throbber
Conductively cooled high-power, high-brightness bars and fiber-
`coupled arrays
`Hailong Zhou, Mark Mondry, Michael Fouksman, Eli Weiss
`Serguei Anikitchev, Keith Kennedy, Jun Li, Erik Zucker and Paul Rudy
`Coherent Inc., Santa Clara, CA, 95054, USA
`
`Jukka Kongas, Jouko Haapamaa, and Sami Lehkonen
`Coherent Finland, Kauhakorvenkatu 52, Tampere, 33720, Finland
`
`Abstract
`
`Solid-state-laser and fiber laser pumping, reprographics, medical and materials processing applications require high
`power, high-brightness bars and fiber-coupled arrays. Conductively cooled laser diode bars allow customers to simplify
`system design and reduce operational size, weight, and costs. We present results on next generation high brightness,
`high reliability bars and fiber-coupled arrays at 790-830 nm, 940 nm and 980 nm wavelengths.
`
`By using novel epitaxial structures, we have demonstrated highly reliable 808 nm, 30% fill-factor conductively cooled
`bars operating at 60W CW mode, corresponding to a linear power density (LPD) of 20 mW/μm. At 25°C, the bars have
`shown greater than 50% wall-plug-efficiency (WPE) when operating at 60W. Our novel approach has also reduced the
`fast-axis divergence FWHM from 31° to less than 24°. These bars have a 50% brightness improvement compared to our
`standard products with this geometry.
`
`At 980nm, we have demonstrated greater than 100W CW from 20% fill-factor conductively cooled bars, corresponding
`to a LPD of 50 mW/μm. At 25°C, the WPE for 976nm bars consistently peaks above 65% and remains greater than
`60% at 100W. We coupled the beam output from those high-brightness bars into fiber-array-packages (“FAPs”), and
`we also achieved high-brightness and high-efficiency FAPs. We demonstrated 60W from a 600μm core-diameter fiber-
`bundle with a high WPE of 55%, and a low numerical aperture of 0.115. The brightness of such FAPs is four times
`higher than our standard high-power 40W FAP products at Coherent. Ongoing life test data suggests an extrapolated
`lifetime greater than 10,000 hours at 80W CW operating-condition based on 30%FF conductively cooled bar geometry.
`
`Keywords: diode-arrays, fill-factor, conductively cooled, fiber-coupling, wall-plug-efficiency
`
`Introduction
`
`High power diode laser integrators continue to place more demanding requirements on component manufacturers, with
`the goals of improving performance, reliability, and manufacturability. Coherent is well known for its family of high
`reliability conductively cooled products between 0.8-1.0 μm, with a wide variety of free space and fiber-coupled bar
`devices, , and we have leveraged our expertise in high power diode lasers to develop a new generation of products to
`address applications requiring increased power, efficiency and brightness. By combining our field proven packaging
`technology with our expertise in epitaxial growth and semiconductor laser design, we are developing the next
`generation of commercially available 808-830 nm and 940-980 nm bars for a variety of pumping and direct diode
`applications.
`
`Our efforts toward next generation bars have included two development programs. The first involved improving overall
`conversion efficiency at 940-980 nm by a combination of epitaxy and design optimization. By increasing the efficiency
`of our 940-980 nm bars, the overall heat dissipation and junction temperatures are reduced, translating not only into
`higher operating powers, but improved lifetime as well. The second component of our development efforts focused on
`improving the amount of useful power, i.e. brightness of our laser diodes. This is particularly important for fiber-
`coupled devices to get as much power into the delivery conduit as possible.
`
`High-Power Diode Laser Technology and Applications III, edited by Mark S. Zediker, Proc. of SPIE
`Vol. 5711 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005) · 0277-786X/05/$15 · doi: 10.1117/12.589860
`
`ASML 1228
`
`37
`
`

`
`790-830nm high-power high-brightness bars at Coherent
`
`At Coherent, a new generation epitaxial structure design coupled with improved semiconductor material quality and
`new bar design allowed us to achieve 60W CW operations for 30% fill-factor (FF) conductively cooled bars. This type
`of bar consists of 19 emitters, each emitter having 150 μm stripe width, with a 500μm distance between two adjacent
`emitters. As shown in Figure 1, these 60W bars demonstrated 53% wall plug efficiency (WPE) at operating point. The
`full-width at half-maxima (FWHM) of spectrum at operating power for these bars is approximately 2.5 nm.
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`1.61.6
`
`Voltage (V)
`Voltage (V)
`
`
`
`1.21.2
`
`
`
`0.80.8
`
`
`
`voltagevoltage
`
`
`
`slope = 1.15 W/Aslope = 1.15 W/A
`
`
`
`.4.4
`
`00
`00
`
`
`
`WPEWPE
`
`
`
`power outputpower output
`
`
`
`7070
`
`
`
`6060
`
`
`
`5050
`
`
`
`4040
`
`
`
`3030
`
`
`
`2020
`
`
`
`1010
`
`
`
`00
`
`Power output (W)
`Power output (W)
`
`WPE (%)
`WPE (%)
`
`
`4040
`
`Current (A)Current (A)
`Figure 1. Performance of 60W conductively cooled 30% fill-factor bars at 25°C heat sink temperature
`
`
`
`6060
`
`
`
`8080
`
`
`
`00
`
`
`
`2020
`
`One advantage of the new structure is the reduction of fast-axis and slow-axis divergence, which enhances beam
`brightness and facilitates micro-lensing. As show in Figure 2, these improved structure designs have reduced the
`FWHM fast axis divergence of 808nm bars from 31° to 21°. The associated decrease in facet power density, coupled
`with improved semiconductor material quality, enabled an improvement in the CW post-aging catastrophic optical
`mirror damage (COMD) level from 3.6 W to 4.8 W, measured on 60um stripe width single emitters. This improvement
`in COMD is very important to achieve reliable bar operation at higher brightness.
`
`1.0
`
`
`
`60um wide single emitters60um wide single emitters
`
`
` Median Median
`
` 25%-75% 25%-75%
`
` Non-Outlier Range Non-Outlier Range
`
`
`
`ControlControl
`
`
`
`Next Generation DesignNext Generation Design
`
`
`
`5.25.2
`
`
`
`5.05.0
`
`
`
`4.84.8
`
`
`
`4.64.6
`
`
`
`4.44.4
`
`
`
`4.24.2
`
`
`
`4.04.0
`
`
`
`3.83.8
`
`
`
`3.63.6
`
`
`
`3.43.4
`
`
`
`3.23.2
`
`
`
`3.03.0
`
`Power (W)
`Power (W)
`
`
`
`Figure 3. 808nm post-aging COMD improvement
`
`FWHM(new design)=21°
`FWHM(control)=31°
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`Intensity
`
`-60
`
`-40
`
`20
`0
`-20
`Angle (degree)
`
`40
`
`60
`
`Figure 2. 808nm Fast axis divergence reduction
`
`
`
`
`
`To assess reliability of our new generation bars, life-testing is being conducted on several groups of conductively cooled
`bars at 65A (~60W CW), 25 °C. Figure 4 shows the reliability data to date. The earliest batch of 3 devices has reached
`
`38 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5711
`
`

`
`5000 hours and only shows an average power drop of 4%. Based upon this life test data collected on these 17 bars, we
`expect mean-time-to- failure (MTTF) to be greater than 15,000 hours with 90% confidence level.
`
`808nm, 30% FF, 60W CW Lifetest
`
`1.0
`
`0.8
`
`0.6
`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.0
`
`Normalized Power
`
`0
`
`1000
`
`4000
`3000
`2000
`Time ( hours )
`
`5000
`
`6000
`
`Figure 4. Life test of 808nm 30%FF bars at 60W CW condition
`
`980nm high-power high-brightness bars at Coherent
`
`In the past few years, there has been a growing need for high-power high-brightness 976 nm bars and fiber-coupled
`arrays for pumping fiber-lasers, as well as high-power, high-efficiency and low-cost 940 nm bars/stacks to pump disk-
`based diode pumped solid state lasers (DPSSL). Here we summarize our recent progress with our 980nm and 940nm
`bars.
