`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 14
`
` Entered: April 19, 2017
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`TIANMA MICRO-ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`JAPAN DISPLAY INC. and
`PANASONIC LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY CO., LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00990 (Patent 7,718,234 B2)
`Case IPR2016-00991 (Patent 8,758,871 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, KRISTINA M. KALAN, and
`ELIZABETH M. ROESEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KALAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Unopposed Motion to Withdraw
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Because this Decision addresses issues applicable to these two cases, we
`exercise our discretion to issue one Decision to be filed in each case. The
`parties may not use this style heading unless authorized.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00990 (Patent 7,718,234 B2)
`IPR2016-00991 (Patent 8,758,871 B2)
`
`
`On April 17, 2017, pursuant to authorization by the Board, John R.
`Fuisz and Jennifer C. Chen filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for Patent
`Co-Owner Panasonic Liquid Crystal Display Co., Ltd. (“PLD”) in each of
`the above-captioned cases. Paper 12.2 Mr. Fuisz and Ms. Chen represent
`that counsel for Petitioner Tianma Micro-Electronics Co., Ltd. “does not
`oppose this Motion.” Id. at 2.
`Mr. Fuisz and Ms. Chen represent that PLD “has retained counsel
`from Wiggin and Dana LLP to represent it for all purposes in this inter
`partes review proceeding.” Id. PLD filed a Power of Attorney on April 5,
`2017, designating Joseph M. Casino as lead counsel and Abraham Kasdan as
`back-up counsel. Paper 11. Mr. Casino and Mr. Kasdan, both of Wiggin
`and Dana LLP, are registered practitioners. Id. The motion is granted.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that John R. Fuisz and Jennifer C. Chen’s Motion to
`Withdraw is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that John R. Fuisz and Jennifer C. Chen are
`permitted to withdraw as counsel for PLD in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Joseph M. Casino is recognized as Lead
`Counsel, and Abraham Kasdan is recognized as Back-Up Counsel, for PLD,
`effective as of the date of this Decision; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that PLD shall file updated mandatory notice
`information listing its new counsel, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, within five
`business days of this Decision.
`
`
`
`2 References in this Decision refer to the papers filed in IPR2016-00990.
`Substantially identical papers were filed in IPR2016-00991.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2016-00990 (Patent 7,718,234 B2)
`IPR2016-00991 (Patent 8,758,871 B2)
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`James R. Barney
`Anthony A Hartmann
`Shing-Yi Cheng
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRET & DUNNER
`tianmaiprs@finnegan.com
`Anthony.hartmann@finnegan.com
`Shingyi.cheng@finnegan.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNERS, Japan Display Inc:
`
`John R. Fuisz
`Jennifer C. Chen
`VINSON & ELKINS, L.L.P.
`JFuisz@velaw.com
`Jchen@velaw.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNERS, Panasonic Liquid Display Co., LTD:
`Joseph M. Casin
`Abraham Kasdan
`WIGGIN AND DANA LLP
`JCasino@wiggin.com
`AKasdan@wiggin.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
