`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 11
`Entered: September 30, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`COMMISSARIAT À L’ENERGIE ATOMIQUE
`ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SILICON GENESIS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`Case IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
` Case IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599) 1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before J. JOHN LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Admission Pro Hac Vice
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are identical in all of these cases.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one order to be filed in each
`case. The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in
`any subsequent papers without prior authorization.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies
`Alternatives (“CEA”) moves for the admission pro hac vice of attorney
`Douglas D. Salyers in each of the above-captioned cases. E.g.,
`Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives v. Silicon
`Genesis Corp., Case IPR2016-00831, Paper 13 (PTAB Sept. 12, 2016). The
`Board may recognize counsel pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a
`showing of good cause, subject to the condition that lead counsel be a
`registered practitioner. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`Lead counsel for Petitioner in each of the above proceedings is Paul
`E. McGowan, a registered practitioner. In support of each of the pro hac
`vice motions, Petitioner submits a Declaration of Douglas D. Salyers. E.g.,
`Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique, Case IPR2016-00831, Ex. 1012. Upon
`consideration of the facts set forth in the pro hac vice motions and Mr.
`Salyers’s declarations, Petitioner has shown good cause for Mr. Salyers to be
`admitted pro hac vice to appear in each of these proceedings.
`
`
`ORDER
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Douglas
`
`D. Salyers in each of the above-captioned cases is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Salyers is authorized to appear as
`back-up counsel for Petitioner in each of the above proceedings, but he may
`not act as lead counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner must remain as
`lead counsel throughout the proceedings;
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Salyers is to comply with the Office
`
`Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in
`Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Salyers is subject to the USPTO
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and
`the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00831 (Patent 6,162,705)
`IPR2016-00832 (Patent 6,013,563)
`IPR2016-00833 (Patent 6,103,599)
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Paul E. McGowan
`Parker D. Hancock
`TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP
`
`paul.mcgowan@troutmansanders.com
`parker.hancock@troutmansanders.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kent Tobin
`
`kentjtobin@gmail.com
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
