Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 15
`
`
`
`JEFF SILVESTRI, ESQ.
`Nevada Bar No. 5779
`McDONALD CARANO WILSON LLP
`2300 W. Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
`Las Vegas, NV 89102
`Telephone: 702.873.4100
`Facsimile: 702.873.9966
`E-mail: jsilvestri@mcdonaldcarano.com
`
`ADAM K. MORTARA, ESQ. (pro hac vice to be submitted)
`BRIAN C. SWANSON, ESQ. (pro hac vice to be submitted)
`BARTLIT BECK HERMAN
` PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
`54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300
`Chicago, IL 60654
`Telephone: 312.494.4400
`E-mail: adam.mortara@bartlit-beck.com
` brian.swanson@bartlit-beck.com
`
`
`DANIEL C. TAYLOR, ESQ. (pro hac vice to be submitted)
`BARTLIT BECK HERMAN
` PALENCHAR & SCOTT LLP
`1899 Wynkoop Street, 8th Floor
`Denver, CO 80202
`Telephone: 303.592.3100
`E-mail: daniel.taylor@bartlit-beck.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff IGT
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
`
`
`
`
`
`IGT,
`
`
`CASE NO.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`v.
`
`ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff IGT brings this complaint for patent infringement and declaratory judgment against
`
`Defendant Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. (“Aristocrat”) and alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United
`
`States, including 35 U.S.C. § 271 and §§ 281-285.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 1/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 2 of 15
`
`
`
`2.
`
`This lawsuit pertains to Aristocrat’s infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,131,908;
`
`7,513,827; 6,394,902; 7,384,334; 8,753,189; D503,951; 6,375,570; 6,702,675; 7,303,469; and
`
`6,932,701.
`3.
`
`IGT also seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that the doctrine
`
`of assignor estoppel bars Aristocrat from challenging the validity of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,375,570;
`
`6,702,675; 7,303,469; and 6,932,701.
`
`PARTIES
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
`
`Nevada, with a principal place of business located at 6355 South Buffalo Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada
`
`89113. IGT is a world leader in gaming entertainment and a leading supplier of casino and lottery
`
`gaming machines commonly known as slot machines.
`5.
`
`Defendant Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the State of Nevada, with a principal place of business located at 7230 Amigo Street, Las
`
`Vegas, Nevada 89119. Aristocrat sells, leases, and/or operates gaming machines in the casino and
`
`lottery markets. Aristocrat is a subsidiary of Aristocrat Leisure Limited, an Australian corporation.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`6.
`
`This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.,
`
`including 35 U.S.C. § 271. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a).
`7.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Aristocrat. Aristocrat is incorporated in
`
`Nevada and maintains substantial, continuous and systematic contacts in Nevada. Aristocrat has
`
`thus purposefully availed itself of the benefits and protections of Nevada’s laws such that it should
`
`reasonably anticipate being haled into court here. Aristocrat regularly transacts business within
`
`Nevada including the sale, lease, and/or operation of gaming machines in Nevada.
`8.
`
`Venue is proper in the District of Nevada pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391, 1400(b).
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`2
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 2/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 3 of 15
`
`
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`The Patents at Issue
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,131,908 (“the ’908 Patent”). The ’908 Patent issued on November 7, 2006. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`10.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,513,827 (“the ’827 Patent”). The ’827 Patent issued on April 7, 2009. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`11.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,394,902 (“the ’902 Patent”). The ’902 Patent issued on May 28, 2002. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit C.
`12.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,384,334 (“the ’334 Patent”). The ’334 Patent issued on June 10, 2008. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit D.
`13.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,753,189 (“the ’189 Patent”). The ’189 Patent issued on June 17, 2014. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit E.
`14.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. D503,951 (“the ’951 Patent”). The ’951 Patent issued on April 12, 2005. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit F.
`15.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,375,570 (“the ’570 Patent”). The ’570 Patent issued on April 23, 2002. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit G.
`16.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,702,675 (“the ’675 Patent”). The ’675 Patent issued on March 9, 2004. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit H.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`3
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 3/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 4 of 15
`
`
`
`17.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,303,469 (“the ’469 Patent”). The ’469 Patent issued on December 4, 2007. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit I.
`18.
`
`Plaintiff IGT is the owner, by assignment, of all rights, title and interest in U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,932,701 (“the ’701 Patent”). The ’701 Patent issued on August 23, 2005. A true and correct
`
`copy of that patent is attached as Exhibit J.
`
`Joe Kaminkow and IGT
`
`19.
`
`Joe Kaminkow is a named inventor on the ’570 Patent, the ’675 Patent, the ’469
`
`Patent, and the ’701 Patent. Kaminkow is a designer of slot machines.
`20.
`
`Kaminkow worked at IGT from 1999 to 2012. As IGT’s Vice President of Game
`
`Design, Kaminkow led the development of several successful slot machines for IGT including SEX
`
`AND THE CITY, STAR WARS, and GHOSTBUSTERS.
`21.
`
`In the course of performing his duties at IGT, Kaminkow obtained patents on several
`
`important innovations in the field of electronic gaming machines. Among these patents are the ’570
`
`Patent, the ’675 Patent, the ’469 Patent, and the ’701 Patent. Kaminkow assigned all rights, title,
`
`and interest in these patents to IGT in exchange for valuable consideration, including salary,
`
`bonuses, and other employment benefits.
`22.
`
`Kaminkow resigned from IGT in January 2012.
`
`Joe Kaminkow and Aristocrat
`
`23.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat called Kaminkow the same night he resigned
`
`from IGT to discuss the possibility of employing him. Upon information and belief, Kaminkow had
`
`lunch with Aristocrat CEO Jamie Odell the next week. See Howard Stutz, Nevadan at Work:
`
`Veteran Game Designer is Always Creating, Las Vegas Review-Journal (Nov. 2, 2013), available at
`
`http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/casinos-gaming/nevadan-work-veteran-game-designer-
`
`always-creating.
`24.
`
`Kaminkow joined Aristocrat in early 2013 immediately after the one-year non-
`
`compete clause in his employment agreement with IGT expired. Kaminkow currently serves as
`
`Aristocrat’s Senior Vice President of Game Development. See News Release, Legendary Game
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`4
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 4/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 5 of 15
`
`
`
`Developer Joins Aristocrat, Market Wired (Feb. 26, 2013), available at
`
`http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/legendary-game-developer-joins-aristocrat-asx-all-
`
`1761483.htm.
`25.
`
`Upon information and belief, Kaminkow has been heavily involved in the
`
`development and design of slot machines Aristocrat has released since Kaminkow joined the
`
`company in 2013. The first sentence of a March 2014 article in the publication Casino Enterprise
`
`Management confirms the centrality of Kaminkow’s role: “Walk into Aristocrat Technologies’ game
`
`development lair, and it’s clear this is Joe Kaminkow’s territory.” Marian Green, Joe Kaminkow
`
`Cultivates Slot Game Creativity, Casino Enterprise Management (Mar. 3, 2014), available at
`
`http://www.casinoenterprisemanagement.com/articles/march-2014/joe-kaminkow-cultivates-slot-
`
`game-creativity.
`26.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat debuted several of the slot machines
`
`Kaminkow designed at the Global Gaming Expo (popularly known as G2E) in Las Vegas in
`
`September 2013. One such slot machine is the BATMAN CLASSIC TV SERIES game. Aristocrat
`
`CEO Jamie Odell told Global Gaming Business Magazine that the BATMAN game is “Joe’s great
`
`product” and that “Aristocrat wouldn’t normally have made that sort of game” without Kaminkow.
`
`Q&A with Jamie Odell, Global Gaming Business Magazine (Sept. 25, 2014), available at
`
`http://ggbmagazine.com/issue/vol-13-no-10-october-2014/article/q-a-with-jamie-odell. Aristocrat’s
`
`Vice President of Marketing told the video publication This Week in Gaming that Kaminkow
`
`designed the BATMAN game. Batman 1966 Slot Machine from Aristocrat Technologies, This
`
`Week in Gambling (Aug. 13, 2014), available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iL0UOSp15A
`
`Aristocrat’s Vice President of Gaming Operations described the BATMAN game as “a coming-out
`
`party for Joe Kaminkow.” Frank Legato, Aristocrat Technologies: Aiming High, Global Gaming
`
`Business Magazine (Aug. 27, 2013), available at http://ggbmagazine.com/issue/vol-12-no-9-
`
`september-2013/article/aristocrat-technologies-aiming-high. In a promotional video Aristocrat’s
`
`Vice President of Gaming Operations called the BATMAN game “the beginning of a new era” for
`
`Aristocrat and said it was “very special” having Kaminkow “bring his skills to Aristocrat, and in
`
`particular to [the BATMAN game].” Video, Behind-the-Scenes Look at Batman Classic TV Series
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`5
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 5/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 6 of 15
`
`
`
`Slot Machine (Apr. 9, 2014), available at http://www.vegasnews.com/113305/ aristocrat-releases-
`
`batman-classic-tv-series-slot-machine-and-behind-the-scenes-video.html. In the same video
`
`Kaminkow himself discusses the bonus wheels on the BATMAN game and refers to himself as “the
`
`king of wheels” having “made more wheel games probably than anybody.” Id.
`27.
`
`Upon information and belief, Kaminkow owns a vintage Batmobile like the one used
`
`in the 1960’s television series on which the BATMAN slot machine is based. Aristocrat displayed
`
`Kaminkow’s Batmobile alongside the BATMAN game at G2E 2013. Howard Stutz, Nevadan at
`
`Work: Veteran Game Designer is Always Creating, Las Vegas Review-Journal (Nov. 2, 2013),
`
`available at http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/casinos-gaming/nevadan-work-veteran-game-
`
`designer-always-creating; Video, Frank Fantini Signs Off from G2E 2013 in Joe Kaminkow’s
`
`Batmobile (Sept. 26, 2013), available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3I1KuWFC1M.
`28.
`
`Aristocrat has released several other slot machines in addition to the BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES game since Kaminkow joined the company. These slot machines include
`
`SUPERMAN THE MOVIE, TARZAN OF THE APES, THE ROLLING STONES, THE
`
`WALKING DEAD, and FLASHDANCE. Upon information and belief, Kaminkow has had
`
`significant involvement in the design and development of these games. See Howard Stutz, Nevadan
`
`at Work: Veteran Game Designer is Always Creating, Las Vegas Review-Journal (Nov. 2, 2013),
`
`available at http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/casinos-gaming/nevadan-work-veteran-game-
`
`designer-always-creating (“Aristocrat unveiled five games designed by [Kaminkow’s] team—
`
`“Flashdance,” “Tarzan,” “The Rolling Stones,” “Superman,” and “Batman.”); Frank Legato,
`
`Aristocrat Technologies: Aiming High, Global Gaming Business Magazine (Aug. 27, 2013),
`
`available at http://ggbmagazine.com/issue/vol-12-no-9-september-2013/article/aristocrat-
`
`technologies-aiming-high (quoting Aristocrat’s Vice President of Gaming Operations as saying that
`
`Aristocrat “already had [‘Flashdance’] in development before we brought Joe Kaminkow in . . . but
`
`after he was done with it, it was a night-and-day change”).
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`6
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 6/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 7 of 15
`
`
`
`COUNT I
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,131,908)
`
`29.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`30.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’908 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES, THE WALKING DEAD, THE ROLLING STONES, TARZAN OF THE
`
`APES, SUPERMAN THE MOVIE, and FLASHDANCE.
`31.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`32.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’908 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT II
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,513,827)
`
`33.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`34.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’827 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES, THE WALKING DEAD, SUPERMAN THE MOVIE, and FLASHDANCE.
`35.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`7
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 7/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 8 of 15
`
`
`
`36.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’827 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT III
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,394,902)
`
`37.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`38.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’902 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES.
`39.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`40.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’902 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT IV
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,384,334)
`
`41.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`42.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’334 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES and TARZAN OF THE APES.
`43.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`8
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 8/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 9 of 15
`
`
`
`44.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’334 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT V
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,753,189)
`
`45.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`46.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’189 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES, SUPERMAN THE MOVIE, and TARZAN OF THE APES.
`47.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`48.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’189 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT VI
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. D503,951)
`
`49.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`50.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’951 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES and SUPERMAN THE MOVIE.
`51.
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including Aristocrat’s profits,
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 289.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`9
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 9/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 10 of 15
`
`
`
`52.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’951 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT VII
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,375,570)
`
`53.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`54.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’570 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES and THE ROLLING STONES.
`55.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`56.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’570 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT VIII
`
`(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF ASSIGNOR ESTOPPEL ON THE ’570 PATENT)
`57.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`
`58.
`
`Joe Kaminkow is a named inventor on the ’570 Patent. His name was added to the
`
`list of inventors by a Certificate of Correction issued on July 8, 2003. Kaminkow assigned all of his
`
`rights, title, and interest in the ’570 Patent to IGT in exchange for valuable consideration.
`59.
`
`Having received valuable consideration for his assignment of the ’570 Patent,
`
`Kaminkow is estopped from challenging the patent’s validity.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`10
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 10/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 11 of 15
`
`
`
`60.
`
`Aristocrat is also estopped from challenging the validity of the ’570 Patent because
`
`the company is in privity with Kaminkow. Upon information and belief, Kaminkow had extensive
`
`involvement in the design and development of games that infringe the ’570 Patent.
`61.
`
`IGT will suffer immediate and real harm if Aristocrat is permitted to challenge the
`
`validity of the ’570 Patent. This action therefore represents a live case or controversy and warrants
`
`issuance of a declaration of the parties’ rights.
`
`COUNT IX
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,702,675)
`
`62.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`63.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’675 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES, SUPERMAN THE MOVIE, THE WALKING DEAD, THE ROLLING
`
`STONES, TARZAN OF THE APES, and FLASHDANCE.
`64.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`65.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’675 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT X
`
`(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF ASSIGNOR ESTOPPEL ON THE ’675 PATENT)
`66.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`
`67.
`
`Joe Kaminkow is a named inventor on the ’675 Patent. Kaminkow assigned all of his
`
`rights, title, and interest in the ’675 Patent to IGT in exchange for valuable consideration.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`11
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 11/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 12 of 15
`
`
`
`68.
`
`Having received valuable consideration for his assignment of the ’675 Patent,
`
`Kaminkow is estopped from challenging the patent’s validity.
`69.
`
`Aristocrat is also estopped from challenging the validity of the ’675 Patent because
`
`the company is in privity with Kaminkow. Upon information and belief, Kaminkow had extensive
`
`involvement in the design and development of games that infringe the ’675 Patent.
`70.
`
`IGT will suffer immediate and real harm if Aristocrat is permitted to challenge the
`
`validity of the ’675 Patent. This action therefore represents a live case or controversy and warrants
`
`issuance of a declaration of the parties’ rights.
`
`COUNT XI
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,303,469)
`
`71.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`72.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’469 Patent: SUPERMAN
`
`THE MOVIE and TARZAN OF THE APES.
`73.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`74.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’469 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT XII
`
`(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF ASSIGNOR ESTOPPEL ON THE ’469 PATENT)
`75.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`
`76.
`
`Joe Kaminkow is the named inventor on the ’469 Patent. Kaminkow assigned all of
`
`his rights, title, and interest in the ’469 Patent to IGT in exchange for valuable consideration.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`12
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 12/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 13 of 15
`
`
`
`77.
`
`Having received valuable consideration for his assignment of the ’469 Patent,
`
`Kaminkow is estopped from challenging the patent’s validity.
`78.
`
`Aristocrat is also estopped from challenging the validity of the ’469 Patent because
`
`the company is in privity with Kaminkow. Upon information and belief, Kaminkow had extensive
`
`involvement in the design and development of games that infringe the ’469 Patent.
`79.
`
`IGT will suffer immediate and real harm if Aristocrat is permitted to challenge the
`
`validity of the ’469 Patent. This action therefore represents a live case or controversy and warrants
`
`issuance of a declaration of the parties’ rights.
`
`COUNT XIII
`
`(INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,932,701)
`
`80.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`81.
`
`Upon information and belief, Aristocrat’s manufacture, use, offer to sell, and sale of
`
`at least the following gaming machines infringes at least one claim of the ’701 Patent: BATMAN
`
`CLASSIC TV SERIES and SUPERMAN THE MOVIE.
`82.
`
`IGT is entitled to recover from Aristocrat the damages sustained by IGT as a result of
`
`Aristocrat’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial, including lost profits and an amount
`
`not less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 284.
`83.
`
`The infringement by Aristocrat of the ’701 Patent will continue to cause IGT
`
`irreparable injury and damage for which there is no adequate remedy at law unless and until
`
`Aristocrat is enjoined from infringing said patent.
`
`COUNT XIV
`
`(DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF ASSIGNOR ESTOPPEL ON THE ’701 PATENT)
`84.
`
`IGT repeats and realleges each of the assertions set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 28
`
`above.
`
`85.
`
`Joe Kaminkow is a named inventor on the ’701 Patent. Kaminkow assigned all of his
`
`rights, title, and interest in the ’701 Patent to IGT in exchange for valuable consideration.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`13
`
`McDONALD • CARANO • WILSON LLP
`
`
`
`2300 WEST SAHARA AVENUE• SUITE 1200 • LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
`
` PHONE (702)873-4100 • FAX (702) 873-9966
`
`
`
`IGT v. Aristocrat Techs., IPR2016-1170
`ARISTOCRAT EX. 2001 - 13/15
`
`

`
`Case 2:15-cv-00473-GWF Document 1 Filed 03/16/15 Page 14 of 15
`
`
`
`86.
`
`Having received valuable consideration for his assignment of the ’701 Patent,
`
`Kaminkow is estopped from challenging the patent’s validity.
`87.
`
`Aristocrat is also estopped from challenging the validity of the ’701 Patent because
`
`the company is in privity with Kaminkow. Upon information and belief, Kaminkow had extensive
`
`involvement in the design and development of games that infringe the ’701 Patent.
`88.
`
`IGT will suffer immediate and real harm if Aristocrat is permitted to challenge the
`
`validity of the ’701 Patent. This action therefore represents a live case or controversy and warrants
`
`issuance of a declaration of the parties’ rights.
`
`REQUESTED RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, IGT respectfully requests the following relief:
`A.
`
`The entry of judgment that Aristocrat has infringed one or more claims of the ’908,
`
`’827, ’902, ’334, ’189, ’951, ’570, ’675, ’469, and/or ’701 Patents literally and/or under the doctrine
`
`of equivalents;
`B.
`
`The entry of a permanent injunction, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283, enjoining
`
`Aristocrat and its agents, servants, officers, directors, employees, affiliated entities, and all persons
`
`in active concert or participation with them from continued infringement of the ’908, ’827, ’902,
`
`’334, ’189, ’951, ’570, ’675, ’469, and/or ’701 Patents;
`C.
`
`A declaration that the doctrine of assignor estoppel bars Aristocrat from challenging
`
`the validity of the ’570 Patent, the ’675 Patent, the ’469 Patent, and/or the ’701 Patent;
`D.
`
`An award to IGT of damages adequate to compensate IGT for Aristocrat’s acts of
`
`infringement of the ’908, ’827, ’902, ’334, ’189, ’951, ’570, ’675, ’469, and/or ’701 Patents;
`E.
`
`An award to IGT equal to any profits that Aristocrat gained from its infringement of
`
`the ’908, ’827, ’902, ’334, ’189, ’951, ’570, ’675, ’469, and/or ’701 Patents;
`F.
`G.
`
`An award of prejudgment and post-judgment interest on all sums awarded;
`
`A post-verdict and post-judgment account for any infringement of the ’908, ’827,
`
`’902, ’334, ’189, ’951, ’570, ’675, ’469, and/or ’701 Patents not otherwise covered by a damages
`
`award and the requested injunctive relief; and
`
`14
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`McD