALLEY,
`Iowa Laser Facility and Departments of
`Chemistry and Physics, University of
`Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242.
`(15 min.)
`
`There are a variety of reports of significant
`laser-produced ionization of alkali metal
`vapors using pulsed lasers (in Li‘ and in Na2)
`and using cw lasers (in Cs3 and in Na‘).
`(See
`also Ref. 5 for additional background.)
`While all of this work is quite interesting,
`much of it involved resonance lines1'2’4 and so
`is perhaps not terribly surprising. The other
`work,3 on the other hand, involves transitions
`between a radiatively trapped upper level of
`an alkali-metal resonance line and a more
`highly excited level which can associatively
`ionize to form Mg.
`In principle, then, this cw
`plasma may contain a concentration of M5’
`which is quite nonequilibrium. Moreover, in
`contrast to a discharge where M; may be
`rapidly destroyed by photodissociation, the
`M3’ may be stable with respect to laser and
`other light (e.g., near-resonance lines) found
`in the laser-produced plasma.
`With this in mind, we have irradiated a
`sodium heat pipe (typically at 10 Torr), usinlg '
`a focused cw dye laser at 5688.2 or 5682.6
`(3p ~> 4d), and also reproduced the Cs result3
`at 6010 A. Unlike Cs,3 where a strong atomic
`ion-electron radiative recombination con-
`tinuum is seen, we see no significant spec-
`troscopic evidence for atomc ions in our Na
`plasma. We feel this is because in Cs, at the
`upper level of transition studied by Tarn and
`Happer, the channel of ion pair formations
`(Cs** + Cs —> Cs+ -1- Cs‘) is available in ad-
`dition to associative ionization (Cs** + Cs ->
`Cs; + e‘). However, for Na** = Na(4d),
`only associative ionization can occur ener-
`getically, so we have produced essentially a
`
`627
`
`molecular ion plasma. Also we note that this
`plasma can be produced at quite low power
`(~2 mW focused broadband laser light at
`5688.2 A!) and we are currently examining the
`energy balance in detail.
`We have obtained spectra of this plasma in
`the 2000-9000 A region. The‘ interpretation
`of this spectrum is still not completely clear.
`The various atomic lines seen can be under-
`stood in terms of Na(4d)—Na and Na(3p)—
`Na(3p) collisions5 and the process (disso-
`ciative recombination): Na; + e‘ -> Na**
`+ Na, where Na* * is a highly excited Na atom
`(e.g., 4d or 5s). The structure seen near the
`exciting line and to the red is presumably
`molecular fluorescence and D line absorption.
`We see five broad features at ~3650, 3780,
`4350, 4520, and 8000 A which remain to be
`explained.
`We have examined the 4200-4700 A region
`under high resolution and find the structure
`in that region to be a continuum, not densely
`spaced lines. A possible explanation is that
`these continua represent the processes Na;
`+ e- —+ Na§ + hv, where Na; is an excited
`state of N82. The occurrence of such mo-
`lecular ion-electron radiative recombination
`has never been previously established, al-
`though the atomic form is well known. The
`features we see peaking at 4350 and 4520 A
`have been observed in other ways, e.g., in
`discharges,7‘9 in Ar“‘ laser UV-line irradiation
`of the N82 C <—- X bands,1° in two-photon Nag
`excitation,“ and in cw and pulsed dye-laser
`excitation at the Na D lines.12‘14 Similar
`features occur in K, Rb, and Cs.8-1535 Several
`explanations have been proposed involving
`free-free, free-bound, or bound-free pro-
`cesses. Note that the radiative recombina-
`tion discussed above can be cast-in “bound-
`free” form when a high molecular Rydberg
`state Nag‘ is formed as a resonance in e‘—Na§
`scattering. Since many of the potential en-
`ergy curves of Nag are fairly well known, e.g.,
`from high quality ab initio calculations and
`a variety of recent experiments, we are
`carrying out explicit calculations of a number
`of these alternatives. We also have and will
`continue to carry out simultaneous ionization
`detection to attempt to resolve the origin of
`the 4350 and 4520 A continua. Finally we
`note that some mechanisms suggest these
`bands might be made into a powerful violet
`laser with limited tunability.
`The 8000 A feature almost certainly cor-
`responds to the
`
`+
`+
`A1: —x1z
`u
`g
`
`satellite band17'13 and has previously been
`observed ‘in a Na (or other alkali) dis-
`charge.3-13v19 There is a continuum overlaid
`with many discrete lines. The discrete lines,
`however, extend through all parts of the laser
`path while the continuum is concentrated in
`the central “white” region near the focus
`where the 4350 and 4520 A features appear.
`The 3650 and 3780 A features have ap-
`parently not been previously reported. They
`also appear continuous and possible expla-
`nations for them are similar to those men-
`tioned above for
`the 4350 and 4520 A
`hands.
`We are currently examining these spectra
`and extending them in a variety of ways, with
`
`emphasis on obtaining microscopic under-
`standing of the plasma formation process.
`*Supported by the National Aeronautics and Space
`Administration and the National Science Founda-
`tion.
`1'1‘. J. Mcllrath and T. B. Lucatorto, Phys. Rev.
`Lett. 38, 1390 (1977). '
`2T. B. Lucatorto and T. J. Mcllrath, Phys. Rev.
`Lett. 37, 428 (1976).
`3A. Tam and W. Happer, Opt. Commun. 21, 403
`(1977).
`4G. H. Bearman and J. J. Leventhal, Phys. Rev.
`Lett. 41, 1227 (1978); 41, 1759(E) (1978).
`5G. S. Hurst, M. G. Payne, S. D. Kramer, and J. P.
`Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 767 (1979).
`GM. Allegrini, G. Alzetta, A. Kopystynska, L. Moi,
`and G. Orriols, Opt. Commun. 19, 96 (1966).
`7H. Bartels, Z. Physik 73, 203 (1932).
`3K. Schmidt Proceedings of the Sixth International
`Conference on Ionization Phenomena in Gases
`(Paris, 1963), Vol. 3, p. 323.
`9J. J. de Groot and J. A. J. M. van Vliet, J. Phys. D
`8, 651 (1975).
`10.1. P. Woerdman, Opt. Commun. 26, 216 (1978).
`“J. P. Woerdman, Chem. Phys. Lett. 43, 279
`(1976).
`12M. Allegrini, G. Alzetta, A. Kopystynska, L. Moi,
`and G. Orriols, Opt. Commun. 22, 329 (1977).
`13A. Kopystynska and P. Kowalczyk, Opt. Commun.
`25, 351 (1978).
`“A. Kopystynska and P. Kowalczyk, Opt. Commun.
`28, 78 (1979).
`15M. M. Rebbeck and J. M. Vaughan, J. Phys. B 4,
`258 (1971).
`“‘J. M. Brom and H. P. Broida, J. Chem. Phys. 61,
`982 (1974).
`17W. C. Stwalley, “Laser Manipulation of Metallic
`Vapors", Radiation Energy Conversion in Space,
`edited by K. W. Billman, Vol. 61 of Progress in As-
`tronautics and Aeronautics (1978), p. 593-601.
`15L. K. Lain, A. Gallagher, and M. M. Hesse], J.
`Chem. Phys. 66, 3550 (1977).
`19P. P. Sorokin and J. R. Lankard, J. Chem. Phys.
`55, 3810 (1971).
`
`J.9. Laser-Induced Penning/Associative
`Ionization in Crossed Atomic Beams, P.
`POLAK-DINGELS, J.-F. DELPECH, AND J.
`WEINER, Department of Chemistry,
`University of Maryland, College Park, MD
`20742.
`(15 min.)
`
`Laser-switched or laser-modified collisions
`are the object of intensive theoretical and
`experimental study because they offerthe '
`possibility of controlling the relative proba-
`bilities of competing inelastic and reactive
`exit channels. The influence of the laser field
`is to modify the electronic states of the sys-
`tem during a collisional encounter. Laser-
`induced collisions are characterized by
`atomic-field interactions which are nonre-
`sonant with respect to dipole-allowed tran-
`sitions of the separated collision partners.
`We discuss here new results on Penning/
`associative ionization of Na/Na collisions in
`the presence of optical field power densities
`of 2107 W/cmz.
`The experimental set-up is as follows.
`Two alkali atomic-beam sources are mounted
`on a multiported vacuum chamber at right
`angles in the horizontal plane. Two laser
`beams enter from opposite ports and overlap
`at the interaction region with an angle of
`nearly 180°. The light sources are flash-
`lamp pumped tunable dye lasers synchro-
`nized together and with a box car integra-
`tor/amplifier used to record the ion signal. A
`quadrupole mass filter, mounted above the
`
`627

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket