throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`Paper 27
`Entered: May 10, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01155 (Patent 8,694,657 B1)
`Case IPR2016-01067 (Patent 8,407,356 B1)
`Case IPR2016-01141 (Patent 8,458,245 B1)
`____________
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, DAVID C. MCKONE, and J. JOHN LEE,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MCKONE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Motion to Terminate
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01155 (Patent 8,694,657 B1)
`IPR2016-01067 (Patent 8,407,356 B1)
`IPR2016-01141 (Patent 8,458,245 B1)
`
`On April 24, 2017, Petitioner Microsoft Corporation and Patent
`
`Owner Windy City Innovations, LLC, filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceeding in each of the above-captioned proceedings (Paper 291) and a
`
`Joint Motion to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential
`
`Information in each proceeding (Paper 30). The parties represent that they
`
`have reached a Settlement Agreement, which is in writing and a true copy of
`
`which has been filed in conjunction with the above motions as required
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). Paper 28, 2; Ex. 2015. The parties also certify
`
`that no other agreements exist between the parties concerning these cases or
`
`the patents at issue. Paper 28, 2.
`
`“An inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be
`
`terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the
`
`petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of
`
`the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(a). Pursuant to Section 317(a), we grant the Motions to Terminate as
`
`to Petitioner Microsoft.
`
`Prior to the settlement between Microsoft and Windy City,
`
`Facebook, Inc., filed Petitions for inter partes review of U.S. Patent
`
`Nos. 8,694,657 B1, 8,407,356 B1, and 8,458,245 B1, along with
`
`corresponding Motions for Joinder with IPR2016-01155, IPR2016-01067,
`
`and IPR2016-01141, respectively. See Facebook, Inc. v. Windy City
`
`Innovations LLC., Case IPR2017-00622, Papers 2, 3; Facebook, Inc. v.
`
`Windy City Innovations LLC., Case IPR2017-00624, Papers 2, 3; Facebook,
`
`
`1 Unless otherwise specified, we refer to the paper and exhibit numbering in
`IPR2016-01155. Similar filings were made in each of the above-captioned
`cases.
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01155 (Patent 8,694,657 B1)
`IPR2016-01067 (Patent 8,407,356 B1)
`IPR2016-01141 (Patent 8,458,245 B1)
`
`Inc. v. Windy City Innovations LLC, Case IPR2017-00655, Papers 2, 3.
`
`Windy City filed its Preliminary Responses to Facebook’s Petitions in
`
`IPR2017-0622 and IPR2017-00624 on April 17, 2017, and its Preliminary
`
`Response to Facebook’s Petition in IPR2017-00655 on May 2, 2017. We
`
`have not yet ruled on Facebook’s Petitions or its Motions for Joinder.
`
`Under Section 317(a), if, after termination as to Microsoft, “no
`
`petitioner remains in the inter partes review, the Office may terminate the
`
`review or proceed to a final written decision under section 318(a).” Our
`
`rules echo our discretion to terminate as to Patent Owner or to proceed with
`
`the trial. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(a) (“[T]he Board is not a party to the
`
`settlement and may independently determine any question of jurisdiction,
`
`patentability, or Office practice.”). In exercise of this discretion, we hold in
`
`abeyance our rulings on the Motions to Terminate as to Windy City until we
`
`have ruled on Facebook’s Petitions and Motions for Joinder in IPR2017-
`
`00622, IPR2017-00624, and IPR2017-00655.
`
`We further determine that the Settlement Agreement filed by the
`
`parties constitutes business confidential information. Therefore, the parties’
`
`Joint Motions to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential
`
`Information are granted.
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motions to Terminate Proceedings
`
`are granted as to Petitioner Microsoft Corporation; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ Joint Motions to Treat
`
`Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information are granted,
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01155 (Patent 8,694,657 B1)
`IPR2016-01067 (Patent 8,407,356 B1)
`IPR2016-01141 (Patent 8,458,245 B1)
`
`and Exhibit 2015 of IPR2016-01155, Exhibit 2015 of IPR2016-01067, and
`
`Exhibit 2011 of IPR2016-01141, shall be kept separate from the pertinent
`
`file consistent with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b).
`
`4
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph Micallef
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`
`Todd Siegel
`Todd.siegel@klarquist.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Peter Lambrianakos
`plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com
`
`Vincent Rubino
`vrubino@brownrudnick.com
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket