throbber
BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY,
`LLC AND BAKER HUGHES
`OILFIELD OPERATIONS(cid:15) LLC
`Exhibit 1144
`BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY,
`LLC AND BAKER HUGHES
`OILFIELD OPERATIONS(cid:15) LLC v.
`PACKERS PLUS ENERGY
`SERVICES, INC.
`IPR2017-00247
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`Patented Sept. 14, 1954
`
`2,689,009
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE
`
`.
`.-
`
`2,639,009
`acmrzmc WELLS
`
`Harold W. Brainerd, Jr. Clarence It. Fast. and
`George 0. Howard, Tulsa, Okla... assignors to
`StanOIind Oil and Gas Company, Tulsa, 01:13.,
`a corporation of Delaware
`No Drawing. Application April 14. 1951,
`Serial No. 221,136
`
`20 Claims.
`
`(Cl. 166—25)
`
`VI
`
`10
`
`15
`
`1
`This invention pertains to a well-treating solu-
`tion and to an improved method of treating wells
`to increase their productivity.
`In the art of completing wells or working over
`old wells to increase the output, acid is injected
`into the producing zones to increase the perme-
`ability of the formation around the well. Since
`acid reacts very rapidly with calcareous forma-
`tions, it appears that the action of the acid is
`very close to the well. Accordingly, the effect of
`acidizing a well is generally to increase output,
`but the increase appears to be much less than
`would be possible if the acid could be made to
`react into long channels deep into the formations
`It has been proposed that strong mineral acids
`which are used to acidize formations penetrated
`by a well be incorporated as the discontinuous
`phase in an acid-oil emulsion. By thus shielding
`the acid, it is prevented from contacting the well
`tubing and the calcareous formations as the acid
`is injected into a well. Corrosion of the tubing
`is avoided. and the reaction of the acid on the
`formation is retarded. Certain oils are known to
`emulsify with acids: and. in some cases. the emul-
`sion may be produced by incorporating in the oil
`or the acid certain emulsiiying agents. This pro-
`posal has not been used, since. in practice, it has
`been found that the emulsifying agents proposed
`are either too stable or too unstable That is.
`if the emulsion is too stable. the emulsion may
`not be easily broken down in the well or in the
`formation; and, if injected into a formation, as
`by the application of a high pressure. the emul-
`sion cannot be displaced from the pores of the
`formation by the relatively small available natu-
`ral driving force. The formation would thus be
`plugged if such stable emulsions were forced into
`the capillaries surrounding a well.
`If the emul-
`sion is unstable, it is of no value for the intended
`purpose.
`In either case, however. the action of
`the acid is close to the well, and long flow chan-
`nels into the formation are not produced.
`It is an object of this invention to provide an
`improved well-treating solution.
`It is another
`object of this invention to provide a well-treating
`solution comprising an emulsion of an acid and
`an oily vehicle which can be injected into a for-
`mation at high pressure to iracture the formation
`and which subsequently can be removed from the
`at D
`formation without plugging the pores thereof. A '
`
`2
`still further object of this invention is to provide
`an improved process for increasing the permea-
`bility of calcareous formations which produce oil
`or gas or other valuable fluids.
`This invention, in brief, comprises a well-treat-
`ing solution in which acid is emulsified in an oil
`dispersion of Batu gum and an improved procesa
`in which the viscous emulsion is injected into a
`formation at a. pressure great enough to fracture
`the formation.
`Batu gum is a natural resin related to the
`Damar natural resins and is a secretion or exuda-
`tion of the Shores tree of the East Indies.
`It is
`soluble in and or coal tar hydrocarbons and in
`hydrogenated aliphatic petroleum solvents but is
`generally only very slightly soluble in crude petro»
`leurn or refined paradinic petroleum hydrocar—
`bons. It is, however, compatible with and can be
`dispersed in paraflinic hydrocarbons, both crude
`and refined. It is available commercially as bold
`scraped, unscraped. nubs and chips, and as dust.
`The acid phase of the emulsion may be any
`acid, such as hydrochloric, nitric, or hydrofluoric.
`which reacts with the formation and produces a
`water-soluble salt. The most important well acid
`is hydrochloric acid in the concentration range
`from about 5 to about 30° 1353. The higher con-
`centrations are preferred in view of the increased
`reaction rate and the decrease in breakdown time
`for the emulsion. The vehicle in which the acid
`of our treating solution is emulsified may consist
`of non-aqueous liquids, such as liquid petroleum
`hydrocarbons, e. g.. crude oil, kerosene. diesel fuel,
`or other light liquid hydrocarbons of this class.
`but we prefer kerosene, since it is practically uni-
`versally available. the composition is relatively
`uniform, and it is not considered hazardous to
`handle While any of the commercial grades of
`- Batu gum will emulsiiy oil and acid in accord-
`40
`ance with this invention. bold scraped and nubs
`and chips are preferied. This gum is preferably.
`ground to pass through a wo-mesh U. S. standard
`sieve or flner. Larger particles may be incorpo-
`rated. We have found, for example. that. with
`Batu hubs and chips, the viscosity of the emul-
`sion varies as a function of the particle size.
`As an example of
`this effect of particle size,
`emulsions having the same proportions of con—
`stituents—namely. 100 parts hydrochloric acid.
`12 parts kerosene. land 2 parts Batu nubs and
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Page 1 of 5
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`2,689,009
`
`Table
`
`Particle see (Mesh)
`—40.....................................
` -100__.
`3‘2
`-200 _____
`3‘?
`-325_____
`
`
`3
`chips by weight—were prepared with different
`sizes of gum particles. The viscosity after 30
`minutes as measured on the Halliburton thicken—
`ing time tester which is described in A. P. I.
`RP 10 13, Recommended Practice for Testing Oil
`Well Cements, third edition, increased as the par-
`ticle size of the gum decreased, as indicated in
`the following table:
`
`4
`can be arranged, so that a viscosity in the pre—
`ferred range is obtained. Higher concentrations
`of the emulsifying agent may be used at increased
`breakdown time where mixing facilities do not
`provide adequate emulsion viscosity. Where the
`emulsifier does not provide a shear rate high
`enough to form a sufficiently viscous emulsion, it
`has been found that increased viscosity can be
`obtained by increasing the mixing time at a mod-
`erately high shear rate. In one case, for example.
`where 2 per cent by weight Batu nubs and chips
`through loo-mesh U. S. standard sieve and 9.6
`per cent by weight kerosene were incorporated in
`13° Be. hydroehloric acid, the viscosity using a
`propeller—type mixer running at 1750 R. P. M.
`was found to increase from about 33 poises after
`5 minutes to about 38 poises after mixing the
`emulsion 15 minutes.
`Since, as pointed out hereinafter, a high initial
`This emulsion is pumped or flowed into the
`viscosity for the emulsion is desirable, it can be
`well, preferably into a confined zone at the bot-
`seen that particles of 100 meshersmallerare
`tom: of
`the well,
`through tubing or the like.
`substantially superior to larger particles.
`another fluid—such as water, oil, or acid—is then
`The emulsion is prepared by first mixing be—
`tween about 5 and about 30 parts of this finely
`injected into the tubing following the emulsion.
`If purnping or injection-of the emulsion or the
`divided gum per 100 parts by weight of liquid
`fluid following the emulsion is continued after
`hydrocarbon. They are nuxedfipreferably. at
`the confined zone in the well becomes filled with
`high shear. rates—until the gum isevenly dis—
`the viscous emulsion, the hydraulic pressure on
`persed in the hydrocarbon. The ratio may be
`the fluid rises until the strength of the formation
`varied substantiaill-F, particularly on the high end,
`is overcome and the formation is fractured. The
`since pumpability is the limiting factor, and very
`hydraulic pressure in the confined zone necessary
`viscous emulsions can be pumped. The amount
`to produce a fracture has been found to vary in
`of hydrocarbon used depends upon the amount
`wells 2,000 feet or more in depth between about
`of acid used, the hydrocarbon-acid ratio being in
`0.7' and about 1 pound per square inch per foot
`the range of about 6 to about 24 parts hydrocar-
`of well depth. This pressure—i. e., the pressure
`bon by weight per 100 parts acid.
`It has been
`required to fracture a formation or the pressure
`found that these proportions may be varied sub-
`beyond which an increase in rate of injection will
`stantially and still obtain a desirable emulsion;
`not materially increase the pressure—is herein—
`but, when the ratio of hydrocarbon to acid is
`after referred to as the formation-breakdowu
`reduced materially below the preferred range.
`there is often excess acid which separates from
`pressure. It is generally recognized by an obser-
`the emulsion'on standing. Also, when the ratio
`vation of the pressure in the tubing or the pres-
`of hydrocarbon to acid is above the preferred
`sure on the pumps, or it may be measured with
`a bottom-hole pressure gage. After the confined
`range, excess hydrocarbon separates from the
`zone in the well becomes filled with emulsion, the
`emulsion on standing. In general, it can be said.
`pressure rises ‘sharply—assummg a substantial
`however, other things. including agitation. being
`volume, e. g.. twu or more barrels per minute, is
`equal, that the viscosity of the emulsion increases
`as the concentration of the kerosene decreases,
`being injected—until the pressure rise ceases to
`untila point is reached at which excess acid
`be proportional to the volume or fluid injected
`into the well.
`In fact, in many cases, after the
`separates from the emulsion on standing. The
`confined zone has been filled with the emulsion
`preferred composition range is, therefore, on a
`and the formationnbrealcdown pressure has been
`weight basis, between about 1 and 5 parts—typi-
`reached, the pressure may decrease sharply, indi—
`cally 2 parts—gum and between about 6 and
`cating that the emulsion is flowing into a free-
`about 24 parts—typically 10 parts—liquid hydro-
`carbon per 100 parts acid.
`ture in the formation.
`In some cases, namely,
`about 25 per cent of the jobs done to date, there
`The oily vehicle containing the dispersed finely
`is.no material breakdown in pressure when the
`divided gum may be emulsified with the acid by
`formation fractures, since the tensile strength of
`any number of means.
`It has been found. how-
`the rock is so low that, when the pressure in the
`ever, that, by mixing the two in any of a number
`confined zone is sufficient to lift the effective over-
`of well-known homogenizers, the viscosity of the
`burden at that point, the formation parts, and
`emulsion is higher than where they are mixed
`the emulsion enters the formation and extends
`at lower shear rates. For example, the acid and
`the fracture to great distances from the well.
`the oily vehicle containing the Batu maybe mixed
`Obviously, after the emulsion commences to enter
`by running them together through an ordinary
`pump, and viscosities as high as 50 pulses mal1r
`and extend the fracture, the friction in the frac-
`ture being small. an increase in the pump rate
`be obtained; where the same concentration of
`will not materially increase the pressure at the
`constituents is used and the rate of shear is
`elevation of the fracture. A formation fracture
`increased by using a ”jet-type homogenizer, the
`and the formation-breakdown pressure are there-
`viscosity of the emulsion may be increased by
`two or more times. Accordingly, it can be seen
`fore readily recognized. Another means of indl-.
`that a viscosity in the range or between about
`eating a formation fracture is to note the slope
`of the-pressure vs. volume curve at the surface.
`25 and about 50 poises, which is the preferred
`If, after the confined-zone of the well is filled.
`range, may be obtained by varying the ratio of
`the constituents and by the method of mixing.
`the emulsion is pumped slowly into the well. it
`In general, less than about 2 per cent Batu based
`will leak away into the permeable formation at a
`on the weight of the acid is to be preferred where
`rate depending upon the differential pressure
`the rate or mixing and/or length of mixing time 75 between the well and the formation; and the
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`40
`
`60
`
`65
`
`70
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 5
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`2,689,009
`
`5
`(inferential pressure will vary directly as the rate
`of injection. However. after the formation frac-
`tures or when the -§ormation—'breakdown pressure
`has been reached, the ratio of -volume-of.flu1d—to
`pressure increases. Accordinglr, the slope-of the
`pressure vs. pump rate curve changes when the
`formation fractures :or when the formation-
`breakdown pressure has been reached.
`after the formation fractures, the emulsion
`enters the fracture-which-may beextended- a-sub—
`stantial distance into-the formation lay-continued
`pumping of the emulsion Or the fluid following
`the emulsion. Any amoun-t-of-emuision may be
`injected mto the fracture, depending upon the
`extent of fracture-desired.
`In -a'-ty.pical treat-
`ment, between about $500 and 2,000 gallons of
`emulsion are injected into 'the fracture.
`'When
`all of the emulsion has been injected into the
`fracture, the fluid following—which,asindlcated
`above, is preferably unemulsified-orplain strong
`mineral acid—may also be injected into the
`fracture.
`As is well known, when strong mineral acids
`are reacted with well-formations, water-soluble
`salts are produced. Whilethe emulsions-and-the
`emulsifying cm are not broken or affected by
`the acid per so, we have found that, When the
`emulsion contacts a calcareous formation-and-the
`water-Soluble salt is produced, the emulsion is
`broken. Apparently this-salt, some surface effect,
`a catalytic-effect of the calcareous formation. or.
`perhaps, the partial reaction of the acid with the
`formation breaks the emulsion, freeing the acid
`for reaction with-the formation.
`The-plain acid following the-emulsion-also con-
`tacts the formation-surrounding the .fracture,.and
`the excess of reaction product or the additional
`reaction itself appears to insure breakdown of
`any emulsion which might not otherwise break
`down. The amount of plain acid following the
`emulsified acid is not believed to be critical-
`In
`fact, none is-actuallyrequire'd; but, byemuisify-
`ing only part-oi the-acid, there is some—economic
`advantage plus the assurance that the .emulsion
`breaks more rapidly. Equal volumes of emulsi-
`fied and plain acid produce very desirable results.
`After the plain acid is injected into the forma-
`tion, the well may be closed in for a short time
`to allow the emulsion to break and the acid to
`react with the formation.
`In-general, the time
`delay is greater than the delay where plain acid is
`injected into a formation, since the reaction rate
`of the emulsion appears to be retarded by the
`emulsion. However, in about 24 hours, the vis-
`cosity of a. kerosene-hydrochloric acid emulsion
`of the preferred composition in the presence of
`excess limestone and at a bottom-hole'tempera-
`ture of 120° 'F. and pressure of 1500 'p. s. i. has
`been found to be reduced from about 50 noises
`to about 5 centipoises,'the viscosity of the reac-
`tion product. This reaction product may then
`be removed from the well by flowing the well.
`by pumping, or the like.
`As an example of the operation-of-this inven-
`tion. an emulsion having the following-composi-
`tion was made up and used to treats well in the
`Fullerton Field. Andrews County, Texas: 260
`pounds of Batu nuhs and chips ground to pass
`through lilo-mesh U. 8. standard sieve were dis-
`persed in 200 gallons of kerosene by circulating
`the kerosene in a tank. This kerosene was then
`emulsified with 1500 gallons of 20 per cent hy-
`drochloric acid (13.25“ Bé.) by circulating the
`two solutions through :a tank with a duplex.
`reciprocating pump for about '60 minutes. At
`
`6
`that time, the viscosity of the-olulsion was about
`30 noises. The emulsion was :then injected at
`the rate of about 110 G. P. M. into aconfined
`zone between '670'5 feet-ands 820 feet-in the Clear—
`fork, a dolomitio formation. This amount of
`emulsion was insufficient to fill the confined cone
`of the well and the two-inch tubing; and, there-
`fore. the emulsion was followed with plain acid.
`The pressure built up to a maximum of about
`4,300 p. s. 1. surface pressure before the forma-
`tion broke down and took the emulsion through
`a fracture. The emulsion was then injected into
`the fracture at about 3.000 p. s. i.
`'It was 'fol—
`lowed in sequence by 3,500 gallons of -15 percent
`plain hydrochloric acid (10.12“ Bé.) and 40 bar-
`rels of crude oil.
`Before this treatment-and after'being-acidized
`with the same amount-of acid solution, the well
`produced 14 barrels of-oil'per-day with .no wa—
`ter. Two months after-treatment and long aft-
`er the “load” all had been recovered, the well
`produced 46 barrels of 'oil per day with no wa-
`ter. The increase in production fellowing this
`treatment indicated that. even though the well
`had previously been acidized with plain acid, new
`flow channels were produced. This indicated
`then that .a permeable fracture was created in
`the formation Which increasedthe drainage area
`of the well and the permeability adjacent the
`well. Many other such treatments in wells in
`different formations, both limestone and dolomit-
`ic, have yielded similar improvements.
`While this invention has been described with
`reference to a preferred-.composition-and a pre-
`ferred procedure, it will be apparent that various
`modifications can be made without departing
`from the spirit of the invention. For example,
`it is sometimes desirable to suspend in the emul-
`sion 2. propping agent, such as sand. having a
`particle size in the range between about 10- and
`about 40-mesh U. S. standard sieve, so that.-aft-
`er the fracture is created and the emulsion is re-
`moved-therefrom, the fracture will be held open
`by these props. Other modifications will be ap—
`parent -to those skilled in the art. The inven-
`tion should therefore not :be construed to be lim-
`ited by the above examples but shonll be lim-
`ited only by the scope of the appended claims.
`We claim:
`1. A composition of matter comprising an
`emulsion of estrous mineral acid and an oily
`vehicle containing Batu gum.
`2. A well-treating emulsion comprising finely
`divided Batu gum. an oily vehicle, .and an acid
`capable of forming a water-soluble salt With.
`earth formations.
`3. A well-treating fluid comprising finely di-
`vided Batu gum dispersed in-an oily vehicle and
`an acid capable of forming a water-soluble salt
`with earth formations, said acid being emulsi-
`fied as the discontinuous phase within said oily
`vehicle.
`4. .A well treating fluid comprising an emulsion
`of hydrochloric-acid and a dispersion of a finely
`divided Batu gum in a compatible 6in vehicle,
`saidacid being the discontinuous phase, and said
`oily vehicle being the continuous phase in said
`emulsion.
`'5. A well-treating fluid comprising anemulsion
`of hydrochloric acid and [between about 3 and
`about 24 parts 'by'weight cf aliouid hydrocarbon
`per 100 parts of said acid, said hydrocarbon con-
`taining sufficient finely divided Batu gum to
`emu'ls‘ity substantially completely said acid and
`said'hv'drocarbon.
`'
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`3'5
`
`4'0
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`75
`
`Page 3 of 5
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`2,689,009
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`7
`36. A well-treating fluid comprising an emul-
`sion of hydrochloric acid and between about 6
`and about 24 parts by weight of a liquid hydro—
`carbon and between about 1 and about 5 parts
`by weight of finely divided Batu gum per 100
`parts of said acid.
`7. A well-treating fluid comprising an emulsion
`of hydrochloric acid and between about 6 and
`about 24 parts by weight of a liquid hydrocar-
`bon per 100 parts of said acid, said hydrocarbon
`containing between about 5 and about 30 parts
`of finely divided Batu gum per 100 parts of said
`liquid hydrocarbon.
`8.191 method of increasing the productivity of a
`calcareous formation penetrated by a well com-
`prising disposing adjacent said formation an
`emulsion of an acid capable of forming a water-
`soluble salt with said formation and a dispersion
`of finely divided Batu gum in a compatible oily
`vehicle, applying a hydraulic pressure as great
`as the formation-breakdown pressure to said
`emulsion to fracture said formation, and inject-
`ing said emulsion into said fracture.
`9. A method of increasing the productivity of a
`calcareous formation penetrated by a well com-
`prising isolating a'section of said well opposite
`said formation from the remainder of said well,
`disposing in said section an emulsion of an acid
`capable of forming a water-soluble salt with said
`formation and a dispersion of finely divided Batu
`gum in a compatible, oily vehicle, applying a hy-
`draulic pressure as great as the formation-breas—
`down pressure to said emulsion to fracture said
`formation, and injecting said emulsion into said
`fracture.
`10. A method of increasing the productivity of
`a calcareous formation penetrated by a well com-
`prising isolating a section of said well opposite
`said formation from the remainder of said well,
`disposing in said section an emulsion of hydro-
`chloric acid and a liquid hydrocarbon containing
`sufficient finely divided Batu gum to emulsify
`substantially completely said acid and said hy-
`drocarbon, applying a hydraulic pressure as great
`as the fomnation-breakdown pressure to said
`emulsion to fracture said formation, and injecting
`said emulsion into said fracture.
`11. A method of increasing the productivity of
`a calcareous formation penetrated by a well
`comprising isolating a section of said well 0p~ -
`posite said formation from the remainder of said
`well, disposing in said section an emulsion of hy-
`drochloric acid solution, between about 6 and
`about 24 parts by weight of a liquid hydrocarbon
`and between about 1 and about 5 parts by weight
`of finely divided Batu gum per 100 parts of said
`acid solution. applying a hydraulic pressure as
`great as the formation breakdown pressure to said
`emulsion to fracture said formation, and inject—
`ing said emulsion into the fracture.
`12. A method of increasing the productivity of
`a calcareous formation penetrated by a. well com—
`prising isolating a section of said well opposite
`said formation from the remainder of said well,
`disposing in said section an emulsion of hydro-
`chloric acid solution, between about 6 and about
`24 parts by weight of a liquid hydrocarbon, and
`between about 1 and about 5 parts by weight of
`finely divided Batu gum per 100 parts of said acid
`solution, applying a hydraulic pressure as great
`as the formation—breakdown pressure to said
`emulsion to fracture said formation, in] acting said
`emulsion into said fracture causing said acid to
`react with said calcareous formation and break
`
`8
`said emulsion whereby the permeability of said
`formationis increased a substantial distance from
`said well and producing said well to remove the
`spent hydrochloric acid solution and liquid by-
`drocarbon from said well.
`13. A method of increasing the productivity of
`a calcareous formation penetrated by a well com-
`prising isolating a section of said well opposite
`said formation from the remainder of said well,
`disposing in said section an emulsion of hydro-
`chloric acid solution. between about 6 and about
`24 parts by weight of a liquid hydrocarbon, and
`between about 1 and about 5 parts by weight of
`finely divided Batu gum per 100 parts of said acid
`solution, applying to said emulsion a hydraulic
`pressure in the range between about 0.7 and about
`1 pound per foot of well depth to fracture said
`formation, displacing said emulsion into the frac-
`ture by injecting a plain acid solution into said
`well following said emulsion, and displacing said
`plain acid solution from said well by following said
`plain acid solution with another fluid whereby
`said emulsion is injected into said formation a
`substantial distance from said well, and said
`emulsion is broken so that the permeability of the
`flow channels to said well is increased a substan-
`tial distance from said well.
`14. A method of increasing the productivity of
`a calcareous formation penetrated by a well com-
`prising isolating a section of said well opposite
`said formation from the remainder of said Well.
`disposing in said section an emulsion of about
`100 parts by weight of about 13° Be. hydrochloric
`acid, about 10 parts by weight of kerosene, and
`about 2 parts by weight of finely divided Batu
`gum, applying to said emulsion in said section
`a hydraulic pressure in the range between about
`0.7 and about 1 pound per foot of well depth to
`fracture said formation, and displacing said emul-
`sion into the fracture.
`15. The method of increasing the productivity
`of a calcareous formation penetrated by a well
`which method comprises emulsifying a strong
`mineral acid in an oily vehicle containing an ef-
`fective amount of Batu gum to form a viscous
`emulsion initially having a viscosity in the range
`of about 25 to about 50 poises and being capable
`of becoming broken by contact with said cal-
`careous formation, introducing said viscous emul-
`sion into a confined zone of said well adjacent
`said formation, applying a hydrostatic pressure
`to said emulsion sufiicient to fracture said forma-
`tion and to displace at least a part of said emul-
`sion into passages formed in the formation, allow—
`ing said emulsion 'to contact said passages for a
`time sufficient for at least a portion of the acid
`to react with the calcareous formation and the
`emulsion to be broken, and producing said well
`to remove liquids therefrom.
`16. A process of treating a well to increase the
`productivity of a calcareous formation penetrated
`by the well, which process comprises dispersing
`finely divided Batu gum in an oily vehicle in an
`amount sufficient to effect emulsification of a
`strong acid in said vehicle, emulsifying in said
`Batu gum-containing vehicle a strong acid ca—
`pable of reacting with calcareous formations to
`form a water—soluble salt, said Batu gum-con-
`taining vehicle and said acid being mixed in
`amounts and for the period of time required to
`obtain initially an emulsion having a viscosity in
`therange of about 25 to 50 pulses. said emulsion
`being capable of becoming broken by contact with
`
`Page 4 of 5
`Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`75
`
`

`

`2,639,009
`
`9
`said calcareous formation, disposing said viscous
`emulsion in a. confined zone in said well adjacent
`said calcareous formation. applying a pressure
`to said emulsion sufficient to fracture said forma-
`tion and to displace at least a part of said emul-
`sion into passages formed by said fracture where-
`by the acid component of said emulsion reacts
`with calcareous material to form a water-soluble
`salt and said emulsion is broken, and producing
`said well to remove fluids therefrom including
`liquid containing said water—soluble salt.
`1'7. The process of claim 16 wherein the par-
`ticle size of the finely divided Batu gum is smaller
`than 40 mesh, the oily vehicle is a hydrocarbon
`liquid, the amount of said oily vehicle is within
`the range of about 6 to about 24 parts by weight
`per hundred parts by weight of acid, and the
`amount of Batu gum is in the range of about 5
`to about 30 parts by weight based on the amount
`of 0in vehicle.
`18. The process of claim 1'? wherein the acid is
`hydrochloric acid having a concentration in the
`range of about 5" to about 20° Bé.
`19. The process of claim 17 wherein said oil?
`
`10
`vehicle and said acid are homogenized to obtain
`said emulsion having a viscosity in the range of
`about 25 to 50 noises.
`20. The process of claim 17 which includes the
`step of following said viscous emulsion in said
`confined zone with plain acid to displace unemul-
`sified acid in addition to said emulsion into pas-
`sages iormed by said fracture.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`References Cited in the file of this patent
`UNITED STATES PATENTS
`Date
`Name
`De Groote __________ Aug. 15, 1933
`De Groote __________ Apr. 23, 1935
`De Groote __________ Aug. 11, 1936
`De Groote __________ Aug. 11, 1936
`Inomis et a]_________ July 26, 1938
`Benckenstein ______ July 25, 1944
`Reistlc, Jr. __________ Apr. 3, 1951
`OTHER REFERENCES
`
`Number
`1,922,154
`2,038,720
`2,050,932
`2,050,933
`2,124,530
`2,354,570
`2,54?,7?8
`
`"Hydrafrac Process," by J. B. Clark. The Oil
`and Gas Journal, October 14, 1948, pages 76—79.
`
`Page 5 of 5
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket