throbber
Paper No.
`Filed: August 9, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR2016-01163
`Patent No. 8,877,168
`
`JOINT REQUEST THAT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BE TREATED AS
`BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND KEPT SEPARATE
`UNDER 37 C.F.R § 42.74(c)
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-01163
`Patent No. 8,877,168
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Mylan”) and Patent Owner Senju
`
`Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Senju”) have entered into a settlement agreement that
`
`resolves all underlying disputes between the parties, including the inter partes
`
`review proceeding IPR2016-01163, against U.S. Patent No. 8,877,168, currently
`
`before the Board (“the proceeding”).
`
`In an email sent to the parties on August 4, 2016, in light of the settlement
`
`agreement, the Board authorized the parties to file a joint motion to terminate in
`
`the above-captioned proceeding. Also in the email, the Board authorized the parties
`
`to file a joint request that the Office treat the agreement as business confidential
`
`information. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the agreement be held
`
`separately and treated as business confidential information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.74(c).
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`If requested, the rules permit the parties to have any filed settlement
`
`agreement treated as business confidential information, and kept separate from the
`
`files of the involved patent. 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Indeed, the statute requires it.
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-01163
`Patent No. 8,877,168
`
`At the request of a party to the proceeding, the agreement
`
`or understanding shall be treated as business confidential
`
`information, shall be kept separate from the file of the
`
`involved patents, and shall be made available only to
`
`Federal Government agencies on written request, or to
`
`any person on a showing of good cause.
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
`
`In a motion filed concurrently herewith, Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly
`
`request termination of the proceeding. The parties also submit, as part of that joint
`
`request, a true copy of the Agreement between them (Exhibit 1035). Because the
`
`Agreement contains confidential business information, the parties jointly request
`
`that the Office treat the Agreement (Exhibit 1035) as business confidential
`
`information, that the Agreement be kept separate from the file of the involved
`
`patents, and that the Agreement be made available only to Federal Government
`
`agencies on written request, or to other persons only on a showing of good cause.
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the Petitioner Mylan and the Patent Owner Senju
`
`jointly and respectfully request that the Board hold the Agreement as business
`
`confidential information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) in the proceeding.
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-01163
`Patent No. 8,877,168
`
`RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
`
`Date: August 9, 2016
`
`/Jitendra Malik/
`
`Jitendra Malik
`Reg. No. 55823
`Alston & Bird LLP
`4721 Emperor Boulevard, Suite 400
`Durham, North Carolina 27703
`
`Lance Soderstrom
`Reg. No. 65405
`Alston & Bird LLP
`90 Park Avenue, 15th Floor
`New York, New York 10016-1387
`
`H. James Abe
`Reg. No. 61182
`Alston & Bird LLP
`333 South Hope Street, 16th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`
`Joseph M. Janusz
`Reg. No. 70396
`Alston & Bird LLP
`101 S. Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28205
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`Date: August 9, 2016
`
`/Bryan Diner/
`
`Bryan C. Diner, Lead Counsel
`Reg. No. 32,409
`Justin J. Hasford, Back-up Counsel
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-01163
`Patent No. 8,877,168
`
`Reg. No. 62,180
`Joshua L. Goldberg, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 59,369
`Elizabeth D. Ferrill, Back-up Counsel
`Reg. No. 58,415
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
`901 New York Ave. NW
`Washington, DC
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd..
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies a copy of the foregoing JOINT REQUEST TO
`
`FILE AS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION was served on
`
`August 9, 2016 via electronic mail directed to the counsel of record for the
`
`Petitioner at the following:
`
`Bryan C. Diner
`Bryan.Diner@finnegan.com
`
`Justin J. Hasford
`Justin.Hasford@finnegan.com
`
`Joshua L. Goldberg
`Joshua.Goldberg@finnegan.com
`
`Elizabeth D. Ferrill
`Elizabeth.Ferrill@finnegan.com
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Alston & Bird LLP
`
`By: /Jitendra Malik/
`
`Jitendra Malik, Ph.D.
`Reg. No. 55823
`Alston & Bird LLP
`4721 Emperor Blvd., Suite 400
`Durham, NC 27703-8580
`jitty.malik@alston.com
`
`Lance Soderstrom
`Reg. No. 65405
`Alston & Bird LLP
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1
`
`

`
`90 Park Avenue, 15th Floor
`New York, New York 10016-1387
`lance.soderstrom@alston.com
`
`H. James Abe
`Reg. No. 61182
`Alston & Bird LLP
`333 South Hope Street, 16th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`james.abe@alston.com
`
`Joseph M. Janusz
`Reg. No. 70396
`Alston & Bird LLP
`101 S. Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28205
`joe.janusz@alston.com
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`LEGAL02/36554588v1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket