throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
` Paper 9
`Entered: November 10, 2016
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CRESWELL HOLDINGS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01090
`Patent 6,340,803 B1
`____________
`
`
`Before PATRICK R. SCANLON, RICHARD E. RICE, and
`BARRY L. GROSSMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`TERMINATION ORDER
`Dismissing the Petition
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a)
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-01090
`Patent 6,340,803 B1
`
`
`On November 4, 2016, the parties filed an Amended Joint Motion To
`Terminate (Paper 8, “Joint Motion” or “Jt. Mot.”) seeking to terminate this
`proceeding on the basis of a settlement. The parties also filed a copy of their
`written settlement agreement (Ex. 2002).1 In their Joint Motion, the parties
`request that their settlement agreement be treated as business confidential
`information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Jt. Mot. 2.
`Further, the parties represent that the related district court litigation
`(Creswell Holdings, LLC. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc., 4:15-cv-407
`(EDTX)) has been dismissed pursuant to their settlement agreement. Id.
`The parties also represent that “[n]o dispute remains between [Patent
`Owner] and [Petitioner] regarding [U.S. Patent No. 6,340,803 B1, which
`Petitioner challenged in the Petition].” Id. at 3.
`The parties’ Joint Motion was filed at a preliminary stage of this
`proceeding, and the Board has not yet determined whether to institute an
`inter partes review. Under these circumstances, we determine that it is
`appropriate to dismiss the Petition. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a).
`This Termination Order does not constitute a final written decision
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement
`agreement (Ex. 2002) be treated as business confidential information is
`granted;
`
`
`
`1 The parties had previously filed that same exhibit on November 1, 2016.
`The record currently contains two duplicate copies of Exhibit 2002.
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-01090
`Patent 6,340,803 B1
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint motion to terminate the
`instant proceeding (Paper 8) is granted; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition is dismissed.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-01090
`Patent 6,340,803 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Eric Klein
`eklein@akingump.com
`
`Todd Landis
`tlandis@akingump.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Hao Ni
`hni@nilawfirm.com
`
`
`Neal G. Massand
`nmassand@nilawfirm.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket