throbber
Amgen Opens Trial In Fight Over Neulasta Generic - Law360
`
`
`
`
`
` Crowell & Moring
`
`Amgen Opens Trial In Fight Over
`Neulasta Generic
`
`By Carolina Bolado
`
`Share us on:    
`
`Law360, Fort Lauderdale (July 11, 2016, 11:27 PM ET) -- Amgen Inc.
`began its pitch Monday to a Florida federal judge to block Canadian
`generics maker Apotex Inc. from making a copy of Amgen's blockbuster
`biologic Neulasta by arguing that the proposed biosimilar infringes a
`patent designed for industrial-scale protein production.
`
`In day one of a bench trial before U.S. District Judge James I. Cohn,
`Amgen argued that Apotex's proposed biosimilar uses a process for
`refolding proteins described in U.S. Patent Number 8,952,138.
`
` Add to Briefcase
` Printable Version
` Rights/Reprints
` Editorial Contacts
`
`Related
`Sections
`Florida
`Intellectual Property
`Life Sciences
`Trials
`
`Case Information
`Case Title
`Amgen Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc.
`et al
`Case Number
`0:15-cv-61631
`
`On the witness stand, Amgen's scientific director Roger Hart, who
`specializes in proteins and helped develop the patent, said the ’138
`patent was developed to address the company's need to make large
`quantities of proteins necessary for products. The process described in
`the patent, however, was not used in the production of Neulasta,
`according to Hart, who told the court that Amgen would have had to get a
`new license from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to make the
`change.
`
`Court
`Florida Southern
`
`Nature of Suit
`Patent
`
`Judge
`James I. Cohn
`
`Date Filed
`August 6, 2015
`
`“A process was already in place, and it was already licensed and well
`controlled and reliable, so there was no need to alter the refolding
`process,” Hart said.
`
`But he added that the process would likely work with granulocyte-colony
`stimulating factor, or G-CSF, the protein from which Neulasta and related
`
`Law Firms
`Cozen O'Connor
`Hogan Lovells
`Paul Weiss
`Companies
`Amgen Inc.
`Apotex Inc.
`Government Agencies
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/814748/amgen-opens-trial-in-fight-over-neulasta-generic[8/5/2016 11:41:43 AM]
`
`APOTEX EX1048
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Patents
`8,952,138 - Refolding proteins
`using a chemically controlled
`redox state
`5,824,784 - N-terminally
`chemically modified protein
`compositions and methods
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Most Popular
`
`How To Snuff Out The Lone
`Wolf Law Firm Culture
`
`$5.5B PwC Trial May Widen
`Target On Auditors Over
`Fraud
`
`LA Atty Accuses Deputy DA
`Of Sharing Private Photos
`
`ASCAP, BMI Lose Battle To
`Modify Antitrust Licensing
`Deals
`
`Law Schools Should Be
`Teaching Emotional IQ, Paper
`Says
`
`1 2 3 4 5
`
`Amgen Opens Trial In Fight Over Neulasta Generic - Law360
`
`drug Neupogen are made, because the protein used when developing
`the patented process is similar.
`
`Apotex has maintained that the method of manufacturing its Neulasta
`biosimilar requires a protein concentration that falls outside of that
`claimed in the '138 patent. The generics maker also argues that the
`patent does not disclose a method of folding any specific protein, much
`less G-CSF.
`
`In addition to the '138 patent, Amgen also claimed that Apotex's
`proposed product would infringe U.S. Patent Number 5,824,784, which
`describes a way of enhancing the mobilization of stem cells in patients
`undergoing stem cell transplants. The parties agreed to dismiss that
`patent from the suit last month.
`
`Amgen sued Apotex in August over its proposed biosimilar to Neulasta, a
`drug that helps reduce the infection risk in people with non-bone-marrow-
`related cancers and low white blood cell counts as a result of
`chemotherapy.
`
`Neulasta brought in $3.65 billion in profit for Amgen in 2014 in the U.S.
`alone.
`
`Apotex does not yet have an FDA license for its biosimilar, which the
`agency started reviewing last year. In December, Judge Cohn granted a
`preliminary injunction and found that biosimilar makers must always
`provide 180-day notice of sales to brand-name rivals when using a
`streamlined approval pathway. The ruling, which Apotex has appealed,
`would delay Apotex's copy of Neulasta and potentially reverberate
`industrywide.
`
`Judge Cohn's ruling addressed a key question left unanswered by the
`Federal Circuit's landmark interpretation last year of a pathway created
`by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act, which includes a
`provision directing biosimilar makers to give 180-day notice to brand-
`name drugmakers. Judge Cohn ruled that making notice mandatory in all
`circumstances would avoid messy and unnecessary patent litigation.
`
`The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent Number 8,952,138.
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/814748/amgen-opens-trial-in-fight-over-neulasta-generic[8/5/2016 11:41:43 AM]
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Amgen Opens Trial In Fight Over Neulasta Generic - Law360
`
`Amgen is represented by John F. O'Sullivan, Allen P. Pegg and Jason D.
`Sternberg of Hogan Lovells and Nicholas Groombridge, Catherine
`Nyarady, Eric Alan Stone, Jennifer H. Wu, Jennifer Gordon, Peter
`Sandel, Conor McDonough, Ana Friedman, Arielle K. Linsey and Stephen
`A. Maniscalco of Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP, and in-
`house by Wendy A. Whiteford, Lois M. Kwasigroch and Kimberlin Morley.
`
`Apotex is represented by Simeon D. Brier, Matthew B. Criscuolo, W.
`Blake Coblentz, Kerry B. McTigue, Barry Golob, Milton A. Marquis, Aaron
`S. Lukas, Marilyn Neiman and Keri L. Schaubert of Cozen O'Connor.
`
`The case is Amgen Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al., case number 0:15-cv-
`61631, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
`
`--Additional reporting by Jeff Overley and John Kennedy. Editing by Brian
`Baresch.
`
`Correction: A previously published version of this story listed an
`additional patent that is no longer part of the suit.
`
`Related Articles
`
`Apotex Accuses Amgen Of Sham Patent Litigation
`
`Amgen Calls For Halt To Neulasta Biosimilar Marketing
`
`Amgen Urges No Exceptions To Biosimilar Notice At Fed. Circ.
`
`Sign in to comment
`
`© 2016, Portfolio Media, Inc. About | Contact Us | Legal Jobs | Careers at Law360 | Terms | Privacy Policy | Law360 Updates | Help Beta Tools: Track
`docs | Track attorneys | Track judges
`
`Visit Our Site Map
`
`http://www.law360.com/articles/814748/amgen-opens-trial-in-fight-over-neulasta-generic[8/5/2016 11:41:43 AM]
`
`Page 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket