`Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 12:25 PM
`To: 'Interferencetrialsection@uspto.gov'
`Cc: E. Anthony Figg; Danny Huntington; Norman Zivin
`Subject: Interference No. 105,995- Levin v Pastorio
`
`As directed by the Order dated June 26, 2015, Levin renews its request to file Motions for judgment based on
`unpatentability of Pastorio involved claims.
`
`Pastorio has indicated that it opposes Levin being authorized to file the three Motions identified as items 4-6 in
`the Levin Motion List (Paper 21).
`
`In view of Pastorio's opposition, Levin also requests authorization to file a single Motion for judgment based on
`unpatentability of Pastorio claims which will set forth the following four grounds of unpatentability:
`1) anticipation by WO 2007/122440 A1 0/110 '440);
`2) obviousness over WO '440 alone or in view of US 6,013, 761 to Zierer et al. and/or US 3,928,372 to Bochis
`et al.;
`3) obviousness over CN 101250158 A in view of WO '440; and
`4) anticipation by AU 2010100462 A4 (AU 2010100462 A4 is prior art if Pastorio cannot prove its asserted
`dates of conception and reduction to practice).
`
`Pastorio has indicated that it would consent to Levin being authorized to file a single motion limited to two
`grounds of unpatentability.
`
`Counsels for the parties are available for a telephone conference.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Gary J. Gershik
`Lead Counsel for Levin
`
`Cooper & Dunham LLP
`30 Rockefeller Plaza, 20th Floor
`New York, New York 10112
`T: 212-278-0552 F: 212-391-0525
`
`This message is intended solely for the use of the addressee and may contain confidential and/or attorney-client privileged information. If you are
`not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
`any review, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify us immediately. Thank
`you.
`
`1
`
`FINCHIMICA EXHIBIT 2005
`ADAMA MAKHTESHIM v. FINCH/MICA
`CASE IPR2016-00577
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