`
`Optimisation of epitaxy designs and growth processes has resulted in a dramatic improvement in efficiency with 980nm
`bars. Figure 5 shows an example 46W 30% FF bar with 69% WPE, operated CW with a 25°C heat sink temperature.
`The lasing wavelength is centered at 976.5 nm at operating conditions with a spectral FWHM value of 2.8 nm, and the
`peak efficiency occurs near the operating point. Far-field profiles of θ⊥ (FWHM) = 33.5° and θ// (FWHM) = 6.5° are
`typical.
`
`Voltage (V)
`Voltage (V)
`
`
`
`1.61.6
`
`
`
`1.41.4
`
`
`
`.2.2
`
`11
`11
`
`
`
`0.80.8
`
`
`
`0.60.6
`
`
`
`0.40.4
`
`
`
`.2.2
`
`00
`00
`
`
`
`voltagevoltage
`
`
`
`WPEWPE
`
`
`
`slope = 1.13 W/Aslope = 1.13 W/A
`
`
`
`power outputpower output
`
`
`
`7070
`
`
`
`6060
`
`
`
`5050
`
`
`
`4040
`
`
`
`3030
`
`
`
`2020
`
`
`
`1010
`
`
`
`00
`
`Power output (W)
`Power output (W)
`
`WPE (%)
`WPE (%)
`
`
`
`00
`
`
`
`1010
`
`
`
`2020
`3030
`
`Current (A)Current (A)
`
`
`
`4040
`
`
`
`5050
`
`Figure 5. 980 nm 69% WPE bar operating at 46W CW , 25 °C
`
`Further redesign and optimisation work has resulted in lower fill-factor and longer cavity length bars with enhanced
`output beam brightness. Figure 6 shows the test result for a 20% fill-factor 980nm bar operating at 100W CW,
`
`Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5711 39
`
`

`
`corresponding to a linear power density of 50 mW/μm. This bar design operates at 63.8% wall-plug efficiency, with a
`peak WPE of 66.7%. An increase of the spectral FWHM to 3.8 nm has been observed and indicates an increase in the
`junction temperature and current density.
`
`
`600um-diameter fiber bundle600um-diameter fiber bundle
`
`coupling efficiency = 87%coupling efficiency = 87%
`
`
`
`WPEWPE
`
`
`
`Bar power outputBar power output
`
`
`
`FAP power outputFAP power output
`
`
`
`7070
`
`
`
`6060
`
`
`
`5050
`
`
`
`4040
`
`
`
`3030
`
`
`
`2020
`
`
`
`1010
`
`
`
`00
`
`Power output (W)
`Power output (W)
`
`WPE (%)
`WPE (%)
`
`Voltage (V)
`Voltage (V)
`
`
`
`1.61.6
`
`
`
`1.21.2
`
`
`
`0.80.8
`
`
`
`0.40.4
`
`
`
`voltagevoltage
`
`
`
`WPEWPE
`
`
`
`power outputpower output
`
`
`
`100100
`
`
`
`8080
`
`
`
`6060
`
`
`
`4040
`
`
`
`2020
`
`Power output (W)
`Power output (W)
`
`WPE (%)
`WPE (%)
`
`
`
`00
`
`
`
`00
`
`
`
`2020
`
`
`
`4040
`
`
`6060
`
`Current (A)Current (A)
`
`
`
`8080
`
`
`00
`
`120120
`
`
`
`100100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`00
`
`
`
`2020
`
`
`4040
`
`Current (A)Current (A)
`
`
`
`6060
`
`
`
`8080
`
`Figure 6. WPE as high as 63.8% is maintained at
`100W CW with conductively cooled 20%FF bars,
`heat sink temperature = 25 °C
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Figure 7. 60 W was measured from a 600 μm
` fiber bundle. Coupling efficiency from bar to
` fiber bundle is 87%.
`
`These high efficiency bars have been integrated into Fiber-Array-Packages (FAP), and example performance data from
`the output of a 600μm-diameter fiber bundle with 0.115 N.A. (numerical aperture) is shown above in Figure 7. With 60
`W coming out of fiber bundle, wall plug efficiency of 55% was observed, with typical coupling efficiencies of 85%-
`90% from the bar into the fiber. A typical currently available high-power FAP product operates at 40 Watts from a
`800μm diameter fiber-bundle with N.A. of 0.15, and the improvements described above have increased the brightness
`by more than 4 times.
`
`To assess the reliability, we have life-tested a several groups of conductively cooled bars. Figure 8 shows a batch of six
`20%FF bars operating at 40A (~40W) for 3000 hours with no degradation, and then we increased the current to 50A
`(~50W) and continued the test for another 3500 hours. The test is still ongoing, and the average power degradation is
`only 1.3% to date. With the data we calculated mean-time-to-failure (MTTF) > 15,000 hours with 90% confidence level
`at this time. With this very slow degradation rate, we should be able to get much longer MTTF expectation as we keep
`running those bars.
`
`980nm 20%FF 40W/50W Lifetest
`(LPD = 25mW/um)
`
`980nm 30%FF 80W CW Lifetest
`(LPD = 27mW/um)
`
`1.2
`1.0
`0.8
`0.6
`0.4
`0.2
`0.0
`
`Normalized Power
`
`0
`
`500
`
`1500
`1000
`Time ( hours )
`
`2000
`
`2500
`
` Figure 9. Life test of 30%FF bars at 80 W CW.
`
`1.2
`1.0
`0.8
`0.6
`0.4
`0.2
`0.0
`
`Normalized Power
`
`0
`
`2000
`
`4000
`Time ( hours )
`
`6000
`
`8000
`
`
`
` Figure 8. Life test of 20%FF bars at 40/50 W CW.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`40 Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5711
`
`

`
`To meet the increasing demand for power, we also designed conductively cooled bars targeting 80 watts reliable
`operation. The bar geometry in this case is 30% FF. Figure 9 shows an on-going life test with 5 bars running at 90A
`(~80W). We have so far collected 2500 hours of lifetime on each bar, and the bars showed an average power
`degradation of 1.8%. The data set does not yet allow accurate assessment MTTF due to wear-out, but we estimate it be
`greater than 10,000 hours.
`
`Demonstrating the robustness of our epi-design and growth capability, 940 nm 30% FF bars have been fabricated with a
`WPE of 68% at 50W, again operating CW with a heat sink temperature of 25 °C. Pilot production bars exhibit a typical
`WPE of 65% at operating conditions.
`
`Summary
`
`Product improvements for commercially available 808-830nm, 940nm, and 976nm bars has been described. More than
`60 watts CW at 808nm from 30% fill-factor conductively cooled bars has been presented. At 25 °C, 53% wall-plug-
`efficiency (WPE) and far field FWHM divergence of 21° has been realized at a 60W operating point. Reliability tests so
`far indicate that a MTTF > 15,000 hours is achievable with high confidence. At 976nm, more than 100W CW from a
`20% fill-factor conductively cooled 65% WPE bars has been demonstrated, with a corresponding LPD of 50 mW/μm.
`At 25 °C, the WPE for these 976nm bars consistently peaks above 65% and remains greater than 60% at 100W CW.
`Our ongoing life test data suggests an extrapolated lifetime greater than 10,000 hours at 80W CW operating-condition
`based on 30%FF conductively cooled bar geometry.
`
`The authors would like to acknowledge the support of DARPA FHOENICS program, Penn State Electro-Optics Center
`and Missile Defense Agency / Advanced Systems.
`
`Acknowledgements
`
`Proc. of SPIE Vol. 5711 41

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket