throbber
Paper 7
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: September 13, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC, WIDEOPENWEST FINANCE,
`LLC, KNOLOGY OF FLORIDA, INC., AND BIRCH
`COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FOCAL IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-012521
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY and BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative
`Patent Judges.
`
`MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a)
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same issues in the inter partes reviews listed in
`the Appendix. Therefore, we issue one Order to be filed in all of the cases.
`The parties, however, are not authorized to use this style of filing in
`subsequent papers.
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-01252
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`Petitioner, along with two other petitioners, filed a total of ten
`petitions on three patents assigned to Patent Owner, Focal IP, LLC.
`Appendix (attached). The ten petitions were filed either on June 23, 2016,
`or June 24, 2016. A Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (“Notice”)
`was filed in each one of the proceedings within the first week of July, 2016.
`See, e.g., IPR2016-01252, Paper 6. Each Notice specifies the time for Patent
`Owner to file its preliminary response in each proceeding, which is three
`months from the date of the Notice. Id. Notwithstanding the Notices, this
`order sets forth a new schedule for Patent Owner to file preliminary
`responses in the ten proceedings.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`
`The decisions on whether to institute inter partes review in the
`
`identified proceedings would be due around January 1, 2017. Taking into
`consideration Federal Holidays and Board resources two weeks prior to
`January 1, 2017, we have determined to modify the due dates for Patent
`Owner to file preliminary responses in the ten proceedings.
`The Board may determine a proper course of conduct in a proceeding
`for any situation not specifically covered by the rules and may enter non-
`final orders to administer a proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.5(a). Based on the
`records of these proceedings, we exercise our discretion to alter the due
`dates for Patent Owner’s preliminary responses. Patent Owner’s preliminary
`responses are due in accordance with the Appendix attached to this order.
`
`2
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-01252
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`
`III. ORDER
`
`Upon consideration of the record before us, it is
`
`ORDERED that notwithstanding the dates specified in the Notices
`
`filed in the identified proceedings, Patent Owner may file a preliminary
`response in the proceedings in accordance with the Appendix due dates
`attached to this Order; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that if Patent Owner wants to file any
`preliminary response for any of the proceedings listed in the Appendix prior
`to the due dates listed there, Patent Owner must arrange a conference call
`with opposing counsel and the Board.
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`APPENDIX2
`
`
`Patent Owner Preliminary
`Response Due Date
`
`October 19, 2016
`
`October 26, 2016
`
`October 12, 2016
`
`Inter Partes
`Review
`IPR2016-01258
`IPR2016-01262
`IPR2016-01252
`IPR2016-01256
`IPR2016-01259
`IPR2016-01263
`IPR2016-01254
`IPR2016-01257
`IPR2016-01260
`IPR2016-01261
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01252
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,764,777 B2
`
`8,155,298 B2
`
`8,457,113 B2
`
`
`
`
`2 Bright House Networks, LLC, WideOpenWest Finance, LLC, Knology of
`Florida, Inc., and Birch Communications are Petitioner in IPR2016-01252, -
`01259, -01263, -01261, and -01262.
`YMax Corporation is Petitioner in IPR2016-01256, -01258, and -01260.
`Cisco Systems, Inc. is Petitioner in IPR2016-01254 and -01257.
`
`4
`
`
`
`

`
`5
`
`Case IPR2016-01252
`Patent 8,155,298 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Wayne Stacy
`Britton Davis
`COOLEY LLP
`wstacy@cooley.com
`bdavis@cooley.com
`zCisco-PAL-IPR@cooley.com
`
`Mark Passler
`AKERMAN LLP
`ip@akerman.com
`
`Patrick McPherson
`Christopher Tyson
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`pdmcpherson@duanemorris.com
`cjtyson@duanemorris.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brent Bumgardner
`John Murphy
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`bbumgardner@nbclaw.net
`murphy@nelbum.com

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket