`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 26
` Entered: May 24, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COMMISSARIAT À L’ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES
`ALTERNATIVES,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SILICON GENESIS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`Case IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`Case IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JONI Y. CHANG, J. JOHN LEE, and SHEILA F. McSHANE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`
`
`A conference was held with the parties on May 17, 2017, regarding
`the above-captioned proceedings. At the conference, the parties provided an
`update regarding the motions authorized by our April 10, 2017 Order (Paper
`321). Specifically, Petitioner Commissariat à L’Energie Atomique et aux
`Energies Alternatives indicated that a delay in finalization of its agreement
`with third party Soitec S.A., which must be filed in each of these
`proceedings pursuant to our April 10, 2017 Order, is expected to be resolved
`by June 16, 2017. Thus, the parties expect to be ready to file the authorized
`motions and related exhibits shortly after that date. Patent Owner Silicon
`Genesis Corporation, however, wishes to reserve its rights to request oral
`argument in the event that further developments prevent the parties from
`requesting termination as authorized by our April 10, 2017 Order.
`The Scheduling Order provided that requests for oral argument were
`due on April 26, 2017, and the oral hearing, if requested, will be held on
`May 31, 2017. Paper 15, 6. In light of the present circumstances, we hereby
`modify the case schedule to change the due date for requests for oral
`argument (37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)) to June 22, 2017, and the date for the oral
`hearing, if requested, to be determined later should it become necessary.
`Nonetheless, the parties remain authorized to instead file the motions and
`papers previously authorized in our April 10, 2017 Order.
`
`
`
`
`1 All citations refer to IPR2016-00831. Similar papers were filed in all three
`of the above-captioned proceedings.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that DUE DATE 4 of our Scheduling Order in each of the
`above-captioned proceedings is changed to June 23, 2017, only as to
`requests for oral argument;
`FURTHER ORDERED that DUE DATE 7 in each proceeding is
`suspended.
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Paul E. McGowan
`Marcus T. Hall
`Douglas D. Salyers
`Parker D. Hancock
`Troutman Sanders LLP
`600 Peachtree Street, Suite 5200
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`(404) 885-3000
`paul.mcgowan@troutmansanders.com
`marcus.hall@troutmansanders.com
`douglas.salyers@troutmansanders.com
`parker.hancock@troutmansanders.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Margaux Nair
`K&L Gates LLP
`70 W. Madison Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Tel.: (312) 807-4280
`margaux.nair.PTAB@klgates.com
`
`George C. Summerfield
`K&L Gates LLP
`70 W. Madison Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60602
`Tel.: (312) 807-4376
`george.summerfield@klgates.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
