throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper No. 13
` Entered: June 14, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`RICOH AMERICAS CORP.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ROUND ROCK RESEARCH LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2016-00635 (Patent 6,147,405)
`IPR2016-00637 (Patent 6,455,935)
`IPR2016-00639 (Patent 6,828,683)
`IPR2016-00640 (Patent 6,358,801)
`IPR2016-00641 (Patent 5,986,347)1
`____________
`
`
`Before GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and
`MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues common to all five proceedings; therefore, we
`issue a single order to be entered in each case. The parties are authorized to
`use this style heading when filing an identical paper in the proceedings,
`provided that such heading includes a footnote attesting that “the word-for-
`word identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the heading.”
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00637 (Patent 6,455,935)
`IPR2016-00640 (Patent 6,358,801)
`
`IPR2016-00635 (Patent 6,147,405)
`IPR2016-00639 (Patent 6,828,683)
`IPR2016-00641 (Patent 5,986,347)
`
`On May 25, 2016, we entered an Order extending the filing date for
`
`Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in each of the above-referenced
`proceedings to June 14, 2016. Paper 8 (“CP Order”), 2–3. On June 13,
`2016, counsel for Patent Owner sent an email communication to the Board,
`on behalf of both parties, seeking an additional two-week extension of the
`filing deadline for Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in each of the
`above referenced cases, given the “imminent settlement of the litigation
`underlying the . . . IPR[] [proceedings].” Attachment 1 (copy of email
`requesting extension to June 28, 2016). In the email communication,
`counsel for Patent Owner states that Patent Owner has signed the settlement
`agreement, but that, “due to the process by which signatures on such
`agreements are obtained by Japanese companies,” counter signatures by
`Petitioner “will take another two weeks.” Id.
`As explained in our previous Order extending the deadline to file each
`preliminary response, we are “mindful of our duty to secure ‘the just,
`speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding.’” Conduct of
`Proceeding Order, 2 (quoting 37 C.F.R. § 42.1(b)). Given the facts and
`circumstances of this case, including the representations in the email
`communication regarding the status of the settlement agreement and the
`signature process, we are persuaded that good cause exists to extend the
`filing date of each Preliminary Response to June 28, 2016. See 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.5(c)(2). We will not entertain any further requests to extend the due
`date of Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses. We also note that the filing
`of a preliminary response is optional and that Patent Owner may waive such
`a filing. 37 C.F.R. § 42.107.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00637 (Patent 6,455,935)
`IPR2016-00640 (Patent 6,358,801)
`
`IPR2016-00635 (Patent 6,147,405)
`IPR2016-00639 (Patent 6,828,683)
`IPR2016-00641 (Patent 5,986,347)
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that the filing date for Patent Owner’s Preliminary
`
`Response in each of IPR2016-00635, IPR2016-00637, IPR2016-00639,
`IPR2016-00640, and IPR2016-00641 is extended to June 28, 2016; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Board will not entertain any further
`requests to extend the due date of Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00637 (Patent 6,455,935)
`IPR2016-00640 (Patent 6,358,801)
`
`IPR2016-00635 (Patent 6,147,405)
`IPR2016-00639 (Patent 6,828,683)
`IPR2016-00641 (Patent 5,986,347)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Theodore Mlynar
`Ted.mlynar@hoganlovells.com
`
`Ira Schaefer
`Ira.schaefer@hoganlovells.com
`
`Gary Serbin
`Gary.serbin@hoganlovells.com
`
`Helen Trac
`Helen.trac@hoganlovells.com
`
`Eric Lobenfeld
`Eric.lobenfeld@hoganlovells.com
`
`Takayuki Yasaku
`Takayuki.yasaku@yasaku-law.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Richard Botos
`rbotos@lernerdavid.com
`
`Neill Taylor
`ntaylor@roundrockresearch.com
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`From: Botos, Richard J [mailto:rbotos@lernerdavid.com]
`Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 12:24 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Ted.mlynar@hoganlovells.com; ira.schaefer@hoganlovells.com; Apicella, Laura
`<lapicella@lernerdavid.com>; West, Maralyn <mwest@lernerdavid.com>; K. McNeill Taylor Jr.
`(ntaylor@roundrockresearch.com) <ntaylor@roundrockresearch.com>
`Subject: Re: IPR2016-00635 IPR2016-00637 IPR2016-00639 IPR2016-00640 IPR2016-00641
`
`Re: IPR2016-00635
` IPR2016-00637
` IPR2016-00639
` IPR2016-00640
` IPR2016-00641
`
`Dear Sirs:
`
`Due to the imminent settlement of the litigation underlying the above-referenced IPRs, the Patent Trial
`and Appeal Board previously extended the time for filing Patent Owner’s Preliminary Responses to June
`14, 2016. Patent Owner Round Rock Research has signed the Settlement Agreement, which has been
`approved pending signature by Petitioner Ricoh.
`
`However, due to the process by which signatures on such agreements are obtained by Japanese
`companies, counter signatures by Petitioner on the underlying Settlement Agreement will take another
`two weeks. Attorneys for Patent Owner and Petitioner respectfully request that the Patent Trial and
`Appeal Board defer any action on the above IPRs until the fully signed Settlement Agreement is obtained
`and the joint motions to terminate the above IPRs are filed.
`
`Representatives for Petitioner and Patent Owner further respectfully request that the time for Patent
`Owner to file the Preliminary Responses be extended to June 28th to preserve the current status of the
`IPRs until the joint motions to terminate them are filed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Richard J. Botos
`Attorney for Patent Owner Round Rock Research
`rbotos@lernerdavid.com
`Direct Dial: (908) 518-6392
`Main: (908) 584-5000
`
`LernerDavid
`Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik LLP
`600 South Avenue West, Westfield, NJ 07090
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY and PRIVILEGE NOTICE
`The information contained in this email message and any attachments originated from Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik LLP, are
`
`

`
`covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC § 2510 et seq., and are exclusively for the use of the intended recipient.
`They may contain legally privileged, confidential information or work product subject to attorney-client privilege or otherwise protected from
`disclosure. No waiver of any privilege is intended. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to
`the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be
`in violation of court order or otherwise unlawful. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us at (908)
`654-5000 (Collect, if necessary).

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket