`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., DISH NETWORK, LLC,
`COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
`COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC,
`VERIZON SERVICES CORP., and ARRIS GROUP, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`TQ DELTA, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-010061
`Patent 7,835,430 B2
`_____________________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING
`
`
`
`
`
`1 DISH Network, LLC, who filed a Petition in IPR2017-00251, and Comcast Cable
`Communications, LLC, Cox Communications, Inc., Time Warner Cable
`Enterprises LLC, Verizon Services Corp., and ARRIS Group, Inc., who filed a
`Petition in IPR2017-00420, have been joined in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing
`IPR2016-01006
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), Petitioner hereby request an oral
`
`hearing in the present inter partes review. Per the Board’s Scheduling Order, the
`
`oral hearing is scheduled for August 3, 2017. See Order, Paper 8, at 8.
`
`1. Request to Consolidate Cases for Oral Hearing
`
`The Board’s Scheduling Order aligned the schedules of six related inter
`
`partes review proceedings. See Order, Paper 8. Because of overlapping subject
`
`matter and issues, and to expedite the proceedings, Petitioner requests that these
`
`cases be set for oral hearing in two groups, as follows:
`
`“Diagnostic/Test” Cases
` IPR2016–01006 (Patent 7,835,430) (this proceeding)
` IPR2016–01007 (Patent 8,432,956)
` IPR2016–01008 (Patent 8,238,412)
` IPR2016–01009 (Patent 8,238,412)
`
`“Phase Scrambling” Cases
` IPR2016–01020 (Patent 9,014,243)
` IPR2016–01021 (Patent 8,718,158)
`
`For the “Diagnostic/Test” cases (including this case), Petitioner respectfully
`
`requests a single consolidated oral hearing, with each side having 40 minutes to
`
`present.
`
`2. Issues to be Presented During Oral Hearing
`
`During the oral hearing, Petitioner requests the opportunity to present oral
`
`argument on all of the issues raised in the papers pertaining to the instituted
`
`2
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing
`IPR2016-01006
`
`grounds, including:
`
` Milbrandt in combination with Chang renders obvious frequency
`domain “idle channel noise information”
`
`
`3. Conclusion
`
`If the Board has any questions or comments, the undersigned attorney
`
`respectfully requests a telephone conference. No fees are believed to be required
`
`for filing this request; however, the Commissioner is authorized to charge any
`
`required fees, or credit any overpayment, to Haynes and Boone, LLP's Deposit
`
`Account No. 08-1394.
`
`June 30, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/David L. McCombs/
`David L. McCombs
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 32,271
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.205, that
`service was made on the Patent Owner as detailed below.
`
`Date of service
`
`June 30, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Hearing
`
`Manner of service
`Email: pmcandrews@mcandrews-ip.com;
`twimbiscus@mcandrews-ip.com; smcbride@mcandrews-ip.com;
`cscharff@mcandrews-ip.com; TQD-CISCO@mcandrews-ip.com
`
`Documents served
`
`Persons served
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Peter J. McAndrews
`Thomas J. Wimbiscus
`Scott P. McBride
`Christopher M. Scharff
`MCANDREWS, HELD & MALLOY, LTD
`500 West Madison Street, 34th Floor
`Chicago, IL 60661
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/David L. McCombs/
`David L. McCombs
`Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 32,271
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
