throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`CRESWELL HOLDINGS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_________________
`
`CASE IPR2016-01090
`Patent 6,340,803
`__________________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37
`C.F.R. § 42.7
`
`
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`JOINT REQUEST TO TREAT AGREEMENT AS BUSINESS
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) AND
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317, and as authorized by the Board Order dated
`
`October 28, 2016, Petitioner Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo”) and Patent
`
`Owner Creswell Holdings LLC (“Creswell”) jointly request termination of Inter
`
`Partes Review No. IPR2016-01090 (“the IPR”) involving U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,340,803 (“the ’803 Patent”).
`
`Creswell and Lenovo reached an agreement settling the matters in
`
`controversy among the Parties with respect to the ’803 Patent. Specifically, the
`
`district court litigation involving Petitioner Lenovo has been dismissed, Creswell
`
`Holdings, LLC. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc., 4:15-cv-407 (EDTX) and the
`
`parties have reached an agreement on any remaining items of controversy.
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the above-referenced agreement is in
`
`writing, and a true and correct copy of that document is being filed herewith as
`
`Exhibit 2002.
`
`Creswell and Lenovo hereby jointly request that the above-referenced
`
`agreement be treated as business confidential information and be kept separate
`
`from the files of the above-captioned IPR pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.74(c). There are no other agreements, oral or written, between the
`
`parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`Lenovo filed a petition requesting inter partes review of the ’803 Patent on
`
`May 23, 2016. Patent Owner Creswell filed its Preliminary Response on
`
`September 6, 2016. The Board has not yet made any decision regarding institution
`
`of inter partes review.
`
`Creswell and Lenovo reached an agreement settling the matters in
`
`controversy among them involving the ’803 Patent, including the related
`
`proceedings before the Board.
`
`On October 22, 2016 Creswell and Lenovo requested Board permission to
`
`file a joint motion to terminate this proceeding. On October 28, 2016, the Board
`
`authorized the filing of the requested joint motion.
`
`II. TERMINATION IS APPROPRIATE.
`
`Termination of the IPR is appropriate as the Board has not yet “decided the
`
`merits of th[is] proceeding.” See, e.g., Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed.
`
`Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012). Notably, no dispute remains between the
`
`Creswell and Lenovo regarding the ’803 Patent. Creswell and Lenovo have agreed
`
`to jointly request termination of the IPR, and the litigation between Creswell and
`
`Lenovo involving the same patent has been dismissed.
`
`3
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`III. STATUS OF RELATED LITIGATIONS
`
`As noted above, the related district court action between Patent Owner and
`
`Petitioner Lenovo has been dismissed. Lenovo and Creswell represent that the
`
`current status of the other related litigation matters is as follows:
`
`Matter
`
`Status
`
`Creswell Holdings LLC v. Hewlett Packard Co., Case.
`
`Dismissed
`
`No. 4:15-cv-00807
`
`
`IV. REQUEST TO TREAT THE AGREEMENT AS BUSINESS
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Creswell and Lenovo hereby request that the above-referenced agreement
`
`filed concurrently herewith as Exhibit 2002 be treated as confidential business
`
`information and be kept separate from the file of the above-captioned IPR pursuant
`
`to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). There are no other agreements,
`
`oral or written, between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation
`
`of, the termination of this proceeding.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`For the reasons stated above, Creswell and Lenovo respectfully request that
`
`the Board terminate the IPR and treat the related agreement filed herewith as
`
`business confidential information and keep that agreement separate from the file of
`
`the above-captioned IPR.
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`DATED November 1, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Neal Massand
`Hao Ni
`Registration No. 53,858
`hni@nilawfirm.com
`Neal G. Massand
`Registration No. 54,296
`nmassand@nilawfirm.com
`
`NI, WANG & MASSAND, PLLC
`8140 Walnut Hill Ln., Ste. 500
`Dallas, TX 75231
`Tel: (972) 331-4600
`Fax: (972) 314-0900
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PATENT
`OWNER
`
`By: /s/ Eric J. Klein
`Eric J. Klein (Reg. No. 51,888)
`Email: eklein@akingump.com
`Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
`1700 Pacific Avenue
`Suite 4100
`Dallas, TX 75201-4624
`Telephone: 214.969.2800
`Fax: 214.969.4343
`
`LEAD COUNSEL FOR
`PETITIONER
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket